Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

History of aerodynamics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AMinistry of Aircraft Production poster on aerodynamics

Aerodynamics is a branch ofdynamics concerned with the study of the motion ofair. It is a sub-field offluid andgas dynamics, and the term "aerodynamics" is often used when referring to fluid dynamics.

Early records of fundamental aerodynamic concepts date back to the work ofAristotle andArchimedes in the 2nd and 3rd centuries BC, but efforts to develop a quantitative theory of airflow did not begin until the 18th century. In 1726Isaac Newton became one of the first aerodynamicists in the modern sense when he developed a theory of air resistance which was later verified for low flow speeds. Air resistance experiments were performed by investigators throughout the 18th and 19th centuries, aided by the construction of the firstwind tunnel in 1871. In his 1738 publicationHydrodynamica,Daniel Bernoulli described a fundamental relationship between pressure, velocity, and density, now termedBernoulli's principle, which provides one method of explaininglift.

Aerodynamics work throughout the 19th century sought to achieveheavier-than-air flight.George Cayley developed the concept of the modern fixed-wing aircraft in 1799, and in doing so identified the four fundamental forces of flight -lift,thrust,drag, andweight. The development of reasonable predictions of the thrust needed to power flight in conjunction with the development of high-lift, low-drag airfoils paved the way for the first powered flight. On December 17, 1903,Wilbur and Orville Wright flew the first successful powered aircraft. The flight, and the publicity it received, led to more organized collaboration between aviators and aerodynamicists, leading the way to modern aerodynamics.

Theoretical advances in aerodynamics were made parallel to practical ones. The relationship described by Bernoulli was found to be valid only for incompressible, inviscid flow. In 1757,Leonhard Euler published theEuler equations, extending Bernoulli's principle to the compressible flow regime. In the early 19th century, the development of theNavier-Stokes equations extended the Euler equations to account forviscous effects. During the time of the first flights, several investigators developed independent theories connectingflow circulation to lift.Ludwig Prandtl became one of the first people to investigateboundary layers during this time.

Antiquity to the 19th century

[edit]
A drawing of a design for a flying machine byLeonardo da Vinci (c. 1488). This machine was anornithopter, with flapping wings similar to those of a bird, first presented in hisCodex on the Flight of Birds in 1505.

Theoretical foundations

[edit]

Although the modern theory of aerodynamic science did not emerge until the 18th century, its foundations began to emerge in ancient times. The fundamental aerodynamicscontinuity assumption has its origins in Aristotle'sTreatise on the Heavens, althoughArchimedes, working in the 3rd century BC, was the first person to formally assert that a fluid could be treated as a continuum.[1] Archimedes also introduced the concept that fluid flow was driven by a pressure gradient within the fluid.[2][3] This idea would later prove fundamental to the understanding of fluid flow.

In 1687, Newton'sPrincipia presentedNewton's laws of motion, the first complete theoretical approach to understanding mechanical phenomena. In particular,Newton's second law, a statement of theconservation of momentum, is one of three fundamental physical principles used to obtain theEuler equations andNavier-Stokes equations.

In 1738, theDutch-SwissmathematicianDaniel Bernoulli publishedHydrodynamica, in which he described the fundamental relationship between pressure and velocity, known today asBernoulli's principle.[4] This states that the pressure of a flowing fluid decreases as its velocity increases and as such was a significant early advance in the theory offluid dynamics, and was first quantified in an equation derived byLeonhard Euler.[5] This expression, often calledBernoulli's Equation, relates the pressure, density, and velocity at two points along a streamline within a flowing fluid as follows:

v122+p1ρ=v222+p2ρ{\displaystyle {v_{1}^{2} \over 2}+{p_{1} \over \rho }={v_{2}^{2} \over 2}+{p_{2} \over \rho }}

Bernoulli's Equation ignores compressibility of the fluid, as well as the effects ofgravity and viscous forces on the flow.Leonhard Euler would go on to publish theEuler equations in 1757, which are valid for both compressible and incompressible flows. The Euler equations were extended to incorporate the effects of viscosity in the first half of the 1800s, resulting in theNavier-Stokes equations.

Studies of air resistance

[edit]
A drawing of a glider bySir George Cayley, one of the early attempts at creating an aerodynamic shape.

