Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Ise-class battleship

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Class of dreadnought battleship

Ise at speed, shortly after completion
Class overview
NameIse class
Builders
Operators Imperial Japanese Navy
Preceded byFusō class
Succeeded byNagato class
Built1915–1918
In service1917–1945
Completed2
Lost2
General characteristics (as built)
TypeDreadnought battleship
Displacement31,260long tons (31,762 t) (normal)
Length208.18 m (683 ft)
Beam28.65 m (94 ft)
Draught8.93 m (29 ft 4 in)
Installed power
Propulsion4 × shafts; 2 ×steam turbine sets
Speed23knots (43 km/h; 26 mph)
Range9,680 nmi (17,930 km; 11,140 mi) at 14 knots (26 km/h; 16 mph)
Complement1,360
Armament
Armour
General characteristics (after first reconstruction)
Displacement42,001 long tons (42,675 t) (deep load)
Length216 m (708 ft 8 in)
Beam31.75 m (104 ft 2 in)
Draught9.45 m (31 ft)
Installed power
  • 8 × water-tube boilers
  • 80,000 shp (60,000 kW)
Propulsion4 × steam turbines
Speed25 knots (46 km/h; 29 mph)
Range7,870 nmi (14,580 km; 9,060 mi) at 16 knots (30 km/h; 18 mph)
Complement1,376
Armament
ArmourDecks: 51–152 mm (2–6 in)
Aircraft carried3
Aviation facilities1catapult
General characteristics (as hybrid carriers, 1945)
Displacement42,675 long tons (43,360 t) (deep load)
Length219.62 m (720 ft 6 in)
Beam31.71 m (104 ft)
Draught9.03 m (29 ft 8 in)
Range9,500 nmi (17,600 km; 10,900 mi) at 16 knots
Complement1,463
Sensors and
processing systems
Armament
  • 4 × twin 35.6 cm guns
  • 8 × twin 12.7 cm DP guns
  • 31 × triple, 11 × single 25 mm AA guns
  • 6 × 30-round AA rocket launchers
Aircraft carried22
Aviation facilities2 catapults

TheIse-class battleships (伊勢型戦艦,Ise-gata senkan) were a pair ofdreadnought battleships built for theImperial Japanese Navy (IJN) duringWorld War I. Both ships carried supplies for the survivors of theGreat Kantō earthquake in 1923. They were modernized in 1934–1937 with improvements to their armour and machinery and a rebuiltsuperstructure in thepagoda mast style. Afterwards they played a minor role in theSecond Sino-Japanese War.

Despite the expensive reconstructions, both vessels were considered obsolete by the eve of thePacific War, and neither saw significant action in the early years of the war. Following the loss of most of the IJN's largeaircraft carriers during theBattle of Midway in mid-1942, they were rebuilt with aflight deck replacing the rear pair ofgun turrets to give them the ability to operate an air group offloatplanes. A lack of aircraft and qualified pilots, however, meant that they never actually operated their aircraft in combat. While awaiting their air group, thesister ships were occasionally used to ferry troops and material to Japanese bases. They participated in theBattle off Cape Engaño in late 1944, where they decoyed the American carrier fleet supporting theinvasion of Leyte away from the landing beaches. Afterwards both ships were transferred toSoutheast Asia; in early 1945 they participated inOperation Kita, where they transportedpetrol and other strategic materials to Japan. The sisters were then reduced toreserve until they were sunk during American airstrikes in July. After the war they werescrapped in 1946–1947.

Background

[edit]
Office of Naval Intelligence recognition drawing

The design of theIse-class battleships was shaped both by the ongoing international naval arms race and a desire among Japanese naval planners to maintain a fleet of capital ships powerful enough to defeat theUnited States Navy in an encounter in Japanese territorial waters.[1] The IJN's fleet of battleships had proven highly successful in 1905, the last year of theRusso-Japanese War, which culminated in the destruction of the Russian Second and Third Pacific Squadrons at theBattle of Tsushima.[2]

In the aftermath, the Japanese Empire immediately turned its focus to the two remaining rivals for imperial dominance in the Pacific Ocean: Britain and the United States.[1]Satō Tetsutarō, a Japanese Navy admiral and military theorist, speculated that conflict would inevitably arise between Japan and at least one of its two main rivals. To that end, he called for the Japanese Navy to maintain a fleet with at least 70% as many capital ships as the US Navy.[3] This ratio, Satō theorized, would enable the Imperial Japanese Navy to defeat the US Navy in one major battle in Japanese waters in any eventual conflict.[3] Accordingly, the 1907 Imperial Defence Policy called for the construction of a battle fleet of eight modern battleships, 20,000 long tons (20,321 t) each, and eight modernarmoured cruisers, 18,000 long tons (18,289 t) each.[4] This was the genesis of theEight-Eight Fleet Program, the development of a cohesive battle line of sixteen capital ships.[5]

The launch ofHMS Dreadnought in 1906 by the Royal Navy raised the stakes,[6] and complicated Japan's plans. Displacing 17,900 long tons (18,187 t) and armed with ten 12-inch (30.5 cm) guns,Dreadnought rendered all existing battleships obsolete by comparison.[7] The launch of thebattlecruiserHMS Invincible the following year was a further setback for Japan's quest for parity.[8] When the two newSatsuma-class battleships and twoTsukuba-class armoured cruisers, launched by 1911, were outclassed by their British counterparts, the Eight-Eight Fleet Program was restarted.[9]

