Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

List of forms of government

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromErgatocracy)
List of governments
This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "List of forms of government" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(December 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Part of thePolitics series
Basic forms ofgovernment
List of forms ·List of countries
iconPolitics portal
Part of thePolitics series
Politics
iconPolitics portal

This article lists forms ofgovernment andpolitical systems, which are notmutually exclusive, and often have much overlap.[1] According toYale professorJuan José Linz there are three main types of political systems today:democracies,totalitarian regimes and, sitting between these two,authoritarian regimes withhybrid regimes.[2][3] Another modern classification system includesmonarchies as a standalone entity or as a hybrid system of the main three.[4] Scholars generally refer to adictatorship as either a form of authoritarianism or totalitarianism.[5][2][6]

The ancient Greek philosopherPlato discusses in theRepublic five types of regimes:aristocracy,timocracy,oligarchy,democracy, andtyranny.[7] The question raised by Plato in theRepublic: What kind of state is best? Generational changes informed by new political and cultural beliefs, technological progress, values and morality over millenniums have resulted in considerable shifts in the belief about the origination of political authority, who may participate in matters of state, how people might participate, the determination of what is just, and so forth.

Basic forms of governments

[edit]
Further information:Mixed government
Systems of government can be divided into two main categories, democratic and non-democratic[8]
DemocraticDirect Democracy,Representative Democracy (Republic Government,Parliamentary Government),Constitutional monarchy
Non-DemocraticAuthoritarian,Totalitarian,Oligarchy,Technocracy,Theocracy,Dictatorship,Absolute monarchy
Other TypesCommunist,Colonialist,Aristocratic

Index of Forms of Government.[1]

Countries in greenclaim to be a type ofdemocracy while countries in red do not. OnlySaudi Arabia,Oman, theUAE,Qatar,Brunei,Afghanistan, and theVatican do not claim to be democratic.

Forms of government by regional control

[edit]
TermDefinitionExamples
ConfederationA confederation (also known as a confederacy or league) is a union of sovereign states, united for purposes of common action often in relation to other states. Usually created by atreaty, confederations of states are usually established for dealing with critical issues, such as defense, foreign relations, internal trade or currency, with thegeneral government being required to provide support for all its members. Confederation represents a main form of inter-governmental-ism, this being defined as "any form of interaction between states which takes place on the basis of sovereign independence or government." Confederation is almost as a federation with the federal government being as a combination or alliance of all the states.
FederationA federation (also known as a federal state) is apolitical entity characterized by aunion of partiallyself-governing states or regions under a central (federal) government. In a federation, the self-governing status of the component states, as well as the division of power between them and the central government, is typically constitutionally entrenched and may not be altered by a unilateral decision of either party, the states or the federal political body. Alternatively, federation is a form of government in which sovereign power is formally divided between a central authority and a number of constituent regions so that each region retains some degree of control over its internal affairs.
Unitary stateA unitary state is astate governed as a single power in which thecentral government is ultimately supreme and anyadministrative divisions (sub-national units) exercise only the powers that the central government chooses to delegate. The majority of states in the world have a unitary system of government. Of the 193UN member states, 165 are governed as unitary states.

Forms of government by power source

[edit]
TermDescriptionExamples
AutocracyAutocracy is asystem of government in which supremepower (social and political) is concentrated in the hands of one person orpolity, whose decisions are subject to neither external legal restraints nor regularized mechanisms of popular control (except perhaps for the implicit threat of acoup d'état or massinsurrection).Absolute monarchies (such asKingdom of Saudi Arabia, theUnited Arab Emirates,Oman,Brunei andEswatini) anddictatorships are the main modern-day forms of autocracy. In family dictatorships, political power is passed down within one family because of the overwhelming authority of the leader. For example, inHaiti a form of hereditary dictatorship was founded byFrançois Duvalier (Papa Doc); it operated much like an absolute monarchy, yet within a nominally republican state. In 1971,Jean-Claude Duvalier (Baby Doc) became Haiti's nextdictator for life after his father's death. Both totalitarian and military dictatorships are often identified with, but need not be, an autocracy.
OligarchyOligarchy, meaning "rule of the few", is a form ofpower structure in whichpower rests with a small number of people. These people might be distinguished bynobility,wealth,family ties,education orcorporate,religious ormilitary control. Such states are often controlled by families who typically pass their influence from onegeneration to the next, butinheritance is not a necessary condition for the application of this term.
DemocracyDemocracy, meaning "rule of the people", is a system of government in which the citizens exercise power directly or elect representatives from among themselves to form a governing body, such as aparliament. Democracy is sometimes referred to as "rule of the majority". Democracy is a system of processing conflicts in which outcomes depend on what participants do, but no single force controls what occurs and its outcomes. This does include citizens being able to vote for different laws and leaders.
AnarchySometimes said to be non-governance; it is a structure which strives for non-hierarchical, voluntary associations among agents, emphasizingautonomy anddecentralization, often employingdirect democracy orconsensus democracy.

Systems resembling anarchism can be a natural, temporary result of civil war in a country, when an established state has been destroyed and the region is in a transitional period without definitive leadership.[9] It has also been proposed as a historical state of human society, especially before the concentration of power afforded by agriculture.[10] It has been presented as a viable long-term choice by individuals known asanarchists who oppose the state and other forms ofcoercive hierarchies. These systems are often highly organized, and include institutional or cultural systems to prevent the concentration of power. Anarchism typically advocates for social organization in non-hierarchical,voluntary associations where peoplevoluntarily help each other.[11] There are a variety of forms of anarchy that attempt to discourage the use of coercion, violence, force and authority, while still producing a productive and desirable society.

Types of democracy

[edit]
Main article:Types of democracy
TermDescriptionExamples
DemarchyGovernment in which the state is governed byrandomly selected decision from a broadly inclusive pool of eligible citizens. These groups, sometimes termed "policy juries", "citizens' juries", or "consensus conferences", deliberately make decisions about public policies in much the same way thatjuries decide criminal cases. Demarchy, in theory, could overcome some of the functional problems of conventionalrepresentative democracy, which is widely subject to manipulation byspecial interests and a division between professional policymakers (politicians and lobbyists) vs. a largely passive, uninvolved and often uninformed electorate. According to Australian philosopherJohn Burnheim, random selection of policymakers would make it easier for everyday citizens to meaningfully participate, and harder for special interests to corrupt the process.

More generally, random selection of decision makers from a larger group is known assortition (from the Latin base for lottery). TheAthenian democracy made much use of sortition, with nearly all government offices filled by lottery (of full citizens) rather than by election. Candidates were almost always male, Greek, educated citizens holding a minimum of wealth and status.

Census democracyIt is the suffrage in which the right to vote is restricted to only a part of the population, being in many cases wealthy class. This was the case in almost all existing democracies of the 18th and 19th centuries, although in the latter the right to vote was given to theworking class and thelower middle class in countries like Great Britain, later in the 20th century theuniversal suffrage with the advent of voting rights for all people of the age of majority.
Direct democracyGovernment in which the people represent themselves and vote directly for new laws and public policy.
ElectocracyA form ofrepresentative democracy where citizens are able to vote for their government but cannot participate directly in governmental decision making. The government has almost absolute power.
ErgatocracyRule by theproletariat, the workers, or the working class. Examples of ergatocracy include communist revolutionaries and rebels who control most of society and establish an alternative economy for people and workers. SeeDictatorship of the proletariat.
Herrenvolk democracyAform of government in which only a specific ethnic group participates in government, while other ethnic groups are disenfranchised. Though elections may be free, voting suffrage is restricted based on race, with governance reflecting the interests of the politically dominant racial group.
Liberal democracyA form of government in whichrepresentative democracy operates under the principles ofliberalism. It is characterised by fair, free, and competitiveelections betweenmultiple distinctpolitical parties, aseparation of powers into differentbranches of government, therule of law in everyday life as part of anopen society, and the protection ofhuman rights andcivil liberties for all persons. To define the system in practice, liberal democracies often draw upon aconstitution, either formally written oruncodified, to delineate the powers of government and enshrine thesocial contract. After a period of sustained expansion throughout the 20th century, liberal democracy became the predominant political system in the world. A liberal democracy may take various constitutional forms: it may be arepublic, such asEstonia,Ireland,Germany, andGreece; or aconstitutional monarchy, such as theUnited Kingdom,Japan orSpain. It may have apresidential system (such asChile, theDominican Republic, or theUnited States), asemi-presidential system (such asCape Verde,France, orPortugal), aparliamentary system (such asAustralia,Germany,Italy,Slovenia,India orNew Zealand) ordirectorial system (such asSwitzerland).
Liquid democracyGovernment in which the people represent themselves or choose to temporarily delegate their vote to another voter to vote for new laws and public policy.Experiments have mostly been conducted on a local level or exclusively through online platforms, such as byPirate Parties
Representative democracyWherein the people or citizens of a country elect representatives to create and implement public policy in place ofdirect participation by the people.Almost all current democratic governments
Social democracyElements of direct and representative democracies are combined in a form ofparticipatory democracy. It also adopts amixed economy combining the principles of afree-market andeconomic orsocial interventionism.

Social democracy rejects the "either/or" phobiocratic/polarization interpretation of capitalism versus socialism. Social democracy argues that all citizens should be legally entitled to certain social rights. These are made up of universal access to public services such as: education, health care, workers' compensation, public transportation, and other services including child care and care for the elderly. Social democracy is connected with the trade union labour movement and supports collective bargaining rights for workers. Contemporary social democracy advocates freedom from discrimination based on differences of: ability/disability, age, ethnicity, sex, language, religion, and social class.

Soviet democracyThe citizens are governed by directly elected councils. The councils are directly responsible to their electors and are bound by their instructions. Such an imperative mandate is in contrast to a free mandate, in which the elected delegates are only responsible to their conscience. Delegates may accordingly be dismissed from their post at any time or be voted out (recall).
Totalitarian democracyA form of electocracy in which lawfully elected representatives maintain the integrity of a nation state whose citizens, while granted the right to vote, have little or no participation in the decision-making process of the government.
Electoral autocracyAhybrid regime, in which democratic institutions are imitative and adhere to authoritarian methods. In these regimes, regular elections are held, but they fail to reach democratic standards of freedom and fairness.
TrigonocracyAhybrid regime consisting of direct democracy, technocracy of lobbyists, and a meritocratic principle. This form of state, according toSam May, demands five political powers, including the known three (Legislative,Executive, andJudiciary) as well as the so-called Monecative for supverision of finances and Mediacative for integrity and independence of the media.This type of government is solely theoretical, as no state has implemented trigonocracy yet.
Digital democracyThe historical scaling problem and inherent inefficiencies of democracy may be resolved with advances in technology, most especially the rise of the Internet. In a digital democracy, specific questions would be formulated as referendums, and frequently put forth for public discussion and comment and voting. Citizens could read the arguments, proffer their own, and vote on the matter, using readily-available technologies like smartphones.

Types of oligarchy

[edit]

Oligarchies are societies controlled and organised by a smallclass of privileged people, with no intervention from the most part of society; this small elite is defined as sharing some common trait.

De jure democratic governments with ade facto oligarchy are ruled by a small group of segregated, powerful or influential people who usually share similar interests or family relations. These people may spread power and elect candidates equally or not equally. An oligarchy is different from a true democracy because very few people are given the chance to change things. An oligarchy does not have to be hereditary or monarchic. An oligarchy does not have one clear ruler but several rulers. (Ancient Greek ὀλιγαρχία (oligarkhía) literally meant "rule by few")

Some historical examples of oligarchy include theRoman Republic, in which only males of the nobility could run for office and only wealthy males could vote, and theAthenian democracy, which usedsortition to elect candidates, almost always male, Greek, educated citizens holding a minimum of land, wealth and status. Some critics ofcapitalism and/orrepresentative democracy think ofthe United States and the United Kingdom as oligarchies.

These categories are not exclusive.

TermDefinition
AristocracyRule by the nobility; a system of governance where political power is in the hands of a small class of privileged individuals who claim a higher birth than the rest of society.[16]
GeniocracyA term invented by the founder ofRaëlism and meaning rule by the intelligent; a system of governance where creativity, innovation, intelligence and wisdom are required for those who wish to govern. Comparable tonoocracy.
HamarchyThe joint rule of different regions retaining their individuality; a system of government consisting of many distinct or independent parts that rule together.[17][18][full citation needed]
KraterocracyRule by the strong; a system of governance where those who are strong enough to seize power through physical force, social maneuvering or political cunning.[19]
KritarchyRule by various judges, thekritarchs; a system of governance composed of law-enforcement institutions in which the state and thelegal systems are traditionally orconstitutionally the same entity. The kritarchs, magistrates and other adjudicators have the legal power to legislate and administer the enforcement of government laws in addition to the interposition of laws and the resolution of disputes. (Not to be confused with"judiciary" or"judicial system".)Somalia, ruled by judges with the tradition ofxeer,[20] as well as theIslamic Courts Union, is a historical example.[21]
MeritocracyRule by the meritorious; a system of governance where groups are selected predicated on their ability, knowledge in a given area, and contributions to society.
NetocracyRule by the digitally literate; a term invented by the editorial board of the American technology magazineWired in the early 1990s. A portmanteau of "Internet" and "aristocracy", "netocracy" refers to a perceived global upper-class that bases its power on a technological advantage and networking skills, in comparison to what is portrayed as a bourgeoisie of a gradually diminishing importance. The netocracy concept has been compared withRichard Florida's concept of thecreative class. Bard and Söderqvist have also defined an under-class in opposition to thenetocracy, which they refer to as the "consumtariat".[22]
NoocracyRule by the wise; a system of governance in which decision making is in the hands of philosophers (as advocated byPlato)
PlutocracyRule by the wealthy; a system wherein governance is indebted to, dependent upon or heavily influenced by the desires of the rich. Plutocratic influence can alter any form of government. For instance, if a significant number of elected representative positions in a republic are dependent upon financial support from wealthy sources, it is a plutocratic republic.
ParticracyRule by a dominantpolitical party (or parties).
StratocracyRule by military service; a system of governance composed of military government in which the state and the military are traditionally orconstitutionally the same entity.[23][24] Citizens with mandatory or voluntary active military service or who have been honorably discharged have the right to govern. (Therefore, stratocracy is not to be confused with "military junta" or "military dictatorship".) TheSpartancity-state is a historical example;[25] its social system and constitution were completely focused on military training and excellence. Stratocratic ideology often attaches to the honor-orientedtimocracy.
SynarchismRule by a secret élite; a form of government where political power effectively rests with a secret élite, in contrast to an oligarchy where the élite is or could be known by the public.
TechnocracyRule by the educated or by technical experts; a system of governance where people who are skilled in their respective areas of expertise control decision-making. In a technocracy, experts in the technical details of specific issues are presumed to best understand the problems at hand, as well as how various technological redresses can improve the society at large. Doctors, engineers, scientists, professionals and technologists who have prowess would compose the governing body instead of politicians, businessmen and economists.[26] In a technocracy, decision-makers would be selected based upon how knowledgeable and skilful they are in their field. Technocracy is today represented by global algorithmic governance by Silicon Valley engineers. This recent form of technocracy has been called 'digitocracy'.[27]
TheocracyRule by a religious elite; a system of governance composed of religious institutions in which the state and the church are traditionally orconstitutionally the same entity.[28]The Vatican (seePope),[29]Iran andAfghanistan (seeSupreme Leader),[30]caliphates and otherIslamic states are historically considered[citation needed]theocracies. Theocracy contrasts withcaesaropapism, a form of government in which church and state form an alliance dominated by the secular power.[31]
TimocracyRule by thehonourable; a system of governance ruled by honorable citizens and property-owners.Socrates defines a timocracy as a government ruled by people who love honour and who are selected according to the degree of honour they hold in society. This form of timocracy is very similar tomeritocracy, in the sense that individuals of outstanding character or faculty are placed in the seat of power.

Types of autocracy

[edit]

Autocracies are ruled by a single entity with absolute power, whose decisions are subject to neither external legal restraints nor regular mechanisms of popular control (except perhaps for implicit threat). That entity may be an individual, as in adictatorship or it may be a group, as in aone-party state. The worddespotism means to "rule in the fashion of despots" and is often used to describe autocracy.

Historical examples of autocracy include theRoman Empire,North Korea, theIslamic Emirate of Afghanistan,Eritrea andNazi Germany.

TermDefinition
Civilian dictatorshipA dictatorship where power resides in the hands of one single person orpolity. That person may be, for example, anabsolute monarch or adictator, but can also be an electedpresident. TheRoman Republic made dictators to lead during times of war; but the Roman dictators only held power for a small time. In modern times, an autocrat's rule is one that is not stopped by any rules of law,constitutions, or other social and political institutions. After World War II, many governments in Latin America, Asia, and Africa were ruled by autocratic governments. Examples of dictators includeJoseph Stalin,Mao Zedong,Adolf Hitler,Benito Mussolini and theKim dynasty ofNorth Korea founded byKim Il Sung.
Military dictatorshipA dictatorship primarily enforced by the military. Military dictators are different fromcivilian dictators for a number of reasons: their motivations for seizing power, the institutions through which they organize their rule, and the ways in which they leave power. Often viewing itself as saving the nation from the corrupt or myopic civilian politicians, a military dictatorship justifies its position as "neutral" arbiters on the basis of their membership within the armed forces. For example, many juntas adopt titles, such as "National Redemption Council", "Committee of National Restoration", or "National Liberation Committee". Military leaders often rule as ajunta, selecting one of them as the head.

Pejorative attributes

[edit]

Regardless of the form of government, the actual governance may be influenced by sectors withpolitical power which are not part of the formal government. These are terms that highlight certain actions of the governors, such ascorruption,demagoguery, orfear mongering that may disrupt the intended way of working of the government if they are widespread enough.

TermDefinition
Banana republicA politically unstable and kleptocratic government that economically depends upon the exports of a limited resource (fruits, minerals), and usually features a society composed ofstratifiedsocial classes, such as a great, impoverished ergatocracy and a ruling plutocracy, composed of the aristocracy of business, politics, and the military.[32] Inpolitical science, the termbanana republic denotes a country dependent upon limitedprimary-sector productions, which is ruled by aplutocracy who exploit the national economy by means of a politico-economicoligarchy.[33] InAmerican literature, the termbanana republic originally denoted the fictionalRepublic of Anchuria, a servile dictatorship that abetted, or supported forkickbacks, the exploitation of large-scale plantation agriculture, especially banana cultivation.[33] In U.S. politics, the termbanana republic is a pejorative political descriptor coined by the American writerO. Henry inCabbages and Kings (1904), a book of thematically related short stories derived from his 1896–1897 residence inHonduras, where he was hiding from U.S. law for bankembezzlement.[34]
BankocracyRule by banks;[35] a system of governance with excessive power or influence of banks and other financial authorities on public policy-making. It can also refer to a form of government where financial institutions rule society.
CorporatocracyRule by corporations; a system of governance where an economic and political system is controlled by corporations or corporate interests.[36] Its use is generally pejorative. Examples includecompany rule in India, and the business voters for theCity of London Corporation.
KakistocracyRule by the worst; a system of government where the least-qualified citizens govern or dictate policies.[37]
KleptocracyRule by thieves; a system of governance where its officials and the ruling class in general pursue personal wealth and political power at the expense of the wider population. In strict terms kleptocracy is not a form of government but a characteristic of a government engaged in such behavior.
NepotocracyRule by nephews;favouritism granted torelatives regardless ofmerit; a system of governance in which importance is given to the relatives of those already in power, like anephew (where the word comes from). In such governments even if the relatives aren't qualified they are given positions of authority just because they know someone who already has authority.[38]Pope Alexander VI (Borgia) was accused of this.[39]
OchlocracyRule by the crowd; a system of governance where mob rule is government by mob or a mass of people, or theintimidation of legitimate authorities. As a pejorative formajoritarianism, it is akin to theLatin phrasemobile vulgus meaning "the fickle crowd", from which the English term "mob" was originally derived in the 1680s. Ochlocratic governments are often a democracy spoiled bydemagoguery, "tyranny of the majority" and the rule of passion over reason; such governments can be as oppressive as autocratic tyrants. Ochlocracy is synonymous in meaning and usage to the modern, informal term "mobocracy".

Other attributes

[edit]
TermDefinition
AdhocracyRule by a government based on relatively disorganized principles and institutions as compared to abureaucracy, its exact opposite.
AnocracyA regime type where power is not vested in public institutions (as in a normal democracy) but spread amongst elite groups who are constantly competing with each other for power. Examples of anocracies in Africa include the warlords ofSomalia and the shared governments insamaya andZimbabwe. Anocracies are situated midway between anautocracy and ademocracy.[40]

ThePolity IV dataset recognizes anocracy as a category. In that dataset, anocracies are exactly in the middle between autocracies and democracies.

Often the word is defined more broadly. For example, a 2010International Alert publication defined anocracies as "countries that are neither autocratic nor democratic, most of which are making the risky transition between autocracy and democracy".[41] Alert noted that the number of anocracies had increased substantially since the end of the Cold War. Anocracy is not surprisingly the least resilient political system to short-term shocks: it creates the promise but not yet the actuality of an inclusive and effective political economy, and threatens members of the established elite; and is therefore very vulnerable to disruption and armed violence.

AuthoritarianismRule by an autocracy or oligarchy with a power source predicated on a political party or stratocracy; characterized by the rejection ofpolitical plurality.
Band societyRule by a government based on small (usually family) unit with a semi-informal hierarchy, with strongest (either physical strength or strength of character) as leader.
BureaucracyRule by a system of governance with many bureaus, administrators, and petty officials.
ConsociationalismRule by a government based on consensus democracy.
Military juntaRule by a committee of military leaders.
NomocracyRule by a government under the sovereignty of rational laws and civic right as opposed to one under theocratic systems of government. In a nomocracy, ultimate and final authority (sovereignty) exists in the law.
CyberocracyRule by a computer, which decides based on computer code and efficient use of information. This is closely linked to Cybersynacy. This type of ruling appears in the short story "The Machine Stops" by E. M. Forster.
AlgocracyRule by algorithms used in diverse levels of bureaucracy, which is also known as algorithmic regulation, regulation by algorithms, algorithmic governance, algorithmic legal order of government by algorithm.
IsocracyA country where everyone has equal political power.

Forms of government by power ideology

[edit]
TermDefinition
MonarchyA monarchy is aform of government in which a group, generally a family representing adynasty, embodies the country'snational identity and its head, themonarch, exercises the role of sovereignty. The actual power of the monarch may vary from purely symbolic (crowned republic), to partial and restricted (constitutional monarchy), to completely autocratic (absolute monarchy). Traditionally the monarch's post isinherited and lasts until death or abdication. In contrast,elective monarchies require the monarch to be elected. Both types have further variations as there are widely divergent structures and traditions defining monarchy. For example, in some[which?]elected monarchies only pedigrees are taken into account for eligibility of the next ruler, whereas many hereditary monarchies impose requirements regarding the religion, age, gender, mental capacity, etc. Occasionally this might create a situation of rival claimants whoselegitimacy is subject to effective election. There have been cases where the term of a monarch'sreign is either fixed in years or continues until certain goals are achieved: an invasion being repulsed, for instance.
RepublicA republic (Latin:res publica) is aform of government in which the country is considered a "public matter", not theprivate concern or property of the rulers. The primary positions of power within a republic are not inherited, but are attained through elections expressing theconsent of the governed. Such leadership positions are therefore expected to fairly represent the citizen body. It is a form of government under which the head of state is not amonarch. In American English, the definition of a republic can also refer specifically to a government in which elected individuals represent the citizen body, also known as arepresentative democracy (ademocratic republic) and exercise power according to therule of law (aconstitutional republic).

Types of monarchy

[edit]

Countries withmonarchy attributes are those where a family or group of families (rarely another type of group), called theroyalty, represents national identity, with power traditionally assigned to one of its individuals, called the monarch, who mostly rule kingdoms. The actual role of the monarch and other members of royalty varies from purely symbolical (crowned republic) to partial and restricted (constitutional monarchy) to completely despotic (absolute monarchy). Traditionally and in most cases, the post of the monarch isinherited, but there are alsoelective monarchies where the monarch is elected.

TermDefinition
Absolute monarchyA traditional and historical system where the monarch exercises ultimate governing authority ashead of state andhead of government. Many nations of Europe during theMiddle Ages were absolute monarchies. Modern examples include mainly Islamic countries such asSaudi Arabia,UAE,Oman,Brunei and one African country,Eswatini.
Constitutional monarchyAlso called parliamentary monarchy, the monarch's powers are limited by law or by a formalconstitution,[42][43] usually assigning them to those of thehead of state. Many modern developed countries, including theUnited Kingdom,Norway,Netherlands,Australia,Canada,Spain andJapan, are constitutional monarchy systems.
Crowned republicA form of government where the monarch (and family) is an official ceremonial entity with no political power. The royal family and the monarch are intended to represent the country and may perform speeches or attend an important ceremonial events as a symbolical guide to the people, but hold no actual power in decision-making, appointments,et cetera.
Elective monarchyA form of government where the monarch is elected, a modern example being theKing of Cambodia, who is chosen by theRoyal Council of the Throne;Vatican City is also often considered a modern elective monarchy.
Self-proclaimed monarchyA form of government where the monarch claims a monarch title without a nexus to the previous monarchdynasty. Modern self-proclaimed monarchies include the micronationPrincipality of Seborga claiming 14 square kilometres (5.4 sq mi) of Italy.

Types of republic

[edit]

Rule by a form of government in which the people, or some significant portion of them, have supreme control over the government and where offices of state are elected or chosen by elected people.[44][45] A common simplified definition of a republic is a government where the head of state is not a monarch.[46][47]Montesquieu included bothdemocracies, where all the people have a share in rule, andaristocracies oroligarchies, where only some of the people rule, as republican forms of government.[48]

These categories are not exclusive.

TermDefinition
Classical republicClassical antiquity civilizations typically followed a republican model with a complex system of assemblies and magistrates, all drawing upon the idea of a "civic" sector—a representative sample of particular populations. In a classical republic, power rests with selected individuals who represent the citizenry (or more usually a limited sector thereof) and who rule in accordance with mutually agreed-upon law.
Constitutional republicRepublics where the government's powers are limited by law or a formalconstitution (an official document establishing the exact powers and restrictions of a nation and its government), and in which the leaders are chosen by a vote amongst the populace. Typically, laws cannot be passed which violate said constitution, unless the constitution itself is altered by law. This theoretically serves to protect minority groups from being subjected to thetyranny of the majority, ormob rule. Examples includeIndia,South Africa,United States, etc.
Democratic republicRepublics where the laws are ultimately decided by popular vote, whether by a body of elected representatives or directly by the public, and there is no restriction on which laws are passed so long as they have majority support. Constitutional law is either non-existent or poses little obstacle to legislation.
Federal republicRepublics that are a federation of states or provinces, where there is a national (federal) law encompassing the nation as a whole but where each state or province is free to legislate and enforce its own laws and affairs so long as they do not conflict with federal law. Examples includeArgentina,Austria,Brazil,Germany,India,Mexico,Russia,Switzerland,United States and Nigeria.
Islamic republicRepublics purporting to be governed in accordance with Islamic law.Islamic Republic of Iran,Mauritania, andIslamic Republic of Pakistan are self-described Islamic republics (as of 2022).Afghanistan,Federal Islamic Republic of the Comoros and theTurkish Islamic Republic of East Turkestan were Islamic republics at one time but are no more.
Parliamentary republicRepublics, likeIndia orSingapore, with an elected head of state, but where the head of state and head of government are kept separate with the head of government retaining most executive powers, or a head of state akin to a head of government, elected by a parliament.
Presidential republicRepublics with an elected head of state, where the head of state is also the head of the government. Examples include theUnited States,Mexico,Brazil,Nigeria andIndonesia.
People's republicRepublics that include countries likeChina andVietnam that arede jure governed for and by the people. The termPeople's Republic is used to differentiate themselves from the earlier republic of their countries before the people's revolution, like the Republic of China.
Semi-presidential republic

A semi-presidential republic is a government system with power divided between a president as head of state and a prime minister as head of government, used in countries likeFrance,Portugal, andEgypt. The president, elected by the people, symbolizes national unity and foreign policy while the prime minister is appointed by the president or elected by the parliament and handles daily administration. The termsemi-presidential distinguishes this system from presidential and parliamentary systems.

Directorial republic

A directorial republic is a government system with power divided among a college of several people who jointly exercise the powers of a head of state and/or a head of government.

Merchant republic

In the early Renaissance, a number of small, wealthy, trade-based city-states embraced republican ideals, notably across Italy and the Baltic. In general, these mercantile republics arose in regions of Europe where feudal control by an absolutist monarchy was minimal or absent completely. In these mercantile republics, the leaders were elected by the citizenry with the primary duty of increasing the city-state's collective wealth.

Forms of government by socio-economic attributes

[edit]

By socio-economic attributes

[edit]
Further information:Economic system

Many political systems can be described as socioeconomic ideologies. Experience with those movements in power and the strong ties they may have to particular forms of government can cause them to be considered as forms of government in themselves.

These categories are not exclusive.

TermDefinition
AnarchismA system that advocatesself-governed societies based on voluntary institutions. These are often described asstateless societies, although several authors have defined them more specifically as institutions based on non-hierarchical orfree associations, while others have advocated for stateless societies with the inclusion ofprivate property, property rights and hierarchical groups, so long as membership and association with those groups are entirelyvoluntary. Anarchism holds thestate to be undesirable, unnecessary and/or harmful.
CapitalismA system in which themeans of production (machines, tools, factories, etc.) are owned by private individuals, workers then negotiate with those individuals to use those means of production in exchange for a portion of what they produce, usually in the form of capital (money). The owners of themeans of production are entitled to whatever portion of the products of the workers' labor that is agreed upon by the two parties.
ColonialismA system in which a native group (or their lands and resources) is subjugated by an external political power for their own economic and/or political benefit.
CommunismA socialist system in which the means of production are commonly owned (either by the people directly, through the commune, or by acommunist state orsociety), and production is undertakenfor use, rather thanfor profit.[49][50] Communist society is thus, in theory,stateless,classless, moneyless, — it is usually regarded as the "final form" of a socialist or anarchist society.
DespotismA system in which the laws and resources of a nation are controlled by one individual, usually amonarch ordictator, who holds absolute political power. Examples include thepharaohs ofAncient Egypt, theRoman emperors and theNorth Korean supreme leaders.
DistributismA variant of capitalism which views widespreadproperty ownership as fundamental right;[51] themeans of production are spread as widely as possible rather than being centralized under the control of the state (as instate socialism), or a few individuals/corporations (as in what proponents of distributism call "crony capitalism")[52] Distributism fundamentally opposessocialism andcapitalism,[53][54] which distributists view as equally flawed and exploitative. In contrast, distributism seeks to subordinate economic activity to human life as a whole, to our spiritual life, our intellectual life, our family life".[55]
FeudalismA system of land ownership and duties common toMedieval Europe andFeudal Japan. Under feudalism, all the land in a kingdom belonged to the king or emperor. However, the king/emperor would give some of the land to the lords or nobles who fought for him. These presents of land were called manors. Then the nobles gave some of their land to vassals. The vassals then had to do duties for the nobles. The lands of vassals were called fiefs.

A similar system is theIqta‘, used by medievalIslamic societies of the middle east and north Africa. This functioned much like the feudal system but generally had titles that weren't granted to a family dynasty but to individuals at the behest of the sultan and generally only required a tax from the lower classes, instead of military service and/or manual labour like in the feudal system.

MinarchismA variant ofcapitalism which advocates for thestate to exist solely to provide a very small number of services. A popular model of the State proposed by minarchists is known as thenight-watchman state, in which the only governmental functions are to protect citizens fromaggression,theft,breach of contract, andfraud as defined byproperty laws, limiting it to three institutions: themilitary, thepolice, andcourts.
MonarchismA system in which the government is headed by an agreed upon head of thenobility who is known as themonarch, usually in the form of aking oremperor (but also less commonly aqueen or empress). In most monarchical systems the position of monarch is oneinherited from a previous ruler bybloodline or marriage, but in other cases it may be a position elected by thenobility themselves, as was the case in the ancientRoman Kingdom and the medievalHoly Roman Empire.
RepublicanismA system in which the laws and governmental policies of the state are considered a "public matter" and decided by the citizens of the society, whoever they may be. Most modern nation-states are examples of republics, but other examples include those of ancientRome andAthens.
SocialismA system in whichworkers, democratically and/orsocially own themeans of production.[56] The economic framework may bedecentralized andself-managed in autonomous economic units, as inlibertarian systems, orcentrallyplanned, as inauthoritarian systems.[57]Public services such ashealthcare andeducation would becommonly,collectively, and/orstate owned.
TotalitarianismA system in which opposition is prohibited, civil rights are extremely suppressed and virtually all aspects of social life, including the economy, morals, public and private lives of citizens, are controlled by a centralizedauthoritarianstate that holds absolute political power, usually under adictatorship orsingle political party.[58] Five examples are theSoviet Union (1927–53),Nazi Germany (1933–1945),Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan,Eritrea andNorth Korea.
TribalismA system based on a small complex society of varying degrees of centralisation that is led by an individual known as a chief.

Types of government by geo-cultural attributes

[edit]

Governments can also be categorized based on their size and scope of influence:

TermDefinition
National governmentThegovernment of anation-state and is a characteristic of aunitary state. This is the same thing as afederal government which may have distinct powers at various levels authorized or delegated to it by its member states, though the adjective 'central' is sometimes used to describe it. The structure of central governments varies. Many countries have created autonomous regions by delegating powers from the central government to governments at a sub national level, such as a regional, state or local level. Based on a broad definition of a basic political system, there are two or more levels of government that exist within an established territory and govern through common institutions with overlapping or shared powers as prescribed by aconstitution or other law.
City-stateAsovereign state, also described as a type of small independent country, that usually consists of a single city and its dependent territories. Historically, this included cities such asRome,Athens,Carthage, and theItalian city-states during theRenaissance. Today only a handful of sovereign city-states exist, with some disagreement as to which are city-states. A great deal of consensus exists that the term properly applies currently toHong Kong,Macau,Singapore,Monaco, andVatican City. City states are also sometimes calledmicro-states which however also includes other configurations of very small countries.
CommuneFrom theMedieval Latincommunia. Anintentional community of people living together, sharing common interests, often having common values and beliefs, as well as sharedproperty, possessions,resources, and, in some communes,work,income orassets.
Intergovernmental organisationsAlso known as international governmental organizations (IGOs): the type of organization most closely associated with the term 'international organization', these are organizations that are made up primarily ofsovereign states (referred to asmember states). Notable examples include theUnited Nations (UN),Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC),Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE),Council of Europe (COE),International Labour Organization (ILO) andInternational Police Organization (INTERPOL). The UN has used the term "intergovernmental organization" instead of "international organization" for clarity.
World governmentThe notion of a commonpolitical authority for all of humanity, yielding a globalgovernment and a singlestate that exercisesauthority over the entireEarth. Such a government could come into existence either through violent and compulsoryworld domination or through peaceful and voluntarysupranational union.

Forms of government by other attributes

[edit]

By significant constitutional attributes

[edit]

Certain major characteristics are defining of certain types; others are historically associated with certain types of government.

By approach to regional autonomy

[edit]

This list focuses on differing approaches that political systems take to the distribution ofsovereignty, and theautonomy of regions within the state.

Theoretical and speculative attributes

[edit]

These have no conclusive historical or current examples outside of speculation and scholarly debate.

TermDefinition
Corporate republicTheoreticalform of government occasionally hypothesised in works ofscience fiction, though some historical nations such as medievalFlorence might be said to have been governed as corporate republics. The colonialmegacorporations such as theDutch East India Company should possibly be considered corporate states, being semi-sovereign with the power to wage war and establish colonies.

While retaining some semblance ofrepublican government, a corporate republic would berun primarily like a business, involving aboard of directors andexecutives.Utilities, includinghospitals,schools, themilitary, and thepolice force, would beprivatised. Thesocial welfare function carried out by the state is instead carried out by corporations in the form of benefits to employees. Although corporate republics do not exist officially in the modern world, they are often used in works of fiction orpolitical commentary as a warning of the perceived dangers of unbridledcapitalism. In such works, they usually arise when a single, vastly powerful corporation deposes a weak government, over time or in acoup d'état.

Some political scientists have also consideredstate socialist nations to be forms of corporate republics, with the state assuming full control of all economic and political life and establishing a monopoly on everything within national boundaries – effectively making the state itself amount to a giant corporation.

Collective consciousnessRule by a collective consciousness of all human minds connected via some form of technological telepathy acting as a form of supercomputer to make decisions based on shared patterned experiences to deliver fair and accurate decisions to problems as they arrive. Also known as the hive mind principle, it differs from voting in that each person would make a decision while in the hive—the synapses of all minds work together following a longer path of memories to make one decision. Seetechnological singularity.
Secret societyA secret society (cryptocracy, secret government,shadow government, or invisible government) is a club or organization whose activities, events, inner functioning, or membership are concealed. As a form of government, secret societies are a theoretical government in which real and actual political power resides with private individuals who make decisions behind the scenes, while publicly elected representatives serve as puppets orscapegoats.

Probably the most infamous secret society is theIlluminati, who had in their general statutes, "The order of the day is to put an end to the machinations of the purveyors of injustice, to control them without dominating them."[59] Secret societies are illegal in several countries, includingItaly andPoland, who ban secret political parties and political organizations in their constitutions.

Secret societies are often portrayed infiction settings. Some examples from popular culture include:

TheonomyA hypotheticalChristian form of government in which society is ruled bydivine law.[60] Theonomists hold that divine law, particularly the judicial laws of theOld Testament, should be observed by modern societies.[61] The chief architects of the movement areGary North,Greg Bahnsen, andR.J. Rushdoony.[62]
MagocracyRule by a government with the highest authority composed entirely or primarily ofmagicians, sages, sorcerers, wizards, witches, or some other magic users. A magocracy consists of a ruling class that uses magic as a centerpiece of their political power. Magocracies can exist as a government of mages ruling over other mages, or as mages ruling over non-magical persons.

Magocracies are portrayed primarily in fiction andfantasy settings. Some examples from popular culture include:

Synthetic TechnocracyRule byspecialist AI experts in a given domain. AI technocrats are assumed to have two major advantages over human technocrats: fairness and comprehensiveness. All forms of human government are seen as inherently flawed, due to the emotional nature of humankind. Synthetic technocracy bills itself as dispassionate and rational, free of the strife of political parties and factions as it pursues its optimal ends. Following in the tradition of other meritocracy theories, synthetic technocrats assume full state control over political and economic issues.

Synthetic technocracy is portrayed primarily inscience fiction settings. Examples from popular culture include Gaia inAppleseed

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abTomar, Dave; Updated, James BarhamPublished (30 August 2021)."25 Forms of Government—A Study Starter | Academic Influence".academicinfluence.com.
  2. ^abJuan José Linz (2000).Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Lynne Rienner Publisher. p. 143.ISBN 978-1-55587-890-0.OCLC 1172052725.
  3. ^Jonathan Michie, ed. (3 February 2014).Reader's Guide to the Social Sciences. Routledge. p. 95.ISBN 978-1-135-93226-8.
  4. ^Ginny Garcia-Alexander; Hyeyoung Woo; Matthew J. Carlson (3 November 2017).Social Foundations of Behavior for the Health Sciences. Springer. pp. 137–.ISBN 978-3-319-64950-4.OCLC 1013825392.
  5. ^Allan Todd; Sally Waller (10 September 2015). Allan Todd; Sally Waller (eds.).History fo States 20th Century). Cambridge University Press. pp. 10–.ISBN 978-1-107-55889-2.
  6. ^Sondrol, P. C. (2009)."Totalitarian and Authoritarian Dictators: A Comparison of Fidel Castro and Alfredo Stroessner".Journal of Latin American Studies.23 (3):599–620.doi:10.1017/S0022216X00015868.JSTOR 157386.S2CID 144333167.
  7. ^Norman Abjorensen (15 June 2019).Historical Dictionary of Democracy. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 288–.ISBN 978-1-5381-2074-3.OCLC 1081354236.
  8. ^David Altman (20 December 2010).Direct Democracy Worldwide. Cambridge University Press. pp. 76–78.ISBN 978-1-139-49543-1.
  9. ^"Better off Stateless: Somalia Before and After Government Collapse"(PDF). George Mason University. 30 September 2007.
  10. ^Graeber, David; Wengrow, David (2021).The dawn of everything: a new history of humanity. London: Allen Lane.ISBN 978-0-241-40242-9.
  11. ^Anarchy Works by Peter Gelderloos. Retrieved21 October 2016.
  12. ^Hansen, Mogens Herman (1999).The Athenian democracy in the age of Demosthenes : structure, principles, and ideology ([2nd ed.] ed.). [Bristol]: Bristol Classical Press.ISBN 1853995851.OCLC 45392658.
  13. ^Dowlen, Oliver (2008).The political potential of sortition a study of the random selection of citizens for public office. Exeter, UK; Charlottesville, VA: Imprint Academic.ISBN 9781845401795.OCLC 213307148.
  14. ^Greenway, H. D. S."Hypocrisy in sowing democracy".Boston.com. Retrieved2019-07-13.
  15. ^Abele, Hanns (1982).Handbuch der österreichischen Wirtschaftspolitik [Handbook of Austrian Economic Policy] (in German). Vienna: Manz. p. 145.ISBN 3214070509.OCLC 10694901.
  16. ^"Aristocracy".Oxford English Dictionary. December 1989. Archived fromthe original on June 29, 2011. RetrievedDecember 22, 2009.
  17. ^Aldrich, Chris (2002).The Aldrich Dictionary of Phobias and Other Word Families. Victoria, Canada: Trafford Publishing. p. 6.ISBN 1-55369-886-X.
  18. ^The Journal of Christian Reconstruction.14. Chalcedon Foundation: 169. 1997https://books.google.com/books?id=uNHbAAAAMAAJ.Lacking an English word [...], Lieber simply coined one, hamarchy, which he derived 'from ama, at the same time, jointly, cooperatingly, andarchein, to rule.'{{cite journal}}:Missing or empty|title= (help)
  19. ^Hausheer, Herman (1942). "Kratocracy". InRunes, Dagobert D. (ed.).Dictionary of Philosophy.
  20. ^MacCallum, Spencer Heath (1 June 1998)."A Peaceful Ferment in Somalia".The Freeman.Foundation for Economic Education. Retrieved15 March 2013.
  21. ^Harvard Divinity School (2016)."The Islamic Courts Union".Harvard Divinity School. Archived fromthe original on 30 July 2020. Retrieved30 September 2020.
  22. ^Bard, Alexander;Söderqvist, Jan (24 February 2012) [2000].The Netocracts: Futurica Trilogy 1. Translated by Smith, Neil. Stockholm Text.ISBN 9789187173004. Retrieved9 March 2024.[...] the new underclass, the consumtariat (CONSUMer proleTARIAT) [...]
  23. ^Bouvier, John; Gleason, Daniel A. (1999) [1851].Institutes of American law. The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd. p. 7.ISBN 978-1-886363-80-9.
  24. ^de Grazia, Alfred (1970). "The Perennial Stratocrats".Kalos: What is to be done with our World?.Archived from the original on 25 May 2021. Retrieved25 May 2021.
  25. ^Gouliamos, Kostas; Kassimeris, Christos (2012). "Stratocracy: The Growing Hypertrophy of the LifeWorld Militarization". In Gouliamos, Kostas; Kassimeris, Christos (eds.).The Marketing of War in the Age of Neo-Militarism.Routledge.
  26. ^Berndt, Ernst R. (September 1982)."From Technocracy To Net Energy Analysis: Engineers, Economists And Recurring Energy Theories Of Value"(PDF).Studies in Energy and the American Economy (Discussion Paper No. 11).Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  27. ^Ballesteros, Alfonso (June 2020)."Digitocracy: Ruling and Being Ruled".Philosophies.5 (9). MDPI: 9.doi:10.3390/philosophies5020009.
  28. ^Compare:"Theocracy, n.".Oxford English Dictionary. 2015. Archived fromthe original on 2013-07-21. Retrieved9 March 2024.a system of government in which priests rule in the name of God or a god
  29. ^"CIA World Factbook – Holy See".CIA. Retrieved2009-08-10.
  30. ^"CIA World Factbook – Iran".CIA. Retrieved2009-08-10.
  31. ^Robertson, Roland (24 July 2020) [1987]. "Church-state Relations in Comparative Perspective". InRobbins, Thomas;Robertson, Roland (eds.).Church-state Relations: Tensions and Transitions (reprint ed.). Abingdon: Routledge. p. 1977.ISBN 9781000159783. Retrieved9 March 2024.[...] Weber's delineation specifies caesaropapism as the domination of religion by secular powers; hierocracy as the legitimating oversight of the political realm by religious functionaries; and theocracy as the fusion of political and religious authority (the priest who is also king).
  32. ^Richard Alan White (1984).The Morass. United States Intervention in Central America. New York: Harper & Row. p. 319.ISBN 9780060911454.
  33. ^ab"Big-business Greed Killing the Banana (p. A19)".The Independent, Via the New Zealand Herald. 24 May 2008. Archived fromthe original on 17 January 2013. Retrieved24 June 2012.
  34. ^O. Henry (15 December 2009).Cabbages and Kings. MobileReference. p. 198.ISBN 978-1-60778-412-8. Retrieved15 March 2013.While he was in Honduras, Porter coined the term 'banana republic'
  35. ^Waibl, Elmar; Herdina, Philip (1997).Dictionary of Philosophical Terms vol. II – English-German / Englisch-Deutsch. Walter de Gruyter. p. 33.ISBN 3110979497. Retrieved18 September 2012.
  36. ^"Corporatocracy".Oxford Dictionaries. Archived fromthe original on May 17, 2012. Retrieved29 May 2012./ˌkôrpərəˈtäkrəsē/ .... a society or system that is governed or controlled by corporations:
  37. ^Bowler, Peter (1985).The superior person's book of words (1 ed.). Boston: David R. Godine.ISBN 0-87923-556-X.OCLC 11757334.
  38. ^"Tajikistan: Nations in Transit 2018 Country Report".Freedom House. Retrieved2022-02-27.
  39. ^"CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Pope Alexander VI".New Advent. Retrieved2022-02-27.
  40. ^Marshall, Monty G.; Cole, Benjamin R. (1 December 2011)."Global Report 2011: Conflict, Governance, and State Fragility"(PDF). Vienna: Center for Systemic Peace. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 17 June 2012. Retrieved2012-08-15.
  41. ^Vernon, Phil; Baksh, Deborrah (September 2010)."Working with the Grain to Change the Grain: Moving Beyond the Millennium Development Goals"(PDF). London:International Alert. p. 29. Retrieved2012-08-15.
  42. ^Fotopoulos, Takis,The Multidimensional Crisis andInclusive Democracy. (Athens: Gordios, 2005). (English translation of the book with the same title published in Greek).
  43. ^"Victorian Electronic Democracy : Glossary". 28 July 2005. Archived fromthe original on 13 December 2007.
  44. ^Montesquieu,The Spirit of the Laws (1748), Bk. II, ch. 1.
  45. ^"Republic".Encyclopædia Britannica.
  46. ^"republic".WordNet 3.0. Dictionary.com. Retrieved20 March 2009.
  47. ^"Republic".Merriam-Webster. Retrieved14 August 2010.
  48. ^Montesquieu,Spirit of the Laws, Bk. II, ch. 2–3.
  49. ^Steele, David Ramsay (September 1999).From Marx to Mises: Post Capitalist Society and the Challenge of Economic Calculation. Open Court. p. 66.ISBN 978-0875484495.Marx distinguishes between two phases of marketless communism: an initial phase, with labor vouchers, and a higher phase, with free access.
  50. ^Busky, Donald F. (July 20, 2000).Democratic Socialism: A Global Survey. Praeger. p. 4.ISBN 978-0275968861.Communism would mean free distribution of goods and services. The communist slogan, 'From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs' (as opposed to 'work') would then rule
  51. ^Shiach, Morag (2004).Modernism, Labour and Selfhood in British Literature and Culture, 1890–1930.Cambridge University Press. p. 224.ISBN 978-0-521-83459-9
  52. ^Zwick, Mark and Louise (2004).The Catholic Worker Movement: Intellectual and Spiritual Origins.Paulist Press. p. 156.ISBN 978-0-8091-4315-3
  53. ^Boyle, David; Simms, Andrew (2009).The New Economics.Routledge. p. 20.ISBN 978-1-84407-675-8
  54. ^Novak, Michael; Younkins, Edward W. (2001).Three in One: Essays on Democratic Capitalism, 1976–2000.Rowman and Littlefield. p. 152.ISBN 978-0-7425-1171-2
  55. ^Storck, Thomas. "Capitalism and Distributism: two systems at war", inBeyond Capitalism & Socialism. Tobias J. Lanz, ed. IHS Press, 2008. p. 75
  56. ^Sinclair, Upton (1918-01-01).Upton Sinclair's: A Monthly Magazine: for Social Justice, by Peaceful Means If Possible.Socialism, you see, is a bird with two wings. The definition is 'social ownership and democratic control of the instruments and means of production.'
  57. ^Schweickart, David.Democratic SocialismArchived 2012-06-17 at theWayback Machine. Encyclopedia of Activism and Social Justice (2006): "Virtually all (democratic) socialists have distanced themselves from the economic model long synonymous with 'socialism,' i.e. the Soviet model of a non-market, centrally-planned economy...Some have endorsed the concept of 'market socialism,' a post-capitalist economy that retains market competition, but socializes the means of production, and, in some versions, extends democracy to the workplace. Some hold out for a non-market, participatory economy. All democratic socialists agree on the need for a democratic alternative to capitalism."
  58. ^"Totalitarianism | Definition, Characteristics, Examples, & Facts | Britannica".www.britannica.com. 2023-05-18. Retrieved2023-06-23.
  59. ^Dülmen, Richard van (1992).The Society of Enlightenment. Polity Press. p. 110.
  60. ^Jones, David W. (1 November 2013).An Introduction to Biblical Ethics. B&H Publishing Group. p. 209.ISBN 9781433680779.
  61. ^English, Adam C. (2003). "Christian Reconstruction after Y2K".New Religious Movements and Religious Liberty in America. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press. pp. 113–114.Theonomy – A system of government characterized by being governed by divine law.
  62. ^Neuhaus, Richard John (May 1990)."Why Wait for the Kingdom? The Theonomist Temptation".First Things. Retrieved8 August 2013.

External links

[edit]
Links to related articles
Autonomous types of first-tiersubdivision administration
Federalism
Unitary state
Unions
Subordinacy
Development
See also
See also
Concepts
Schools
Philosophers
Ancient
Medieval
Early modern
18th and 19th
centuries
20th and 21st
centuries
Works
See also
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_forms_of_government&oldid=1283357489#Types_of_democracy"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp