| Koppány | |
|---|---|
 Execution of Koppány as depicted in theIlluminated Chronicle | |
| Duke of Somogy | |
| Reign | After 972 - 997 or 998 |
| Predecessor | Zerind the Bald (?) |
| Successor | None |
| Born | Before 965 |
| Died | 997 or 998 NearVeszprém or inSomogy |
| Dynasty | Árpád dynasty |
| Father | Zerind the Bald |
Koppány, also calledCupan was a Hungarian lord in the late 10th century and leader of pagans opposing theChristianization of Hungary. As the duke ofSomogy, he laid claim to the throne based on the traditional idea ofseniority, but was defeated and executed byStephen (born with the pagan name Vajk), son of the previousgrand princeGéza.
According to modern scholars' consensus view, he was a member of the royalÁrpád dynasty. Koppány was the lord of the southern region of Transdanubia during the reign of Géza, who ruled between the early 970s and 997. After the death of Géza, Koppány laid claim to the throne against Géza's devout Christian son,Stephen. His claim was mainly supported by pagan Hungarians, but the royal army routed his army nearVeszprém in 997 or 998. Koppány was killed either in the battle or in his duchy, whither he had fled from the battlefield. His corpse was cut in four pieces to be displayed on the walls of four major strongholds ofHungary,Győr,Veszprém,Esztergom andGyulafehérvár (now Alba Iulia, Romania).
He was the son ofZerind the Bald, according to the 14th-centuryIlluminated Chronicle.[1] Although no primary source mentions that Koppány was descended fromÁlmos orÁrpád, the firstgrand princes of the Hungarians, his attempt to seize the throne shows that he was a member of theÁrpád dynasty.[2] Historians debate which of thefour or five sons of Árpád was Koppány's ancestor.[3] HistoriansGyula Kristó, László Szegfű and György Szabados say that Koppány was probably descended from Árpád's oldest son, Tarkatzus,[4][5] but Kornél Bakay (who identified Zerind the Bald withLadislas the Bald) writes that Árpád's youngest son,Zoltán, was Koppány's forefather.[6] The exact date of Koppány's birth cannot be determined.[7] He was allegedly born between around 950 and 965, because his claim to the throne in 997 shows that he was the oldest member of the Árpád dynasty at that time.[8]
The 14th-centuryIlluminated Chronicle recorded that "Duke Cupan ... held sway over a duchy"[9] (ducatum tenebat, in Latin) during the reign ofGéza, Grand Prince of the Hungarians.[10] Géza, who ascended the throne around 972, was described as a cruel monarch in late 11th-century legends.[11] His fame, along with the fact that only a few late-10th-century members of the royal family are known, suggests that Géza murdered most of his kinsmen, according to historianPál Engel.[12]
Even if Géza carried out a purge among his relatives, Koppány survived it.[12] According to theIlluminated Chronicle, he was "Duke of Symigium" (orSomogy).[12][13] Two later sources—the 15th-centuryOsvát Laskai and an unknown 16th-centuryCarthusian monk—mentioned that Koppány had also been the lord ofZala.[14] Based on the sources, modern historians agree that Koppány administered the southwestern region ofTransdanubia, most likely betweenLake Balaton and the riverDráva.[12][15][16][4] Szabados says that Koppány's father had already dominated Somogy and Zala;[17] in contrast, László Kontler writes that Koppány received his duchy from Géza as a compensation after Géza made his own son,Stephen, his heir.[15]
Géza died in 997.[18] Either in the same or the next year, Koppány revolted against Géza's successor, Stephen, claiming the throne and Géza's widow,Sarolt, for himself.[19][20] His claim to the throne shows that he considered himself the lawful heir to Géza in accordance with the traditional principle ofseniority, but in contrast with the Christian law ofprimogeniture which supported Stephen's right to succeed his father.[18][4] Koppány's effort to marry Géza's widow was also in line with the pagan custom oflevirate marriage, but Christians regarded it as anincestuous attempt.[19][21] Both of Koppány's claims suggest that he was pagan, or he inclined to paganism even if he had been baptised.[4]
In the nearly contemporaneous deed of foundation of thePannonhalma Archabbey, Stephen mentioned that "a certaincounty named Somogy" attempted to dethrone him after his father's death.[22] The late 11th-centuryLesser Legend of King St Stephen declared that "certain noblemen whose hearts were inclined to idle banquets" turned against Stephen after his ascension to the throne.[23][24] Both sources suggest that it was not Stephen who started the war, but that Koppány rebelled against him.[25]
Koppány started to "destroy the castles of Stephen, plunder his properties [and] murder his servants", according to theLesser Legend.[23] The same source also wrote that Koppány laid siege toVeszprém, but Stephen collected his army, marched to the fortress and annihilated Koppány's troops.[23] The German knights who had settled in Hungary after Stephen marriedGisela of Bavaria in 996, played a preeminent role in the victory of the royal army.[26][18] The commander of the royal army,Vecelin, was one of the German immigrants.[27] The deed of foundation of the Pannonhalma monastery even referred to the civil war as a fight between "the Germans and the Hungarians".[22][27]
Koppány was killed by Vecelin in the battle near Veszprém, according to Chapter 64 of theIlluminated Chronicle.[26][28] On the other hand, Chapter 40 of the same source says that Vecelin killed Koppány in Somogy.[29] If the latter report is valid, Koppány fled from the battlefield after his defeat at Veszprém, but the royal army chased and murdered him in his duchy.[30] On Stephen's order, Koppány's body was quartered and its parts were hung over the walls ofEsztergom,Veszprém,Győr andGyulafehérvár (present-day Alba Iulia in Romania).[28]