 | This article has multiple issues. Please helpimprove it or discuss these issues on thetalk page.(Learn how and when to remove these messages) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
|
Leitkultur (German:[ˈlaɪtkʊlˌtuːɐ̯]ⓘ) is a German concept, which can be translated as 'guiding culture' or 'leading culture', less literally as 'common culture', 'core culture' or 'basic culture'.[1][2][3] The term was first introduced in 1998 by the German-Arab sociologistBassam Tibi[4] and from 2000 onward the term figured prominently in the national political debate in Germany about national identity andimmigration.[5][6]
 | This sectionrelies largely or entirely on asingle source. Relevant discussion may be found on thetalk page. Please helpimprove this article byintroducing citations to additional sources. Find sources: "Leitkultur" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(December 2024) |
Bassam Tibi first suggested a 'Leitkultur' in his 1998 bookEuropa ohne Identität ('Europe without identity'). He defined it in terms of what are commonly calledwestern values, and spoke of aEuropean rather than a German 'Leitkultur'. "The values needed for a core culture are those ofmodernity:democracy,secularism, theEnlightenment,human rights andcivil society." (B. Tibi, Europa ohne Identität, p. 154). These core values are similar to those of the 'liberal-democratic basic order' (Freiheitlich-demokratische Grundordnung) which is considered the foundational value of thepost-warWest Germany, and theunified German state after theGerman reunification of 1990. Tibi advocated cultural pluralism based on value consensus, rather thanmonoculturalism. However, he also opposed value-blindmulticulturalism, and the development ofparallel societies where immigrant minorities live and work, isolated from western society around them.[7] Tibi advocated a structured immigration policy, and opposed illegal immigration into Germany.
| This sectionrelies largely or entirely on asingle source. Relevant discussion may be found on thetalk page. Please helpimprove this article byintroducing citations to additional sources. Find sources: "Leitkultur" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(February 2017) |
Theo Sommer, then publisher ofDie Zeit, was one of the first to use the termGerman core culture, as part of a debate about the assimilation of immigrants in Germany, and national core values: "Integration necessarily implies a far-reaching assimilation onto the German guiding culture and its core values" („Der Kopf zählt, nicht das Tuch“, Zeit 30/1998).
However, the term only became a national political issue in October 2000.Friedrich Merz, then leader of the Christian-DemocraticCDU in theBundestag, wrote an article forDie Welt, rejectingmulticulturalism, and advocated controls on immigration and compulsory assimilation in a German core culture. Merz, after being reminded of the earlier article by Theo Sommer, referred to Sommer as the inspiration for this policy. Sommer, in turn, claimed he was only advocating integration of immigrants, and distanced himself from the call for restriction of immigration ("Einwanderung ja, Ghettos nein - Warum Friedrich Merz sich zu Unrecht auf mich beruft", Zeit 47/2000). Merz, supported by theBrandenburg interior ministerJörg Schönbohm (CDU), proposed an annual immigration limit of 200 000, about 0.25% of the German population. Anything more, according to Merz, would exceed the absorptive capacity of German society. Immigrants had a duty, according to Merz, to adopt the basic cultural values of Germany.
Bassam Tibi now protested that politicians had appropriated his proposal for their own purposes, and pronounced the entire debate a 'failure'. Most of the reactions to Merz's proposals were negative, and the debate split along party lines, with the government coalition (social-democraticSPD and theGreen Party) rejecting a German Leitkultur.Cem Özdemir (then Bundestag member, Green Party) and others defended 'integration' as against 'assimilation' of immigrants. Forcing immigrants to assimilate at any price would in any case, according to Özdemir, deny the reality that Germany was a multicultural society. Some reactions in media outside Germany likened the Leitkultur proposals to the enforcedGermanisation in territories occupied byNazi Germany, where the population was usually forbidden to speak local languages.
In 2005, the new presiding chairman of theBundestag,Norbert Lammert (CDU), proposed a re-opening of the debate on a Leitkultur. The proposal, he said in an interview inDie Zeit, has been summarily dismissed without argument; "The noticeable thing about the very short national debate is that the Leitkultur concept was widely rejected, as a negative reflex, but that there was a wide recognition of the problems underlying the debate" ("Das Parlament hat kein Diskussionsmonopol", Zeit 43/2005). There was no noticeable reaction to his suggestion at first: Lammert then proposed to move the discussion to a European level, to establish aEuropean core identity. In an article inDie Welt, he wrote: "If Europe wishes to preserve the multiplicity of nation identities, and yet establish a collective identity, it must develop a political core ideal, a set of foundational values and convictions. Such a European core ideal must necessarily be based on the common cultural roots of Europe, on its shared history, and on shared religious tradition," (Die Welt, 13 December 2005).
In early 2006, theJyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy led to violent protests in Islamic countries, against depictions ofMuhammad in a Danish newspaper. Lammert now restated his demand for a re-opening of the Leitkultur debate. The cartoon protests, he said, show that German society must reach a consensus on its "foundational values and a minimal standard of value orientation". The 'constitutional patriotism' (proposed by the philosopherJürgen Habermas) would not suffice, since all constitutions are based on non-random cultural assumptions. Fundamental rights, such as freedom of the press and freedom of expression, must be fully supported by a social consensus. Given the background of a multicultural society in Germany, according to Lammert, rights must be linked to certain cultural values, and a nationwide debate on this issue was necessary, to re-establish such a link. The idea of multiculturalism was "perhaps originally well-intentioned", but had reached the end of its useful life. Multiculturalism could not be allowed to create a society where all values were equal – and therefore in practice had no values. In conflicts of values, society had to decide which values were valid, and which were not. Lammert insisted that he had never spoken of aGerman Leitkultur. The essential elements of the German culture were not specifically German, he said, and it would be better to speak of aEuropean Leitkultur. (Deutschlandfunk interview with Lammert, reported in theFrankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung of 8 February 2006).
Jörg Schönbohm also remains a vigorous advocate of a German core culture: in 2006 he suggested changing the name of the Berlin radio stationradiomultikulti into 'Radio Schwarz-Rot-Gold' (black-red-gold, the colours of theflag of Germany).[8]
| This sectionrelies largely or entirely on asingle source. Relevant discussion may be found on thetalk page. Please helpimprove this article byintroducing citations to additional sources. Find sources: "Leitkultur" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(December 2024) |
The concept of Leitkultur figured prominently in the national debate about a test for immigrants to Germany.[9] These tests are known in English as 'citizenship tests' (see for example theLife in the United Kingdom test) but they often apply to all immigrants, not just those seekingnaturalisation.[10] In Germany, the federal parliament (Bundestag) ultimately decided against a national immigrant test, but the 16states can set their own tests, which can be based on an officially defined German culture and values.
Authority control databases: National |
|---|