Inmechanical engineering, anoverconstrained mechanism is alinkage that has moredegrees of freedom than is predicted by themobility formula. The mobility formula evaluates the degree of freedom of a system ofrigid bodies that results whenconstraints are imposed in the form ofjoints between the links.
If the links of the system move in three-dimensional space, then the mobility formula is
whereN is the number of links in the system,j is the number of joints, andfi is the degree of freedom of theith joint.
If the links in the system move planes parallel to a fixed plane, or in concentric spheres about a fixed point, then the mobility formula is
If a system of links and joints has mobilityM = 0 or less, yet still moves, then it is called anoverconstrained mechanism.
The reason of over-constraint is the unique geometry of linkages in these mechanisms, which the mobility formula does not take into account. This unique geometry gives rise to "redundant constraints", i.e. when multiple joints are constraining the same degrees of freedom. These redundant constraints are the reason of the over-constraint.
For example, as shown in the figure to the right, consider a hinged door with 3 hinges. The mobility criterion for this door gives the mobility to be −1. Yet, the door moves and has a degree of freedom 1, as all its hinges have colinear axes.
The figure on the left shows a two-hinged trunk lid. The calculated mobility for the lid relative to the car body is zero, yet it moves as its hinges (which are pin joints) have colinear axes. In this case, the second hinge is kinematically redundant.
A well-known example of an overconstrained mechanism is theparallel linkage with multiple cranks, as seen in therunning gear of steam locomotives.
Sarrus mechanism consists of six bars connected by six hinged joints.
A general spatial linkage formed from six links and six hinged joints has mobility
and is therefore a structure.
The Sarrus mechanism has one degree of freedom whereas the mobility formula yields M = 0, which means it has a particular set of dimensions that allow movement.[1]
Another example of an overconstrained mechanism is Bennett's linkage, invented byGeoffrey Thomas Bennett in 1903, which consists of four links connected by four revolute joints.[2]
A general spatial linkage formed from four links and four hinged joints has mobility
which is a highly constrained system.
As in the case of the Sarrus linkage, it is a particular set of dimensions that makes the Bennett linkage movable.[3][4]
The dimensional constraints that makes Bennett's linkage movable are the following. Let us number the links in order that links with consecutive index are joined (first and fourth links are also joined). For thei-th link, let us denote bydi andai respectively the distance and the oriented angle of the axes of therevolute joints of the link. Bennett's linkage must satisfies the following constraints:
Moreover, the links are assembled in such a way that, for two links that are joined, the common perpendicular to the joint axes of the first link intersects the common perpendicular of the joint axes of the second link.
Below is an external link to an animation of a Bennett's linkage.
James Watt employed an approximate straight line four-bar linkage to maintain a near rectilinear motion of the piston rod, thus eliminating the need of using acrosshead.
Same as the crank-drivenelliptic trammel, Hoberman mechanisms move because of their particular geometric configurations.
Overconstrained mechanisms can be also obtained by assembling togethercognate linkages; when their number is more than two, overconstrained mechanisms with negative calculated mobility will result.[5][6] The companion animated GIFs show overconstrained mechanisms obtained by assembling together four-bar coupler cognates and function cognates of the Watt II type.[7]