| Disability |
|---|
Therapy |
The depiction ofdisability in the media plays a major role in molding the public perception ofdisability.[1] Perceptions portrayed in themedia directly influence the way people with disabilities are treated in current society. "[Media platforms] have been cited as a key site for the reinforcement of negative images and ideas in regard to people with disabilities."[2]
As a direct response, there have been increasing examples worldwide of people with disabilities pursuing their own media projects, such as creatingfilm series centered on disability issues,radio programs andpodcasts designed around and marketed towards those with disabilities, and so on.
The media generally depicts people with disabilities according to common stereotypes such aspity andheroism.Disability advocates often call this type of societal situation the "pity/heroism trap" or "pity/heroism dichotomy" and call instead for its supporters to "Piss On Pity" and push forward withinclusion instead.[3]
When reports are about the "plight of the disabled" they rely on the pity ormedical model of disability.Telethons are an example of this, such as theJerry Lewis MDA Telethon which has been heavily criticized and sometimes evenphysically protested bydisability rights advocates.[4][5]
Negative day-to-day reporting may occur chiefly by depicting a given person or people with a disability as a burden or drain on society.[6]
The "super-crip" model, in which subjects are portrayed as heroically overcoming their conditions, is also often used when reporting on people with disabilities.[7]
Thesocial model tends to be used for reporting on the activities of disability rights activists if the report is positive.[8]
The term "inspiration porn" was coined in 2012 by disability rights activistStella Young in an editorial inAustralian Broadcasting Corporation's webzineRamp Up.[9] The term describes when people with disabilities are calledinspirational solely or in part on the basis of their disability.[10][11]
Researchers note that information is prioritized for people with disabilities, with communication as a hard distinct second and entertainment is framed as a luxury[12]
 | This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Disability in the media" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(February 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Stereotypical depictions of disability that originate in the arts, film, literature, television, and other mass media fiction works, are frequently normalized through repetition to the general audience. Once such a stereotype is absorbed and accepted by the mainstream public, it continues to be repeated in the media, in many slightly varied forms, but staying close to the stereotype. Many media stereotypes about disability have been identified. They are sometimes referred to as "tropes", meaning a recurring image or representation in the mainstream culture that is widely recognizable.[13] Tropes repeated in works of fiction have an influence on how society at large perceives people with disabilities. Other forms of media, in turn, then portray people with disabilities in ways that conform with tropes and repeat them.[14]
Some of these disability tropes that have been identified in popular culture include:
Sometimes, characters that are given a disability are only seen as their disability. Through the medical model, their disability is explained and narrated in aWebMD style. This disability stereotype, asJay Timothy Dolmage describes it, is known as the "Disability as Pathology" myth. It is harmful because it feeds into the idea that disabled people are their disability first before their personhood.[16]
Other disability stereotypes that have been identified in popular culture include:[17]
While there are con artists who fake a disability such asBelle Gibson, they are rare, while people with genuine disabilities are relatively common. Media, and especially current affairs reporting, that focuses on the few fraudulent fake-disabled people while ignoring or systematically under-representing the many genuinely disabled people creates a misperception of disabled people which encourages negative stereotyping. This is especially problematic for people withhidden disabilities, who may be disbelieved and abused by members of the public for "faking it," as they believe that disability fakers are more common than genuine disabilities. One example is wheelchair users not being able to walk.[22][citation needed]
The existence of disability tropes in mass media is related to other stereotypes, or tropes, that have developed when other marginalized groups in society are depicted,[23] such as theMagical Negro trope identified, and criticized, by film directorSpike Lee. The mocking names often given to these tropes when they are identified indicates a rejection of the harmful stereotypes that they propagate.
Stereotypes may endure in a culture for several reasons: they are constantly reinforced in the culture, which mass media does easily and effectively; they reflect a common human need to organize people and categorize them; they reinforce discrimination that allows one group of society to exploit and marginalize another group.[17] Several studies of mass media in Britain and the United States have identified common stereotypes, such as "noble warrior", "charity cripple", "curio", "freak", and "Pollyanna", where the researchers identified a position of "disapproval", on the part of the media, of some aspect of the disability.[24] It has been shown that media portrayals of disability became more normalizing and accepting in the years immediately afterWorld War II, when returning veterans with war-related disabilities were being reintegrated into society. A backlash of intolerance towards disability followed during the mid-20th century, with some researchers speculating that this may have been related to society's reaction against any identifiable "difference" as a result of Cold War tensions. Depictions of disability in media soon reverted to emphasizing the "freakish" nature of disability.[25]
Broadcast media has in recent years begun to recognize the large audience of people with disabilities that it reaches. Programming dedicated to disability issues is increasing.
In 1990, the signing of theAmericans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became the first news story on disability issues to become a lead story on cable news broadcasterCNN. News DirectorEd Turner contacted the Washington bureau of CNN to have the signing of the ADA by President Bush broadcast live. The next day, the signing of the ADA was covered as the top headline inThe New York Times,The Washington Post, and every other major U.S. newspaper. Disability rights activistLex Frieden has stated, "That was the first time that millions of people were exposed to disability rights as the number one story".[26] These milestones were a major change in reducing exclusion and invisibility for people with disabilities.
Ouch![27] by theBritish Broadcasting Corporation,The Largest Minority[28] broadcast inNew York City, andDtv[29] presented insign language onSABC television inSouth Africa, are examples of programming produced for, and usually also by, people with disabilities.
Radio reading services are radio stations that broadcast readings from newspapers, magazines and books to mainly blind or partially sighted audiences.
In recent years, some mainstream publications and broadcasters have added writing and programming about disability-related topics. The Creative Diversity Network in the United Kingdom is an organization that advocates increased cultural and disability-related programming. Clare Morrow, the organization's Network Manager, states that "Disability is now at the heart of the diversity agenda for all of the UK's main television companies, thanks to their collective work".[30] The BBC Website includesOuch!, a disability news and discussion blog and internet talk show program.[31]
Many activist and charitable organisations have websites and publish their own magazines or newsletters.
Disability has been shown to audiences since the early days of documentary film. Educational silent films showing hospital patients with various disabling conditions were shown to medical and nursing students. Films ofschizophrenia patients with symptoms ofcatatonia,World War I veterans with extremeposttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (shell-shock) symptoms, and many other such films survive today.Michael J. Dowling (1866–1921) was a prominentMinnesota politician and newspaper publisher, who was also a quadruple amputee. World War I inspired him to further the cause of veterans with disabilities. Dowling had himself filmed performing routine tasks on his own, and had the films screened for groups such as theAmerican Medical Association in 1918. His efforts promoted the rehabilitation of physically disabled people.[32]
Documentary films sometimes had a tone that was a reflection of the public's morbid curiosity about visible disabilities that were considered shameful and ordinarily were hidden from public view. Nazi propagandists exploited this fear and prejudice to push the public to accept theireuthanasia policies, including forcible sterilization, by screening films showing people with intellectual and physical disabilities living in squalid conditions.[33] At the same time, American President Franklin D. Roosevelt and his White House staff made a great effort to disguise his disability (Roosevelt becameparaplegic after contractingpolio as an adult). Roosevelt was photographed and filmed only from positions that would hide his disability from the public, for fear that he would be perceived as weak.[33]
More recently, documentary films about disability have been widely viewed on both public and cable television programming. TheChannel 5 (UK) programExtraordinary Lives, andChannel 4 programBody Shock in the United Kingdom, broadcast much documentary material about disability. Titles of some documentary programming includes: "The Boy Who Sees Without Eyes — the 14-year-old American boy who navigates by sound;The Twin Within the Twin — the 34-year-old Bengali who carries his foetal twin within his abdomen; andThe Twins Who Share a Body — Abby and Brittany Hensel, the world's only known dicephalus twins, ie. two heads with one body".[34] Some of the documentaries, perceived to be in the "shock doc" (shock documentary) genre, have been denounced by critics with disabilities. Although the documentary programming contains educational and scientific information, the sensationalized, overt emotional appeal of the "tabloid tone" of the programming has raised objections. Laurence Clark has written in the BBC Website's disability blogOuch!:
During these programs I often find myself screaming at the TV: 'Where the hell do they find these people?!' I suspect that someone somewhere has set up an agency called Rent-a-Freak, specifically to supply the most bizarre, eccentric disabled people they can find to budding documentary makers. But unlike today's documentary subjects, the freaks of old were at least paid to take part — and had some say over their performances.[34]
The first photographer to become widely known for depicting the visibly disabled wasDiane Arbus, active in the 1950s and 1960s.[35] Her photographs, which are in fact art photographs, have been, and remain, highly controversial.[36]
American documentary photographers Tom Olin and Harvey Finkle, known for documenting thedisability rights movement since the 1980s, have exhibited at many venues including the National Constitution Center Museum.[37]
Members of the public with disabilities have criticized media depictions of disability on the grounds that stereotypes are commonly repeated. Media coverage that is "negative", "unrealistic", or displays a preference for the "pitiful" and "sensationalistic" over the "everyday and human side of disability"[38] are identified at the root of the dissatisfaction. Journalist Leye Jeannette Chrzanowski, who uses a wheelchair, has written:
Many people with disabilities believe mainstream journalists are incapable of accurately covering stories about them. Generally, journalists either portray us as pitiful cripples, super achievers, or insane mental patients. These erroneous media stereotypes of people with disabilities are perpetuated because journalists consistently fail to understand or learn about people with disabilities and the issues that are important to us.[38]
Various organisations and programmes have been established to try to positively influence the frequency and quality of reporting on disability issues.[39][40][41] By 2000, it was estimated that in the United States, there were between 3000 and 3500 newsletters, 200 magazines, and 50 to 60 newspapers regularly published that focussed on disability issues.[26]
Social media is a tool used to connect disabled individuals with similar interests and experiences.[42] Online forums and chat rooms therefore work as a connector for example people with impaired hearing are able to connect with those who many not know howAmerican Sign Language. Social media has also been used as an educational tool to teach others about the disabled community, how to better accommodate and find treatment or aid. In these cases social media has been a way to reduce isolation and reduce stereotypes made about disabled individuals.
These examples provide a sample of contemporary representations of disability in the media that include authentic and incidental portrayal of disability by disabled actors and professionals.
Theatre and disability has grown as a movement and portrayal of disabled characters is subject to greater scrutiny. Disabled actors are more commonly authentically cast, reclaiming disabled stories, bringing authenticity, subtext and apostmodern perspective of disability in performance.
| Main topics | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approaches | |||||||||||
| Rights, law, support |
| ||||||||||
| Structural and assistive | |||||||||||
| Social issues | |||||||||||
| Disability studies | |||||||||||
| Arts, media, culture, sport | |||||||||||
