Dobres' body of work examines the association between technology and social agency. Instead of focusing primarily on the materiality of technology, Dobres expounds the value of analyzing cultures through the lens of technological production. Dobres suggests that technology is inextricably linked tocultural practices, as the production of technology is shaped by social processes and is an avenue through which culture is expressed.[4]
Dobres explores these concepts in her bookTechnology and Social Agency: Outlining a Practice Framework for Archaeology.[5][6] This publication focuses on how the study of technology and social agency can be used to better understand how social constructs control and have controlled production of materials through the centuries.[7] Much of her other work contains research around similar topics such as gender, prehistoric technology and art, and societal impacts on such things.[8]
^Stockl, Andrea (2000). "Review of Technology and Social Agency. Outlining a Practice Framework for Archaeology".Cambridge Anthropology.22 (1):78–80.ISSN0305-7674.JSTOR23820355.
^Mullins, Paul R. (2001). "Technology and Social Agency. Marcia-Anne Dobres. 2000. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK. xii + 300 pp. $62.95 (cloth), ISBN 1-57718-123-9; $29.95 (paper), ISBN 1-57718-124-7.Agency in Archaeology. Marcia-Anne Dobres and John Robb, editors. 2000. Routledge, NY. xiii + 270 pp. $32.99 (paper), ISBN 0-415-20761-4".American Antiquity.66 (4):755–756.doi:10.2307/2694198.ISSN0002-7316.JSTOR2694198.
^Miller, Heather M.-L. (2000). "The Social Dynamics of Technology: Practice, Politics, and World Views. Marcia-Anne Dobres and Christopher R. Hoffman, editors. 1999. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. xvi +240 pp., 29 figures, 1 table, references cited, index. $45.00 (cloth), ISBN 1- 56098-909-2".American Antiquity.65 (1):201–202.doi:10.2307/2694820.ISSN0002-7316.JSTOR2694820.S2CID158016747.