Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Linear elasticity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromElastodynamics)
Mathematical model of how solid objects deform
This article includes a list ofgeneral references, butit lacks sufficient correspondinginline citations. Please help toimprove this article byintroducing more precise citations.(September 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Part of a series on
Continuum mechanics
J=Ddφdx{\displaystyle J=-D{\frac {d\varphi }{dx}}}

Linear elasticity is a mathematical model of how solid objectsdeform and become internallystressed by prescribed loading conditions. It is a simplification of the more generalnonlinear theory of elasticity and a branch ofcontinuum mechanics.

The fundamental assumptions of linear elasticity areinfinitesimal strains — meaning, "small" deformations — and linear relationships between the components of stress and strain — hence the "linear" in its name. Linear elasticity is valid only for stress states that do not produceyielding. Its assumptions are reasonable for many engineering materials and engineering design scenarios. Linear elasticity is therefore used extensively instructural analysis and engineering design, often with the aid offinite element analysis.

Mathematical formulation

[edit]

Equations governing a linear elasticboundary value problem are based on threetensorpartial differential equations for thebalance of linear momentum and sixinfinitesimal strain-displacement relations. The system of differential equations is completed by a set oflinear algebraicconstitutive relations.

Direct tensor form

[edit]

In directtensor form that is independent of the choice of coordinate system, these governing equations are:[1]

whereσ{\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\sigma }}} is theCauchy stress tensor,ε{\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\varepsilon }}} is theinfinitesimal strain tensor,u{\displaystyle \mathbf {u} } is thedisplacement vector,C{\displaystyle {\mathsf {C}}} is the fourth-orderstiffness tensor,F{\displaystyle \mathbf {F} } is the body force per unit volume,ρ{\displaystyle \rho } is the mass density,{\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\nabla }}} represents thenabla operator,()T{\displaystyle (\bullet )^{\mathrm {T} }} represents atranspose,()¨{\displaystyle {\ddot {(\bullet )}}} represents the secondmaterial derivative with respect to time, andA:B=AijBij{\displaystyle {\mathsf {A}}:{\mathsf {B}}=A_{ij}B_{ij}} is the inner product of two second-order tensors (summation over repeated indices is implied).

Cartesian coordinate form

[edit]
Note: theEinstein summation convention of summing on repeated indices is used below.

Expressed in terms of components with respect to a rectangularCartesian coordinate system, the governing equations of linear elasticity are:[1]

An elastostatic boundary value problem for an isotropic-homogeneous media is a system of 15 independent equations and equal number of unknowns (3 equilibrium equations, 6 strain-displacement equations, and 6 constitutive equations). By specifying the boundary conditions, the boundary value problem is fully defined. To solve the system two approaches can be taken according to boundary conditions of the boundary value problem: adisplacement formulation, and astress formulation.

Cylindrical coordinate form

[edit]

In cylindrical coordinates (r,θ,z{\displaystyle r,\theta ,z}) the equations of motion are[1]σrrr+1rσrθθ+σrzz+1r(σrrσθθ)+Fr=ρ 2urt2σrθr+1rσθθθ+σθzz+2rσrθ+Fθ=ρ 2uθt2σrzr+1rσθzθ+σzzz+1rσrz+Fz=ρ 2uzt2{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}&{\frac {\partial \sigma _{rr}}{\partial r}}+{\frac {1}{r}}{\frac {\partial \sigma _{r\theta }}{\partial \theta }}+{\frac {\partial \sigma _{rz}}{\partial z}}+{\cfrac {1}{r}}(\sigma _{rr}-\sigma _{\theta \theta })+F_{r}=\rho ~{\frac {\partial ^{2}u_{r}}{\partial t^{2}}}\\&{\frac {\partial \sigma _{r\theta }}{\partial r}}+{\frac {1}{r}}{\frac {\partial \sigma _{\theta \theta }}{\partial \theta }}+{\frac {\partial \sigma _{\theta z}}{\partial z}}+{\frac {2}{r}}\sigma _{r\theta }+F_{\theta }=\rho ~{\frac {\partial ^{2}u_{\theta }}{\partial t^{2}}}\\&{\frac {\partial \sigma _{rz}}{\partial r}}+{\frac {1}{r}}{\frac {\partial \sigma _{\theta z}}{\partial \theta }}+{\frac {\partial \sigma _{zz}}{\partial z}}+{\frac {1}{r}}\sigma _{rz}+F_{z}=\rho ~{\frac {\partial ^{2}u_{z}}{\partial t^{2}}}\end{aligned}}}The strain-displacement relations areεrr=urr ;  εθθ=1r(uθθ+ur) ;  εzz=uzzεrθ=12(1rurθ+uθruθr) ;  εθz=12(uθz+1ruzθ) ;  εzr=12(urz+uzr){\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\varepsilon _{rr}&={\frac {\partial u_{r}}{\partial r}}~;~~\varepsilon _{\theta \theta }={\frac {1}{r}}\left({\cfrac {\partial u_{\theta }}{\partial \theta }}+u_{r}\right)~;~~\varepsilon _{zz}={\frac {\partial u_{z}}{\partial z}}\\\varepsilon _{r\theta }&={\frac {1}{2}}\left({\cfrac {1}{r}}{\cfrac {\partial u_{r}}{\partial \theta }}+{\cfrac {\partial u_{\theta }}{\partial r}}-{\cfrac {u_{\theta }}{r}}\right)~;~~\varepsilon _{\theta z}={\cfrac {1}{2}}\left({\cfrac {\partial u_{\theta }}{\partial z}}+{\cfrac {1}{r}}{\cfrac {\partial u_{z}}{\partial \theta }}\right)~;~~\varepsilon _{zr}={\cfrac {1}{2}}\left({\cfrac {\partial u_{r}}{\partial z}}+{\cfrac {\partial u_{z}}{\partial r}}\right)\end{aligned}}}and the constitutive relations are the same as in Cartesian coordinates, except that the indices 1,2,3 now stand forr{\displaystyle r},θ{\displaystyle \theta },z{\displaystyle z}, respectively.

Spherical coordinate form

[edit]

In spherical coordinates (r,θ,ϕ{\displaystyle r,\theta ,\phi }) the equations of motion are[1]σrrr+1rσrθθ+1rsinθσrϕϕ+1r(2σrrσθθσϕϕ+σrθcotθ)+Fr=ρ 2urt2σrθr+1rσθθθ+1rsinθσθϕϕ+1r[(σθθσϕϕ)cotθ+3σrθ]+Fθ=ρ 2uθt2σrϕr+1rσθϕθ+1rsinθσϕϕϕ+1r(2σθϕcotθ+3σrϕ)+Fϕ=ρ 2uϕt2{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}&{\frac {\partial \sigma _{rr}}{\partial r}}+{\cfrac {1}{r}}{\frac {\partial \sigma _{r\theta }}{\partial \theta }}+{\cfrac {1}{r\sin \theta }}{\frac {\partial \sigma _{r\phi }}{\partial \phi }}+{\cfrac {1}{r}}(2\sigma _{rr}-\sigma _{\theta \theta }-\sigma _{\phi \phi }+\sigma _{r\theta }\cot \theta )+F_{r}=\rho ~{\frac {\partial ^{2}u_{r}}{\partial t^{2}}}\\&{\frac {\partial \sigma _{r\theta }}{\partial r}}+{\cfrac {1}{r}}{\frac {\partial \sigma _{\theta \theta }}{\partial \theta }}+{\cfrac {1}{r\sin \theta }}{\frac {\partial \sigma _{\theta \phi }}{\partial \phi }}+{\cfrac {1}{r}}[(\sigma _{\theta \theta }-\sigma _{\phi \phi })\cot \theta +3\sigma _{r\theta }]+F_{\theta }=\rho ~{\frac {\partial ^{2}u_{\theta }}{\partial t^{2}}}\\&{\frac {\partial \sigma _{r\phi }}{\partial r}}+{\cfrac {1}{r}}{\frac {\partial \sigma _{\theta \phi }}{\partial \theta }}+{\cfrac {1}{r\sin \theta }}{\frac {\partial \sigma _{\phi \phi }}{\partial \phi }}+{\cfrac {1}{r}}(2\sigma _{\theta \phi }\cot \theta +3\sigma _{r\phi })+F_{\phi }=\rho ~{\frac {\partial ^{2}u_{\phi }}{\partial t^{2}}}\end{aligned}}}

Spherical coordinates (r, θ,φ) as commonly used inphysics: radial distancer, polar angleθ (theta), and azimuthal angleφ (phi). The symbolρ (rho) is often used instead ofr.

The strain tensor in spherical coordinates isεrr=urrεθθ=1r(uθθ+ur)εϕϕ=1rsinθ(uϕϕ+ursinθ+uθcosθ)εrθ=12(1rurθ+uθruθr)εθϕ=12r[1sinθuθϕ+(uϕθuϕcotθ)]εrϕ=12(1rsinθurϕ+uϕruϕr).{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\varepsilon _{rr}&={\frac {\partial u_{r}}{\partial r}}\\\varepsilon _{\theta \theta }&={\frac {1}{r}}\left({\frac {\partial u_{\theta }}{\partial \theta }}+u_{r}\right)\\\varepsilon _{\phi \phi }&={\frac {1}{r\sin \theta }}\left({\frac {\partial u_{\phi }}{\partial \phi }}+u_{r}\sin \theta +u_{\theta }\cos \theta \right)\\\varepsilon _{r\theta }&={\frac {1}{2}}\left({\frac {1}{r}}{\frac {\partial u_{r}}{\partial \theta }}+{\frac {\partial u_{\theta }}{\partial r}}-{\frac {u_{\theta }}{r}}\right)\\\varepsilon _{\theta \phi }&={\frac {1}{2r}}\left[{\frac {1}{\sin \theta }}{\frac {\partial u_{\theta }}{\partial \phi }}+\left({\frac {\partial u_{\phi }}{\partial \theta }}-u_{\phi }\cot \theta \right)\right]\\\varepsilon _{r\phi }&={\frac {1}{2}}\left({\frac {1}{r\sin \theta }}{\frac {\partial u_{r}}{\partial \phi }}+{\frac {\partial u_{\phi }}{\partial r}}-{\frac {u_{\phi }}{r}}\right).\end{aligned}}}

(An)isotropic (in)homogeneous media

[edit]

Inisotropic media, the stiffness tensor gives the relationship between the stresses (resulting internal stresses) and the strains (resulting deformations). For an isotropic medium, the stiffness tensor has no preferred direction: an applied force will give the same displacements (relative to the direction of the force) no matter the direction in which the force is applied. In the isotropic case, the stiffness tensor may be written:[citation needed]Cijkl=Kδijδkl+μ(δikδjl+δilδjk23δijδkl){\displaystyle C_{ijkl}=K\,\delta _{ij}\,\delta _{kl}+\mu \,(\delta _{ik}\delta _{jl}+\delta _{il}\delta _{jk}-{\tfrac {2}{3}}\,\delta _{ij}\,\delta _{kl})} whereδij{\displaystyle \delta _{ij}} is theKronecker delta,K is thebulk modulus (or incompressibility), andμ{\displaystyle \mu } is theshear modulus (or rigidity), twoelastic moduli. If the medium is inhomogeneous, the isotropic model is sensible if either the medium is piecewise-constant or weakly inhomogeneous; in the strongly inhomogeneous smooth model, anisotropy has to be accounted for. If the medium ishomogeneous, then the elastic moduli will be independent of the position in the medium. The constitutive equation may now be written as:σij=Kδijεkk+2μ(εij13δijεkk).{\displaystyle \sigma _{ij}=K\delta _{ij}\varepsilon _{kk}+2\mu \left(\varepsilon _{ij}-{\tfrac {1}{3}}\delta _{ij}\varepsilon _{kk}\right).}

This expression separates the stress into a scalar part on the left which may be associated with a scalar pressure, and a traceless part on the right which may be associated with shear forces. A simpler expression is:[3][4]σij=λδijεkk+2μεij{\displaystyle \sigma _{ij}=\lambda \delta _{ij}\varepsilon _{kk}+2\mu \varepsilon _{ij}}where λ isLamé's first parameter. Since the constitutive equation is simply a set of linear equations, the strain may be expressed as a function of the stresses as:[5]εij=19Kδijσkk+12μ(σij13δijσkk){\displaystyle \varepsilon _{ij}={\frac {1}{9K}}\delta _{ij}\sigma _{kk}+{\frac {1}{2\mu }}\left(\sigma _{ij}-{\tfrac {1}{3}}\delta _{ij}\sigma _{kk}\right)}which is again, a scalar part on the left and a traceless shear part on the right. More simply:εij=12μσijνEδijσkk=1E[(1+ν)σijνδijσkk]{\displaystyle \varepsilon _{ij}={\frac {1}{2\mu }}\sigma _{ij}-{\frac {\nu }{E}}\delta _{ij}\sigma _{kk}={\frac {1}{E}}[(1+\nu )\sigma _{ij}-\nu \delta _{ij}\sigma _{kk}]}whereν{\displaystyle \nu } isPoisson's ratio andE{\displaystyle E} isYoung's modulus.

Elastostatics

[edit]

Elastostatics is the study of linear elasticity under the conditions of equilibrium, in which all forces on the elastic body sum to zero, and the displacements are not a function of time. Theequilibrium equations are thenσji,j+Fi=0.{\displaystyle \sigma _{ji,j}+F_{i}=0.}In engineering notation (with tau asshear stress),

This section will discuss only the isotropic homogeneous case.

Displacement formulation

[edit]

In this case, the displacements are prescribed everywhere in the boundary. In this approach, the strains and stresses are eliminated from the formulation, leaving the displacements as the unknowns to be solved for in the governing equations.First, the strain-displacement equations are substituted into the constitutive equations (Hooke's law), eliminating the strains as unknowns:σij=λδijεkk+2μεij=λδijuk,k+μ(ui,j+uj,i).{\displaystyle \sigma _{ij}=\lambda \delta _{ij}\varepsilon _{kk}+2\mu \varepsilon _{ij}=\lambda \delta _{ij}u_{k,k}+\mu \left(u_{i,j}+u_{j,i}\right).}Differentiating (assumingλ{\displaystyle \lambda } andμ{\displaystyle \mu } are spatially uniform) yields:σij,j=λuk,ki+μ(ui,jj+uj,ij).{\displaystyle \sigma _{ij,j}=\lambda u_{k,ki}+\mu \left(u_{i,jj}+u_{j,ij}\right).}Substituting into the equilibrium equation yields:λuk,ki+μ(ui,jj+uj,ij)+Fi=0{\displaystyle \lambda u_{k,ki}+\mu \left(u_{i,jj}+u_{j,ij}\right)+F_{i}=0}or (replacing double (dummy) (=summation) indices k,k by j,j and interchanging indices, ij to, ji after the, by virtue ofSchwarz' theorem)μui,jj+(μ+λ)uj,ji+Fi=0{\displaystyle \mu u_{i,jj}+(\mu +\lambda )u_{j,ji}+F_{i}=0}whereλ{\displaystyle \lambda } andμ{\displaystyle \mu } areLamé parameters.In this way, the only unknowns left are the displacements, hence the name for this formulation. The governing equations obtained in this manner are called theelastostatic equations, the special case of the steadyNavier–Cauchy equations given below.

Derivation of steady Navier–Cauchy equations in Engineering notation

First, thex{\displaystyle x}-direction will be considered. Substituting the strain-displacement equations into the equilibrium equation in thex{\displaystyle x}-direction we haveσx=2μεx+λ(εx+εy+εz)=2μuxx+λ(uxx+uyy+uzz){\displaystyle \sigma _{x}=2\mu \varepsilon _{x}+\lambda (\varepsilon _{x}+\varepsilon _{y}+\varepsilon _{z})=2\mu {\frac {\partial u_{x}}{\partial x}}+\lambda \left({\frac {\partial u_{x}}{\partial x}}+{\frac {\partial u_{y}}{\partial y}}+{\frac {\partial u_{z}}{\partial z}}\right)}τxy=μγxy=μ(uxy+uyx){\displaystyle \tau _{xy}=\mu \gamma _{xy}=\mu \left({\frac {\partial u_{x}}{\partial y}}+{\frac {\partial u_{y}}{\partial x}}\right)}τxz=μγzx=μ(uzx+uxz){\displaystyle \tau _{xz}=\mu \gamma _{zx}=\mu \left({\frac {\partial u_{z}}{\partial x}}+{\frac {\partial u_{x}}{\partial z}}\right)}

Then substituting these equations into the equilibrium equation in thex{\displaystyle x\,\!}-direction we haveσxx+τyxy+τzxz+Fx=0{\displaystyle {\frac {\partial \sigma _{x}}{\partial x}}+{\frac {\partial \tau _{yx}}{\partial y}}+{\frac {\partial \tau _{zx}}{\partial z}}+F_{x}=0}x(2μuxx+λ(uxx+uyy+uzz))+μy(uxy+uyx)+μz(uzx+uxz)+Fx=0{\displaystyle {\frac {\partial }{\partial x}}\left(2\mu {\frac {\partial u_{x}}{\partial x}}+\lambda \left({\frac {\partial u_{x}}{\partial x}}+{\frac {\partial u_{y}}{\partial y}}+{\frac {\partial u_{z}}{\partial z}}\right)\right)+\mu {\frac {\partial }{\partial y}}\left({\frac {\partial u_{x}}{\partial y}}+{\frac {\partial u_{y}}{\partial x}}\right)+\mu {\frac {\partial }{\partial z}}\left({\frac {\partial u_{z}}{\partial x}}+{\frac {\partial u_{x}}{\partial z}}\right)+F_{x}=0}

Using the assumption thatμ{\displaystyle \mu } andλ{\displaystyle \lambda } are constant we can rearrange and get:(λ+μ)x(uxx+uyy+uzz)+μ(2uxx2+2uxy2+2uxz2)+Fx=0{\displaystyle \left(\lambda +\mu \right){\frac {\partial }{\partial x}}\left({\frac {\partial u_{x}}{\partial x}}+{\frac {\partial u_{y}}{\partial y}}+{\frac {\partial u_{z}}{\partial z}}\right)+\mu \left({\frac {\partial ^{2}u_{x}}{\partial x^{2}}}+{\frac {\partial ^{2}u_{x}}{\partial y^{2}}}+{\frac {\partial ^{2}u_{x}}{\partial z^{2}}}\right)+F_{x}=0}

