 | You can helpexpand this article with text translated fromthe corresponding article in Spanish. (December 2019)Click [show] for important translation instructions.
|
The termmacana, ofTaíno origin, refers to various wooden weapons used by the various native cultures ofCentral andSouth America. These weapons were referred to as a hadzab or hats'ab inYucatecanMayan.[1]
The earliest meaning attributed tomacana is a sword-like weapon made out of wood, but still sharp enough to be dangerous.[2] The term is also sometimes applied to the similarAztec weapon, which is studded with pieces ofobsidian in order to create a blade, though some authorities distinguish this item by using theNahuatl namemacuahuitl.
In theAndes, the Spanish conquistadors applied the term "macana" to the several blunt,mace-like weapons at the disposal of theInca army's arsenal, particularly to theChaska chuqui (lit. star spear) and theChambi (mace) weapons which consisted of a wooden shaft with a heavy metal (copper or bronze) or stone object at the end. As its name suggests, theChaska chuqui tip was in a star shape to maximize the potential to break bone. They were the most common weapon in theInca arsenal, and it is possible that gold or silver was used for the star for high-ranking officers.[3]
In modernSpanish the word has broadened to refer to various types of blunt wooden weapons, especially a policenightstick, with a shape very similar to Okinawantonfas.
The sizes of macanas are thought to have varied significantly, depending on the application. Most were about one meter long, though other macana varieties were larger.[4] Diversity in macana size likely arose due to various factors, including battle strategy, combatant status or position in themilitary hierarchy, ethnopolitical group, orenvironmental factors such as availability of chulul wood.[1] The most dominant iterations of macanas appear to be broad, flat wooden shafts with grooved edges flanked with obsidian blades held in place by resin or another mastic.[5] Macana makers may have made their segments shorter to produce more of them per blade from this non-local resource, especially if obsidian grew increasingly scarce.[1] The obsidian was imported into the lowlands from highland sources inGuatemala andMexico, probably as preformed polyhedral cores.[6]
One-handed use of macanas enables the user to hold ashield in the free hand while larger macana species typically necessitates two hands.[4]Spanish reports during early battles with the Maya described their opponents' armaments included "[s]words that appeared to be two-handed ones"[7] and "two-handed swords of very strong wood [studded with] obsidian."[7]
Many of the obsidian shards used for macanas were prismatic blade segments, which are among the most abundantlithics at late sites in the Maya lowlands.[1]Archeology in sites with macana remains has revealed that some sites, particularly those with large numbers of segments, had bimodal – smaller (ca. 8–10mm) and larger (ca. 20–24 +) – length distributions. This supports the possibility of two sizes of macanas.[1]
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)