Irrealism is a philosophical position first advanced byNelson Goodman in "Ways of Worldmaking",[1] encompassingepistemology,metaphysics, andaesthetics.
Irrealism was initially motivated by the debate betweenphenomenalism andphysicalism inepistemology.[2] Rather than viewing either as prior to the other, Goodman described them both as alternative "world-versions", both useful in some circumstances, but neither capable of capturing the other in an entirely satisfactory way, a point he emphasizes with examples from psychology.[3] He goes on to extend thisepistemic pluralism to all areas of knowledge, from equivalentformal systems inmathematics (sometimes it is useful to think of points as primitives, sometimes it is more useful to consider lines the primitive) to alternative schools ofart (for some paintings thinking in terms of representational accuracy is the most useful way of considering them, for others it is not). However, in line with his consideration ofphenomenalism andphysicalism, Goodman goes beyond saying merely that these are "world-versions" ofthe world, instead he describes worlds as "made by making such versions".[4]
Metaphysically, Goodman's irrealism is distinct fromanti-realism though the two concepts are frequently confused. "We are not speaking in terms of multiple possible alternatives to a single actual world but of multiple actual worlds."[5] He makes no assertions regarding "the way the world is" and that there is no primary world-version i.e. "no true version compatible with all true versions." As Goodman says, "Not only motion, ... but even reality is relative."[6] It follows that Goodman accepts many forms of realism and anti-realism without being troubled by the resulting contradictions.
The artist Tristan Tondino writes, "Realism is an Irrealism. Reality is plurality - we partially create it, we must open our universes and our perceptions to all new versions that may promote the concept of human rights and expand its possibilities."[7]
ThesociologistNikolas Rose subscribes to irrealism in hisPowers of Freedom, though his irrealism differs from Goodman's in being 'technical, not psychologistic, furthering Goodman's assertions of the human mind are only capable of a limited understanding and that it is a construct built upon itself."
PhilosopherJan Westerhoff discusses irrealism in his paper "The consequences of living in a virtual world generated by our brain"[8]
The philosophical term may be used in more specific or arguably narrower senses, such as "colour irrealism".[9]
{{cite web}}:Missing or empty|title= (help){{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)isbn:0915144514.