The first battleships built for the renewed Eight-Eight Fleet Program were the two dreadnoughts of theKawachi class, ordered in 1907 and laid down in 1908. In 1910, the Navy put forward a request to theDiet (parliament) to secure funding for the entirety of the program at once. Because of economic constraints, only four battlecruisers and a single battleship of theFusō class were ultimately approved by the Diet. Three moreFusō-class ships (Yamashiro,Ise, andHyūga) were approved[10] and all three were ordered in April 1913. WhileYamashiro was laid down later that year, the IJN lacked the funding to proceed with the construction ofIse andHyūga until the Diet authorized additional funding for the ships in July 1914.[11]

Design and description

[edit]
Ise underway during the 1920s

The progress ofFusō's construction, while the IJN waited for the funding to be released and foreign developments, caused the IJN to reassess theFusō-class design. The distribution of the midships gun turrets was the most obvious flaw as they complicated the protection of the midshipsmagazine and exposed more of the ship to the blast effects of the guns when they fired. Another issue was that Japanese sailors had problems maintaining a high rate of fire with the 45.36-kilogram (100 lb) shells used in the manually loaded 152-millimetre (6 in) secondary guns used in theFusō class and earlier designs. To resolve this issue, the IJN designed a smaller 140-millimetre (5.5 in) gun that offset its lighter shell weight with a higher rate of fire. It also decided that the barbette armour of the earlier ships was too thin and wanted a modest increase in speed to partially counter the higher speeds of the latest foreign ships like the BritishQueen Elizabeth-class battleships and RussianBorodino-class battlecruisers. For financial reasons more powerful engines could not be ordered so the new design was lengthened slightly and the boiler rooms enlarged to increase speed by 0.5knots (0.93 km/h; 0.58 mph) to 23 knots (43 km/h; 26 mph). To save weight the forecastle deck was shortened so that the lower midships gun turret was lower than in theFusō class. This reduced the crew's accommodations despite a significant increase in the crew's numbers and naval historianFukui Shizuo believed that these ships had the worst habitability of any Japanesecapital ship. The final design was designated A-92 by the IJN.[12]

The ships had a length of 208.18 metres (683 ft)overall, abeam of 28.65 metres (94 ft) and adraught of 8.93 metres (29 ft 4 in) atdeep load.[13] Theydisplaced 31,260long tons (31,762 t) at normal load and 36,500 long tons (37,086 t) at deep load, roughly 650 long tons (660 t) more than the preceding class. Their crew consisted of 1,360 officers and enlisted men.[14] They had ametacentric height of 1.74 metres (5 ft 9 in) at deep load.[15]

During the ships' modernization during the 1930s, their forward superstructures were enlarged with multiple platforms added to their tripodforemasts. Both ships were also giventorpedo bulges to improve their underwater protection and to compensate for the weight of the additional armour. In addition, their sterns were lengthened by 7.62 metres (25 ft). These changes increased their overall length to 213.8 metres (701 ft), their beam to 31.75 metres (104 ft 2 in) and their draft to 9.45 metres (31 ft).[16] Their displacement increased over 5,000 long tons (5,100 t) to 42,001 long tons (42,675 t) at deep load.[17] The crew now numbered 1,376 officers and enlisted men.[18]

Propulsion

[edit]

TheIse-class ships had two sets of direct-drivesteam turbines, each of which drove two propeller shafts with 3.43-metre (11 ft 3 in) propellers. The high-pressure turbines drove the wing shafts while the low-pressure turbines drove the inner shafts. The turbines were designed to produce a total of 40,000 or 45,000shaft horsepower (30,000 or 34,000 kW) (Hyūga andIse respectively), using steam provided by 24Kampon Ro Gōwater-tube boilers at working pressures of 13–16.9 kg/cm2 (1,275–1,657 kPa; 185–240 psi). Both ships comfortably exceeded their designed speed of 23 knots (43 km/h; 26 mph) during theirsea trials;Ise reached 23.6 knots (43.7 km/h; 27.2 mph) from 56,498 shp (42,131 kW) andHyūga exceeded that with 24 knots (44 km/h; 28 mph) from 63,211 shp (47,136 kW).[19] Each of the boilers consumed a mixture of coal and oil and the ships had a stowage capacity of 4,607 long tons (4,681 t) of coal and 1,411 long tons (1,434 t) offuel oil, which gave them a range of 9,680nautical miles (17,930 km; 11,140 mi) at a speed of 14 knots (26 km/h; 16 mph).[18]Ise andHyūga had threegenerators of 150 kilowatts (200 hp) capacity and two 250-kilowatt (340 hp)turbo generators at 225 volts.[20]

During their 1930s modernization, the boilers on each ship were replaced by eight new Kampon oil-fired boilers, fitted into the former aftboiler room, and the forwardfunnel was removed.[18] The turbines were replaced by four geared Kampon turbines with a designed output of 80,000 shp (60,000 kW) intended to increase their speed to 24.5 knots (45.4 km/h; 28.2 mph). On her trials,Ise reached a top speed of 25.26 knots (46.78 km/h; 29.07 mph) from 81,050 shp (60,440 kW).[13] The fuel storage of the ships was increased to a total of 5,113 long tons (5,195 t) of fuel oil that gave them a range of 7,870 nautical miles (14,580 km; 9,060 mi) at a speed of 16 knots (30 km/h; 18 mph).[18]

Armament

[edit]