The retarding effect of air on a moving object was among the earliest aerodynamic phenomena to be explored. Aristotle wrote aboutair resistance in the 4th century BC,[3] but lacked the understanding to quantify the resistance he observed. In fact, Aristotle paradoxically suggested that the movement of air around a thrown spear both resisted its motion and propelled it forward.[6] In the 15th century,Leonardo da Vinci published theCodex Leicester, in which he rejected Aristotle's theory and attempted to prove that the only effect of air on a thrown object was to resist its motion,[7] and that air resistance was proportional to flow speed, a false conclusion which was supported by Galileo's 17th century observations of pendulum motion decay.[3] In addition to his work on drag, da Vinci was the first person to record a number of aerodynamic ideas including correctly describing the circulation of vortices and thecontinuity principle as applied to channel flow.[3]

The true quadratic dependency of drag on velocity was experimentally proven independently byEdme Mariotte andChristiaan Huygens, both members of the Paris Academy of Sciences, in the late 17th century.[8]Sir Isaac Newton later became the first person to theoretically derive this quadratic dependence of air resistance in the early 18th century,[9] making him one of the first theoretical aerodynamicists. Newton stated that drag was proportional to the dimensions of a body, the density of the fluid, and the square of the air velocity, a relationship which was demonstrated to be correct for low flow speeds, but stood in direct conflict with Galileo's earlier findings. The discrepancy between the work of Newton, Mariotte, and Huygens, and Galileo's earlier work was not resolved until advances in viscous flow theory in the 20th century.

Newton also developed a law for the drag force on a flat plate inclined towards the direction of the fluid flow. UsingF for the drag force,ρ for the density,S for the area of the flat plate,V for the flow velocity, andθ for the angle of attack, his law was expressed as:

F=ρSV2sin2(θ){\displaystyle F=\rho SV^{2}\sin ^{2}(\theta )}

This equation overestimates drag in most cases, and was often used in the 19th century to argue the impossibility of human flight.[3] At low inclination angles, drag depends linearly on the sin of the angle, not quadratically. However, Newton's flat plate drag law yields reasonable drag predictions for supersonic flows or very slender plates at large inclination angles which lead to flow separation.[10][11]

Air resistance experiments were carried out by investigators throughout the 18th and 19th centuries. Drag theories were developed byJean le Rond d'Alembert,[12]Gustav Kirchhoff,[13] andLord Rayleigh.[14] Equations for fluid flow withfriction were developed byClaude-Louis Navier[15] andGeorge Gabriel Stokes.[16] To simulate fluid flow, many experiments involved immersing objects in streams of water or simply dropping them off the top of a tall building. Towards the end of this time periodGustave Eiffel used hisEiffel Tower to assist in the drop testing of flat plates.

A more precise way to measure resistance is to place an object within an artificial, uniform stream of air where the velocity is known. The first person to experiment in this fashion wasFrancis Herbert Wenham, who in doing so constructed the firstwind tunnel in 1871. Wenham was also a member of the first professional organization dedicated to aeronautics, theRoyal Aeronautical Society of theUnited Kingdom. Objects placed in wind tunnel models are almost always smaller than in practice, so a method was needed to relate small scale models to their real-life counterparts. This was achieved with the invention of the dimensionlessReynolds number byOsborne Reynolds.[17] Reynolds also experimented withlaminar toturbulent flow transition in 1883.

A replica of theWright Brothers'wind tunnel is on display at the Virginia Air and Space Center. Wind tunnels were key in the development and validation of the laws of aerodynamics.

Developments in aviation

[edit]

Working from at least as early as 1796, when he constructed a model helicopter,[18] until his death in 1857,Sir George Cayley is credited as the first person to identify the four aerodynamic forces of flight—weight,lift,drag, andthrust—and the relationships between them.[19][20] Cayley is also credited as the first person to develop the modern fixed-wing aircraft concept; although da Vinci's notes contain drawings and descriptions of a fixed-wing heavier-than-air flight machine, da Vinci's notes were disorganized and scattered following his death, and his aerodynamics achievements were not rediscovered until after technology had progressed well beyond da Vinci's advances.[21]

By the late 19th century, two problems were identified before heavier-than-air flight could be realized. The first was the creation of low-drag, high-lift aerodynamic wings. The second problem was how to determine the power needed for sustained flight. During this time, the groundwork was laid down for modern dayfluid dynamics and aerodynamics, with other less scientifically-inclined enthusiasts testing various flying machines with little success.

In 1884,John J. Montgomery, an American trained in physics, began experimenting with glider designs. Using a water table with circulating water and a smoke chamber he began applying the physics of fluid dynamics to describe the motions of flow over curved surfaces such as airfoils.[22] In 1889,Charles Renard, a French aeronautical engineer, became the first person to reasonably predict the power needed for sustained flight.[23] Renard and German physicistHermann von Helmholtz explored the wing loading (weight to wing-area ratio) of birds, eventually concluding that humans could not fly under their own power by attaching wings onto their arms.Otto Lilienthal, following the work of Sir George Cayley, was the first person to become highly successful with glider flights. Lilienthal believed that thin, curved airfoils would produce high lift and low drag.

Octave Chanute's 1893 book,Progress in Flying Machines, outlined all of the known research conducted around the world up to that point.[24] Chanute's book provided a great service to those interested in aerodynamics and flying machines.

With the information contained in Chanute's book, the personal assistance of Chanute himself, and research carried out in their own wind tunnel, theWright brothers gained enough knowledge of aerodynamics to fly the first powered aircraft on December 17, 1903. The Wright brothers' flight confirmed or disproved a number of aerodynamics theories. Newton's drag force theory was finally proved incorrect. This first widely publicised flight led to a more organized effort between aviators and scientists, leading the way to modern aerodynamics.

During the time of the first flights,John J. Montgomery,[25]Frederick W. Lanchester,[26]Martin Kutta, andNikolai Zhukovsky independently created theories that connectedcirculation of a fluid flow to lift. Kutta and Zhukovsky went on to develop a two-dimensional wing theory. Expanding upon the work of Lanchester,Ludwig Prandtl is credited with developing the mathematics[27] behind thin-airfoil and lifting-line theories as well as work withboundary layers. Prandtl, a professor at theUniversity of Göttingen, instructed many students who would play important roles in the development of aerodynamics, such asTheodore von Kármán andMax Munk.

Design issues with increasing speed

[edit]

Compressibility is an important factor in aerodynamics. At low speeds, the compressibility of air is not significant in relation toaircraft design, but as the airflow nears and exceeds thespeed of sound, a host of new aerodynamic effects become important in the design of aircraft. These effects, often several of them at a time, made it very difficult forWorld War II era aircraft to reach speeds much beyond 800 km/h (500 mph).

Some of the minor effects include changes to the airflow that lead to problems in control. For instance, theP-38 Lightning with its thick high-lift wing had a particular problem in high-speed dives that led to a nose-down condition subsequently calledMach tuck. Pilots would enter dives, and then find they could no longer control the plane which continued to pitch nose-down. The problem was remedied by adding a "dive flap" to the lower surface of the wing. This increased drag and significantly altered the flow pattern around the airfoil.[28]

A similar problem affected some models of theSupermarine Spitfire. At high speeds, theailerons could apply more torque than the Spitfire's thin wings could handle, and the entire wing would twist in the opposite direction. This meant that the plane would roll in the direction opposite to that which the pilot intended, and led to a number of accidents. Earlier models weren't fast enough for this to be a problem, and so it wasn't noticed until later model Spitfires like the Mk.IX started to appear. This was mitigated by adding considerable torsional rigidity to the wings, and was wholly cured when the Mk.XIV was introduced.

TheMesserschmitt Bf 109 andMitsubishi Zero had the exact opposite problem in which the controls became ineffective. At higher speeds, the pilot simply couldn't move the controls because there was too much airflow over the control surfaces. The planes would become difficult to maneuver, and at high enough speeds aircraft without this problem could out-turn them.

These problems were eventually solved as jet aircraft reached transonic andsupersonic speeds. German scientists in WWII experimented withswept wings. Their research was applied on theMiG-15 andF-86 Sabre and bombers such as theB-47 Stratojet usedswept wings which delay the onset of shock waves and reduce drag.

In order to maintain control near and above the speed of sound, it is often necessary to use either power-operated all-flying tailplanes (stabilators), ordelta wings fitted with power-operatedelevons. Power operation prevents aerodynamic forces overriding the pilots' control inputs.

Finally, another common problem that fits into this category isflutter. At some speeds, the airflow over the control surfaces will become turbulent, and the controls will start to flutter. If the speed of the fluttering is close to aharmonic of the control's movement, theresonance could break the control off completely. This was a serious problem on the Zero andVL Myrsky. When problems with poor control at high speed were first encountered, they were addressed by designing a new style of control surface with more power. However, this introduced a new resonant mode, and a number of planes were lost before this was discovered. On design of VL Myrsky, this problem was countered by increasing the rigidity and weight of the wing, therefore increasing the dampening of the harmonic oscillation, which compromised the performance to some extent.

All of these effects are often mentioned in conjunction with the term "compressibility", but in a manner of speaking, they are incorrectly used. From a strictly aerodynamic point of view, the term should refer only to those side-effects arising as a result of the changes in airflow from an incompressible fluid (similar in effect to water) to a compressible fluid (acting as a gas) as the speed of sound is approached. There are two effects in particular,wave drag andCritical Mach number.

