Nagas of Padmavati | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| early 3rd century–mid-4th century | |||||||||
 The Nagas shown at their greatest extent, along with the risingGuptas. | |||||||||
| Status | Empire | ||||||||
| Capital | Padmavati modern day Gwalior | ||||||||
| Common languages | Sanskrit Prakrit | ||||||||
| Religion | Hinduism | ||||||||
| Government | Monarchy | ||||||||
| Maharaja | |||||||||
| History | |||||||||
• Established | early 3rd century | ||||||||
• Disestablished | mid-4th century | ||||||||
| |||||||||
| Today part of | India | ||||||||
TheNaga (IAST: Nāga) dynasty ruled parts of north-central India during the 3rd and the 4th centuries, after the decline of theKushan Empire and before the rise of theGupta Empire. Its capital was located atPadmavati, which is identified with modern Pawaya in Gwalior City inMadhya Pradesh. Modern historians identify it with the family that is calledBharashiva (IAST: Bhāraśiva) in the records of theVakataka dynasty.
According to thePuranic texts as well as numismatic evidence, dynasties known as the Nagas also ruled atVidisha, Kantipuri, andMathura. All these Naga dynasties may have been different branches of a single family, or may have been a single family that ruled from different capitals at different times. No concrete conclusions can be drawn regarding this based on the available historical evidence.
InMadhya Pradesh, Naga coins have been discovered atPawaya,Narwar,Gohad,Vidisha, Kutwar (Kotwal), andUjjain.[1] InUttar Pradesh, they have been discovered atMathura,[2] and in theJhansi district.[1]
Based on the provenance of these coins, H. V. Trivedi theorizes that the core Naga territory extended fromMorena and Jhansi districts in north to Vidisha in south. The Naga kingdom eventually expanded to include Mathura in north and Ujjain in south.[3]
The Naga dynasty is known mainly from the coins issued by its rulers, and from brief mentions in literary texts and inscriptions of the other dynasties.[4] According to theVayu and theBrahmanda Puranas, nine Naga kings ruled Padmavati (or Champavati), and seven Naga kings ruled Mathura, before theGuptas. According to theVishnu Purana, nine Naga kings ruled at Padmavati, Kantipuri, and Mathura.[5][6]
ThePuranas state that only nine Naga kings ruled at Padmavati, but coins of twelve kings believed to be Naga kings by modern historians have been discovered.[7] The coins of eleven of these rulers have been discovered at Padmavati (modern Pawaya): the only exception is Vyaghra, who is known from a single coin discovered at the nearbyNarwar.[8]
The inscriptions of theVakataka dynasty (such as those fromChamak andTirodi) state the mother of the Vakataka kingRudrasena was a daughter of the Bharashiva king Bhava-naga.[9] This Bhava-naga has been identified with the Naga king of same name, whose coins have been discovered at Padmavati. Rudrasena's reign is dated to c. 335–355, therefore, his maternal grandfather Bhava-naga can be dated to the early 4th century CE. Historian H. V. Trivedi assumes that Bhava-naga ruled for around 25 years, based on the large number and variety of coins issued by him, dating his rule to c. 310-335 CE.[7]
TheAllahabad Pillar inscription ofSamudragupta (r. c. 335–380) mentions Ganapati-naga as one of the kings defeated by him. Thus, Ganapati can be dated to the mid-4th century. The other Naga rulers cannot be dated with certainty, but H. V. Trivedi came up with the following tentative chronological list of Naga rulers, based onnumismatic andpalaeographic evidence:[10][7]
Since the Nagas of Kantipuri are known only from a passing mention in theVishnu Purana, it is possible that Kantipuri was a subsidiary capital of the dynasty.[11] HistorianK. P. Jayaswal attributed several coins to the Nagas of Kantipuri, reading the names on these coins as Haya-naga, Traya-naga, Barhina-naga, Chharaja-naga, Bhava-naga, and Rudra-sena.[12] However, other scholars, such as A. S. Altekar have disagreed with Jayaswal's reading of the coin legends, and disputed the attribution of these coins to the Nagas.[13] According to Altekar, only one of the coins mentioned by Jayaswalpossibly bears the legend "Traya-naga".[14] Jayaswal identified Kantipuri as present-day Kantit inMirzapur district, connecting the Bharashivas to the local Bhar kings. However, there is no evidence to support this identification.[15] No Naga kings have been found at Kantit,[2] and Kotwal (also Kutwal or Kutwar) inMorena district is a better candidate for the location of Kantipuri.[16]
According to thePuranas, the Naga kings ruled at Padmavati (or Champavati), Kantipuri (or Kantipura), Mathura, andVidisha (seeNagas of Vidisha).[17] Based on the available information, it cannot be said with certainty if these Naga dynasties were different families, different branches of the same family, or a single family that ruled from all these locations at different times, moving its capital to a new location each time. H. V. Trivedi, the editor of theCatalogue of the Coins of the Naga Kings of Padmavati, theorized that the Naga dynasty probably originated at Vidisha, from where its members moved northwards to Padmavati, Kantipuri, and Mathura.[4][8]
Earlier, historianK. P. Jayaswal had theorized that the Naga dynasty was established by a 2nd-century ruler named Nava-naga. Based on the misinterpretation of the wordnava (which can mean "new" or "nine") in the Puranas as "new", he speculated that a king called Nava had established a new dynasty.[8] According to him, the coins bearing the legend "Navasa" (or "Nevasa") were issued by this king.[12] Jayaswal interpreted a symbol on this coin as a serpent (nāga) with raised hood.[18] He further theorized that Nava-naga's successor was Virasena, whose coins have been discovered in present-day westernUttar Pradesh and easternPunjab.[19] According to Jayaswal, Virasena evicted theKushan rulers from Mathura, and subsequently, the Naga dynasty was divided into three branches, which ruled from Mathura, Padmavati, and Kantipuri.[12]
Jayaswal's theory has been disputed by other historians, based on the following points:
The Nagas rose to power after the decline of theKushan Empire in north-central India, in the early 3rd century.[22] The Vakataka inscription that mentions the Bharashiva king Bhava-naga states that the Bharashivas performedashvamedha (horse sacrifices) ten times. The ashvamedha ceremony was used by the Indian kings to prove their imperial sovereignty, and therefore, the identification of the Bharashivas with the Nagas has led to suggestions that the Nagas assumed a sovereign status after defeating the Kushan rulers.[9][4] However, there is no concrete evidence for this: several other powers, including theYaudheyas and theMalavas, rose to prominence in this period, and the decline of the Kushan power in this region may be alternatively attributed to them.[23] It is also possible that a confederation of these powers defeated the Kushan rulers, or they independently, but simultaneously, took control of the Kushan territories.[22]
Several Naga coins feature a bull (vrisha in Sanskrit), and Vrisha was also the name of a Naga king known from coinage. H. V. Trivedi theorized that Vrisha was the founder of the dynasty, and initially ruled at Vidisha, where several Naga coins have been discovered.[24] The Vakataka inscription mentions that the Bharashiva family obtained the holy water of the Ganges for their coronation by the prowess of their arms. Therefore, Trivedi theorized that the Nagas (that is, the Bharashivas) subsequently migrated northwards (towards the Ganges), establishing their rule at Padmavati. From there, they advanced up to Kantipuri and Mathura in the process of invading the Kushan territory.[25] Bhima-naga, whose coins bear the titleMaharaja, may have been the dynasty's first king to rule from Padmavati.[26]
TheAllahabad Pillar inscription of theGupta kingSamudragupta states that he defeated Ganapati-naga. This suggests that Ganapati-naga was the last Naga king, and after his defeat, the Naga territory was annexed to the Gupta Empire. The inscription also mentions two other rulers - Nagadatta and Nagasena, whose identity is not certain. According toHarsha-charita, Nagasena was a Naga ruler of Padmavati, but neither of these kings are attested by any coins.[7]
