| O Come, O Come, Emmanuel | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Native name | Veni, veni, Emmanuel |
| Genre | Hymn |
| Written | 1861 (translated) |
| Text | John Mason Neale, translator |
| Based on | Matthew 1:23 |
| Meter | 8.8.8.8.(L.M.) with Refrain |
| Melody | "Bone Jesu dulcis cunctis" (anon., 15th c.) |
| Recording | |
"Veni, Veni Emmanuel", arranged by Peter Zagar for voice and cello | |
"O come, O come, Emmanuel" (Latin: "Veni, veni, Emmanuel") is aChristianhymn forAdvent, which is also often published in books ofChristmas carols.[1][2][3] The text was originally written inLatin. It is a metrical paraphrase of theO Antiphons, a series ofplainchantantiphons attached to theMagnificat atVespers over the final days before Christmas. The hymn has its origins over 1,200 years ago in monastic life in the 8th or 9th century. Seven days before Christmas Eve monasteries would sing the “O antiphons” in anticipation of Christmas Eve when the eighth antiphon, “O Virgo virginum” (“O Virgin of virgins”) would be sung before and after Mary's canticle, the Magnificat (Luke 1:46b–55). The Latin metrical form of the hymn was composed as early as the 12th century.[4]
The 1851 translation byJohn Mason Neale fromHymns Ancient and Modern is the most prominent by far in the English-speaking world, but other English translations also exist. Translations into other modern languages (particularly German) are also in widespread use. While the text may be used with many metrical hymn tunes, it was first combined withits most famous tune, often itself calledVeni Emmanuel, in the English-languageHymnal Noted in 1851. Later, the same tune was used with versions of "O come, O come, Emmanuel" in other languages, including Latin.
The words and the music of "O come, O come, Emmanuel" developed separately. The Latin text is first documented in Germany in 1710, whereas the tune most familiar in the English-speaking world has its origins in 15th-century France.
In spite of claims the Latin metrical hymn dates from the 11th or 12th century, it appears for the first time in the seventh edition ofPsalteriolum Cantionum Catholicarum (Cologne, 1710). This hymnal was a major force in the history of German church music: first assembled byJesuit hymnographer Johannes Heringsdorf in 1610 and receiving numerous revised editions through 1868, it achieved enormous impact due to its use in Jesuit schools.[5]
Each stanza of the hymn consists of a four-line verse (in 88.88 meter with an AABB rhyme scheme), paraphrasing one of theO Antiphons. There is also a new two-line refrain (again in 88 meter): "Gaude, gaude! Emmanuel / nascetur pro te, Israel", i.e., "Rejoice, Rejoice! Emmanuel will be born for you, O Israel". There are only five verses: two of the antiphons are omitted and the order of the remaining verses differs from that of the O Antiphons, most notably the last antiphon ("O Emmanuel") becomes the first verse of the hymn and gives the hymn its title of “Veni, veni, Emmanuel”:
1. Veni, veni Emmanuel!
Captivum solve Israel!
Qui gemit in exilio,
Privatus Dei Filio.[7th antiphon]
Gaude, gaude, Emmanuel
nascetur pro te, Israel.
2. Veni o Jesse virgula!
Ex hostis tuos ungula,
De specu tuos tartari
Educ, et antro barathri.[3rd antiphon]
3. Veni, veni o Oriens!
Solare nos adveniens,
Noctis depelle nebulas,
Dirasque noctis tenebras.[5th antiphon]
4. Veni clavis Davidica!
Regna reclude coelica,
Fac iter Tutum superum,
Et claude vias Inferum.[4th antiphon]
5. Veni, veni Adonai!
Qui populo in Sinai
Legem dedisti vertice,
In maiestate gloriae.[2nd antiphon]
In 1844, the 1710 text was included in the second volume ofThesaurus Hymnologicus, a monumental collection by the German hymnologist Hermann Adalbert Daniel, thus ensuring a continued life for the Latin text even as thePsalteriolum came to the end of its long history in print.
It was fromThesaurus Hymnologicus thatJohn Mason Neale would come to know the hymn. Neale would both publish the Latin version of the hymn in Britain and translate the first (and still most important) English versions.[6]
The 1710 text was published in Joseph Hermann Mohr's Cantiones Sacrae of 1878, with two additional verses of unknown authorship paraphrasing the two “missing”O Antiphons. The order of verses now followed that of the antiphons (beginning with “Sapientia” and ending with “Emmanuel”), and accordingly the hymn's title in this hymnal was “Veni, O Sapientia”. The refrain had undergone a slight change and was now "Gaude, gaude, O Israel. Mox veniet Emmanuel”, i.e. “Rejoice, rejoice, o Israel. Soon shall come Emmanuel”.[7]
1. Veni, O Sapientia,
Quae hic disponis omnia,
Veni, viam prudentiae
Ut doceas et gloriae.
Gaude, gaude, o Israel.
Mox veniet Emmanuel.
2. Veni, veni Adonai ...
3. Veni, o Jesse virgula ...
4. Veni, clavis Davidica ...
5. Veni, veni, o Oriens ...
6. Veni, Veni, Rex Gentium,
Veni, Redemptor omnium,
Ut salves tuos famulos
Peccati sibi conscios.
7. Veni, veni, Emmanuel ...
John Mason Neale published the five-verse Latin version, which he had presumably learned from Daniels'Thesaurus Hymnologicus,[6] in his 1851 collectionHymni Ecclesiae.[8]
In the same year, Neale published the first documented English translation, beginning with "Draw nigh, draw nigh, Emmanuel", inMediæval Hymns and Sequences. He revised this version forThe Hymnal Noted, followed by a further revision, in 1861, forHymns Ancient and Modern. This version, now with the initial line reading "O come, O come, Emmanuel", would attain hegemony in the English-speaking world (aside from minor variations from hymnal to hymnal).[9]
Thomas Alexander Lacey (1853–1931) created a new translation (also based on the five-verse version) forThe English Hymnal in 1906, but it received only limited use.[10]
It would take until the 20th century for the additional two stanzas to receive significant English translations. The translation published byHenry Sloane Coffin in 1916 – which included only the "O Come, O Come Emmanuel" verse by Neale and Coffin's two "new" verses – gained the broadest acceptance, with occasional modifications.[11]
A full seven-verse English version officially appeared for the first time in 1940, in theHymnal of theEpiscopal Church.
Contemporary English hymnals print various versions ranging from four to eight verses. The version included in theHymnal 1982 of the Episcopal Church is typical: there are eight stanzas, with "Emmanuel" as both the first and the last stanza. From this version, six lines date from the original 1851 translation by Neale, nine from the version fromHymns Ancient and Modern (1861), eleven (including the two supplementary stanzas, following Coffin) from theHymnal 1940, and the first two lines of the fourth stanza ("O come, thou Branch of Jesse's tree, \ free them from Satan's tyranny") are unique to this hymnal.[12]
| J. M. Neale (1851) | Hymns Ancient and Modern (1861) | T. A. Lacey (1906) |
|---|---|---|
Draw nigh, draw nigh, Emmanuel, | O come, O come, Emmanuel, | O come, O come, Emmanuel! |
Additional verses trans. H. S. Coffin (1916)
O come, Thou Wisdom from on high,
And order all things, far and nigh;
To us the path of knowledge show,
And cause us in her ways to go.
Rejoice! Rejoice! Emmanuel
Shall come to thee, O Israel.
O come, Desire of nations, bind
All peoples in one heart and mind;
Bid envy, strife and quarrels cease;
Fill the whole world with heaven’s peace.
Rejoice! Rejoice! Emmanuel
Shall come to thee, O Israel.
Because "O Come, O Come Emmanuel" is ametrical hymn in the common 88.88.88 meter scheme (in some hymnals given as "8.8.8.8 and refrain"[13]), it is possible to pair the words of the hymn with any number of tunes. The meter is shared between the original Latin text and the English translation.
However, at least in the English-speaking world, "O Come, O Come Emmanuel" is associated with one tune more than any other, to the extent that the tune itself is often calledVeni Emmanuel.
The familiar tune called "Veni Emmanuel" was first linked with this hymn in 1851, whenThomas Helmore published it in theHymnal Noted, paired with an early revision of Neale's English translation of the text. The volume listed the tune as being "From a French Missal in theNational Library, Lisbon."[14] However, Helmore provided no means by which to verify his source, leading to long-lasting doubts about its attribution. There was even speculation that Helmore might have composed the melody himself.
The mystery was settled in 1966 by British musicologistMary Berry (also anAugustiniancanoness and noted choral conductor), who discovered a 15th-century manuscript containing the melody in theNational Library of France.[15] The manuscript consists of processional chants for burials. The melody used by Helmore is found here with the text "Bone Jesu dulcis cunctis" [Goodbye sweet Jesus to all]; it is part of a series of two-parttropes to theresponsoryLibera me.
As Berry (writing under hername in religion, Mother Thomas More) points out in her article on the discovery, "Whether this particular manuscript was the actual source to which [Helmore] referred we cannot tell at present." (Recall thatHymnal Noted referred to Lisbon, not Paris, and to a missal, not a processional.) Berry raised the possibility that there might exist "an even earlier version of" the melody.[16] However, there is no evidence to suggest that this tune was connected with this hymn before Helmore's hymnal; thus, the two would have first come together in English. Nonetheless, because of the nature of metrical hymns, it is perfectly possible to pair this tune with the Latin text; versions doing so exist byZoltán Kodály,[17]Philip Lawson[18] andJan Åke Hillerud [sv],[19] among others.
In the German language,Das katholische Gesangbuch der Schweiz ("The Catholic Hymnal of Switzerland") andGesangbuch der Evangelisch-reformierten Kirchen der deutschsprachigen Schweiz ("The Hymnal of the Evangelical-Reformed Churches of German-speaking Switzerland"), both published in 1998, adapt a version of the text by Henry Bone that usually lacks a refrain to use it with this melody.[20]
Source[21]
The pairing of the hymn text with theVeni Emmanuel tune was proved an extremely significant combination. The hymn text was embraced both out of aRomantic interest in poetic beauty and medieval exoticism and out of a concern for matching hymns to liturgical seasons and functions rooted in theOxford Movement in the Church of England. TheHymnal Noted, in which the words and tune were first combined, represented the "extreme point" of these forces. This hymnal "consisted entirely of versions of Latin hymns, designed for use as Office hymns within the Anglican Church despite the fact that Office hymns had no part in the authorized liturgy. The music was drawn chiefly from plainchant", as was the case with theVeni Emmanuel tune for "O Come, O Come Emmanuel", the combination of which has been cited as an exemplar of this new style of hymnody.[22]
"O Come, O Come Emmanuel" was thus ideally situated to benefit from the cultural forces that would bring aboutHymns Ancient and Modern in 1861. This new hymnal was a product of the same ideological forces that paired it with theVeni Emmanuel tune, ensuring its inclusion, but was also designed to achieve commercial success beyond any one party of churchmanship, incorporating high-quality hymns of all ideological approaches.[22]
The volume succeeded wildly; by 1895,Hymns Ancient and Modern was being used in three quarters of English churches. The book "probably did more than anything else to spread the ideas of the Oxford Movement" (which include the aesthetics of "O Come, O Come Emmanuel") "so widely that many of them became imperceptibly a part of the tradition of the Church as a whole." Its musical qualities in particular "became an influence far beyond the boundaries of the Church of England." It is very reflective of these cultural forces that the form of "O Come, O Come Emmanuel" inHymns Ancient and Modern remains predominant in the English-speaking world.[22] (This predominance encompasses not just theVeni Emmanuel tune, but also the revised English translation that included, for example, the title used in this article – see the sectionEnglish versions below.)
While the "Veni Emmanuel" tune predominates in the English-speaking world, several others have been closely associated with the hymn.
In the United States, some Lutheran hymnals use the tune "St. Petersburg" by Dmitry Bortniansky for "O Come, O Come, Emmanuel."[23] A Moravian hymnal from the US gives a tune attributed toCharles Gounod[24]
Alternative tunes are particularly common in the German-speaking world, where the text of the hymn originated, especially as the hymn was in use there for many years before Helmore's connection of it to the "Veni Emmanuel" tune became known.
Among several German paraphrases of the hymn, one is attributed toChristoph Bernhard Verspoell – one of the earliest and most influential to arise around the late-18th/early-19th century. It is associated with its own distinctive tune, which has enjoyed exceptionally long-lasting popularity in theDiocese of Münster.[25]
A more faithful German translation byHeinrich Bone became the vehicle for a tune from JBC Schmidts'Sammlung von Kirchengesängen für katholische Gymnasien (Düsseldorf 1836), which remains popular in German diocesan song-books and regional editions of the common hymnalGotteslob. This melody was carried across the Atlantic byJohann Baptist Singenberger, where it remains in use through the present in some Catholic communities in the United States.
The Archdiocese of Cologne's supplement toGotteslob (#829) includes a tune by CF Ackens (Aachen, 1841) with the Bone translation. A version by Bone without a refrain is commonly connected with a tune from theAndernacher Gesangbuch (Cologne, 1608), but it can also be used with the melody of the medieval Latin hymnConditor alme siderum, further demonstrating the flexibility of metrical hymnody.
Works related toO come, O come, Emmanuel at Wikisource
Media related toVeni, veni, Emmanuel at Wikimedia Commons| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
| Other | |