Wave drag is a sudden rise in drag on the aircraft, caused by air building up in front of it. At lower speeds, this air has time to "get out of the way", guided by the air in front of it that is in contact with the aircraft. But at the speed of sound, this can no longer happen, and the air which was previously following thestreamline around the aircraft now hits it directly. The amount of power needed to overcome this effect is considerable. The critical Mach number is the speed at which some of the air passing over the aircraft's wing becomes supersonic.

At the speed of sound, the way that lift is generated changes dramatically, from being dominated byBernoulli's principle to forces generated byshock waves. Since the air on the top of the wing is traveling faster than on the bottom, due to Bernoulli effect, at speeds close to the speed of sound the air on the top of the wing will be accelerated to supersonic. When this happens, the distribution of lift changes dramatically, typically causing a powerful nose-down trim. Since the aircraft normally approached these speeds only in a dive, pilots would report the aircraft attempting to nose over into the ground.

Dissociation absorbs a great deal of energy in a reversible process. This greatly reduces the thermodynamic temperature of hypersonic gas decelerated near an aerospace vehicle. In transition regions, where this pressure dependent dissociation is incomplete, both the differential, constant pressure heat capacity and beta (the volume/pressure differential ratio) will greatly increase. The latter has a pronounced effect on vehicle aerodynamics including stability.

Faster than sound – later 20th century

[edit]

As aircraft began to travel faster, aerodynamicists realized that the density of air began to change as it came into contact with an object, leading to a division of fluid flow into the incompressible andcompressible regimes. In compressible aerodynamics, density and pressure both change, which is the basis for calculating thespeed of sound. Newton was the first to develop a mathematical model for calculating the speed of sound, but it was not correct untilPierre-Simon Laplace accounted for the molecular behavior of gases and introduced theheat capacity ratio. The ratio of the flow speed to the speed of sound was named theMach number afterErnst Mach, who was one of the first to investigate the properties ofsupersonic flow which includedSchlieren photography techniques to visualize the changes in density.Macquorn Rankine andPierre Henri Hugoniot independently developed the theory for flow properties before and after ashock wave.Jakob Ackeret led the initial work on calculating the lift and drag on a supersonic airfoil.[29] Theodore von Kármán andHugh Latimer Dryden introduced the termtransonic to describe flow speeds around Mach 1 where drag increases rapidly. Because of the increase in drag approaching Mach 1, aerodynamicists and aviators disagreed on whether supersonic flight was achievable.

Image showing shock waves from NASA'sX-43A hypersonic research vehicle in flight at Mach 7, generated using acomputational fluid dynamics algorithm.

On September 30, 1935, aVolta Congress was held inRome on the topic of high velocity flight and the possibility of breaking thesound barrier.[30] Participants includedTheodore von Kármán,Ludwig Prandtl,Jakob Ackeret,Eastman Jacobs,Adolf Busemann,Geoffrey Ingram Taylor,Gaetano Arturo Crocco, and Enrico Pistolesi. Ackeret presented a design for asupersonic wind tunnel. Busemann gave a presentation on the need for aircraft withswept wings for high speed flight. Eastman Jacobs, working forNACA, presented his optimized airfoils for high subsonic speeds which led to some of the high performance American aircraft duringWorld War II. Supersonic propulsion was also discussed. The sound barrier was broken using theBell X-1 aircraft twelve years later, thanks in part to those individuals.

By the time the sound barrier was broken, much of the subsonic and low supersonic aerodynamics knowledge had matured. TheCold War fueled an ever-evolving line of high performance aircraft.Computational fluid dynamics was started as an effort to solve for flow properties around complex objects and has rapidly grown to the point where entire aircraft can be designed using a computer, with wind-tunnel tests followed by flight tests to confirm the computer predictions.

