Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Military history of Turkey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

See also:Military of the Ottoman Empire
Part ofa series on the
History ofTurkey
Turkey in Asia Minor and Transcaucasia, 1921
Troy 3000–700 BC
Hattians 2500–2000 BC
Akkadian Empire 2400–2150 BC
Luwians 2300–1400 BC
Assyria 1950–1750 BC
Kussara 1780–1680 BC
Achaeans (Homer) 1700–1300 BC
Kizzuwatna 1650–1450 BC
Hittites 1680–1220 BC
Arzawa 1500–1320 BC
Mitanni 1500–1300 BC
Hayasa-Azzi 1500–1290 BC
Lycia 1450–350 BC
Assuwa 1300–1250 BC
Diauehi 1200–800 BC
Neo-Hittites 1200–800 BC
Phrygia 1200–700 BC
Caria 1150–547 BC
Tuwanuwa 1000–700 BC
Ionia 1000–545 BC
Urartu 859–595/585 BC
Diauehi 1200–800 BC
Neo-Hittites 1200–800 BC
Phrygia 1200–700 BC
Caria 1150–547 BC
Doris 1100–560 BC
Aeolis 1000–560 BC
Tuwanuwa 1000–700 BC
Ionia 1000–545 BC
Urartu 859–595/585 BC
Median Empire 678–549 BC
Lydia 685–547 BC
Achaemenid Empire 559–331 BC
Kingdom of Alexander the Great 334–301 BC
Kingdom of Cappadocia 322–130 BC
Antigonids 306–168 BC
Seleucid Empire 305–64 BC
Ptolemaic Kingdom 305–30 BC
Kingdom of Pontus 302–64 BC
Bithynia 297–74 BC
Attalid kingdom 282–129 BC
Galatia 281–64 BC
Parthian Empire 247 BC–224 AD
Armenian Empire 190 BC–428 AD
Roman Republic 133–27 BC
Commagene 163 BC–72 AD
Ancient Rome 133 BC-27 BC–330 AD
Sasanian Empire 224–651 AD (briefly in Anatolia)
Eastern Roman Empire (330–1453; 1204-1261 in exile asEmpire of Nicaea)
Rashidun Caliphate (637–656)
Great Seljuk State (1037–1194)
Danishmends (1071–1178)
Sultanate of Rum (1077–1307)
Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia (1078–1375)
Anatolian beyliks (1081–1423)
County of Edessa (1098–1150)
Artuqids (1101–1409)
Empire of Trebizond (1204–1461)
Latin Empire (1204–1261)
Karamanids (1250–1487)
Ilkhanate (1256–1335)
Kara Koyunlu (1375–1468)
Ak Koyunlu (1378–1501)
Rise (1299–1453)
Classical Age (1453–1566)
Transformation (1566–1703)
Old Regime (1703–1789)
Decline and modernization (1789–1908)
Defeat and dissolution (1908–1922)
Timeline
flagTurkey portal

Thismilitary history of Turkey is the history of the armed forces established underTurkey, beginning with theTurkish War of Independence.

War of Independence

[edit]
TheLiberation of Izmir in 1922 effectively sealed the Turkish victory and ended theTurkish War of Independence.
Main article:Turkish War of Independence

The Turkish revolutionaries rejected theTreaty of Sèvres (1920), which had left the Ottoman government in control of substantially less of Anatolia than modern Turkey controls. Following the victory ofAtatürk's forces in the War of Independence, the Treaty of Sèvres was substituted with theTreaty of Lausanne (1923), which granted international recognition to the government ofAnkara, rather than the Ottoman government inIstanbul.

