![]() Fubuki (1936) | |
Class overview | |
---|---|
Name | Fubuki class |
Builders |
|
Operators |
|
Preceded by | Mutsuki class |
Succeeded by | Hatsuharu class |
Subclasses |
|
Built | 1926–1933 |
In commission | 1928–1953 |
Completed | 24 |
Lost | 22 |
Retired | 2 |
General characteristics | |
Type | Destroyer |
Displacement | |
Length |
|
Beam | 10.4 m (34 ft 1 in) |
Draft | 3.2 m (10 ft 6 in) |
Propulsion | |
Speed | 38 knots (44 mph; 70 km/h) |
Range | 5,000 nmi (9,300 km) at 14 knots (26 km/h) |
Complement | 219 |
Armament |
|
TheFubuki-class destroyers (吹雪型駆逐艦,Fubukigata kuchikukan) were aclass of twenty-fourdestroyers of theImperial Japanese Navy.[1] TheFubuki class has been described as the world's first modern destroyer.[2] They remained effective in their role to the end ofWorld War II, despite being much older than contemporary ships of foreign nations.[3]
Following the ratification of theWashington Naval Treaty in 1922, theImperial Japanese Navy General Staff issued requirements for a destroyer with a maximum speed of 39knots (72 km/h; 45 mph), range of 4,000nautical miles (7,400 km; 4,600 mi) at 14 knots (26 km/h; 16 mph), and armed with large numbers of torpedoes. As the treaty placed Japan in an inferior position relative to the United States and Great Britain in terms of capital ships, the obvious course of action would be to build large numbers of other types of ships not restricted by the treaty, with the most powerful weaponry possible.[4] These destroyers were intended to operate with the new series of fast and powerfulcruisers also under consideration as part of a program intended to give the Imperial Japanese Navy a qualitative edge with the world's most modern ships.[5]
The resultantFubuki class was ordered under the 1923 fiscal year budget, based on a smaller 1750 ton design, with ships completed between 1926 and 1931. Their performance was a great improvement over previous destroyer designs, so much so that they were designatedSpecial Type Destroyers (特型駆逐艦,Toku-gata Kuchikukan). The large size, powerful engines, high speed, large radius of action, and unprecedented armament gave these destroyers the firepower similar to manylight cruisers in other navies.[6] The closest equivalents in theUnited States Navy were thePorter andSomers-class destroyers, of which only thirteen vessels were constructed in the 1930s to function as destroyer squadron leaders.[7]
The initial design for theFubuki-class was based on a 2000-ton displacement hull with a single 12.7 cm (5.0 in) battery, two twin 24-inchtorpedo tubes (as introduced inMutsuki), and capable of 40 knots (74 km/h). Following the adoption of theWashington Naval Treaty from 1923, the design was modified to 1680 standard tons with more guns and more torpedo tubes. However, their increased displacement more than offset their more powerful engines, resulting in a slower top speed than originally planned.[8]
The engines were powered by fourKampon boilers running two-shaft gearedturbines at 50,000 shp, yielding a rated speed of 35knots (65 km/h), with a range of 5000 nautical miles.
The S-shaped curved bow introduced on theMutsuki class was retained; however, the well deck in front of the bridge was removed, which made it possible to extend theforecastle further aft and to flare the hull back to the first stack, which increased seaworthiness. The forecastle was also raised one deck in height to reduce the effect of heavy seas on the forward gun mount. Thebridge enlarged and enclosed.[9] The bow was given a significant flare, to offer protection against weather in thePacific.
TheFubuki-class vessels were originally intended to have only hull numbers. This proved to be extremely unpopular with the crews and was a constant source of confusion in communications with the earlierKamikaze andMutsuki classes, and naval policy was changed in August 1928. Hence, theFubuki-class vessels were assigned names as they were launched.
Between June 1928 and March 1933, twenty-fourFubuki-class destroyers were built. Several modifications took place throughout production, and the twenty-four units can be broken down into three groups. The final four ships were so different they were given a new class name. As completed,Fubuki had twin 5-inch guns in "A", "X", and "Y" positions, with triple torpedo tubes in "D", "P", and "Q",[10] making them the most powerful destroyers in the world at the time of their completion.
TheFubuki-class destroyers were far more capable than the previousMutsuki-class in armament. Themain battery consisted of sixType 3 127 mm 50 caliber naval guns, mounted in pairs in three weather-proof, splinter-proof, gas-tightgun turrets that were far ahead of their time.[8] The Group I vessels could elevate to over 40 degrees, but from Group II (the last 14 vessels of the series), these guns weredual-purpose guns that could be elevated to 70 degrees, making them the world's first destroyers with this ability.[11] Ammunition was brought up on hoists from magazines located directly underneath each gun turret, which had a far greater rate of fire than those of other contemporary destroyers in which ammunition was typically manually loaded.[6] However, the gun houses were not bullet-proof, and were thus actually still gun mounts, rather than proper turrets.[4]
The three triple 24-inch (610 mm)torpedo launchers withType 8 torpedoes which had proved successful on theMutsuki-class was again used, and each tube had a reload, giving the destroyer a complement of 18 torpedoes in total. The forward launchers were located between thesmokestacks.