Following the same procedure for they{\displaystyle y\,\!}-direction andz{\displaystyle z\,\!}-direction we have(λ+μ)y(uxx+uyy+uzz)+μ(2uyx2+2uyy2+2uyz2)+Fy=0{\displaystyle \left(\lambda +\mu \right){\frac {\partial }{\partial y}}\left({\frac {\partial u_{x}}{\partial x}}+{\frac {\partial u_{y}}{\partial y}}+{\frac {\partial u_{z}}{\partial z}}\right)+\mu \left({\frac {\partial ^{2}u_{y}}{\partial x^{2}}}+{\frac {\partial ^{2}u_{y}}{\partial y^{2}}}+{\frac {\partial ^{2}u_{y}}{\partial z^{2}}}\right)+F_{y}=0}(λ+μ)z(uxx+uyy+uzz)+μ(2uzx2+2uzy2+2uzz2)+Fz=0{\displaystyle \left(\lambda +\mu \right){\frac {\partial }{\partial z}}\left({\frac {\partial u_{x}}{\partial x}}+{\frac {\partial u_{y}}{\partial y}}+{\frac {\partial u_{z}}{\partial z}}\right)+\mu \left({\frac {\partial ^{2}u_{z}}{\partial x^{2}}}+{\frac {\partial ^{2}u_{z}}{\partial y^{2}}}+{\frac {\partial ^{2}u_{z}}{\partial z^{2}}}\right)+F_{z}=0}

These last 3 equations are the steady Navier–Cauchy equations, which can be also expressed in vector notation as(λ+μ)(u)+μ2u+F=0{\displaystyle (\lambda +\mu )\nabla (\nabla \cdot \mathbf {u} )+\mu \nabla ^{2}\mathbf {u} +\mathbf {F} ={\boldsymbol {0}}}

Once the displacement field has been calculated, the displacements can be replaced into the strain-displacement equations to solve for strains, which later are used in the constitutive equations to solve for stresses.

The biharmonic equation
[edit]

The elastostatic equation may be written:(α2β2)uj,ij+β2ui,mm=Fi.{\displaystyle (\alpha ^{2}-\beta ^{2})u_{j,ij}+\beta ^{2}u_{i,mm}=-F_{i}.}

Taking thedivergence of both sides of the elastostatic equation and assuming the body forces has zero divergence (homogeneous in domain) (Fi,i=0{\displaystyle F_{i,i}=0\,\!}) we have(α2β2)uj,iij+β2ui,imm=0.{\displaystyle (\alpha ^{2}-\beta ^{2})u_{j,iij}+\beta ^{2}u_{i,imm}=0.}

Noting that summed indices need not match, and that the partial derivatives commute, the two differential terms are seen to be the same and we have:α2uj,iij=0{\displaystyle \alpha ^{2}u_{j,iij}=0} from which we conclude that:uj,iij=0.{\displaystyle u_{j,iij}=0.}

Taking theLaplacian of both sides of the elastostatic equation, and assuming in additionFi,kk=0{\displaystyle F_{i,kk}=0\,\!}, we have(α2β2)uj,kkij+β2ui,kkmm=0.{\displaystyle (\alpha ^{2}-\beta ^{2})u_{j,kkij}+\beta ^{2}u_{i,kkmm}=0.}

From the divergence equation, the first term on the left is zero (Note: again, the summed indices need not match) and we have:β2ui,kkmm=0{\displaystyle \beta ^{2}u_{i,kkmm}=0}from which we conclude that:ui,kkmm=0{\displaystyle u_{i,kkmm}=0}or, in coordinate free notation4u=0{\displaystyle \nabla ^{4}\mathbf {u} =0} which is just thebiharmonic equation inu{\displaystyle \mathbf {u} \,\!}.

Stress formulation

[edit]

In this case, the surface tractions are prescribed everywhere on the surface boundary. In this approach, the strains and displacements are eliminated leaving the stresses as the unknowns to be solved for in the governing equations. Once the stress field is found, the strains are then found using the constitutive equations.

There are six independent components of the stress tensor which need to be determined, yet in the displacement formulation, there are only three components of the displacement vector which need to be determined. This means that there are some constraints which must be placed upon the stress tensor, to reduce the number of degrees of freedom to three. Using the constitutive equations, these constraints are derived directly from corresponding constraints which must hold for the strain tensor, which also has six independent components. The constraints on the strain tensor are derivable directly from the definition of the strain tensor as a function of the displacement vector field, which means that these constraints introduce no new concepts or information. It is the constraints on the strain tensor that are most easily understood. If the elastic medium is visualized as a set of infinitesimal cubes in the unstrained state, then after the medium is strained, an arbitrary strain tensor must yield a situation in which the distorted cubes still fit together without overlapping. In other words, for a given strain, there must exist a continuous vector field (the displacement) from which that strain tensor can be derived. The constraints on the strain tensor that are required to assure that this is the case were discovered by Saint Venant, and are called the "Saint Venant compatibility equations". These are 81 equations, 6 of which are independent non-trivial equations, which relate the different strain components. These are expressed in index notation as:εij,km+εkm,ijεik,jmεjm,ik=0.{\displaystyle \varepsilon _{ij,km}+\varepsilon _{km,ij}-\varepsilon _{ik,jm}-\varepsilon _{jm,ik}=0.}In engineering notation, they are:2ϵxy2+2ϵyx2=22ϵxyxy2ϵyz2+2ϵzy2=22ϵyzyz2ϵxz2+2ϵzx2=22ϵzxzx2ϵxyz=x(ϵyzx+ϵzxy+ϵxyz)2ϵyzx=y(ϵyzxϵzxy+ϵxyz)2ϵzxy=z(ϵyzx+ϵzxyϵxyz){\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}&{\frac {\partial ^{2}\epsilon _{x}}{\partial y^{2}}}+{\frac {\partial ^{2}\epsilon _{y}}{\partial x^{2}}}=2{\frac {\partial ^{2}\epsilon _{xy}}{\partial x\partial y}}\\&{\frac {\partial ^{2}\epsilon _{y}}{\partial z^{2}}}+{\frac {\partial ^{2}\epsilon _{z}}{\partial y^{2}}}=2{\frac {\partial ^{2}\epsilon _{yz}}{\partial y\partial z}}\\&{\frac {\partial ^{2}\epsilon _{x}}{\partial z^{2}}}+{\frac {\partial ^{2}\epsilon _{z}}{\partial x^{2}}}=2{\frac {\partial ^{2}\epsilon _{zx}}{\partial z\partial x}}\\&{\frac {\partial ^{2}\epsilon _{x}}{\partial y\partial z}}={\frac {\partial }{\partial x}}\left(-{\frac {\partial \epsilon _{yz}}{\partial x}}+{\frac {\partial \epsilon _{zx}}{\partial y}}+{\frac {\partial \epsilon _{xy}}{\partial z}}\right)\\&{\frac {\partial ^{2}\epsilon _{y}}{\partial z\partial x}}={\frac {\partial }{\partial y}}\left({\frac {\partial \epsilon _{yz}}{\partial x}}-{\frac {\partial \epsilon _{zx}}{\partial y}}+{\frac {\partial \epsilon _{xy}}{\partial z}}\right)\\&{\frac {\partial ^{2}\epsilon _{z}}{\partial x\partial y}}={\frac {\partial }{\partial z}}\left({\frac {\partial \epsilon _{yz}}{\partial x}}+{\frac {\partial \epsilon _{zx}}{\partial y}}-{\frac {\partial \epsilon _{xy}}{\partial z}}\right)\end{aligned}}}

The strains in this equation are then expressed in terms of the stresses using the constitutive equations, which yields the corresponding constraints on the stress tensor. These constraints on the stress tensor are known as theBeltrami-Michell equations of compatibility:σij,kk+11+νσkk,ij+Fi,j+Fj,i+ν1νδi,jFk,k=0.{\displaystyle \sigma _{ij,kk}+{\frac {1}{1+\nu }}\sigma _{kk,ij}+F_{i,j}+F_{j,i}+{\frac {\nu }{1-\nu }}\delta _{i,j}F_{k,k}=0.}In the special situation where the body force is homogeneous, the above equations reduce to[6](1+ν)σij,kk+σkk,ij=0.{\displaystyle (1+\nu )\sigma _{ij,kk}+\sigma _{kk,ij}=0.}

A necessary, but insufficient, condition for compatibility under this situation is4σ=0{\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\nabla }}^{4}{\boldsymbol {\sigma }}={\boldsymbol {0}}} orσij,kk=0{\displaystyle \sigma _{ij,kk\ell \ell }=0}.[1]

These constraints, along with the equilibrium equation (or equation of motion for elastodynamics) allow the calculation of the stress tensor field. Once the stress field has been calculated from these equations, the strains can be obtained from the constitutive equations, and the displacement field from the strain-displacement equations.

An alternative solution technique is to express the stress tensor in terms ofstress functions which automatically yield a solution to the equilibrium equation. The stress functions then obey a single differential equation which corresponds to the compatibility equations.

Solutions for elastostatic cases

[edit]
Thomson's solution - point force in an infinite isotropic medium
[edit]

The most important solution of the Navier–Cauchy or elastostatic equation is for that of a force acting at a point in an infinite isotropic medium. This solution was found byWilliam Thomson (later Lord Kelvin) in 1848 (Thomson 1848). This solution is the analog ofCoulomb's law inelectrostatics. A derivation is given in Landau & Lifshitz.[7]: §8  Defininga=12ν{\displaystyle a=1-2\nu }b=2(1ν)=a+1{\displaystyle b=2(1-\nu )=a+1}whereν{\displaystyle \nu } is Poisson's ratio, the solution may be expressed asui=GikFk{\displaystyle u_{i}=G_{ik}F_{k}} whereFk{\displaystyle F_{k}} is the force vector being applied at the point, andGik{\displaystyle G_{ik}} is a tensorGreen's function which may be written inCartesian coordinates as:Gik=14πμr[(112b)δik+12bxixkr2]{\displaystyle G_{ik}={\frac {1}{4\pi \mu r}}\left[\left(1-{\frac {1}{2b}}\right)\delta _{ik}+{\frac {1}{2b}}{\frac {x_{i}x_{k}}{r^{2}}}\right]}

It may be also compactly written as:Gik=14πμ[δikr12b2rxixk]{\displaystyle G_{ik}={\frac {1}{4\pi \mu }}\left[{\frac {\delta _{ik}}{r}}-{\frac {1}{2b}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}r}{\partial x_{i}\partial x_{k}}}\right]}and it may be explicitly written as:Gik=14πμr[112b+12bx2r212bxyr212bxzr212byxr2112b+12by2r212byzr212bzxr212bzyr2112b+12bz2r2]{\displaystyle G_{ik}={\frac {1}{4\pi \mu r}}{\begin{bmatrix}1-{\frac {1}{2b}}+{\frac {1}{2b}}{\frac {x^{2}}{r^{2}}}&{\frac {1}{2b}}{\frac {xy}{r^{2}}}&{\frac {1}{2b}}{\frac {xz}{r^{2}}}\\{\frac {1}{2b}}{\frac {yx}{r^{2}}}&1-{\frac {1}{2b}}+{\frac {1}{2b}}{\frac {y^{2}}{r^{2}}}&{\frac {1}{2b}}{\frac {yz}{r^{2}}}\\{\frac {1}{2b}}{\frac {zx}{r^{2}}}&{\frac {1}{2b}}{\frac {zy}{r^{2}}}&1-{\frac {1}{2b}}+{\frac {1}{2b}}{\frac {z^{2}}{r^{2}}}\end{bmatrix}}}

In cylindrical coordinates (ρ,ϕ,z{\displaystyle \rho ,\phi ,z\,\!}) it may be written as:Gik=14πμr[112bz2r2012bρzr20112b012bzρr20112bρ2r2]{\displaystyle G_{ik}={\frac {1}{4\pi \mu r}}{\begin{bmatrix}1-{\frac {1}{2b}}{\frac {z^{2}}{r^{2}}}&0&{\frac {1}{2b}}{\frac {\rho z}{r^{2}}}\\0&1-{\frac {1}{2b}}&0\\{\frac {1}{2b}}{\frac {z\rho }{r^{2}}}&0&1-{\frac {1}{2b}}{\frac {\rho ^{2}}{r^{2}}}\end{bmatrix}}}wherer is total distance to point.

It is particularly helpful to write the displacement in cylindrical coordinates for a point forceFz{\displaystyle F_{z}} directed along the z-axis. Definingρ^{\displaystyle {\hat {\boldsymbol {\rho }}}} andz^{\displaystyle {\hat {\mathbf {z} }}} as unit vectors in theρ{\displaystyle \rho } andz{\displaystyle z} directions respectively yields:u=Fz4πμr[14(1ν)ρzr2ρ^+(114(1ν)ρ2r2)z^]{\displaystyle \mathbf {u} ={\frac {F_{z}}{4\pi \mu r}}\left[{\frac {1}{4(1-\nu )}}\,{\frac {\rho z}{r^{2}}}{\hat {\boldsymbol {\rho }}}+\left(1-{\frac {1}{4(1-\nu )}}\,{\frac {\rho ^{2}}{r^{2}}}\right){\hat {\mathbf {z} }}\right]}

It can be seen that there is a component of the displacement in the direction of the force, which diminishes, as is the case for the potential in electrostatics, as 1/r for larger. There is also an additional ρ-directed component.

Boussinesq–Cerruti solution - point force at the origin of an infinite isotropic half-space
[edit]

Another useful solution is that of a point force acting on the surface of an infinite half-space. It was derived by Boussinesq[8] for the normal force and Cerruti for the tangential force and a derivation is given in Landau & Lifshitz.[7]: §8  In this case, the solution is again written as a Green's tensor which goes to zero at infinity, and the component of the stress tensor normal to the surface vanishes. This solution may be written in Cartesian coordinates as [recall:a=(12ν){\displaystyle a=(1-2\nu )} andb=2(1ν){\displaystyle b=2(1-\nu )},ν{\displaystyle \nu } = Poisson's ratio]:

Gik=14πμ[br+x2r3ax2r(r+z)2azr(r+z)xyr3axyr(r+z)2xzr3axr(r+z)yxr3ayxr(r+z)2br+y2r3ay2r(r+z)2azr(r+z)yzr3ayr(r+z)zxr3axr(r+z)zyr3ayr(r+z)br+z2r3]{\displaystyle G_{ik}={\frac {1}{4\pi \mu }}{\begin{bmatrix}{\frac {b}{r}}+{\frac {x^{2}}{r^{3}}}-{\frac {ax^{2}}{r(r+z)^{2}}}-{\frac {az}{r(r+z)}}&{\frac {xy}{r^{3}}}-{\frac {axy}{r(r+z)^{2}}}&{\frac {xz}{r^{3}}}-{\frac {ax}{r(r+z)}}\\{\frac {yx}{r^{3}}}-{\frac {ayx}{r(r+z)^{2}}}&{\frac {b}{r}}+{\frac {y^{2}}{r^{3}}}-{\frac {ay^{2}}{r(r+z)^{2}}}-{\frac {az}{r(r+z)}}&{\frac {yz}{r^{3}}}-{\frac {ay}{r(r+z)}}\\{\frac {zx}{r^{3}}}-{\frac {ax}{r(r+z)}}&{\frac {zy}{r^{3}}}-{\frac {ay}{r(r+z)}}&{\frac {b}{r}}+{\frac {z^{2}}{r^{3}}}\end{bmatrix}}}

Other solutions
[edit]
  • Point force inside an infinite isotropic half-space.[9]
  • Point force on a surface of an isotropic half-space.[6]
  • Contact of two elastic bodies: the Hertz solution (seeMatlab code).[10] See also the page onContact mechanics.

Elastodynamics in terms of displacements

[edit]
[icon]
This sectionneeds expansion with: more principles, a brief explanation to each type of wave. You can help byadding to it. (talk)(September 2010)

Elastodynamics is the study ofelastic waves and involves linear elasticity with variation in time. Anelastic wave is a type ofmechanical wave that propagates in elastic orviscoelastic materials. The elasticity of the material provides the restoringforce of the wave. When they occur in theEarth as the result of anearthquake or other disturbance, elastic waves are usually calledseismic waves.

The linear momentum equation is simply the equilibrium equation with an additional inertial term:σji,j+Fi=ρu¨i=ρttui.{\displaystyle \sigma _{ji,j}+F_{i}=\rho \,{\ddot {u}}_{i}=\rho \,\partial _{tt}u_{i}.}

If the material is governed by anisotropic Hooke's law (with the stiffness tensor homogeneous throughout the material), one obtains thedisplacement equation of elastodynamics:(Cijklu(k,l)),j+Fi=ρu¨i.{\displaystyle \left(C_{ijkl}u_{(k},_{l)}\right),_{j}+F_{i}=\rho {\ddot {u}}_{i}.}

If the material is isotropic and homogeneous, one obtains the (general, or transient)Navier–Cauchy equation:μui,jj+(μ+λ)uj,ij+Fi=ρttuiorμ2u+(μ+λ)(u)+F=ρ2ut2.{\displaystyle \mu u_{i,jj}+(\mu +\lambda )u_{j,ij}+F_{i}=\rho \partial _{tt}u_{i}\quad {\text{or}}\quad \mu \nabla ^{2}\mathbf {u} +(\mu +\lambda )\nabla (\nabla \cdot \mathbf {u} )+\mathbf {F} =\rho {\frac {\partial ^{2}\mathbf {u} }{\partial t^{2}}}.}

The elastodynamic wave equation can also be expressed as(δklttAkl[])ul=1ρFk{\displaystyle \left(\delta _{kl}\partial _{tt}-A_{kl}[\nabla ]\right)u_{l}={\frac {1}{\rho }}F_{k}}whereAkl[]=1ρiCikljj{\displaystyle A_{kl}[\nabla ]={\frac {1}{\rho }}\,\partial _{i}\,C_{iklj}\,\partial _{j}}is theacoustic differential operator, andδkl{\displaystyle \delta _{kl}} isKronecker delta.

Inisotropic media, the stiffness tensor has the formCijkl=Kδijδkl+μ(δikδjl+δilδjk23δijδkl){\displaystyle C_{ijkl}=K\,\delta _{ij}\,\delta _{kl}+\mu \,(\delta _{ik}\delta _{jl}+\delta _{il}\delta _{jk}-{\frac {2}{3}}\,\delta _{ij}\,\delta _{kl})}whereK{\displaystyle K} is thebulk modulus (or incompressibility), andμ{\displaystyle \mu } is theshear modulus (or rigidity), twoelastic moduli. If the material is homogeneous (i.e. the stiffness tensor is constant throughout the material), the acoustic operator becomes:Aij[]=α2ij+β2(mmδijij){\displaystyle A_{ij}[\nabla ]=\alpha ^{2}\partial _{i}\partial _{j}+\beta ^{2}(\partial _{m}\partial _{m}\delta _{ij}-\partial _{i}\partial _{j})}

Forplane waves, the above differential operator becomes theacoustic algebraic operator:Aij[k]=α2kikj+β2(kmkmδijkikj){\displaystyle A_{ij}[\mathbf {k} ]=\alpha ^{2}k_{i}k_{j}+\beta ^{2}(k_{m}k_{m}\delta _{ij}-k_{i}k_{j})}whereα2=(K+43μ)/ρβ2=μ/ρ{\displaystyle \alpha ^{2}=\left(K+{\frac {4}{3}}\mu \right)/\rho \qquad \beta ^{2}=\mu /\rho }are theeigenvalues ofA[k^]{\displaystyle A[{\hat {\mathbf {k} }}]} witheigenvectorsu^{\displaystyle {\hat {\mathbf {u} }}} parallel and orthogonal to the propagation directionk^{\displaystyle {\hat {\mathbf {k} }}\,\!}, respectively. The associated waves are calledlongitudinal andshear elastic waves. In the seismological literature, the corresponding plane waves are called P-waves and S-waves (seeSeismic wave).

Elastodynamics in terms of stresses

[edit]

Elimination of displacements and strains from the governing equations leads to theIgnaczak equation of elastodynamics[11](ρ1σ(ik,k),j)Sijklσ¨kl+(ρ1F(i),j)=0.{\displaystyle \left(\rho ^{-1}\sigma _{(ik},_{k}\right),_{j)}-S_{ijkl}{\ddot {\sigma }}_{kl}+\left(\rho ^{-1}F_{(i}\right),_{j)}=0.}

In the case of local isotropy, this reduces to(ρ1σ(ik,k),j)12μ(σ¨ijλ3λ+2μσ¨kkδij)+(ρ1F(i),j)=0.{\displaystyle \left(\rho ^{-1}\sigma _{(ik},_{k}\right),_{j)}-{\frac {1}{2\mu }}\left({\ddot {\sigma }}_{ij}-{\frac {\lambda }{3\lambda +2\mu }}{\ddot {\sigma }}_{kk}\delta _{ij}\right)+\left(\rho ^{-1}F_{(i}\right),_{j)}=0.}

The principal characteristics of this formulation include: (1) avoids gradients of compliance but introduces gradients of mass density; (2) it is derivable from a variational principle; (3) it is advantageous for handling traction initial-boundary value problems, (4) allows a tensorial classification of elastic waves, (5) offers a range of applications in elastic wave propagation problems; (6) can be extended to dynamics of classical or micropolar solids with interacting fields of diverse types (thermoelastic, fluid-saturated porous, piezoelectro-elastic...) as well as nonlinear media.

Anisotropic homogeneous media

[edit]
Main article:Hooke's law

For anisotropic media, the stiffness tensorCijkl{\displaystyle C_{ijkl}} is more complicated. The symmetry of the stress tensorσij{\displaystyle \sigma _{ij}} means that there are at most 6 different elements of stress. Similarly, there are at most 6 different elements of the strain tensorεij{\displaystyle \varepsilon _{ij}\,\!}. Hence the fourth-order stiffness tensorCijkl{\displaystyle C_{ijkl}} may be written as a matrixCαβ{\displaystyle C_{\alpha \beta }} (a tensor of second order).Voigt notation is the standard mapping for tensor indices,ij=α=11223323,3213,3112,21123456{\displaystyle {\begin{matrix}ij&=\\\Downarrow &\\\alpha &=\end{matrix}}{\begin{matrix}11&22&33&23,32&13,31&12,21\\\Downarrow &\Downarrow &\Downarrow &\Downarrow &\Downarrow &\Downarrow &\\1&2&3&4&5&6\end{matrix}}}

With this notation, one can write the elasticity matrix for any linearly elastic medium as:CijklCαβ=[C11C12C13C14C15C16C12C22C23C24C25C26C13C23C33C34C35C36C14C24C34C44C45C46C15C25C35C45C55C56C16C26C36C46C56C66].{\displaystyle C_{ijkl}\Rightarrow C_{\alpha \beta }={\begin{bmatrix}C_{11}&C_{12}&C_{13}&C_{14}&C_{15}&C_{16}\\C_{12}&C_{22}&C_{23}&C_{24}&C_{25}&C_{26}\\C_{13}&C_{23}&C_{33}&C_{34}&C_{35}&C_{36}\\C_{14}&C_{24}&C_{34}&C_{44}&C_{45}&C_{46}\\C_{15}&C_{25}&C_{35}&C_{45}&C_{55}&C_{56}\\C_{16}&C_{26}&C_{36}&C_{46}&C_{56}&C_{66}\end{bmatrix}}.}

As shown, the matrixCαβ{\displaystyle C_{\alpha \beta }} is symmetric, this is a result of the existence of a strain energy density function which satisfiesσij=Wεij{\displaystyle \sigma _{ij}={\frac {\partial W}{\partial \varepsilon _{ij}}}}. Hence, there are at most 21 different elements ofCαβ{\displaystyle C_{\alpha \beta }\,\!}.

The isotropic special case has 2 independent elements:Cαβ=[K+4μ /3K2μ /3K2μ /3000K2μ /3K+4μ /3K2μ /3000K2μ /3K2μ /3K+4μ /3000000μ 000000μ 000000μ ].{\displaystyle C_{\alpha \beta }={\begin{bmatrix}K+4\mu \ /3&K-2\mu \ /3&K-2\mu \ /3&0&0&0\\K-2\mu \ /3&K+4\mu \ /3&K-2\mu \ /3&0&0&0\\K-2\mu \ /3&K-2\mu \ /3&K+4\mu \ /3&0&0&0\\0&0&0&\mu \ &0&0\\0&0&0&0&\mu \ &0\\0&0&0&0&0&\mu \ \end{bmatrix}}.}

The simplest anisotropic case, that of cubic symmetry has 3 independent elements:Cαβ=[C11C12C12000C12C11C12000C12C12C11000000C44000000C44000000C44].{\displaystyle C_{\alpha \beta }={\begin{bmatrix}C_{11}&C_{12}&C_{12}&0&0&0\\C_{12}&C_{11}&C_{12}&0&0&0\\C_{12}&C_{12}&C_{11}&0&0&0\\0&0&0&C_{44}&0&0\\0&0&0&0&C_{44}&0\\0&0&0&0&0&C_{44}\end{bmatrix}}.}

The case oftransverse isotropy, also called polar anisotropy, (with a single axis (the 3-axis) of symmetry) has 5 independent elements:Cαβ=[C11C112C66C13000C112C66C11C13000C13C13C33000000C44000000C44000000C66].{\displaystyle C_{\alpha \beta }={\begin{bmatrix}C_{11}&C_{11}-2C_{66}&C_{13}&0&0&0\\C_{11}-2C_{66}&C_{11}&C_{13}&0&0&0\\C_{13}&C_{13}&C_{33}&0&0&0\\0&0&0&C_{44}&0&0\\0&0&0&0&C_{44}&0\\0&0&0&0&0&C_{66}\end{bmatrix}}.}

When the transverse isotropy is weak (i.e. close to isotropy), an alternative parametrization utilizingThomsen parameters, is convenient for the formulas for wave speeds.

The case of orthotropy (the symmetry of a brick) has 9 independent elements:Cαβ=[C11C12C13000C12C22C23000C13C23C33000000C44000000C55000000C66].{\displaystyle C_{\alpha \beta }={\begin{bmatrix}C_{11}&C_{12}&C_{13}&0&0&0\\C_{12}&C_{22}&C_{23}&0&0&0\\C_{13}&C_{23}&C_{33}&0&0&0\\0&0&0&C_{44}&0&0\\0&0&0&0&C_{55}&0\\0&0&0&0&0&C_{66}\end{bmatrix}}.}

Elastodynamics

[edit]

The elastodynamic wave equation for anisotropic media can be expressed as(δklttAkl[])ul=1ρFk{\displaystyle (\delta _{kl}\partial _{tt}-A_{kl}[\nabla ])\,u_{l}={\frac {1}{\rho }}F_{k}}whereAkl[]=1ρiCikljj{\displaystyle A_{kl}[\nabla ]={\frac {1}{\rho }}\,\partial _{i}\,C_{iklj}\,\partial _{j}}is theacoustic differential operator, andδkl{\displaystyle \delta _{kl}} isKronecker delta.

Plane waves and Christoffel equation

[edit]

Aplane wave has the formu[x,t]=U[kxωt]u^{\displaystyle \mathbf {u} [\mathbf {x} ,\,t]=U[\mathbf {k} \cdot \mathbf {x} -\omega \,t]\,{\hat {\mathbf {u} }}}withu^{\displaystyle {\hat {\mathbf {u} }}\,\!} of unit length.It is a solution of the wave equation with zero forcing, if and only ifω2{\displaystyle \omega ^{2}} andu^{\displaystyle {\hat {\mathbf {u} }}} constitute an eigenvalue/eigenvector pair of theacoustic algebraic operatorAkl[k]=1ρkiCikljkj.{\displaystyle A_{kl}[\mathbf {k} ]={\frac {1}{\rho }}\,k_{i}\,C_{iklj}\,k_{j}.}Thispropagation condition (also known as theChristoffel equation) may be written asA[k^]u^=c2u^{\displaystyle A[{\hat {\mathbf {k} }}]\,{\hat {\mathbf {u} }}=c^{2}\,{\hat {\mathbf {u} }}}wherek^=k/kk{\displaystyle {\hat {\mathbf {k} }}=\mathbf {k} /{\sqrt {\mathbf {k} \cdot \mathbf {k} }}}denotes propagation direction andc=ω/kk{\displaystyle c=\omega /{\sqrt {\mathbf {k} \cdot \mathbf {k} }}} is phase velocity.

See also

[edit]
Part of a series on
Continuum mechanics
J=Ddφdx{\displaystyle J=-D{\frac {d\varphi }{dx}}}

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcdeSlaughter, William S. (2002).The Linearized Theory of Elasticity. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser Boston.doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0093-2.ISBN 978-1-4612-6608-2.
  2. ^Belen'kii; Salaev (1988)."Deformation effects in layer crystals".Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk.155 (5):89–127.doi:10.3367/UFNr.0155.198805c.0089.
  3. ^Aki, Keiiti;Richards, Paul G. (2002).Quantitative seismology (2 ed.). Mill Valley, California: University Science Books.ISBN 978-1-891389-63-4.
  4. ^Continuum Mechanics for Engineers 2001 Mase, Eq. 5.12-2
  5. ^Sommerfeld, Arnold (1964).Mechanics of Deformable Bodies. New York: Academic Press.
  6. ^abtribonet (2017-02-16)."Elastic Deformation".Tribology. Retrieved2017-02-16.
  7. ^abLandau, L.D.;Lifshitz, E. M. (1986).Theory of Elasticity (3rd ed.). Oxford, England: Butterworth Heinemann.ISBN 0-7506-2633-X.
  8. ^Boussinesq, Joseph (1885).Application des potentiels à l'étude de l'équilibre et du mouvement des solides élastiques. Paris, France: Gauthier-Villars.Archived from the original on 2024-09-03. Retrieved2007-12-19.
  9. ^Mindlin, R. D. (1936)."Force at a point in the interior of a semi-infinite solid".Physics.7 (5):195–202.Bibcode:1936Physi...7..195M.doi:10.1063/1.1745385. Archived fromthe original on September 23, 2017.
  10. ^Hertz, Heinrich (1882). "Contact between solid elastic bodies".Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik.92.
  11. ^Ostoja-Starzewski, M., (2018),Ignaczak equation of elastodynamics, Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids.doi:10.1177/1081286518757284
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Linear_elasticity&oldid=1283753724"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp