Inchemistry, thelattice energy is theenergy change upon formation of onemole of a crystallineionic compound from its constituentions, which are assumed to initially be in thegaseous state. It is a measure of the cohesive forces that bind ionic solids. The size of the lattice energy is connected to many otherphysical properties includingsolubility,hardness, andvolatility. Since it generally cannot be measured directly, the lattice energy is usually deduced from experimental data via theBorn–Haber cycle.[1]
The concept of lattice energy was originally applied to the formation of compounds with structures likerocksalt (NaCl) andsphalerite (ZnS) where the ions occupy high-symmetry crystal lattice sites. In the case of NaCl, lattice energy is the energy change of the reaction
which amounts to −786 kJ/mol.[2]
Some chemistry textbooks[3] as well as the widely usedCRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics[4] define lattice energy with the opposite sign, i.e. as the energy required to convert the crystal into infinitely separated gaseous ions invacuum, anendothermic process. Following this convention, the lattice energy of NaCl would be +786 kJ/mol. Both sign conventions are widely used.
The relationship between the lattice energy and the latticeenthalpy at pressure is given by the following equation:
where is the lattice energy (i.e., the molarinternal energy change), is the lattice enthalpy, and the change of molar volume due to the formation of the lattice. Since the molar volume of the solid is much smaller than that of the gases,. The formation of acrystal lattice from ions invacuum must lower the internal energy due to the net attractive forces involved, and so. The term is positive but is relatively small at low pressures, and so the value of the lattice enthalpy is also negative (andexothermic).
The lattice energy of anionic compound depends strongly upon the charges of the ions that comprise the solid, which must attract or repel one another viaCoulomb's Law. More subtly, the relative and absolute sizes of the ions influence.London dispersion forces also exist between ions and contribute to the lattice energy via polarization effects. For ionic compounds made of molecular cations and/or anions, there may also be ion-dipole and dipole-dipole interactions if either molecule has amolecular dipole moment. The theoretical treatments described below are focused on compounds made of atomic cations and anions, and neglect contributions to the internal energy of the lattice from thermalized lattice vibrations.
In 1918[5]Born andLandé proposed that the lattice energy could be derived from theelectric potential of the ionic lattice and a repulsivepotential energy term.[2]
where
TheBorn–Landé equation above shows that the lattice energy of a compound depends principally on two factors:
Barium oxide (BaO), for instance, which has the NaCl structure and therefore the same Madelung constant, has a bond radius of 275 picometers and a lattice energy of −3054 kJ/mol, while sodium chloride (NaCl) has a bond radius of 283 picometers and a lattice energy of −786 kJ/mol. The bond radii are similar but the charge numbers are not, with BaO having charge numbers of (+2,−2) and NaCl having (+1,−1); the Born–Landé equation predicts that the difference in charge numbers is the principal reason for the large difference in lattice energies.
Closely related to this widely used formula is theKapustinskii equation, which can be used as a simpler way of estimating lattice energies where high precision is not required.[2]
For certain ionic compounds, the calculation of the lattice energy requires the explicit inclusion of polarization effects.[7] In these cases thepolarization energyEpol associated with ions on polar lattice sites may be included in the Born–Haber cycle. As an example, one may consider the case ofiron-pyrite FeS2. It has been shown that neglect of polarization led to a 15% difference between theory and experiment in the case of FeS2, whereas including it reduced the error to 2%.[8]
The following table presents a list of lattice energies for some common compounds as well as their structure type.
Compound | Experimental Lattice Energy[1] | Structure type | Comment |
---|---|---|---|
LiF | −1030 kJ/mol | NaCl | difference vs. sodium chloride due to greatercharge/radius for both cation and anion |
NaCl | −786 kJ/mol | NaCl | reference compound for NaCl lattice |
NaBr | −747 kJ/mol | NaCl | weaker lattice vs. NaCl |
NaI | −704 kJ/mol | NaCl | weaker lattice vs. NaBr, soluble in acetone |
CsCl | −657 kJ/mol | CsCl | reference compound for CsCl lattice |
CsBr | −632 kJ/mol | CsCl | trend vs CsCl like NaCl vs. NaBr |
CsI | −600 kJ/mol | CsCl | trend vs CsCl like NaCl vs. NaI |
MgO | −3795 kJ/mol | NaCl | M2+O2− materials have high lattice energies vs. M+O−. MgO is insoluble in all solvents |
CaO | −3414 kJ/mol | NaCl | M2+O2− materials have high lattice energies vs. M+O−. CaO is insoluble in all solvents |
SrO | −3217 kJ/mol | NaCl | M2+O2− materials have high lattice energies vs. M+O−. SrO is insoluble in all solvents |
MgF2 | −2922 kJ/mol | rutile | contrast with Mg2+O2− |
TiO2 | −12150 kJ/mol | rutile | TiO2 (rutile) and some other M4+(O2−)2 compounds arerefractory materials |