The twelve 45-calibre35.6 cm (14 in) Type 41 guns of theIse class were mounted in three pairs of twin-gun,superfiring turrets. Numbered one through six from front to rear, each turret weighed 655 long tons (666 t). The hydraulically powered turrets had an elevation capability of −5/+20 degrees. The guns had a rate of fire of 1.5–2 rounds per minute and could be loaded at any angle between −3 and +20 degrees. In 1921 the elevation was increased to +30 degrees and then to +43 degrees during their mid-1930s modernization,[21] except for No. 6 turret as its supporting structure could not be lowered. The recoil mechanism of the guns was also changed from a hydraulic to a pneumatic system, which allowed for a faster firing cycle of the main guns.[22]

By World War II, the guns used Type 91armour-piercing, capped shells. Each of these shells weighed 673.5 kilograms (1,485 lb) and was fired at amuzzle velocity of 770–775 metres per second (2,530–2,540 ft/s). They had a maximum range of 25,000 metres (27,000 yd) at +20 degrees of elevation and 35,450 meters (38,770 yd) at +43 degrees after modernization. Also available was a 625-kilogram (1,378 lb)high-explosive shell that had a muzzle velocity of 805 metres per second (2,640 ft/s). A special Type 3Sanshikidan incendiaryshrapnel shell was developed in the 1930s for anti-aircraft use.[23]

The ships'secondary armament consisted of twenty 50-calibre14-centimetre (5.5 in) Type 3 guns. Eighteen of these were mounted incasemates in theforecastle and superstructure and the remaining pair were mounted on the deck above them and protected bygun shields. They had a maximum elevation of +20 degrees which gave them a range of 16,300 metres (17,800 yd).[24] Each gun had a rate of fire of up to 10 rounds per minute.[25]Anti-aircraft defence was provided by four 40-calibre3rd Year Type 8-centimetre[Note 1]AA guns in single mounts. The 7.62-centimetre (3 in) high-angle guns had a maximum elevation of +75 degrees, and had a rate of fire of 13 to 20 rounds per minute. They fired a 6 kg (13 lb) projectile with a muzzle velocity of 680 m/s (2,200 ft/s) to a maximum height of 7,500 metres (24,600 ft).[26] The ships were also fitted with six submerged 53.3-centimetre (21 in)torpedo tubes, three on eachbroadside.[27] They carried twelve to eighteen6th Year Type torpedoes[28] which had a 200-kilogram (440 lb)warhead. They had three settings for range and speed: 15,000 metres (16,000 yd) at 26 knots (48 km/h; 30 mph), 10,000 metres (11,000 yd) at 32 knots (59 km/h; 37 mph), or 7,000 metres (7,700 yd) at 37 knots (69 km/h; 43 mph).[29]

A twin-gun 127 mm mount on board the battleshipNagato. The mounts used on board theIse class were the same model.

In 1931–1933 the AA guns were replaced with eight 40-calibre12.7 cm (5 in) Type 89dual-purpose guns, fitted on both sides of the forward superstructures in four twin-gun mounts.[30] When firing at surface targets, the guns had a range of 14,700 metres (16,100 yd); they had aceiling of 9,440 metres (30,970 ft) at their maximum elevation of +90 degrees. Their maximum rate of fire was 14 rounds a minute, but their sustained rate of fire was around eight rounds per minute.[31] Two twin-gun mounts for license-builtVickerstwo-pounder (4-centimetre (1.6 in)) light AA guns were also added.[32] These guns had a maximum elevation of +80 degrees and a rate of fire of 200 rounds per minute.[33] The pair of 14 cm guns on the upper deck were removed at this time.[32]

During the mid-1930s reconstruction, the torpedo tubes were removed and the Vickers two-pounders were replaced by twenty license-builtHotchkiss2.5-centimetre (1 in) Type 96 light AA guns in 10 twin-gun mounts.[32] This was the standard Japanese light AA gun during World War II, but it suffered from severe design shortcomings that rendered it a largely ineffective weapon. According to historian Mark Stille, the twin and triple mounts "lacked sufficient speed in train or elevation; the gun sights were unable to handle fast targets; the gun exhibited excessive vibration; the magazine was too small, and, finally, the gun produced excessive muzzle blast".[34] These guns had an effective range of 1,500–3,000 metres (1,600–3,300 yd), and an effective ceiling of 5,500 metres (18,000 ft) at an elevation of 85 degrees. The maximum effective rate of fire was only between 110 and 120 rounds per minute because of the frequent need to change the fifteen-round magazines.[35] In addition the forward pair of 14 cm guns in the forecastle were removed at this time and the maximum elevation of the remaining guns was increased to +30 degrees.[32]

Protection

[edit]

TheIse-class ships'waterlineprotective belt had a maximum thickness of 299 mm (11.8 in) ofVickers cemented armour amidships; below it was astrake of 100 mm (3.9 in) armour. The upper armoureddeck consisted of two layers of high-tensile steel 55 mm (2.2 in) thick and the lower armoured deck also consisted of two layers of high-tensile steel, but only 30 mm (1.2 in) thick. The sides of this deck sloped downwards to meet the bottom of the lower strake of the belt armour. The ends of the belt armour were closed off bybulkheads that ranged in thickness from 203 to 102 mm (8 to 4 in).[36] The turrets were protected with an armour thickness of 254 mm (10 in) on the face and 76 mm on the roof.[37] The casemate armour was 149 mm (5.9 in) thick and that of thebarbettes was 299 mm thick rather than the originally planned 305 mm. The sides of theconning tower were 305 mm thick.[38][Note 2]

TheIse class were the only Japanese battleships to place the powder magazine above the shell magazine as the IJN wished to put as much space as possible between the highly flammablepropellant andmine and torpedo detonations. The danger from plunging shells at long distances was not appreciated until the fatal magazine explosions of three British battlecruisers during the 1916Battle of Jutland graphically demonstrated the point. To further protect the magazines the depth of thedouble bottom was increased to a total of 3.58 metres (11 ft 9 in) underneath the barbettes and magazines. Additionally, the vessels contained 660 watertight compartments to preserve buoyancy in the event of battle damage.[39] In addition to the torpedo bulge added when the ships were modernized, the deck armour over the machinery and magazines was increased to a total thickness of 140 mm. Inside the original skin of the ships, twotorpedo bulkheads were also added[40] and the turret roofs were increased to a total of 152 millimetres (6 in) of armour.[41]

Fire control and sensors

[edit]

While the details of the ships' fire-control instruments are not fully available, it is known that the ships were fitted with afire-control director after completion. No computer was fitted at that time and data from the rangefinders had to be processed manually. Turrets 2, 3, and 5 were built with imported 6-metre (19 ft 8 in)Bausch & Lombrangefinders. These were felt to be inferior to the BritishBarr & Stroud instruments used on other ships and were removed in 1920. They were replaced by either the British rangefinders or domestically built instruments of 6 or 8 metres (19 ft 8 in or 26 ft 3 in) length. In the late 1920s the fire-control systems were upgraded and additional platforms were added to the foremast to accommodate them. A pair of directors for the 12.7 cm AA guns were added, one on each side of the forward superstructure, in the early 1930s. The fire-control systems were again upgraded in the mid-1930s and directors were added for the 25 mm AA guns.[42] Both ships had 10-metre (32 ft 10 in) rangefinders installed at the top of the pagoda mast at that time.Type 21 air-searchradars were installed aboard the sisters in mid-1942.[32]

Aircraft

[edit]

Ise was briefly fitted with an aircraftflying-off platform for aMitsubishi 1MF3 fighter on Turret No. 2 in 1927. It was replaced by a platform on Turret No. 5 for aYokosuka E1Yreconnaissancefloatplane in 1928–1929.[43] Acatapult and a collapsible 4-tonne (3.9-long-ton)crane were fitted on the stern during the mid-1930s modernization, and the ships were equipped to operate three floatplanes, although nohangar was provided. The initialNakajima E4N2 biplanes were replaced byNakajima E8N2 biplanes in 1938.[32]

Conversion to hybrid carriers

[edit]
An American late-war drawing of theIse class, showing variations in the reported configuration of the catapults

Thesinking of the British capital shipsPrince of Wales andRepulse by Japanese land-based aircraft on 10 December 1941 led the IJN to realize that battleships could not operate in the face of enemy aircraft and required friendly air support to protect them. The loss of four Japanese aircraft carriers during the Battle of Midway in June 1942 severely limited the ability of the IJN to provide any air cover and alternatives were sought. Earlier proposals to convert one or more battleships into carriers had been made and rejected at the beginning of the war, but they were revived after Midway. Plans for more elaborate conversions were rejected on the grounds of expense and - more critically - time, and the IJN settled on removing the rear pair of turrets and replacing them with a flight deck equipped with two catapults to launch floatplanes. TheIse-class ships were selected for the conversion becauseHyūga had suffered an explosion in Turret No. 5 in early May that virtually destroyed the turret and Turret No. 6 could not elevate to the full +43 degrees deemed necessary for the long-range engagement anticipated by the IJN. TheFusōs were scheduled to follow once the first two were completed.[44]

Armament changes

[edit]

The rear turrets, the barbettes and their supporting structures were removed beginning in early 1943 and the openings in the middle deck were covered by 152 mm plates salvaged from the turret armour. All of the 14 cm guns were removed and the casemate openings sealed off. Four additional twin 12.7 cm mounts were added, one pair abreast the funnel and the other abreast the conning tower. The original ten twin 25 mm gun mounts were replaced by triple mounts and nine new triple mounts were added, a total of 57 guns. Two each Type 94 and Type 95 AA directors were added to control the additional guns. The ammunition for these new guns was stored in the magazines originally used for the 14 cm guns and for Turret No. 5.[45] During 1944, the ships' AA defences were reinforced with an additional dozen triple and eleven single 25 mm gun mounts, for a total of 104 barrels, and a pair ofType 13early warning radars were added. In September six 30-round AA rocket launchers were added on the sides of the flight deck.[32]

Flight deck arrangements

[edit]

A 70-metre-long (229 ft 8 in) flight deck was built above the stern and stretched forward to the rebuilt aft superstructure. The flight deck was 29 metres (95 ft 2 in) wide at its forward end and 13 metres (42 ft 8 in) at the stern. It overhung the stern and increased the overall length of the ships to 219.62 metres (720 ft 6 in). A pair of rotating gunpowder-propelled catapults were fitted on the sides of the hull, forward of the aft superstructure where they partially restricted thearc of fire of the two amidships turrets. They could launch aircraft up to 4,600 kilograms (10,100 lb) in weight and required 30 seconds to launch each aircraft. The flight deck had eight permanent storage positions connected by rails to the catapults and the hydraulically operatedaircraft lift that brought the aircraft up from the hangar below on the trolleys used to move the floatplanes about. Two aircraft were intended to be stowed on the catapults and three more in temporary positions on the flight deck for a total of thirteen.[46]

The 40-metre-long (131 ft 3 in) hangar was 20 metres (65 ft 7 in) wide forward and 11 metres (36 ft 1 in) at the rear. It was 6 metres (19 ft 8 in) high and designed to stow nine aircraft. It was fitted withfire fighting foam andcarbon dioxide dispensers as a result of wartime experience. The T-shaped lift was 12.1 metres (39 ft 8 in) wide at its forward end and 6.6 metres (21 ft 8 in) wide at its aft end. It was also 12.1 metres long and had a capacity of 6 tonnes (5.9 long tons).Petrol storage tanks with a capacity of 76 tonnes (75 long tons) were installed in the former magazine of Turret No. 6 to provide each aircraft with enough fuel for threesorties. To recover the aircraft the collapsible crane formerly on the stern was moved up to the port side of the flight deck. Another crane was intended on the starboard side, but it was never fitted.[47]

The ships had an air group of 11 each ofYokosuka D4Ydive bombers (Allied reporting name "Judy") andAichi E16A reconnaissance aircraft (Allied reporting name "Paul"). Both aircraft had development problems and neither air group ever had all of its intended aircraft. Coupled with a shortage of trained pilots, neither ship ever used its aircraft during combat.[48]

Other changes

[edit]
Hyūga running her sea trials on 23 August 1943

After the loss of thefast battleshipHiei at theNaval Battle of Guadalcanal in late 1942 to rudder damage, the IJN decided to reinforce the protection of the steering compartment and to create an auxiliary steering compartment. The protection of the former was strengthened by the addition of aconcrete wall at least 1 metre (3 ft 3 in) in thickness and some of the armour removed from the turrets was used to protect the latter. The double bottom below the former positions of aft turrets was converted to hold fuel oil; this increased the ships' endurance to 9,500 nautical miles (17,600 km; 10,900 mi) at a speed of 16 knots.[49] A pair ofType 22 surface-search radars were also fitted during the conversion.[32]

The removal of the secondary armament, the rear turrets and their supporting structures was generally compensated by the addition of the flight deck, hangar, AA guns and more fuel, and the metacentric height increased 0.23 metres (9.1 in) to 2.81 metres (9 ft 3 in) at full load as a result of the reduction in the displacement by over 2,000 tonnes (2,000 long tons) to 40,444 tonnes (39,805 long tons). This also reduced the draught to 9.03 metres (29 ft 8 in). The overhang of the flight deck at the stern increased the overall length to 219.62 metres (720 ft 6 in) and the beam was slightly reduced to 31.71 metres (104 ft 0 in).[49]

Ships

[edit]
Construction data
ShipKanjiBuilder[50]Laid down[50]Launched[50]Completed[50]Fate
Ise伊勢Kawasaki,Kobe10 May 19152 November 191615 December 1917Scrapped in place, 9 October 1946 – 4 July 1947[43]
Hyūga日向Mitsubishi,Nagasaki6 May 191527 January 191730 April 1918Scrapped, 2 July 1946 – 4 July 1947[51]

Service

[edit]

Upon commissioning, thesister ships were assigned to the 1st Battleship Division of the1st Fleet.Hyūga had an explosion in one of her main gun turrets that killed 11 men and injured 25 in 1919; the following year she accidentally collided with and sank aschooner, losing two crewmen. Before the start of the Pacific War, both ships frequently exercised off the coasts of the Soviet Union, Korea and China in addition to training in Japanese waters.Ise hostedEdward,Prince of Wales, and hisaide-de-camp LieutenantLouis Mountbatten in 1922 during the prince's visit to Japan. InKorea Bay when the 1923 Great Kantō earthquake struck, they sailed toKyushu where they loaded supplies for the victims on 4 September. Together with two other battleships and a pair oflight cruisers,Ise sank thedestroyerYayoi in 1926 during gunnery practice.Ise's AA armament was upgraded in 1931 andHyūga's two years later. The latter ship was modernized in 1934–36 andIse in 1935–37, both atKure Naval Arsenal. During the Second Sino-Japanese War, the sisters frequently patrolled the Chinese coast in support of the blockade imposed by Japan. In August 1937Hyūga ferried twobattalions ofSpecial Naval Landing Forces toPort Arthur. Three years later, she served as theflagship for the Emperor of the puppet state ofManchukuo,Henry Pu-yi, during his state visit to Japan in June 1940. On 15 November the ships were transferred to the 2nd Battleship Division of the 1st Fleet. The sisters were refitted in late 1940 in preparation for war, which included the fitting of externaldegaussing coils and additional AA directors.[32]

World War II

[edit]
Ise underway after her modernization

When Japan began the Pacific War on 8 December,[Note 3] the sisters sortied for theBonin Islands with four other battleships and thelight carrierHōshō as distant cover for the fleet attackingPearl Harbor, and returned six days later.[32] On 11 March 1942Ise andHyūga sortied from their anchorage atHashirajima to join the unsuccessful search for the American carrier force that had attackedMarcus Island a week earlier. Similarly they pursued but did not catch the American carriers that had launched theDoolittle Raid on 18 April.[52]

During gunnery training on 5 May, there was a premature detonation in the left gun ofHyūga's Turret No. 5 that disabled both guns and killed 51 crewmen. Both aft magazines were flooded to douse the resulting fire and save the ship. She received temporary repairs during which the turret was removed and replaced by a circular armour plate on which three triple 25 mm gun mounts were positioned. On 11 May a valve inIse's No. 2 engine room stuck in the open position and flooded the engine room. While under repair at Kure, both ships received prototype Type 21 radars.[32] Commanded by Vice-AdmiralShirō Takasu, the 2nd Battleship Division set sail with the Aleutian Support Group on 28 May, at the same time that most of the Imperial Fleet began an attack onMidway Island (Operation MI).[53][54]

They returned home on 14 June and the IJN began preliminary planning to replace the lost carriers with hybrid carriers converted from battleships. The sisters were selected for conversion and detached from the division on 14 July in preparation. They remained on "standby alert" until the actual conversions began.[32]Ise was converted at Kure Naval Arsenal from 23 February to 5 September 1943 andHyūga atSasebo Naval Arsenal from 2 May to 30 November.[55]

After completing her sea trials,Ise was attached to theImperial Japanese Naval Academy atEtajima and ferried troops and munitions to the naval base atTruk in October. In November the ship beganworking up, joined by the newly completedHyūga the following month, and both rejoined the 2nd Battleship Division. On 1 May 1944, the sisters were transferred toRear AdmiralMatsuda Chiaki's reformedFourth Carrier Division of the3rd Fleet.[32] The division's634th Naval Air Group was formed that same day and conducted its first catapult launches in late June.[56]

Battle off Cape Engaño

[edit]
Ise photographed by American aircraft during the Battle off Cape Engaño

In October 1944, the two ships were involved in theBattle off Cape Engaño. Shortages of aircraft and serviceability problems greatly retarded pilot training and the ships only had a total of 17 D4Ys and 18 E16As on hand on 1 October; of these, only 6 and 16 were operational, respectively.[57] The Japanese plan for the defence of the Philippines envisioned that the surviving carriers would be used to lure the American carrier forces away from the invasion area to a position where the carriers could be attacked by land-based aircraft, while the transports would be attacked by the rest of the IJN.[58] The other carrier air groups were not in much better shape and the Japanese decided to retain the aircraft ashore for use against the American carriers. The Fourth Carrier Division, including the sisters, fleet carrierZuikaku and the light carriersZuihō,Chitose, andChiyoda, was assigned to the Northern Force under the command ofVice AdmiralJisaburō Ozawa. TheIse-class sisters sailed fromYashima on 20 October. Ozawa's carrier group was a decoy force, divested of all but 108 aircraft, intended to lure the American fleet away from protecting the transports at the landing beaches. On the morning of 24 October, the group was facing a United States Navy force that included ten carriers containing 600–1,000 aircraft.[59] Ozawa launched the bulk of his few aircraft to attack the American carriers as a distraction. They inflicted no damage and caused the Americans to search in the direction from which they had attacked. The Americans finally spotted the Japanese carriers at 16:40, some 200 miles (320 km) east ofCape Engaño, the northeastern tip ofLuzon. The American carriers were spread out and it was very late in the day to launch anairstrike, so AdmiralWilliam Halsey, commander of theThird Fleet decided to mass his carriers in a position to attack the following morning. Ozawa reversed course during the night, correctly believing that the Americans would follow him north.[60]

Although they had lost contact during the night, the Americans did find the Japanese carriers at 07:35. They had already launched an airstrike of 180 aircraft that was orbiting 50 miles (80 km) ahead of the American carriers while waiting for the Japanese ships to be located.[61] This was just the first of a total of five airstrikes that the Americans launched that day. The sisters were not heavily engaged by the early airstrikes, which instead focused on Ozawa's fleet and light carriers, sinking carriersZuikaku,Chitose andZuihō, and the destroyerAkizuki, while the carrierChiyoda and the cruiserTama were crippled.Ise claimed to have shot down five attacking dive bombers from the second wave and one small bomb detonated on Turret No. 2.Hyūga was lightly damaged by near misses that ruptured some hull plating in her bulge and peppered her superstructure with splinters. She took on a 5-degreelist that was quickly corrected before she was ordered to towChiyoda to safety. Her attempt was unsuccessful andChiyoda had to be abandoned,[32] eventually sunk by additional USN cruiser shellfire and destroyer-launched torpedoes.[62]

Ise was attacked by 80-odd aircraft from the fourth wave, but they failed to inflict any serious damage. She dodged 11 torpedoes and was only hit by a bomb once, on the bulge outboard of the port catapult. Some 34 other bombs near missed her, spraying her with splinters and ruptured some hull plates that contaminated some fuel oil and caused leaks in her port boiler rooms. While an exact total of her casualties is not available, it has been estimated that 5 men were killed and some 111–121 crewmen were wounded during this attack.[43]Hyūga was unsuccessfully attacked by an American submarine at 18:43. Around 19:00 Ozawa learned about a force of destroyers and cruisers that drove off the Japanese destroyers rescuing survivors from some of the carriers lost earlier in the day and sankChiyoda. He ordered the Fourth Carrier Division to reverse course and engage the Americans, but the battleships were unable to find them, and Ozawa ordered them to reverse course and head forAmami Ōshima. When they arrived on 27 October, Ozawa transferred toHyūga and hoisted his flag aboard her. While en route for Kure, the division was unsuccessfully attacked by another submarine.[32]

Late war

[edit]
Ise on fire during the attack on 28 July

In early November the catapults were removed from both ships, and they loaded troops and munitions later that month. While en route they were diverted to the Spratly Islands upon reports of heavy air raids atManila. After off-loading their cargo, they sailed forLingga Island, near Singapore, on 20 November. They transferred toCam Ranh Bay,French Indochina, andHyūga became flagship of the5th Fleet there on 14 December. The division sailed for Singapore on 30 December and Vice AdmiralKiyohide Shima transferred his flag to the light cruiserŌyodo on arrival there the following day. The division continued onwards to Lingga. Its planned return to Japan was delayed by attacks by the American Third Fleet on targets in Indochina and southern China that sank twooil tankers that were intended to refuel the division.[32]

The IJN then decided to use the sisters and their escorts to bring a load of petrol, rubber, tin and other strategic minerals back to Japan after the American carriers departed theSouth China Sea (Operation Kita). They loaded their cargoes beginning on 6 February at Singapore and departed four days later. Also carrying some 1,150 oilfield workers, they were escorted byŌyodo and three destroyers.[32] Decrypted Japanese radio signals revealed the Japanese plan to theAllies, and 15 submarines were positioned along their anticipated route in an attempt to intercept and sink the ships. An additional 11 were moved into position while the group was en route, but only three were ultimately able to attack. None of them were successful[63] before the Japanese reached Kure on 20 February. The Fourth Carrier Division was disbanded on 1 March and the sisters were reduced to 1st rank reserve ships. On 19 March Kure was attacked by aircraft fromTask Force 58 andHyūga was hit three times by bombs that killed 37 men and wounded 52. Her gunners claimed to have shot down one American dive bomber during the attack.Ise was hit twice during the attack, but her casualties, if any, are unknown.[32]

The wreck ofHyūga after the July attacks

The ships were turned intofloating AA batteries over the next several months although it availed them little when they were attacked again byAmerican carrier aircraft in July. On the 24thIse was struck by five bombs and near missed multiple times; all told she lost 50 crewmen killed and many others wounded. The bombs started numerous leaks andIse began to settle by the bow, although she was returned to an evenkeel after three days pumping.Hyūga was a primary focus of the attack and she received 10 direct hits and up to 30 near misses. She was badly damaged with some 200-odd crewmen killed and 600 wounded during the attack. She slowly foundered over the next two days and was not attacked when the Americans returned four days later. This time it wasIse's turn and she was struck 11 or more times with many near misses that put her on the bottom in shallow water with a 15 degree list. The sisters were struck off theNavy List in November and their wrecks were scrapped after the war.[32]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^These guns were license-built Britishquick-firing (QF)QF 12-pounder guns. While the Japanese designated them as 8 cm, their actual calibre was 76.2 mm.[26]
  2. ^Sources contradict each other regarding the armour scheme of these ships. Lengerer, the most recent researcher using Japanese sources, has been followed rather than older sources.
  3. ^Japan Standard Time is 19 hours ahead ofHawaiian Standard Time, so in Japan, theattack on Pearl Harbor happened on 8 December.

Footnotes

[edit]
  1. ^abStille, p. 4
  2. ^Evans & Peattie, p. 124
  3. ^abEvans & Peattie, p. 143
  4. ^Evans & Peattie, p. 150
  5. ^Stille, p. 7
  6. ^Evans & Peattie, p. 152
  7. ^Sandler, p. 90
  8. ^Evans & Peattie, p. 154
  9. ^Evans & Peattie, p. 159
  10. ^Evans & Peattie, pp. 159, 166
  11. ^Lengerer 2011, pp. 13, 19
  12. ^Lengerer 2011, pp. 16–17, 19–20, 33–34
  13. ^abLengerer March 2007, p. 9
  14. ^Jentschura, Jung & Mickel, pp. 25–26
  15. ^Lengerer 2011, p. 40
  16. ^Chesneau, p. 171
  17. ^Lengerer 2009, p. 51
  18. ^abcdJentschura, Jung & Mickel, p. 26
  19. ^Lengerer 2011, pp. 21–22
  20. ^Lengerer March 2007, p. 8
  21. ^Lengerer 2011, pp. 24–26, 30
  22. ^Lengerer March 2007, pp. 15–17
  23. ^Campbell, pp. 175, 183
  24. ^Lengerer 2011, pp. 33–34
  25. ^Campbell, p. 190
  26. ^abCampbell, p. 198
  27. ^Gardiner & Gray, p. 230
  28. ^Lengerer 2011, p. 35
  29. ^Campbell, p. 204
  30. ^Lengerer March 2007, p. 12
  31. ^Campbell, pp. 192–93
  32. ^abcdefghijklmnopqrsHackett, Kingsepp & Ahlberg,Ise and Hackett & Kingsepp,Hyūga
  33. ^Campbell, p. 74
  34. ^Stille, p. 11
  35. ^Campbell, p. 200
  36. ^Lengerer 2006, pp. 28–30; Lengerer 2011, p. 36
  37. ^Lengerer March 2007, p. 16
  38. ^Lengerer 2006, pp. 28–30
  39. ^Lengerer 2011, pp. 36, 38
  40. ^Whitley, pp. 194–95
  41. ^Lengerer March 2007, p. 17
  42. ^Lengerer 2011, pp. 28, 30–31, 41
  43. ^abcHackett, Kingsepp & Ahlberg
  44. ^Lengerer 2009, pp. 39–40
  45. ^Lengerer 2009, p. 43
  46. ^Lengerer 2009, pp. 43–44, 50
  47. ^Lengerer 2009, pp. 45–49
  48. ^Lengerer 2009, pp. 51–53
  49. ^abLengerer 2009, pp. 43, 49–51
  50. ^abcdWhitley, p. 193
  51. ^Hackett & Kingsepp
  52. ^Whitley, pp. 197, 199
  53. ^Rohwer, pp. 168–69
  54. ^Parshall & Tully, pp. 46, 454
  55. ^Lengerer 2009, p. 42
  56. ^Lengerer 2009, pp. 51–52
  57. ^Lengerer 2009, p. 52
  58. ^Polmar & Genda, p. 415
  59. ^Morison 1958, pp. 191, 193.
  60. ^Polmar & Genda, pp. 427–428
  61. ^Polmar & Genda, pp. 428–429
  62. ^Jentschura, Jung & Mickel, p. 57
  63. ^Blair, pp. 846–49

References

[edit]
  • Blair, Clay (2001).Silent Victory: The U.S. Submarine War Against Japan. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press.ISBN 978-1-55750-217-9.
  • Campbell, John (1985).Naval Weapons of World War II. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press.ISBN 0-87021-459-4.
  • Chesneau, Roger, ed. (1980).Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1922–1946. Greenwich, UK: Conway Maritime Press.ISBN 0-85177-146-7.
  • Evans, David &Peattie, Mark R. (1997).Kaigun: Strategy, Tactics, and Technology in the Imperial Japanese Navy, 1887–1941. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press.ISBN 0-87021-192-7.
  • Gardiner, Robert & Gray, Randal, eds. (1985).Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1906–1921. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press.ISBN 0-87021-907-3.
  • Hackett, Bob & Kingsepp, Sander (2011)."IJN Hyuga: Tabular Record of Movement". Combinedfleet.com. Retrieved15 June 2013.
  • Hackett, Bob; Kingsepp, Sander & Ahlberg, Lars (2012)."IJN Ise: Tabular Record of Movement". Combinedfleet.com. Retrieved15 May 2013.
  • Jentschura, Hansgeorg; Jung, Dieter & Mickel, Peter (1977).Warships of the Imperial Japanese Navy, 1869-1945. Annapolis, Maryland:Naval Institute Press.ISBN 0-87021-893-X.
  • Layman, R. D. & McLaughlin, Stephen (1991).The Hybrid Warship: The Amalgamation of Big Guns and Aircraft. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press.ISBN 1-55750-374-5.
  • Lengerer, Hans (September 2006). Ahlberg, Lars (ed.). "Battleships Ise and Hyûga – Part I".Contributions to the History of Imperial Japanese Warships (Paper I):4–30.(subscription required)(contact the editor at lars.ahlberg@halmstad.mail.postnet.se for subscription information)
  • Lengerer, Hans (March 2007). Ahlberg, Lars (ed.). "Battleships Ise and Hyûga – Part II".Contributions to the History of Imperial Japanese Warships (Paper II):4–17.(subscription required)
  • Lengerer, Hans (2009). "Ise and Hyûga: The IJN's Hybrid Battleship-Carriers". In Jordan, John (ed.).Warship 2009. London: Conway. pp. 39–54.ISBN 978-1-84486-089-0.
  • Lengerer, Hans (March 2011). Ahlberg, Lars (ed.). "The Japanese 14"-Gunned Battleships: An Abstract of the Fusō and Ise Classes – Part I".Contributions to the History of Imperial Japanese Warships (Paper X):5–42.(subscription required)
  • Morison, Samuel Eliot (1958).Leyte: June 1944 – January 1945.History of United States Naval Operations in World War II. Vol. XII. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.OCLC 1035611842.OL 24388559M.
  • Polmar, Norman &Genda, Minoru (2006).Aircraft Carriers: A History of Carrier Aviation and Its Influence on World Events. Vol. 1,1909–1945. Washington, D.C.: Potomac Books.ISBN 1-57488-663-0.
  • Rohwer, Jurgen (2005).Chronology of the War at Sea, 1939–1945: The Naval History of World War Two. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press.ISBN 1-59114-119-2.
  • Sandler, Stanley (2004).Battleships: An Illustrated History of their Impact. Weapons and Warfare. Santa Barbara, California: ABC Clio.ISBN 1-85109-410-5.
  • Stille, Mark (2008).Imperial Japanese Navy Battleships 1941–45. New Vanguard. Vol. 146. Botley, Oxford, UK: Osprey Publishing.ISBN 978-1-84603-280-6.
  • Whitley, M. J. (1998).Battleships of World War II. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press.ISBN 1-55750-184-X.

External links

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toIse class battleship.
Japanese naval ship classes of World War I
Seaplane carriers
Dreadnoughtbattleships
Pre-dreadnought battleships
Battlecruisers
Armored cruisers
Light cruisers
Protected cruisers
Unprotected cruisers
Destroyers
Torpedo boats
Submarines
S
Single ship of class
L
Loaned from theRoyal Navy
C
Completed after the war
Aircraft carriers
Light aircraft carriers
Escort carriers
Battleships
Heavy cruisers
Armored cruisers
Light cruisers
Protected cruisers
Destroyers
1st class
Type Special
Type A
Type B
Type C
Type D
2nd class
Torpedo boats
Escort ships
(Kaibōkan)
Type A
Type B
Type C
Type D
Submarines
1st class
Kaidai Type
Junsen Type
Junsen Type A
Junsen Type B
Junsen Type C
Type D/Sen'yu
2nd class
Kaichū Type
Type L
Midget
Submarine tenders
Seaplane tenders
Gunboats
Ocean
River
Small craft
Escort carriers
Landing craft carriers
Type C
M Type C
Type A
M Type A
Type B
Submarines
Small craft
S: Single ship in classC: Converted to ship typeL: Officially classed as light cruisers until 1939 refitsI: Incomplete until the end of the warX: Cancelled
Japanese transcription:class/type (,"Gata"),(re)model/mark (,"Kai"),A (,"Kō"),B (,"Otsu"),C (,"Hei"),D (,"Tei")
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ise-class_battleship&oldid=1276384957"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp