| Enabling Act of 1933 | |
|---|---|
| Reichstag | |
| |
| Citation | RGBl. I S. 141 |
| Territorial extent |  Weimar Republic → Nazi Germany |
| Enacted by | Reichstag |
| Enacted by | Reichsrat |
| Signed by | PresidentPaul von Hindenburg |
| Signed | 23 March 1933 |
| Commenced | 23 March 1933 |
| Repealed | 20 September 1945 |
| Legislative history | |
| First chamber:Reichstag | |
| Introduced by | Hitler cabinet |
| Passed | 23 March 1933 |
| Voting summary |
|
| Second chamber:Reichsrat | |
| Passed | 23 March 1933 |
| Voting summary |
|
| Repealed by | |
| Control Council Law No. 1 - Repealing of Nazi Laws | |
| Status:Repealed | |
TheEnabling Act of 1933 (German:Ermächtigungsgesetz, officially titledGesetz zur Behebung der Not von Volk und Reichlit. 'Law to Remedy the Distress of People andReich'),[1] was a law that gave theGerman Cabinet – most importantly, theChancellor,Adolf Hitler – the power to make and enforce laws without the involvement of theReichstag or PresidentPaul von Hindenburg. By allowing the Chancellor to override the checks and balances in the constitution, the Enabling Act was a pivotal step in the transition from the democraticWeimar Republic to the totalitarian dictatorship ofNazi Germany.
On 30 January 1933,Adolf Hitler, leader of theNazi Party (NSDAP), was appointed as Chancellor, the head of the German government.[2] Hitler immediately asked President von Hindenburg to dissolve theReichstag. A general election was scheduled for 5 March 1933.
On 27 February, theReichstag building of the German parliamentcaught fire.[3] Acting as chancellor, Hitler immediately accused theCommunists of perpetrating the arson as part of a larger effort to overthrow the German government. He persuaded Hindenburg to enact theReichstag Fire Decree,[4] which abolished most civil liberties, including the right to speak, assemble and protest, and the right to due process. A state of emergency was declared on the basis of the decree, which enabled a violent crackdown against the Nazis' political enemies, in particular theCommunist Party.[5]
Amid the ongoing repression, Hitler contended that the Reichstag Fire Decree was nonetheless insufficient and demanded a more sweeping measure.[6] He submitted to the Reichstag a proposal for an enabling law that would grant effectively untrammeled power to his cabinet.[7]
For thegeneral election of 5 March 1933, the Nazis were allied with other nationalist and conservative factions.[8] At asecret meeting on 20 February, major German industrialists had agreed to finance the Nazis' election campaign.[9][10] The main residual opposition was theSocial Democrats. On election day Germans voted in an atmosphere of extremevoter intimidation, perpetrated mainly by the NaziSturmabteilung (SA) militia.
The NSDAP emerged from the election with five million more votes than in the previous election, but failed to gain an absolute majority in parliament.[11] It remained dependent on the 8% of seats won by its coalition partner, theGerman National People's Party (DNVP), to attain a 52% majority.
In the first post-election cabinet meeting on 15 March, Hitler declared his intention to pass an Enabling Act[citation needed] along the lines of the one previously proposed, in order to give the NSDAP complete freedom of action.
The Enabling Act would allow the National Ministry (essentially the cabinet) to enact legislation, including laws deviating from or altering the constitution, without the consent of the Reichstag, for a period of four years. The law was thus itself considered a constitutional amendment. It therefore required a two-thirds super-majority support from aquorum of at least two-thirds of all members of the Reichstag.
Despite the elimination of the Communists and heavy pressure on the rest of the opposition, the bill's passage was not a certainty. To pass it, the Nazis used a strategy of coercion, bribery, and manipulation of parliamentarians.
TheSocial Democrats and the Communists were expected to vote against. The government had already arrested all Communist and some Social Democrat deputies under the Reichstag Fire Decree. The conservative parties representing the middle class, theJunkers and business interests were expected to vote for the law.
A two-thirds majority would therefore be in reach with the votes of the CatholicCentre Party. Hitler negotiated with the Centre Party's chairman,Ludwig Kaas, a Catholic priest, and finalized an agreement on 22 March. Kaas agreed to support the law in exchange for assurances of his party's continued existence, the protection of Catholic civil liberties and Catholic schools, and the retention of civil servants affiliated with the party.
Some historians, such asKlaus Scholder, have maintained that Hitler also promised to negotiate aReichskonkordat with theHoly See, a treaty that formalized the position of the Catholic Church in Germany on a national level. Kaas was a close associate of Cardinal Pacelli, then Vatican Secretary of State (and laterPope Pius XII). Pacelli had been pursuing a German concordat as a key policy for some years, but the instability of Weimar governments, as well as the opposition of some parties to a treaty, had blocked the project.[12] The day after the Enabling Act vote, Kaas went to Rome in order to, in his own words, "investigate the possibilities for a comprehensive understanding between church and state".[13] No evidence has surfaced for a link between the Enabling Act and theReichskonkordat signed on 20 July 1933.
As with most of the laws passed in the process ofGleichschaltung, the Enabling Act is quite short, especially considering its implications. The full text, in German[14] and English, follows:
| Gesetz zur Behebung der Not vonVolk undReich | Law to Remedy the Distress of the People and the Reich |
| Der Reichstag hat das folgende Gesetz beschlossen, das mit Zustimmung des Reichsrats hiermit verkündet wird, nachdem festgestellt ist, daß die Erfordernisse verfassungsändernder Gesetzgebung erfüllt sind: | TheReichstag has enacted the following law, which is hereby proclaimed with the assent of theReichsrat, it having been established that the requirements for a constitutional amendment have been fulfilled: |
| Artikel 1 | Article 1 |
| Reichsgesetze können außer in dem in der Reichsverfassung vorgesehenen Verfahren auch durch die Reichsregierung beschlossen werden. Dies gilt auch für die in den Artikeln 85 Abs. 2 und 87 der Reichsverfassung bezeichneten Gesetze. | In addition to the procedure prescribed by the constitution, laws of the Reich may also be enacted by the government[15] of the Reich. This includes the laws referred to by Articles 85 Paragraph 2 and Article 87 of the constitution.[16] |
| Artikel 2 | Article 2 |
| Die von der Reichsregierung beschlossenen Reichsgesetze können von der Reichsverfassung abweichen, soweit sie nicht die Einrichtung des Reichstags und des Reichsrats als solche zum Gegenstand haben. Die Rechte des Reichspräsidenten bleiben unberührt. | Laws enacted by the government of the Reich may deviate from the constitution as long as they do not affect the institutions of the Reichstag and the Reichsrat. The rights of the President remain unaffected. |
| Artikel 3 | Article 3 |
| Die von der Reichsregierung beschlossenen Reichsgesetze werden vom Reichskanzler ausgefertigt und im Reichsgesetzblatt verkündet. Sie treten, soweit sie nichts anderes bestimmen, mit dem auf die Verkündung folgenden Tage in Kraft. DieArtikel 68 bis 77 der Reichsverfassung finden auf die von der Reichsregierung beschlossenen Gesetze keine Anwendung. | Laws enacted by the Reich government shall be issued by the Chancellor and announced in theReich Law Gazette. They shall take effect on the day following the announcement, unless they prescribe a different date. Articles 68 to 77 of the Constitution do not apply to laws enacted by the Reich government.[17] |
| Artikel 4 | Article 4 |
| Verträge des Reiches mit fremden Staaten, die sich auf Gegenstände der Reichsgesetzgebung beziehen, bedürfen für die Dauer der Geltung dieser Gesetze nicht der Zustimmung der an der Gesetzgebung beteiligten Körperschaften. Die Reichsregierung erläßt die zur Durchführung dieser Verträge erforderlichen Vorschriften. | Treaties of the Reich with foreign states, which relate to matters of Reich legislation, shall for the duration of the validity of these laws not require the consent of the legislative authorities. The Reich government shall enact the legislation necessary to implement these agreements. |
| Artikel 5 | Article 5 |
| Dieses Gesetz tritt mit dem Tage seiner Verkündung in Kraft. Es tritt mit dem 1. April 1937 außer Kraft; es tritt ferner außer Kraft, wenn die gegenwärtige Reichsregierung durch eine andere abgelöst wird. | This law enters into force on the day of its proclamation. It expires on 1 April 1937; it expires furthermore if the present Reich government is replaced by another. |
Articles 1 and 4 gave the government the right to draw up the budget, approve treaties, and enact any laws whatsoever without input from the Reichstag. By the rules of pre-1933 German legal interpretation, and post-1945 if such a law were not now unconstitutional, this would mean that such laws would henceforth be decided by a majority vote in the Cabinet. This was not followed.[citation needed]
In the years immediately preceding, the government had relied onArticle 48 emergency decrees. These had to be made by the President, alongside ordinary laws which he simply enacted. In the passing of Enabling-Act-based laws, the President had no role to play at all. Until Hitler effectively assumed the President's role in 1934, laws were passed without any contribution by the head of state. This was a situation unique in German history.
The signatories of the Enabling Act (and their fates) were:[18]
Late on 23 March, the Reichstag assembled at theKroll Opera House, its temporary home since the Reichstag fire.SA men were positioned inside and outside the chamber.[19]
The KPD had not been formally banned despite the Nazis' virulent anti-Communist rhetoric. A violent uprising was still feared, and it was hoped that the KPD's presence on the ballot would siphon off votes from the SPD.[citation needed] However, since the election of 6 March, the party was subject to virulent police repression on the grounds of its purported involvement in the Reichstag fire.[20] It was therefore widely understood that the KPD deputies would not be allowed to take their seats in parliament.
The SPD's expected opposition was partly neutralized by the Reichstag Fire Decree, which had been used to detain a number of[quantify] SPD deputies. Other SPD[quantify] parliamentarians had fled into exile.
Debate within the Centre Party had continued until the day of the vote. Ludwig Kaas advocated voting in favour of the act, touting promised written guarantees from Hitler. Former ChancellorHeinrich Brüning wanted the bill to be rejected. The majority sided with Kaas, and Brüning agreed to maintain party cohesion by voting for the law.[19]
The Reichstag, led by its president,Hermann Göring, changed its rules of procedure to make it easier to pass the bill. Under theWeimar Constitution, aquorum of two-thirds of the entire Reichstag membership was required to be present in order to pass a law amending the constitution. To sidestep this potential obstruction, Göring declared that any deputy who was "absent without excuse" was to be considered as present.[citation needed] In this case, 432 of the Reichstag's 647 deputies would normally be required present. Göring reduced this figure to 378 by not counting the 81KPD deputies.
Hitler spoke in favour of the proposed law.The speech recapitulated the supposed historical responsibility of the Weimar Republic in Germany's crisis, and then listed grievances that would be addressed by the Enabling Act. In a pitch to the Centre Party, Hitler emphasised the importance of Christianity in German culture and incorporated Ludwig Kaas's requested guarantees almost verbatim. His speech concluded with reassurances about the continuity of Weimar institutions, but an appeal to the inadequacy of parliamentary government:
"Some of the [government's] planned measures require the approval of the majority necessary for constitutional amendments. The performance of these tasks and their completion is necessary. It would be inconsistent with the aim of the national uprising and it would fail to suffice for the intended goal were the Government to negotiate with and request the approval of the Reichstag for its measures in each given case."[21]
The Centre's Ludwig Kaas spoke to voice his party's support for the bill amid "concerns put aside". He had still not received the written guarantee he had negotiated but had been assured it was being "typed up". It was never received.[19][page needed] Heinrich Brüning remained silent.
Only SPD leaderOtto Wels spoke against the Enabling Act. He defended the Social Democrats' record in rebuilding Germany following the First World War, and dismissed the Nazis' claimed need for special powers. Defying direct intimidation, Otto Wels declared his party's continued allegiance to Germany's institutions:
"The Weimar Constitution is not a socialist constitution. But we stand by the principles enshrined in, the principles of a state based on the rule of law, of equal rights, of social justice. In this historic hour, we German Social Democrats solemnly pledge ourselves to the principles of humanity and justice, of freedom and socialism. No Enabling Act gives you the power to destroy ideas that are eternal and indestructible."[22]
As voting proceeded, SPD deputies were actively intimidated by the Nazi SA men, who were present throughout the proceedings.[23]
All parties except the SPD voted in favour of the Enabling Act. With the KPD banned and 26 SPD deputies arrested or in hiding, the final tally was 444 in favour of the Enabling Act against 94 opposed (all Social Democrats). The Reichstag adopted the bill with the support of 83% of the deputies present. Even if all SPD deputies had been present, it would have passed with 78.7% support.
| Party | Deputies | For | Against | Absent | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nazi Party | NSDAP | 288 | 288 | — | — | |
| Social Democratic Party | SPD | 120 | — | 94 | 26 | |
| Communist Party | KPD | 81 | — | — | 81 | |
| Centre | 73 | 72 | — | 1 | ||
| National People's Party | DNVP | 52 | 52 | — | — | |
| Bavarian People's Party | BVP | 19 | 19 | — | — | |
| State Party | DStP | 5 | 5 | — | — | |
| Christian Social People's Service | CSVD | 4 | 4 | — | — | |
| People's Party | DVP | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | |
| Farmers' Party | DBP | 2 | 2 | — | — | |
| Landbund | 1 | 1 | — | — | ||
| Total | 647 | 444 (68.62%) | 94 (14.53%) | 109 (16.85%) | ||
In the evening of the same day, theReichsrat gave its assent, unanimously and without prior debate, and the Enabling Act was signed into law by President Paul von Hindenburg.[24][25][26][27][28][excessive citations] Unless extended by the Reichstag, the act would expire after four years.
The Enabling Act completed the effect of the Reichstag Fire Decree. It transformed Hitler's government into a legal dictatorship and laid the groundwork for his totalitarian regime. Thus empowered, Hitler could beginGerman rearmament and achieve his aggressive foreign policy aims, which ultimately resulted inWorld War II.
TheReichstag effectively became therubber stamp parliament that Hitler sought.[29] TheGerman conservative elite, including the vice-chancellorFranz von Papen, having underestimated the determination of the Nazis to monopolize state power, were soon marginalized by the Nazi regime.[30][31] By mid-March 1933, the government began sending communists, trade union leaders, and other political dissidents toDachau, the first Nazi concentration camp.[32]
On 14 July 1933, a law[citation needed] made the Nazi Party the only legally permitted party in Germany. With that, Hitler fulfilled what he had promised in earlier campaign speeches: "I set for myself one aim ... to sweep these thirty parties out of Germany!"[33]
The Weimar Constitution of 1919, as amended by the Enabling Act, remained technically in effect.
During the negotiations between the government and the political parties, it had been agreed that the government should inform the Reichstag parties of laws passed under the Enabling Act. For that purpose, a workingcommittee was set up[citation needed], co-chaired by Hitler and Centre Party chairman Kaas. However, the committee met only three times, without any major impact, and had become a dead letter even before all other parties were banned.
Although the Act had formally given legislative powers to the government as a whole, those powers were, for all intents and purposes, exercised by Hitler himself. After the passage of the Act, there were no longer serious deliberations in Cabinet meetings. After 1934, its meetings became more and more infrequent, and it did not meet in full after 1938.
The "Law on the Reconstruction of the Reich" (30 January 1934) dissolved the state parliaments, effectively rendering irrelevant the Reichsrat, which represented the states. Two weeks later (14 February) the Reichsrat itselfwas abolished. Both laws contradicted Article 2 of the Enabling Act, which stated that laws passed under the Enabling Act must "not affect" the Reichsrat.
In August 1934, President Hindenburg died, and Hitler seized the president's powers for himself in accordance with theLaw Concerning the Head of State of the German Reich, passed the previous day. The move wasconfirmed by a referendum later that month. But Article 2 of the Enabling Act stated that the president's powers were to remain "undisturbed" (or "unaffected", depending on the translation). Furthermore, a 1932 amendment to the constitution had made the president of the High Court of Justice, not the chancellor, first in the line of succession to the presidency—and even then on an interim basis pending new elections.[19] This ostensible violation of Article 2 was never challenged in court.
The Enabling Act was renewed twice, first in 1937 and then in 1941[citation needed]. Its renewal was practically assured because all other parties were banned. Voters were presented with a single list of Nazis and Nazi-approved candidates under far-from-secret conditions.
In 1942, the Reichstag passed a law giving Hitler power of life and death over every citizen, effectively extending the provisions of the Enabling Act for the duration of the war.[34]
The Enabling Act was formally declared to be repealed by theAllied Control Council inControl Council Law No. 1, following thesurrender of Germany at the end of World War II.[35]
Germany'sBasic Law (constitution) of 1949 stipulates that only bodies that are constitutionally endowed with legislative power can enact laws. This theoretically precludes legislation such as the 1933 Enabling Act.
Article 9 of the 1949 constitution allows for social groups to be labeledverfassungsfeindlich ("hostile to the constitution") and to be proscribed by the federal government. Political parties can be labeled enemies to the constitution only by theBundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court) according to Art. 21 II. This clause makes clear that even a popular majority cannot be allowed to install atotalitarian orautocratic regime such as with the Enabling Act of 1933, which would violate the principles of the German constitution.
In his 2003 book,The Coming of the Third Reich, British historianRichard J. Evans argued that the Enabling Act was legally invalid. He contended that Göring had no right to arbitrarily reduce the quorum required to bring the bill up for a vote. While the Enabling Act only required the support of two-thirds of those present and voting, two-thirds of the entire Reichstag's membership had to be present in order for the legislature to consider a constitutional amendment.
According to Evans, while Göring was not required to count the KPD deputies in order to get the Enabling Act passed, he was required to "recognize their existence" by counting them for purposes of the quorum needed to call it up, making his refusal to do so "an illegal act". Even if the Communists had been present and voting, the session's atmosphere was so intimidating that the Act would have still passed with at least 68.7% support.
He also argued that the act's passage in the Reichsrat was tainted by the overthrow of the state governments under the Reichstag Fire Decree; as Evans put it, the states were no longer "properly constituted or represented", making the Enabling Act's passage in the Reichsrat "irregular".[20]
The 2003 filmHitler: The Rise of Evil contains a scene portraying the passage of the Enabling Act.[36]
.svg)
