Inphilosophy,facticity (French:facticité,German:Faktizität)[1] has multiple meanings — from "factuality" and "contingency" to the intractable conditions ofhuman existence.[2]
The term was first used by German philosopherJohann Gottlieb Fichte (1762–1814) and has a variety of meanings. It can refer to facts and factuality, as in nineteenth-centurypositivism, but comes to mean that which resists explanation and interpretation inWilhelm Dilthey andNeo-Kantianism. The Neo-Kantians contrasted facticity with ideality, as doesJürgen Habermas inBetween Facts and Norms (Faktizität und Geltung).
German philosopherMartin Heidegger (1889–1976) discusses "facticity"[1] as the "thrownness" (Geworfenheit) of individual existence, which is to say individuals are "thrown into the world." By this, he does not only refer to a brute fact, or the factuality of a concrete historical situation, e.g. "born in the '80s." Facticity is something that already informs and has been taken up in existence, even if it is unnoticed or left unattended. As such, facticity is not something individuals come across and directly behold. In moods, for example, facticity has an enigmatic appearance, which involves both turning toward andaway from it. For Heidegger, moods are conditions of thinking and willing to which they must in some way respond. Thethrownness of human existence (orDasein) is accordingly disclosed through moods.
In the mid-20th century works of French existentialistsJean-Paul Sartre andSimone de Beauvoir, facticity signifies all of the concrete details against the background of which human freedom exists and is limited. For example, these may include the time and place of birth, a language, an environment, an individual's previous choices, as well as the inevitable prospect of their death. For example: currently, the situation of a person who is born without legs precludes their freedom to walk on the beach; if future medicine were to develop a method of growing new legs for that person, their facticity might no longer exclude this activity.
Facticity is a term that takes on a more specialized meaning in 20th centurycontinental philosophy, especially inphenomenology andexistentialism, includingEdmund Husserl,Martin Heidegger,Jean-Paul Sartre,Maurice Merleau-Ponty andTheodor Adorno. Recent philosophers such asGiorgio Agamben,Jean-Luc Nancy,Byung-Chul Han andFrançois Raffoul have taken up the notion of facticity in new ways.[citation needed]
Facticity plays a key part inQuentin Meillassoux's philosophical project to challenge the thought-world relationship ofcorrelationism. Meillassoux defines it as "the absence of reason for any reality; in other words, the impossibility of providing an ultimate ground for the existence of any being."[3]