Anti-aircraft capability was also as per theMutsuki-Class, with two Type 92 7.7 mm anti-aircraft machine guns located in front of the second stack. These were replaced byType 93 13 mm AA Guns before the start of the war. Following the start of thenPacific War, a number of units received an additional pair of Type 93 guns mounted in front of the bridge, which were later changed toType 96 25mm AA Guns. In late 1943 to early 1944, one of the aft guns was replaced with two triple Type 96 guns, and an additional raised gun platform with another two triple Type 96 guns was added between the two aft torpedo launchers, In late 1944, the remaining units received more Type 96 guns as single mounts on the forecastle and stern.Yūgiri received a Type 22 radar in November 1943, and the remaining seven units were so fitted in 1944. The few ships remaining in late 1944 also received the Type 13 radar.[4]
The first group, orFubuki class, consisting of the first ten vessels completed in 1928 and 1929, were simpler in construction than the vessels that followed. They had a rangefinder on the compass bridge and an exposed gun-fire control room, and were equipped with a "Type A" gun turret that elevated both of its barrels at the same time and only to 40 degrees.[12] The first group can be distinguished from later ships by their massive circular air ducts abreast the two stacks leading to the boiler room, with the exception ofUranami, which integrated the ventilation ducts into the platforms built around the stacks.[4]
The second group, orAyanami class, were built in 1930 and 1931, and had larger bridges that encompassed the rangefinder, anazimuth compass sighting device and the gun-fire control room, as well as a range finding tower. Furthermore, the boiler room's air inlet was changed from a pipe to a bowl shape. They also benefited from the deployment of "Type B" turrets, which could elevate each gun separately to 75° forAA use, making them the world's first destroyers with this capability.[12]
The third group, also known as theAkatsuki class, were built from 1931 to 1933. These vessels had three larger boilers instead of the previous four and a narrower fore funnel. Improvements included a unique splinter-proof torpedo launcher-turret, which allowed the torpedo launcher tubes to be reloaded in action.[12]
However, theFubuki class also had a number of inherent design problems. The large amount of armament combined with a smaller hull displacement than in the original design created issues with stability. Despite design features intended to reduce weight, including use of welding on the hull and lighter alloys above the main deck, the ships exceeded their design weight by over 200 tons, which was even more of a problem with the Group II ships, with their larger bridge and heavier gun mounts. After theTomozuru Incident, in which the top-heavy design of many Japanese warships called basic design issues into question, additionalballast had to be added.
In theFourth Fleet Incident, during which atyphoon damaged virtually every ship in theFourth Fleet, an issue with the longitudinal strength of theFubuki-class hull was discovered. As a result, all vessels were reconstructed between 1935 and 1937. An additional 40 tons of ballast was added, the bridge reduced in size and the height of the smoke stacks was decreased. The number of torpedo reloads were reduced from nine to three (for the center launcher only), and fewer shells were stored for the guns. The amount of fuel carried was also increased to help lower the center-of-gravity. Eight of theAyanami class were retrofitted with the lighter "Type C" gun mounts. These changes increased the displacement to 2050 tons standard tons and over 2400 tons full load. The rebuild reduced the top speed slightly to 34 knots.
Of the 24Fubuki-class vessels completed, one (Miyuki) was sunk in a collision in 1934.[13] The remaining vessels served during the Pacific War. In November 1942, theAyanami damaged the battleshipUSS South Dakota with her gunfire during theNaval Battle of Guadalcanal before being attacked byUSS Washington, which crippled the battleshipKirishima as well. She was scuttled the following day byUranami. In August 1943,John F. Kennedy'sPT-109 was rammed, split asunder and sunk byAmagiri of this class.
Eight ships of the class were sunk bysubmarines, two bymines, the rest by air attacks. OnlyHibiki andUshio survived the war.Hibiki was taken by theSoviet Navy as aprize of war, and continued to be used until 1964.
Name | Kanji | Yard no. | Builder | Laid down | Launched | Completed | Fate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ayanami | 綾波 | Dai-45 | Fujinagata Shipyards, Japan | 20 Jan 1928 | 5 Oct 1929 | 30 Apr 1930 | Scuttled off Guadalcanal byUranami9°06′S159°31′E / 09.10°S 159.52°E /-09.10; 159.52 (IJN Ayanami scuttled by IJN Uranami, 15 November 1942), 15 Nov 1942; struck 15 Dec 1942 |
Shikinami | 敷波 | Dai-46 | Maizuru Naval Arsenal, Japan | 6 Jul 1928 | 22 Jun 1929 | 24 Dec 1929 | Torpedoed S of Hainan18°10′N114°24′E / 18.16°N 114.40°E /18.16; 114.40 (IJN Shikinami sunk by torpedo, 12 September 1944) 12 Sep 1944; struck 10 Oct 1944 |
Asagiri | 朝霧 | Dai-47 | Sasebo Naval Arsenal, Japan | 12 Dec 1928 | 18 Nov 1929 | 30 Jun 1930 | Air attack off Guadalcanal8°00′S160°06′E / 08°S 160.10°E /-08; 160.10 (IJN Asagiri sunk by air attack, 28 August 1942) on 28 Aug 1942; struck 1 Oct 1942 |
Yūgiri | 夕霧 | Dai-48 | Maizuru Naval Arsenal, Japan | 1 Apr 1929 | 12 May 1930 | 3 Dec 1930 | Sunk in action, central Solomons4°26′S154°00′E / 04.44°S 154°E /-04.44; 154 (IJN Yūgiri sunk in action, 25 November 1943) on 25 Nov 1943; struck 15 Dec 1943 |
Amagiri | 天霧 | Dai-49 | Ishikawajima Shipyards, Japan | 28 Nov 1928 | 27 Feb 1930 | 10 Nov 1930 | Mined, S of Makassar Strait2°06′S116°27′E / 02.10°S 116.45°E /-02.10; 116.45 (IJN Amagiri sunk by mine, 23 April 1944) on 23 Apr 1944; struck 10 Jun 1944 |
Sagiri | 狭霧 | Dai-50 | Uraga Dock Company, Japan | 28 Mar 1929 | 23 Dec 1929 | 30 Jan 1931 | Torpedoed off Kuching1°20′N110°13′E / 01.34°N 110.21°E /01.34; 110.21 (IJN Sagiri sunk by torpedo, 24 December 1941) on 24 Dec 1941; struck 15 Jan 1942 |
Oboro | 朧 | Dai-51 | Sasebo Naval Arsenal, Japan | 29 Nov 1929 | 8 Nov 1930 | 31 Oct 1931 | Air attack off Kiska Island52°10′N178°05′E / 52.17°N 178.08°E /52.17; 178.08 (IJN Oboro sunk by air attack, 16 October 1942) on 16 Oct 1942; struck 15 Nov 1942 |
Akebono | 曙 | Dai-52 | Sasebo Naval Arsenal, Japan | 25 Oct 1929 | 7 Nov 1930 | 31 Jul 1931 | Air attack Manila Bay14°21′N120°30′E / 14.35°N 120.50°E /14.35; 120.50 (IJN Akebono sunk by air attack, 13 November 1944) on 13 Nov 1944; struck 10 Jan 1945 |
Sazanami | 漣 | Dai-53 | Maizuru Naval Arsenal, Japan | 21 Feb 1930 | 6 Jun 1931 | 19 May 1932 | Torpedoed E of Palau5°09′N141°09′E / 05.15°N 141.15°E /05.15; 141.15 (IJN Sazanami sunk by torpedo, 14 January 1944) on 14 Jan 1944; struck 10 Mar 1944 |
Ushio | 潮 | Dai-54 | Uraga Dock Company, Japan | 24 Dec 1929 | 17 Nov 1930 | 14 Nov 1931 | surrendered to Allies 15 Sep 1945; scrapped 1948 |
Name | Kanji | Builder | Laid down | Launched | Completed | Fate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Akatsuki | 暁 | Sasebo Naval Arsenal, Japan | 17 Feb 1930 | 7 May 1932 | 30 Nov 1932 | Sunk in action off Guadalcanal9°10′S159°34′E / 09.17°S 159.56°E /-09.17; 159.56 (IJN Akatsuki sunk in action, 13 November 1942) on 13 Nov 1942; struck 15 Dec 1942 |
Hibiki | 響 | Maizuru Naval Arsenal, Japan | 21 Feb 1930 | 16 Jun 1932 | 31 Mar 1933 | surrendered 5 Oct 1945; prize of war to USSR on 5 Jul 1947; sunk as target around 1970s |
Ikazuchi | 雷 | Uraga Dock Company, Japan | 7 Mar 1930 | 22 Oct 1931 | 15 Aug 1932 | torpedoed W of Guam10°08′N143°31′E / 10.13°N 143.51°E /10.13; 143.51 (IJN Ikazuchi sunk by torpedo, 13 April 1944) on 13 Apr 1944; struck 10 Jun 1944 |
Inazuma | 電 | Fujinagata Shipyards, Japan | 7 Mar 1930 | 25 Feb 1932 | 15 Nov 1932 | Torpedoed W of Celebes5°05′N119°23′E / 05.08°N 119.38°E /05.08; 119.38 (IJN Inazuma sunk by torpedo, 14 May 1944) on 14 May 1944; struck 10 Jun 1944 |