With some exceptions, the knowledge ofhypersonic aerodynamics has matured between the 1960s and the present decade. Therefore, the goals of an aerodynamicist have shifted from understanding the behavior of fluid flow to understanding how to engineer a vehicle to interact appropriately with the fluid flow. For example, while the behavior of hypersonic flow is understood, building ascramjet aircraft to fly at hypersonic speeds has seen very limited success. Along with building a successful scramjet aircraft, the desire to improve the aerodynamic efficiency of current aircraft and propulsion systems will continue to fuel new research in aerodynamics. Nevertheless, there are still important problems in basic aerodynamic theory, such as in predicting transition to turbulence, and the existence and uniqueness of solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^Anderson 1997, p. 17.
  2. ^Anderson 1997, pp. 18–19.
  3. ^abcdeAckroyd, J. A. D.; Axcell, B. P.; Ruban, A. I. (2001).Early Developments of Modern Aerodynamics. Reston, Virginia:American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.ISBN 1-56347-516-2.
  4. ^"Hydrodynamica". Britannica Online Encyclopedia. Retrieved2008-10-30.
  5. ^Anderson 1997, p. 47.
  6. ^Anderson 1997, pp. 16–17.
  7. ^Anderson 1997, p. 25.
  8. ^Anderson 1997, pp. 32–35.
  9. ^Newton, I. (1726).Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, Book II.
  10. ^von Karman, Theodore (2004).Aerodynamics: Selected Topics in the Light of Their Historical Development. Dover Publications.ISBN 0-486-43485-0.OCLC 53900531.
  11. ^Anderson 1997, p. 40.
  12. ^d'Alembert, J. (1752).Essai d'une nouvelle theorie de la resistance des fluides.
  13. ^Kirchhoff, G. (1869).Zur Theorie freier Flussigkeitsstrahlen. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (70), 289-298.
  14. ^Rayleigh, Lord (1876).On the Resistance of Fluids. Philosophical Magazine (5)2, 430-441.
  15. ^Navier, C. L. M. H. (1827). "Memoire sur les lois du mouvement des fluides".Mémoires de l'Académie des Sciences.6:389–440.
  16. ^Stokes, G. (1845).On the Theories of the Internal Friction of Fluids in Motion. Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (8), 287-305.
  17. ^Reynolds, O. (1883).An Experimental Investigation of the Circumstances which Determine whether the Motion of Water Shall Be Direct or Sinuous and of the Law of Resistance in Parallel Channels. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A-174, 935-982.
  18. ^Wragg, D.W.;Flight before flying, Osprey, 1974, Page 57.
  19. ^"U.S Centennial of Flight Commission - Sir George Cayley". Archived fromthe original on 20 September 2008. Retrieved2008-09-10.Sir George Cayley, born in 1773, is sometimes called the Father of Aviation. A pioneer in his field, he was the first to identify the four aerodynamic forces of flight - weight, lift, drag, and thrust and their relationship. He was also the first to build a successful human-carrying glider. Cayley described many of the concepts and elements of the modern airplane and was the first to understand and explain in engineering terms the concepts of lift and thrust.
  20. ^Cayley, George. "On Aerial Navigation"Part 1Archived 2013-05-11 at theWayback Machine,Part 2Archived 2013-05-11 at theWayback Machine,Part 3Archived 2013-05-11 at theWayback MachineNicholson's Journal of Natural Philosophy, 1809-1810. (ViaNASA).Raw text. Retrieved: 30 May 2010.
  21. ^Anderson 1997, pp. 21, 25–26.
  22. ^Harwood, CS and Fogel, GBQuest for Flight: John J. Montgomery and the Dawn of Aviation in the West, University of Oklahoma Press, 2012.
  23. ^Renard, C. (1889).Nouvelles experiences sur la resistance de l'air. L'Aeronaute (22) 73-81.
  24. ^Chanute, Octave (1997).Progress in Flying Machines. Dover Publications.ISBN 0-486-29981-3.OCLC 37782926.
  25. ^Harwood, CS and Fogel, GBQuest for Flight: John J. Montgomery and the Dawn of Aviation in the West University of Oklahoma Press, 2012.
  26. ^Lanchester, F. W. (1907).Aerodynamics.
  27. ^Prandtl, L. (1919).Tragflügeltheorie. Göttinger Nachrichten, mathematischphysikalische Klasse, 451-477.
  28. ^Bodie, Warren M. (2 May 2001).The Lockheed P-38 Lightning. pp. 174–175.ISBN 0-9629359-5-6.
  29. ^Ackeret, J. (1925).Luftkrafte auf Flugel, die mit der grosserer als Schallgeschwindigkeit bewegt werden. Zeitschrift fur Flugtechnik und Motorluftschiffahrt (16), 72-74.
  30. ^Anderson, John D. (2007).Fundamentals of Aerodynamics (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.ISBN 978-0-07-125408-3.OCLC 60589123.

References

[edit]
  • Anderson, John David (1997).A History of Aerodynamics and its Impact on Flying machines. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.ISBN 0-521-45435-2.
Chronological
Topic histories
Other topics
Classical physics
Modern physics
Recent developments
On specific discoveries
By periods
By groups
Scientific disputes
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_aerodynamics&oldid=1272814167"
Category:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp