You can helpexpand this article with text translated fromthe corresponding article in French. (December 2018)Click [show] for important translation instructions.
Machine translation, likeDeepL orGoogle Translate, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia.
Consideradding a topic to this template: there are already 1,979 articles in themain category, and specifying|topic= will aid in categorization.
Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article.
Youmust providecopyright attribution in theedit summary accompanying your translation by providing aninterlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary isContent in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Grand schisme d'Occident]]; see its history for attribution.
You may also add the template{{Translated|fr|Grand schisme d'Occident}} to thetalk page.
TheWestern Schism, also known as thePapal Schism, theGreat Occidental Schism, theSchism of 1378, or theGreat Schism[1] (Latin:Magnum schisma occidentale, Ecclesiae occidentalis schisma), was asplit within theCatholic Church lasting from 20 September 1378 to 11 November 1417, in whichbishops residing inRome andAvignon simultaneously claimed to be the truepope, and were eventually joined by a third line ofPisan claimants in 1409. The event was driven by international rivalries, personalities and political allegiances, with the Avignon Papacy in particular being closely tied to theFrench monarchy.
The papacy hadresided in Avignon since 1309, butPope Gregory XI returned to Rome in 1377. The Catholic Church split in September 1378, when, following Gregory XI's death andUrban VI's subsequent election, a group of French cardinals declared his election invalid and electedClement VII, who claimed to be the true pope. After several attempts at reconciliation, theCouncil of Pisa (1409) declared that both rivals were illegitimate and elected a third purported pope.[2] The schism was finally resolved when the Pisan claimantAntipope John XXIII called theCouncil of Constance (1414–1418). The Council arranged for therenunciation of both Roman popeGregory XII and Pisan antipope John XXIII. The Avignon antipopeBenedict XIII was excommunicated, whilePope Martin V was elected and reigned from Rome.
The split is sometimes referred to as the'Great Schism', although this term is usually reserved for theEast–West Schism of 1054 between the churches remaining in communion with theSee of Rome and those remaining with theEastern Orthodox Church.
Under pressure fromPhilip IV of France, the papacy had, since 1309, resided in Avignon, a papalenclave surrounded byFrance. Initiated byPope Clement V, theAvignon Papacy had developed a reputation for corruption that estranged much of WesternChristendom.[3] This reputation was attributed to perceptions of strong French influence, the papalcuria's efforts to extend its powers of patronage, and attempts to increase its revenues. The last Avignon pope,Gregory XI, at the entreaty of relatives, friends, and his retinue, decided to return toRome on 17 January 1377.[4] Gregory, however, announced his intention to reverse his decision and return to Avignon just after the Easter celebrations of 1378.[5]
Before he could return to Avignon, Gregory XI died in the Vatican palace on 27 March 1378.[6] The Romans put into operation a plan to use intimidation and violence (impressio et metus) to ensure the election of a Roman pope.[7] The pope and his curia had returned to Rome after seventy years in Avignon, and the Romans were prepared to do everything in their power to keep them there.[8] On 8 April 1378, thecardinals elected Bartolomeo Prignano, thearchbishop of Bari, asPope Urban VI.[9]
Map showing allegiance to Rome (blue), to Avignon (red), and variable allegiance (orange) during the Western Schism; this breakdown is valid until theCouncil of Pisa (1409), which created a third line of claimants.
The majority of the cardinals who had elected Urban VI quickly regretted their decision and removed themselves toAnagni.[10] Meeting atFondi, thirteen cardinals elected Count Robert of Geneva asPope Clement VII on 20 September 1378.[11] The dissident cardinals argued that the election of Urban VI was invalid because it had been out of fear of the rioting Roman crowds.[12] Unable to maintain himself in Anagni, and following the defeat of his forces at the battle of Marino,[13] Clement VII fled to Naples, which was ruled by one of his supporters, QueenJoanna I of Naples.[14] Despite being met regally by Joanna, Clement was met with the populace chantingViva Papa Urbano (Long Live Pope Urban) andMuoia l'Anticristo (Death to the Antichrist), which convinced him to leave.[14][15] He took a ship to Avignon and reestablished the papal court there.Charles V of France, who seems to have been irked beforehand by the choice of the Roman pontiff, soon became his greatest protector.[16] Besides France, Clement eventually succeeded in winning to his causeCastile,Aragon,Navarre,Poland,Lithuania,Hungary,Scotland, and most of Italy besides Naples andSavoy.[17] Years later,Owain Glyndŵr'srebellion inWales also recognized the Avignon antipope Benedict XIII.[18]John I of Portugal, the founder of theHouse of Aviz,[19] whotook the throne with English support signed theTreaty of Windsor in 1386 and firmly sided with Urban VI.[20] Unlike their relatives, theAngevin kings ofHungary (Louis I andMary) supported Rome.[21]Joanna I of Naples, who sided with Clement VII was deposed and replaced byCharles III in 1381.[22] Charles III would later take the throne of Hungary from Mary and her husbandSigismund; for this she was excommunicated by Urban VI.[23]
In the intense partisanship that was characteristic of the Middle Ages, the schism engendered a fanatical hatred noted byJohan Huizinga:[24]
when the town ofBruges went over to the "obedience" of Avignon, a great number of people left to follow their trade in a city of Urbanist allegiance. ... In the 1382, theoriflamme, which might only be unfurled in a holy cause, was taken up against theFlemings, because they were Urbanists, that is, infidels.
Sustained by such national and factional rivalries, the schism continued after the deaths of both Urban VI in 1389 and Clement VII in 1394.Boniface IX was crowned in Rome in 1389, andBenedict XIII, who was elected against the wishes of Charles VI of France, reigned in Avignon from 1394.[25] When Pope Boniface died in 1404, the eight cardinals of the Roman conclave offered to refrain from electing a new pope if Benedict would resign; but when Benedict's legates refused on his behalf,[a][27] the Roman party then proceeded to elect PopeInnocent VII.[26] Discussions continued instead with Innocent, but quickly stalled and by February 1405, and Benedict's envoys had returned to Avignon.[26] Benedict quickly excommunicated Innocent and with an army started marching towards Rome, in May 1405. He occupied Genoa for a year and awaited French military support, which never came.[26] Innocent died 6 November 1406, and the Roman cardinals elected Angelo Correr as Gregory XII.[28]
The suggestion for achurch council to resolve the Schism, first made in 1378, was not adopted initially, becausecanon law required that a pope call a council. Eventually theologians likePierre d'Ailly and Jean Gerson, adopted arguments that permitted the Church to call a council to resolve this issue,[29] whileFrancesco Zabarella argued that a council could only be convoked by an emperor.[30]
Pope Benedict and Gregory agreed to abdicate their respective papacies in December 1406. However, Benedict stated that he wanted to negotiate a solution first.[28] Gregory sent an ambassador to the St. Victor abbey in Marseille, where Benedict was staying.[28] On the other hand, Gregory preferred Savona, and Benedict concurred.[28] They balked at the last moment, and both groups of cardinals abandoned their preferred leaders.[31] TheCouncil of Pisa met in 1409 under the auspices of the cardinals to try solving the dispute.[31] At the fifteenth session, on 5 June 1409, the Council of Pisa attempted to depose both the Roman pope and Avignon antipope as schismatical, heretical, perjured and scandalous,[32] but proceeded to inflame the problem even further by electing Peter Philargi, the cardinal archbishop of Milan, asAlexander V.[33] He reigned briefly in Pisa from June 26, 1409, to his death in 1410,[34] when he was succeeded by, Baldassare Cossa asJohn XXIII,[35] who achieved limited support.
In 1414,Council of Constance was convened by the Pisan popeJohn XXIII to resolve the schism once and for all.[36] The council was also endorsed by the Roman popeGregory XII, giving it greater legitimacy.[37] On 6 April 1415, the council issuedHaec sancta,[38] stating that the council is the Church's highest governing body and has the authority to remove popes.[39][40]Haec sancta is today considered invalid by the Catholic Church, on the basis that Gregory XII was the legitimate pope at the time and the decree was passed by the council in a session before his confirmation; further, since it was not used to remove him, it was not actually used to remove the pope.
The council, advised by the theologianJean Gerson, secured the resignation of Gregory XII and the detention and removal of John XXIII.[41] The Avignon antipopeBenedict XIII, who refused to step down, wasexcommunicated on 27 July 1417, having lost all his supporters in the process.[42][41] The Council electedPope Martin V in 1417, essentially ending the schism.[43]
Benedict XIII, recognized byKing Martin of Aragon in 1397, chose to ignore pleas for his resignation.[44] Benedict died 23 May 1423: to succeed him three cardinals elected Gil Sanchez Munoz y Carbon asClement VIII.[45] Clement VIII resigned in 1429 and recognized Martin V, putting a definite end to the last remnants of theAvignon Papacy.[45]
Conciliarism gained impetus due to the Schism.[46] This new reformist movement held that a general council is superior to the pope on the strength of its capability to resolve ecclesiastical issues. Theorists such asJean Gerson explained that the priests and the church itself are the sources of the papal power and, thus, the church should be able to correct, punish, and, if necessary, depose a pope.
On 18 January 1460,Pope Pius II issued the bullExecrabilis which forbade any attempt to appeal papal judgements by general councils.[47]
There was also a marked decline in discipline within the church. Scholars note that the Western Schism effectively eroded the church's authority and its capacity to proclaim the gospel.[48] This dissension and loss of unity ultimately culminated in theProtestant Reformation of the 16th century.
Plaque commemorating the popes buried inSt. Peter's. Alexanders VI, VII, and VIII are numbered as though the Pisan pope Alexander V were legitimate, but John XXIII (d. 1963) reused the ordinal of the Pisan pope John XXIII.
For the next five centuries, the Catholic Church recognized the Roman popes as the legitimate line from 1378 to 1409, followed by the Pisan popes from 1409 to 1415. All Avignon popes after 1378 are considered to be antipopes. This recognition is reflected in the numbering of popesAlexander VI,VII, andVIII, who numbered themselves consecutively after their Pisan namesake Alexander V.
The recognition of the Pisan popes made the continued legitimacy of the Roman pope Gregory XII doubtful for 1409–1415. TheAnnuario Pontificio for 1860 listed the Pisan popes as true popes from 1409 to 1415, but it acknowledged that Gregory XII's reign ended in either 1409 or 1415.
The Western Schism was, in practice, reinterpreted in 1958 whenAngelo Giuseppe Roncalli chose to reuse the ordinal XXIII upon his election as Pope John XXIII, citing "twenty-two [sic] Johns of indisputable legitimacy".[49] (There had actually been twenty undisputed Johns due toantipopes and numbering errors.) Although Roncalli's declaration of assuming the name specified that his decision was made "apart from disputes about legitimacy", this passage was subsequently excised from the version appearing in theActa Apostolicae Sedis, and the Pisan popes Alexander V and John XXIII have since been classified as antipopes by the Roman Curia.[50] The reinterpretation is reflected in modern editions of theAnnuario Pontificio, which extend Gregory XII's reign to 1415. The line of Roman popes is now retroactively recognized by the Catholic Church as the sole legitimate line during the Western Schism. However, Popes Alexander VI through VIII have not been renumbered, leaving a gap in the numbering sequence.
According to John F. Broderick (1987):
Doubt still shrouds the validity of the three rival lines of pontiffs during the four decades subsequent to the still disputed papal election of 1378. This makes suspect the credentials of the cardinals created by the Roman, Avignon, and Pisan claimants to the Apostolic See. Unity was finally restored without a definitive solution to the question; for the Council of Constance succeeded in terminating the Western Schism, not by declaring which of the three claimants was the rightful one, but by eliminating all of them by forcing their abdication or deposition, and then setting up a novel arrangement for choosing a new pope acceptable to all sides. To this day the Church has never made any official, authoritative pronouncement about the papal lines of succession for this confusing period; nor has Martin V or any of his successors. Modern scholars are not agreed in their solutions, although they tend to favor the Roman line.[51]
^Huizinga, Johan (1924).The Waning of the Middle Ages: A Study of the Forms of Life, Thought and Art in France and the Netherlands in the XIVth and XVth Centuries. Edward Arnold & Co
Atwood, Craig D. (2001).Always Reforming: A History of Christianity Since 1300. Mercer University Press.
Bellitto, Christopher M. (2002).The General Councils. Paulist Press.
Blumenfeld-Kosinski, Renate (2009). "The Conceptualization and Imagery of the Great Schism". In Rollo-Koster, Joëlle; Izbicki, Thomas M. (eds.).A Companion to the Great Western Schism (1378–1417). Brill. pp. 123–158.
Broderick, John F. (1987). "The Sacred College of Cardinals: Size and Geographical Composition (1099–1986)".Archivum Historiae Pontificiae.25. Gregorian Biblical Press:7–71.
Cable, Martin J. (2015)."Cum essem in Constantie...": Raffaele Fulgosio and the Council of Constance, 1414-1415. Brill.
Coriden, James (2004).An Introduction to Canon Law. Paulist Press.ISBN0809142562.
Fleck, Cathleen A. (2009). "Seeking Legitimacy:Art and Manuscripts for the Popes in Avignon from 1378 to 1417". In Rollo-Koster, Joëlle; Izbicki, Thomas M. (eds.).A Companion to the Great Western Schism (1378–1417). Brill. pp. 239–302.
Fleck, Cathleen A. (2016).The Clement Bible at the Medieval Courts of Naples and Avignon: "A Story of Papal Power, Royal Prestige, and Patronage. Routledge.266
Huizinga, Johan (1924).The Waning of the Middle Ages: A Study of the Forms of Life, Thought and Art in France and the Netherlands in the XIVth and XVth Centuries. Edward Arnold & Co.
Keen, Maurice, ed. (2010).Medieval Warfare: A History. Oxford University Press.
Kelly, J.N.D. (1986).Oxford Dictionary of the Popes. Oxford University Press.
Kneupper, Frances Courtney (2016).The Empire At The End Of Time. Oxford University Press.
Linder, Robert D. (2008).The Reformation Era. Greenwood Press.
Logan, F. Donald (2002).A History of the Church in the Middle Ages. Routledge.
McGuire, Brian Patrick (2006).A Companion to Jean Gerson. Brill.
Oakley, Francis (2003).The Conciliarist Tradition: Constitutionalism in the Catholic Church 1300-1870. Oxford University Press.
Oakley, Francis (2008). "The Conciliar Heritage and the Politics of Oblivion". In Christianson, Gerald; Izbicki, Thomas M.; Bellitto, Christopher M. (eds.).The Church, the Councils, and Reform: The Legacy of the Fifteenth Century. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press. p. 89.ISBN978-0813215273.
O'Brien, Emily (2015).The 'Commentaries' of Pope Pius II (1458-1464) and the Crisis of the Fifteenth-Century Papacy. University of Toronto Press.
O’Callaghan, Joseph F. (1975).A History of Medieval Spain. Cornell University Press.
Orji, Cyril (2021).An Introduction to Religious and Theological Studies (2nd ed.). Cascade Books.
Riccoboni, Sister Bartolomea (2000). Bornstein, Daniel (ed.).Life and Death in a Venetian Convent: The Chronicle and Necrology of Corpus. The University of Chicago Press.
Richardson, Carol M. (2009).Reclaiming Rome: Cardinals in the Fifteenth Century. Brill.
Rollo-Koster, Joëlle (2009). "Civil Violence and the Initiation of the Schism". In Rollo-Koster, Joëlle; Izbicki, Thomas M. (eds.).A Companion to the Great Western Schism (1378–1417). Brill. pp. 9–66.
Rollo-Koster, Joëlle (2022).The Great Western Schism, 1378–1417: Performing Legitimacy, Performing Unity. Cambridge University Press.
Rosenwein, Barbara H. (2018).A Short History of the Middle Ages. Vol. II: From c.900 to c.1500. University of Toronto Press.
Scott, Karen (1993). "Io Catarina: Ecclesiastical Politics and Oral Culture in the Letters of Catherine of Siena". In Cherewatuk, Karen; Wiethaus, Ulrike (eds.).Dear Sister: Medieval Women and the Epistolary Genre. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Stump, Philip H. (2009). "The Council of Constance (1414-1418) and the End of the Schism". In Rollo-Koster, Joëlle; Izbicki, Thomas M. (eds.).A Companion to the Great Western Schism (1378–1417). Brill. pp. 395–442.
Swanson, Robert (2021). "The church and religious life: The papacy". In Lazzarini, Isabella (ed.).The Later Middle Ages. Oxford University Press. pp. 79–108.
Trexler, R.C. (1974).The Spiritual Power: Republican Florence under Interdict. Brill.
.jpg)
.svg)
.svg)
