In July 2022, theMink Commission released a report that criticised Frederiksen's government's handling of theCluster 5 COVID-19 outbreak among Danishmink, though it absolved Frederiksen of deliberate misleading of the public.[4] TheRadikale Venstre brought an ultimatum against Frederiksen threatening to bring amotion of no confidence against her government if she did not call for an early election.[5] On 5 October 2022, Frederiksen announced that an election was to be held on 1 November of the same year.[6] The election resulted in the best result for the Social Democrats in 20 years with the party gaining two more seats for a total of 50.[7] Frederiksen herself received 60,837 votes, the most of any candidate.[8] On 13 December 2022, Frederiksen announced that an accord on a coalition government with the Social Democrats, theVenstre and theModerates had been reached, with herself continuing as prime minister.[9]
She was born 19 November 1977 in the city ofAalborg inNorth Denmark. Frederiksen's father was atypographer and her mother was ateacher.[2] As a teenager, she campaigned to preserve rain forests, protect whales, and end apartheid.[10]
Frederiksen worked as a youth consultant forLO, The Danish Confederation of Trade Unions.[2] She was elected as amember of parliament forCopenhagen County in the2001 general election which saw theSocial Democrats losing the first place and placing second for the first time since 1920.[2] After her election, Frederiksen was named as her party's spokesperson for culture, media and gender equality.[2] In 2002, she received theNina Bang award for "showing political courage, enthusiasm and impact with social feeling".[12] Frederiksen received the Ting Prize in 2012. She co-authored the booksEpostler (2003) andFrom Fight to Culture (2004).
After the2005 general election loss, Frederiksen became her party's spokesperson forsocial affairs.[2] Following the election, she also served as the vice-chairperson of the parliamentary group of the Social Democrats.[2] In the2007 general election that saw the Social Democrats losing two seats, Frederiksen obtained 27,077 votes, placing her seventh in the ranking of the ten Danish politicians with the most votes.[13]
After the2011 general election that led to a Social Democrats government, Frederiksen served under Prime MinisterHelle Thorning-Schmidt asMinister for Employment from 2011 to 2014 andMinister of Justice from 2014 until she succeeded her as party leader.[2][3] As Minister of Employment, Hendriksen sought reforms of early retirement pensions, flex jobs, and the employment system. The controversial cash assistance reform meant lower cash benefits for young unemployed and provided cohabiting mutual support, among other things.[14]
Under Frederiksen's leadership after the2015 general election in which the Social Democrats returned to power and gained three seats in theFolketing, the party has moved back to the left on economic issues while taking a conservative stance onimmigration.[15][16]
The2019 general election saw the Social Democrats gaining a further seat while support for theDanish People's Party and theLiberal Alliance collapsed, costingLars Løkke Rasmussen his majority. With the result beyond doubt on election night, Rasmussen conceded defeat.[17] Frederiksen was appointed prime minister on 27 June 2019, heading an exclusively Social Democratic minority government supported by the red bloc of theSocial Liberal Party, theRed-Green Alliance and theGreen Left.[18][1] Despite having run on ananti-immigration stance during the election, Frederiksen briefly shifted her stance on immigration by allowing more foreign labour and reversing government plans to hold foreign criminals offshore after winning government.[19][20][21]
At a press conference on 4 November 2020, Mette Frederiksen stated that the government had decided that all mink in Denmark should be killed due to the risk of infection with COVID-19. Subsequently, it emerged that this order was illegal and was described by many as being in violation of the Danish Constitution.[22] The government came up with changing explanations and several parties in the Folketing demanded an account of the mink case. The statement was published on 18 November 2020 and it emerged that six ministers had been warned on 1 October 2020 that the order was illegal. Minister of Food, Agriculture and FisheriesMogens Jensen withdrew immediately. Mette Frederiksen has denied knowledge of the lack of legal basis.[23]
Acommission of inquiry was set up to investigate the case,[24] delivering its report on 30 June 2022. The report stated that Frederiksen's statements at the press conference on 4 November 2020 were "objectively grossly misleading", but that she was not aware of the illegality of the order to kill all mink.[25][26] TheRed-Green Alliance andGreen Left, both of which are supporting parties of Frederiksen, announced they would not be voting for independent lawyer examination of the report, which could lead toimpeachment.[27] Leader of theSocial Liberal Party, also a supporting party,Sofie Carsten Nielsen similarly did not want independent examination, but demanded a general election before 4 October 2022.[28] If her demands were not met, she promised to support amotion of no confidence against Frederiksen.[29] Frederiksen later announced on 5 October 2022 that a general election would be held on 1 November 2022.[6]
Frederiksen received an official reprimand from the Folketing on 5 July 2022 for her actions in handling the mink case.[30] The reprimand stated that Frederiksen had "acted highly criticisable". This was given to her by her own government, with her own party,Social Democrats, not stating that she had committed any errors;[31] the opposition did not participate as they considered it inadequate.[32]
On 2 July 2022Sofie Carsten Nielsen, leader of the Social Liberals, one of supporting parties of the government, encouraged Frederiksen to set an election date before 4 October after the report of theMink Commission was published, criticising the government's handling of theCluster 5 outbreak in November 2020.[33] Later the same day, Nielsen announced that she was ready to put forward amotion of no confidence if the prime minister refused to call early elections.[34] On 5 October, Frederiksen announced that general elections were to be held on 1 November, the first to be held on a Tuesday since the2007 Danish general election.[35]
The2022 Danish general election election was simultaneously the best result for theSocial Democrats in more than 20 years and the worst result forVenstre in more than 30 years.[36][37] Frederiksen, the leader of the red bloc, thanked voters for giving the red bloc a majority; despite winning a slim majority of one seat, she decided to follow her campaign promise and resign in order to seek a new centrist government with parties from both sides of the political spectrum.[38] Following the results, she was congratulated by the prime ministers of Norway and Spain,Jonas Gahr Støre andPedro Sánchez, both members of her same European political group, theParty of European Socialists.[39][40]
On 13 December, Mette Frederiksen went to the queen to presenther new government, which includes the Moderates and Venstre; the first time the Social Democrats and Venstre formed a government together since1978. Leader of Venstre, Jakob Elleman-Jensen, became deputy prime minister and minister of defence while leader of the Moderates Lars Løkke Rasmussen was made foreign minister.[41] Nine social democrats lost their ministerial positions due to the formation of the new cabinet.[42] Two ministers, both from the Moderates, are not members of the Folketing.[43] This marked the first time since2007 that aprime minister was reelected into a consecutive term.
Frederiksen gained international attention in August 2019 whenU.S. PresidentDonald Trump cancelled a state visit to Denmark following her refusal to sellGreenland, an autonomous territory of theKingdom of Denmark. On 15 August 2019,The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump had discussed the possibility of buying Greenland with aides.[44]Kim Kielsen, thepremier of Greenland, responded by saying that Greenland is not for sale.[45] On 18 August 2019, after the rumor was confirmed by the White House, Frederiksen echoed Kielsen's comments, saying that "Greenland is not Danish. Greenland belongs to Greenland", and called the discussion "absurd".[46] On 20 August 2019, Trump cancelled the state visit, scheduled 2–3 September 2019, with specific reference to Frederiksen's refusal to discuss a possible sale.[47][48][49]
On 3 January 2020, Iranian GeneralQasem Soleimani wasassassinated by the United States, which considerably heightened the existing tensions between the two countries. Frederiksen called it "a really serious situation". She avoided the question on whether the killing was right, instead calling for de-escalation.[50]
Frederiksen with Finnish Prime MinisterSanna Marin in Copenhagen, 4 May 2022
At the request of theUnited States,[51] Frederiksen initiated diplomatic talks in early 2022 on the possible presence of American troops on Danish soil. Frederiksen expressed enthusiasm for the talks, stating that "We want a stronger American presence in Europe and in Denmark".[52] In December 2023, Frederiksen announced a US-Danish defense cooperation agreement, that allows for U.S. soldiers and military equipment to be based atSkrydstrup Air Base,Krarup Air Base andAalborg Air Base.[53]
Frederiksen meets with President of the European CouncilCharles Michel in Copenhagen, 14 May 2024.
On 24 February 2025, Frederiksen said she does not believe Russian PresidentVladimir Putin "wants peace in Ukraine" and expressed doubts about US PresidentDonald Trump's attempts tonegotiate a peace deal in the Russia-Ukraine war, saying that "I understand that many people think that a peaceful solution or a ceasefire sounds like a good idea, but we run the risk that peace in Ukraine is actually [could be - ed.] more dangerous than the war that is going on now."[62]
In 2020, Frederiksen was labeled "the most euroskeptic [Danish] Prime Minister in history" by the Danishonline newspaperAltinget.[63] Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, however, she "transformed from a skeptic into a strong advocate of [EU] cooperation".[64]
Frederiksen said the2022 Nord Stream gas leaks were sabotage, while cautioning that it was not an attack on Denmark as they occurred in international waters.[67] Frederiksen travelled to London andBrussels to discuss the leaks with British Prime MinisterLiz Truss, President of the European CouncilCharles Michel and NATO Secretary GeneralJens Stoltenberg.[68] She also talked with French PresidentEmmanuel Macron over the phone. She reiterated to all she spoke with that there is a need for increased surveillance ofcritical infrastructure and that they must take Russian PresidentVladimir Putin's threats seriously.[69]
In May 2023, her government decided to triple Denmark'smilitary spending over the next 10 years. This spending will be partly financed by the abolition of a public holiday for employees.[70]
In February 2025, she said that Denmark would increase defense spending to more than 3% of GDP within the next two years.[71]
In March 2025, Germanychanged its constitution to allow it to spend up to a €1 trillion on defense, security, infrastructure, and green energy over the next decade. Frederiksen called it "fantastic news for all Europeans".[72]
In June 2021, Frederiksen's government announced a new model of distributinggymnasium applicants. The model aims to solve the issue of ethnic and economic disparity and "parallel society tendencies" between gymnasiums by considering parent income.[76] Heavy criticism was directed at the suggestion by the blue bloc, who called it "forced distribution".[77] Apetition for scrapping the law gained over 50000 signatures, allowing it to be presented before the Folketing.[78]
A year later, in June 2022, Frederiksen and her government announced their intention to introduce a ceiling to the entry quotient[a] of higher education. Education offers with a higher entry quotient than the proposed ceiling of 10[b] would have to offer admission through other means, such as a subject-specific admission test. The goal of the ceiling is to lessen the pressure on students by reducing the need for high grades, and to allow students greater freedom in selecting education.[79]
In September 2022, Frederiksen proposed that approximately half of allMaster's degrees would be shortened from two years to one year. This would mostly affect degrees in thesocial sciences andhumanities, withnatural sciences andmedicine being left mostly untouched. The proposal was met with harsh criticism fromstudents,academics,rectors and parts of the business world, claiming it would negatively affect the quality of education and require the learning of two years material in one year. Frederiksen denied this, claiming the quality of education was to increase and that workers could betrained on the job.[80][81]
Frederiksen has stated a desire to be "Prime Minister of Children",[82] and in 2021, she presented a plan called "Law of Children", aiming to put children first in social cases, including giving municipalities more resources to take children away from violent parents, and to give children more rights in divorce cases.[83] In 2020, she also made a deal with theSocialist People's Party, theRed-Green Alliance, and theDanish People's Party, in order to give people who have worked for long the ability to get early retirement. This was also one of Frederiksen's main promises during the 2019 election campaign.[84]
Frederiksen is a vocal opponent ofsex work because she considers it violence against women. For many years, she has strongly advocated for theprohibition of the purchase of sex, as inSweden,Norway, andIceland.[85] In 2002, she opened the debate on the abolition of prostitution, and was behind the 2009 congressional decision that the Social Democrats would "work for a ban on the purchase of sexual acts", saying that prostitution caused mental health damage to the prostitute.[86]
Frederiksen became increasingly sceptical of mass immigration, as she believes it has had negative impacts for much of the population, a more pressing issue since at least 2001 after theSeptember 11 attacks which intensified during the2015 European migrant crisis. In a biography, Frederiksen stated: "For me, it is becoming increasingly clear that the price of unregulated globalisation, mass immigration, and the free movement of labour is paid for by the lower classes."[15][16]
Under Frederiksen, the Social Democrats voted in favour of a law allowing Danish authorities to confiscate money, jewellery, and other valuable items from refugees crossing the border.[87] The bill received harsh condemnation from theUnited Nations Human Rights Council,[88] and widespread comparisons between the plan and the treatment ofJews inNazi-occupied Europe.[89] The Social Democrats voted for a lawbanning the wearing ofburqas andniqābs, while abstaining during a vote on a law on mandatory handshakes, irrespective of religious sentiment, at citizenship ceremonies and on a plan to house criminalasylum seekers on a bridgeless island on which they would have to stay at night.[15] Frederiksen also backed the right-wing populistDanish People's Party in their paradigm shift push to makerepatriation, rather thanintegration, the goal of asylum policy. She has called for a cap on non-Western immigrants, expulsion ofasylum seekers to a reception centre in North Africa, and forced 37-hours-per-week labour for immigrants in exchange for benefits.[15]
Frederiksen has referred toIslam as a "barrier to integration", arguing that someMuslims "do not respect the Danish judicial system", that some Muslim women refuse to work for religious reasons, and that Muslim girls are subject to "massive social control", and has called forMuslim schools to be closed.[90]
In April 2021, Frederiksen announced that Denmark's "ultimate goal" shall henceforth be one of "zero spontaneous asylum seekers". Danish Integration Minister Mattias Tesfaye added that "no exceptions will be made" towards that goal.Danish Refugee Council's Secretary General Charlotte Slente called the move "irresponsible".[91] The Danish state subsequently ceased the renewal of temporary residency permits to about 189 Syrian refugees, claiming that it is "now safe to return toSyria".[92]
Despite having adopted new stricter migration policies than earlier Social Democratic governments, she and her government have also introduced a few relaxations of Danish immigration policies. Even though Mette Frederiksen and her government are against the idea of sudden asylum seekers, they are supporters of the UN refugee quota system and have reintroduced Denmark's participation in that system.[93] Other relaxations include getting children out of infamous migration centre Sjælsmark and increasing social benefits for refugees.[citation needed]
She has argued that the perception of the Social Democrats adopting theThird Way and practicingcentrist,neoliberal economics and supporting unrestrictedglobalisation contributed to the party's poor electoral performance in the early 21st century. Labeling economic foreign policies of Europe as tooliberal, Frederiksen has criticised other social democratic parties for losing their voters' trust by failing to prevent globalisation's chipping away of labour rights, increasing inequality and uncontrolled immigration.[15]
Frederiksen's government made international news with the agreement to reduce Denmark's territorial emissions by 70% in 2030 compared to 1990,[94] the decision to stop oil and gas exploration after 2050[95][96] (also driven by the fact that only one company applied for a lease in the latest auction[97]), and the energy islands in the North Sea.[98]
Frederiksen publicly said: "I was a social democrat before I gotgreen. And when I wake up in the morning, I am still a social democrat before I am green."[99]
More than a year after having set an ambitious reduction target for the decade, there are in March 2021 no concrete plans for dealing with the remaining two-thirds of the needed reductions to achieve the Danish 2030 emission target.[100] Green NGOs have largely viewed Frederiksen's Minister of ClimateDan Jørgensen's tenure negatively in 2020.[101][102]
Frederiksen's government has described its climate action strategy as a "hockey stick" model.[103] This means it plans toawait new technologies and falling costs and thus only achieve most reductions at the end of the decade. This strategy has been described by the other political parties as a "Bjørn Lomborg" dream.[104]
Despite pleas from theUNFCCC,[105] theInternational Monetary Fund,[106] theWorld Bank,[107] the Danish economic councils[108] and the Danish Council on Climate Change,[109] Frederiksen's government has postponed the implementation of a highercarbon pricing mechanism,[110] even though Denmark was a pioneer with its adoption in 1992.[111] The opposition to higher carbon taxes was positively received by associations representing the major emitting sectors such as theConfederation of Danish Industry[112] and the Danish Agriculture and Food Council.[113]
As of March 2021, Denmark stands to have a much lower price on carbon than its neighbours in 2030, with consequences such as trucks from Germany waiting to refuel until they are in Denmark to benefit from the lowdiesel prices in Denmark.[114] Denmark is also one of the four EU countries without carbon taxes on passenger flights.[115] In fact, Frederiksen's government had plans to guarantee domestic flights during theCOVID-19 pandemic by subsidising domestic flights, a decision decried by greenNGOs and the supporting parties:Red-Green Alliance andSocialist People's Party.[116] The decision was not implemented as theEuropean Commission would not approve of it due to regulations on state aid.[117]
Frederiksen's government entered a formal agreement with the cement manufacturerAalborg Portland (Denmark's largest carbon emitter standing for 4% of the national emissions) concluding that they did not have to reduce their annual emissions below their 1990 level of 1.54 million CO2 tons.[118] Previously, Mette Frederiksen had said: "I will chain myself to Portland before anyone is allowed to close them".[119]
Similarly, her government has been criticised[120] for allowing state-owned companies to continue the build-out of fossil fuel infrastructure like a natural gas pipeline of 115 km, with an associated socio-economic cost of $113 million for Denmark.[121] In a formal answer to the Parliament, the Minister of ClimateDan Jørgensen confirmed that the gas pipeline would not reduce the carbon emissions in the short term nor add any jobs in Denmark.[122]
As stipulated in the Climate Act, the Danish Council on Climate Change has to make annual recommendations for and provide a status update on the Danish government's climate efforts. In February 2021, the Danish Council on Climate found it was not likely that Frederiksen's government would achieve their original target of a 70% reduction of greenhouse gases by 2030.[123]
In May 2010, it was revealed that Frederiksen's daughter, along with the children of several other prominent Social Democrat politicians, was being educated at aprivate school.[124] Along with her colleagues, Frederiksen was accused of hypocrisy by the Danish press as her party had long seen the promotion ofpublic education as a key policy.[124] In 2005, Frederiksen had openly criticised parents who sent their children to private schools.[124] Frederiksen responded to the criticism by saying that her opinion on private education had become more nuanced since her remarks in 2005 and that it would have been hypocritical of her to put her own political career ahead of her daughter's best interest.[125]
On 14 March 2013,Ekstra Bladet announced that she and her ministry had failed to inform theFolketing about the correct figures regarding how many unemployment benefit recipients would drop out of the unemployment benefit system in 2013.[126] According toEkstra Bladet, on 5 December 2012, the Ministry of Employment had new figures for how many people were expected to lose the right to unemployment benefits on 1 January 2013 and the following six months. The number was 22,679 people and thus significantly higher than the 7–12,000 people that the government had announced.[127] She was strongly criticised for this – and both theUnity List and theDanish People's Party subsequently called her in consultation on the matter.[128]
The new unemployment benefit rules were adopted in 2010 by the VK government and the Danish People's Party, and were to be fully implemented on 2 July 2012. The changes mean that the unemployment benefit period is shortened from 4 to 2 years. In the Finance Act agreement for 2012, it was agreed to extend the unemployment benefit period by up to half a year for all insured unemployed who exhausted the unemployment benefit entitlement in the second half of 2012. Therefore, it was not until 1 January 2013 that many began to lose their unemployment benefit entitlement.[129]
Her government endured criticism in 2020 and 2021 for refusing to repatriate children with Danish citizenship from Syrian refugee camps inKurdish-controlled Syria, due to their parents having joined theIslamic State.[130] A medical report released in April 2022 revealed that many of the children wereundernourished and that one 4-year-old in particular needed hospitalisation. This led to her government preparing to evacuate the children on the condition that their parents do not come with them, which again led to criticism, notably from her supporting parties, theSocial Liberal Party and theGreen Left.[131][132]
Bystanders said that she was roughly shoved, causing her to fall sideways, though she did not hit the ground.[134] A 39-year-old man from Poland was identified as a suspect and ordered to appear in court,[135] though he denied the charges.[134]
Frederiksen was taken toRigshospitalet, and thePrime Minister's Office later released a statement from anorthopedicattending physician, which stated that Frederiksen had suffered a "contusion (to the) right shoulder and minor distortion [of]cervical vertebrae (whiplash)",[136] but was otherwise in good condition.[137] Police said that the suspect was a Polish national and that there appeared to be no political motive for the attack.[138] Days later, she said that she was still shaken by the incident, but said she believed it was "the prime minister who got hit", differentiating it from an attack on her personally.[139]
On 7 August 2024, Frederiksen's attacker was convicted by the Copenhagen District Court and sentenced to four months imprisonment, deportation and a ban from entering Denmark for six years following his release.[140]
Order of Princess Olga 1lvl. (Ukraine, 27 January 2023) — for a significant personal contribution to strengthening interstate cooperation, supporting the independence and territorial integrity of Ukraine;[141]
Order of Liberty (Ukraine, 10 June 2024) — for outstanding personal merits in strengthening Ukrainian-Danish interstate cooperation, support of state sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine;[142]
^Rasmussen, Louise Breusch; Gronholt-Pedersen, Jacob (19 December 2023). Richardson, Alex (ed.)."Denmark, U.S. reach defence agreement".reuters.com. Retrieved20 December 2023.
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