Turkey’s Soviet tanks

[edit]

In 1932, the Soviet Union sent twoT-26 Mod. 1931s (equipped with two 7.62mm machinegun turrets), fourT-27 tankettes, and many vehicles and motorcycles to the Turkish Army in order to increase its part of the arms market and expand the USSR's influence beyond its vast borders.[1] The Soviet Union hoped that favourable experiences with the given AFVs would lead to the Turkish Army placing a significant order for Soviet weaponry equipment.[2] This strategy paid off, as Turkey ordered 64 T-26 Mod. 1933s, oneT-37A, and 34BA-3 armoured cars in 1934.[3] The T-26s were the Turkish Army's first genuine tanks, serving with the newly formed 1st Tank Regiment of the 2nd Cavalry Division inLüleburgaz, on the border with Greece.[2] Despite being quickly supplemented by a number ofVickers Mk VI light tanks from the United Kingdom and 100 French RenaultR-35s that arrived in Turkey in 1940, the T-26's relatively powerful penetration capabilities ensured they remained the most capable tanks in Turkish service until the arrival of the firstValentine tanks from the United Kingdom in 1941.[4] The 1st Tank Regiment at the time was made up of the 102nd and 103rd Tank Divisions, as well as a Reserve Division.[5] The BA-3s were divided into two divisions: the 1st and 2nd Armoured Car Divisions.[6] The T-26 Mod. 1931s and T-27s formed a Mixed Tank Company and were primarily used to familiarize troops with tanks (a singleFT-17 was bought from France in 1928 for the similar purpose) and demonstrate tank effectiveness to other army formations.[6] This structure is thought to have stayed unchanged until the last T-26s and BA-3s were retired in 1943.[6]

Because Turkey remained neutral duringWWII until February 1945, the Soviet-delivered T-26s and BA-3s would never see combat against a foreign foe.[7] Nonetheless, these Soviet AFVs laid the groundwork for tank operations in the Turkish Army, a fact that is seldom understood even now.[2] This information is probably even more strange in light of the fact that 20 years after its delivery, there was no sign of Soviet weapons systems remaining in Turkey, with the country instead receiving vast numbers ofUS tanks for possible use in a battle against theUSSR.[2]

Unlike the T-26, the amphibious light tank design was not well received by the Turkish Army, and no additional T-37As were ever ordered.[1] The tank, armed with only a single 7.62mm DT machine gun and weakly armoured (3mm to 10mm at the front), offered few remarkable features aside from its amphibious capability.[8] Nonetheless, theSoviet Army found the concept well-suited to their doctrine, purchasing over 2500 T-37As, another 1300+ T-38s, and 350+T-40s in the 1930s.[2][9] The tankette concept was also rejected by Turkish Army leadership, and aside from the four prototypes supplied by the Soviets, Turkey made no attempt to obtain further T-27s or contemporary designs from other sources. Of course, after WWII, the tankette concept was generally abandoned (with the noteworthy exception of the German Wiesel), and their intended mission of reconnaissance was instead filled by light tanks and armoured cars.[2] None of the Turkish T-37As or T-27s survive today, having most likely been demolished by the late 1940s.[9]

The BA-3 armoured car was only marginally more popular than the T-27 and T-37A, owing mostly to its heavy armament of a single 45mm gun and one 7.62mm DT MG placed in the same turret as the T-26 (a second DT was located in the hull).[10] The type's low mobility was a key disadvantage, and operations were frequently limited to hard surfaces due to its substantial weight, however tracks could be attached to the rear wheels for slightly increased mobility in rough terrain.[2] The BA-3's hull armour was 9mm thick, providing all-around protection.[10][9]

In comparison to the typically decades-long career of modern tanks, which for someLeopard 2 MBTs is already more than 40 years, Turkey's T-26s survived fewer than ten years (which is still considerably over the average tank's longevity of this era).[9] The tanks began to wear out by the early 1940s, and their bad condition was aggravated by a dearth of spare parts, which could no longer be obtained from the war-torn Soviet Union.[10] All T-26s had previously been decommissioned from operational service by 1943.[9] Two T-26 Mod. 1933s remain in the gardens of theHarbiye Military Museum inIstanbul and theEtimesgut Tank Müzesi inAnkara, albeit without their original camouflage scheme.[2]

For a country that currently employs a considerable number of German and American-made tanks, the founding of a tank arm (and, indeed, its first tank regiment) equipped with Soviet-made tanks is a historical oddity.[10] Turkey is the only country in the world to have operated tanks from practically every major player in World War II, including the Soviet Union, theUnited Kingdom, the United States, Germany, andFrance.[9] Little evidence of this past remains, save for the efforts of historians and writers to preserve and restore what would otherwise be lost.[2]

World War II

[edit]
See also:Refah tragedy

In 1938, theTurkish Army at peacetime strength consisted of 174,000 soldiers and 20,000officers forming 11army corps, 23divisions, one armouredbrigade, 3cavalry brigades and 7 frontier commands.[11][12] Like most nations at the time it was ill-equipped with primarilyWorld War I era weapons.[11] The rifles used were a mixture includingMausers,Mannlichers,Lee–Enfields,Martinis,Lebels and others.[12] As late as February 1940, theBritish Foreign Office noted:"The Turkish Army is very short of rifles and has asked us to supply 150,000."[12]

A TurkishCurtiss Falcon CW 22 aircraft, circa 1940s

TheTurkish Air Force had 131 first lineaircraft in 1937, of which only half were relatively modern.[12] Turkey hoped to increase the size of its fleet to 300 by 1938.[12] Although Turkey had 300 trainedpilots, the majority of them would be rated with moderate ability to fly in bad weather in a Western European Air Force.[12] In 1942, Ernest Phillips in his workHitler's last Hope: A factual survey of the Middle East warzone and Turkey's vital strategic position admitted:"If the Germans were to stage an all out offensive in this area, they could bring more planes into the air than the Turks could even gather, and if we were to send too many from Libya to help Turkey, the weakness there would be such that we should be in difficulties on the other side of the Suez."[13] At the beginning ofWorld War II the Turkish Air Force consisted of some 370 aircraft of all types, 450 pilots and 8,000 men.[14] During the war Turkey sent pilots toGreat Britain for training purposes. 14 are known to have died in Great Britain.[15][16] One of them was shot down by a German plane during a training flight in British air space, the rest died in accidents. The daughter of formerAir Forces Commander Emin Alpkaya, who had been sent to Britain for training during the war, stated she found something amazing while examining her father's wartime diaries. He wrote that"they have told me that I am ready to go to Berlin. I have returned from the bombardment at 6 in the morning. I was tired".[17] There were some allegations that Turkish pilots, who had been in Britain to get training during World War II, joined missions which bombedBerlin. However officials of the Turkish General Staff asserted that their pilots were never assigned in active aerial warfare and bombing flights.[15] Alpkaya may have been referring to a ride along in a plane manned by an allied crew, in which he took on the role of observer, and not a combat role.

The Turkish fleet inMalta, in 1936, prior toWorld War II. The Navy was the weakest of the three armed services at the outbreak of war.

TheTurkish Navy was the weakest of the services. It consisted of the outdatedbattle cruiserYavuz (ex-Goeben), 4destroyers, 5–6submarines, 2light cruisers, 3mine-sweepers, 2gunboats, 3 motortorpedo boats, 4minelayers and asurveying vessel.[18][19] The personnel strength was approximately 800 officers and 4,000 men.[20] The Navy lacked all modern appliances for defending coasts and harbours, and the ships were defenceless against air attacks.[18]

During the Anglo-Turkish Treaty negotiations in September 1939 a military credit agreement amounting to£25 million was agreed upon.[21] A Turkish Ministry of Defence letter to theTurkish General Staff dating 22.03.1940 stated that theTurkish Army was to be increased to 1.3 million effectives, forming 14army corps consisting of 41infantry and 3cavalrydivisions, 7 fortified positions and one armouredbrigade.[21] Yet, the letter stated,"the material resources of the nation were unable to provide for the provisioning and transport of this large number of effectives".[22]

TurkishMG08 team on the minaret of theHagia Sophia Museum, 1941.
Cemil Cahit Toydemir examines the Tiger tank.1943

World War II broke out in the first year of theİsmet İnönü presidency, and both the Allies and the Axis started to put pressure on İnönü to bring Turkey into the war on their respective sides. The Germans sentFranz von Papen to Ankara, whileWinston Churchill secretly met with İnönü inside a train wagon nearAdana on January 30, 1943. İnönü later met withFranklin D. Roosevelt and Winston Churchill at theSecond Cairo Conference on December 4–6, 1943. Turkey remained neutral until the final stages ofWorld War II and tried to maintain an equal distance between both theAxis and theAllies until February 1945, when Turkey entered the war on the side of the Allies against Germany and Japan.

Until 1941, both Roosevelt and Churchill thought that continued Turkish neutrality would serve the interests of the Allies by blocking the Axis from reaching the strategic oil reserves of the Middle East. But the early victories of the Axis up to the end of 1942 caused Roosevelt and Churchill to re-evaluate a possible Turkish participation in the war on the side of the Allies. Turkey had maintained a decently-sized Army and Air Force throughout the war, and Churchill wanted the Turks to open a new front in the Balkans. Roosevelt, on the other hand, still believed that a Turkish attack would be too risky. İnönü knew very well the hardships which his country had suffered during 11 years of incessant war between 1911 and 1922 and was determined to keep Turkey out of another war as long as he could. İnönü also wanted assurances on financial and military aid for Turkey, as well as a guarantee that the United States and theUnited Kingdom would stand beside Turkey in case of a Soviet invasion of the Turkish Straits after the war.

ULTRA message of Turkish declaration of War on Germany.

In April 1944, Turkey halted its sales ofchromite to Germany, and broke off relations in August. Turkey declared war on the Axis powers in February, 1945, after the Allies made its invitation to the inaugural meeting of the United Nations (along with the invitations of several other nations) conditional on full belligerency. No Turkish troops ever saw combat.

Korean War

[edit]
The commander of theTurkish Brigade,Tahsin Yazıcı receiving aSilver Star during theKorean War.
Main article:Turkish Brigade

During theCold War, Turkey participated in theKorean War as a member state of theUnited Nations, suffering 731 deaths in combat. The fear of a Soviet invasion and Stalin's unconcealed desire to control the Turkish Straits eventually led Turkey to give up its principle of neutrality in foreign relations and joinNATO on February 18, 1952. FollowingNATO membership, Turkey initiated a comprehensive modernization program for its Armed Forces.

Invasion of Cyprus

[edit]
Main articles:1974 Cypriot coup d'état andTurkish invasion of Cyprus

On 15 July 1974, theGreek military junta underDimitrios Ioannides carried out acoup d'état in Cyprus, tounite the island with Greece.[23][24][25] The coup ousted presidentMakarios III and replaced him with pro-enosis nationalistNikos Sampson.[26] In response to the coup, five days later the Turkish army invaded the island, citing a right to intervene to restore the constitutional order from the 1960Treaty of Guarantee.[27][28][29][30][31] This justification was rejected by the United Nations and the international community.[32]

International pressure led to a ceasefire; by then 36% of the island had been taken over by the Turks and 180,000 Greek Cypriots had been evicted from their homes in the north.[33] At the same time, around 50,000 Turkish Cypriots were displaced to the north and settled in the properties of the displaced Greek Cypriots. In mid-1975 among a variety of sanctions against Turkey, the US Congress imposed an arms embargo on Turkey for using US-supplied equipment during the invasion.[34] There were 1,534 Greek Cypriots[35] and 502 Turkish Cypriots[36] missing as a result of the fighting from over ten years of conflict.

The occupation is viewed as illegal under international law and amounting to illegal occupation of EU territory since Cyprus became a member of theEuropean Union.[37]

Recent

[edit]

Towards the end of the 1980s, a restructuring and modernization process has been initiated by the Turkish Armed Forces, which still continues today. The final goal ofTurkey is to produce indigenous military equipment and to become increasingly self-sufficient in terms of military technologies.

Kurdish–Turkish conflict

[edit]
Main article:Kurdish–Turkish conflict (1978–present)
[icon]
This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding to it.(March 2014)

Iraq

Main article:List of Turkish operations in northern Iraq

First Libyan Civil War

[edit]
Main article:2011 military intervention in Libya

Turkey's armed forces participated in theNATO-led military intervention andno-fly zone inLibya againstMuammar Gaddafi's government troops.

TheTurkish Navy participated with five ships and one submarine in the NATO-led naval blockade to enforce the arms embargo. It additionally provided sixF-16 Fighting Falcon jets for aerial operations. On 24 March 2011,Turkey's parliament approved Turkish participation in military operations in Libya, including enforcing theNFZ in Libya. The airbases committed wereIncirlik andİzmir.

Six batteries of the NATO-backed,MIM-104 Patriot missile defense systems have been set up to protect Turkey against aerial incursions from war-torn Syria.

Syrian civil war

[edit]
Main article:Turkish involvement in the Syrian civil war
[icon]
This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding to it.(April 2013)

Second Libyan Civil War

[edit]
Main article:Turkish military intervention in the Second Libyan Civil War
[icon]
This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding to it.(November 2021)

2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war

[edit]
Main article:2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war
[icon]
This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding to it.(November 2021)

Overseas deployments

[edit]

Current

[edit]

Past

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abJane's – World War II Tanks and Fighting Vehicles – The Complete Guide.pdf Jane's – World War II Tanks and Fighting Vehicles – The Complete Guide.pdf(PDF).
  2. ^abcdefghiOryx."Fading History: Türkiye's Soviet Tanks".Oryx. Retrieved2023-01-04.
  3. ^"Deciphering Turkey's Geopolitical Balancing and Anti-Westernism in Its Relations with Russia".Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP). Retrieved2023-01-04.
  4. ^"Photos – Turkey – Pre- & During WWII".MilitaryImages.Net. Retrieved2023-01-04.
  5. ^NATO."Türkiye and NATO – 1952".NATO. Retrieved2023-01-04.
  6. ^abc"Turkish Tanks and AFVs from WW2 to this day".www.tanks-encyclopedia.com. Retrieved2023-01-04.
  7. ^Mitzer, Stijn."Fading History: Türkiye's Soviet Tanks".Oryx. Retrieved2024-10-23.
  8. ^Livingston, Craig (1994)."'One Thousand Wings': The United States Air Force Group and the American Mission for Aid to Turkey, 1947–50".Middle Eastern Studies.30 (4):778–825.doi:10.1080/00263209408701024.ISSN 0026-3206.JSTOR 4283676.
  9. ^abcdef"Tank Encyclopedia, the first online tank museum".Tank Encyclopedia. Retrieved2023-01-04.
  10. ^abcd"Soviet BA-3 and BA-6".www.tanks-encyclopedia.com. Retrieved2023-01-04.
  11. ^abDouglas Arthur Howard:The history of Turkey, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2001,ISBN 0313307083, p. 111.
  12. ^abcdefSelim Deringil:Turkish Foreign Policy During the Second World War: An 'Active' Neutrality, Cambridge University Press, 2004,ISBN 978-0521523295, p. 33.
  13. ^Ernest Phillips,Hitler's last Hope: A factual survey of the Middle East warzone and Turkey's vital strategic position, 1942, p. 54.
  14. ^William Green, John Fricker:The air forces of the world: their history, development, and present strength, Macdonald, 1958, p. 281.
  15. ^abTurkish pilots never assigned in bombardment flights during World War II, The Free Library, October 23, 2009.
  16. ^İngiltere'de şehit düşen subayların sırrıArchived 2012-02-03 at theWayback Machine, Aksiyon, Erkan Car, 9 August 2004.
  17. ^Bombardımanda Türk pilotları,Hürriyet, 22.10.2009.
  18. ^abDeringil, 2004, p. 35
  19. ^The Americana Annual, Americana Corporation, 1941, p. 281. (University of California, digitalized July 2010).
  20. ^The World almanac and book of facts, Mark S. Hoffman, Press Pub. Co. (The New York World), 1946, p. 371.
  21. ^abDeringil, 2004, p. 38.
  22. ^Deringil, 2004, p. 39.
  23. ^Papadakis, Yiannis (2003). "Nation, narrative and commemoration: political ritual in divided Cyprus".History and Anthropology.14 (3):253–270.doi:10.1080/0275720032000136642.S2CID 143231403.culminating in the 1974 coup aimed at the annexation of Cyprus to Greece
  24. ^Atkin, Nicholas; Biddiss, Michael; Tallett, Frank (23 May 2011).The Wiley-Blackwell Dictionary of Modern European History Since 1789. John Wiley & Sons. p. 184.ISBN 978-1-4443-9072-8.
  25. ^Journal of international law and practice, Volume 5. Detroit College of Law at Michigan State University. 1996. p. 204.
  26. ^"Cyprus: Big Troubles over a Small Island".Time. 29 July 1974. Archived fromthe original on 21 December 2011. Retrieved13 November 2011.
  27. ^Ronen, Yaël (2011).Transition from Illegal Regimes under International Law. Cambridge University Press. p. 62.ISBN 978-1-139-49617-9.Tensions escalated again in July 1974, following a coup d'état by Greek Cypriots favouring a union of Cyprus with Greece. In response to the coup, Turkey invaded Cyprus.
  28. ^Bryant, Rebecca; Papadakis, Yiannis (2012).Cyprus and the Politics of Memory: History, Community and Conflict. I.B.Tauris. p. 5.ISBN 978-1-78076-107-7.In response to the coup, Turkey launched a military offensive in Cyprus that divided the island along the Green Line, which now splits the entire island.
  29. ^Diez, Thomas (2002).The European Union and the Cyprus Conflict: Modern Conflict, Postmodern Union. Manchester University Press. p. 105.ISBN 978-0-7190-6079-3.Turkey did, however, act unilaterally in 1974, in response to a military coup in Cyprus instigated by the military junta ruling then in Greece with the apparent objective of annexing the island.
  30. ^Ker-Lindsay, James; Faustmann, Hubert; Mullen, Fiona (2011).An Island in Europe: The EU and the Transformation of Cyprus. I.B. Tauris. p. 3.ISBN 9781848856783.Divided since 1974, when Turkish forces invaded in response to a Greek led coup, many observers felt that taking in the island would either be far too risky or far too problematic.
  31. ^Mirbagheri, Faruk (2009).Historical Dictionary of Cyprus. Scarecrow Press. p. 43.ISBN 978-0-8108-6298-2.On 20 July 1974, in response to the coup and justifying its action under the Treaty of Guarantee, Turkey landed forces in Kyrenia.
  32. ^Gray, Christine (2008).International Law and the Use of Force. Oxford University Press. p. 94.ISBN 978-0-19-102162-6.
  33. ^U.S. Congressional Record, V. 147, Pt. 3, 8 March 2001 to 26 March 2001[1]Archived 10 September 2015 at theWayback Machine
  34. ^Turkey and the United States: The Arms Embargo Period. Praeger Publishers (5 August 1986). 1986.ISBN 978-0275921415.
  35. ^"Over 100 missing identified so far".Cyprus Mail. Archived fromthe original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved13 October 2007.
  36. ^"Missing cause to get cash injection".Cyprus Mail. Archived fromthe original on 30 September 2007. Retrieved13 October 2007.
  37. ^James Ker-Lindsay; Hubert Faustmann; Fiona Mullen (15 May 2011).An Island in Europe: The EU and the Transformation of Cyprus. I.B.Tauris. p. 15.ISBN 978-1-84885-678-3.Archived from the original on 18 September 2015. Retrieved20 June 2015.Classified as illegal under international law, and now due to Cyprus' accession into theEuropean Union is also an illegal occupation of EU territory.

Sources

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Links to related articles
History
Ancient and Middle Ages
Seljuks andBeyliks
Ottoman Empire
Republic of Türkiye
Overviews
Topics
Geography
Regions
(west to east)
Topics
Government
Branches
Politics
Topics
Economy
Demographics
Society
Culture
Leadership
General
Field armies
Services
Internal security
Equipment
Education
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Military_history_of_Turkey&oldid=1275682681"
Category:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp