Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Democracy Ranking

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Annual global ranking of liberal democracies

For overview of democracy indices, seeDemocracy indices.
Part of thePolitics series
Democracy
iconPolitics portal

TheDemocracy Ranking was an index compiled by the Association for Development and Advancement of the Democracy Award, anAustria-based non-partisan organization.[1][2]Democracy Ranking produced an annual globalranking of liberal democracies. The applied conceptualformula, which measures the quality of democracy, integratesdemocracy and other characteristics of thepolitical system with the performance of non-political dimensions (gender,economy,knowledge,health, andenvironment). Democracy Ranking has emphasized a broader understanding of democracy, creating a conceptual link betweenpolitics and the output and performance ofsociety. The Democracy Ranking has compared several-year intervals, delivering ranking results, which show how ranking positions and score levels have developed recently.

Ranking 2016

[edit]

Source:[3]

RankCountryScorePolitical SystemEconomyEnvironmentGender EqualityHealthKnowledgeGender Comprehensive
1 Norway87.199.284.759.984.784.361.492.1
2  Switzerland86.792.280.582.681.288.273.585.6
3 Sweden86.297.467.471.485.384.866.291.0
4 Finland86.099.763.760.684.782.170.292.4
5 Denmark85.194.369.578.182.881.467.687.3
6 Netherlands83.393.669.759.381.984.968.786.5
7 New Zealand81.492.263.366.382.881.359.186.8
8 Germany81.390.271.160.578.085.367.283.9
9 Ireland80.991.563.271.975.879.461.584.2
10 Australia80.587.669.859.983.683.670.084.8
11 Belgium80.390.561.555.581.384.068.085.1
12 Canada79.989.768.356.382.082.062.084.9
13 Austria79.985.569.166.480.286.669.182.0
14 United Kingdom79.687.862.370.680.679.864.183.5
15 France78.285.259.269.878.186.362.682.0
16 United States76.584.271.549.178.783.062.380.5
17 Slovenia75.983.754.662.479.979.364.582.6
18 Japan75.579.857.163.882.087.765.878.8
19 Spain75.383.142.475.276.885.058.180.8
20 Portugal74.885.145.267.874.480.354.179.7
21 Uruguay73.583.352.278.573.871.543.277.0
22 Lithuania72.581.255.070.876.168.049.178.6
23 Estonia72.584.860.531.779.772.356.581.2
24 Chile72.081.451.267.376.976.841.478.4
25 Czech Republic72.079.460.557.274.976.154.576.4
26 Israel71.972.860.965.078.281.469.374.7
27 Poland71.480.553.566.674.971.944.277.4
28 Italy71.175.448.772.973.884.054.875.6
29 Hong Kong70.760.977.291.480.0100.054.171.5
30 Latvia70.678.853.871.676.266.344.378.4
31 Costa Rica70.280.244.779.070.173.134.574.9
32 South Korea70.269.162.857.478.682.475.272.5
33 Cyprus69.177.146.267.173.076.543.374.5
34 Slovakia68.075.251.564.268.372.647.171.3
35 Croatia67.073.639.172.269.973.147.872.7
36 Singapore65.952.290.578.186.679.763.165.5
37 Greece65.468.132.966.269.484.360.369.9
38 Panama65.371.753.275.967.769.728.372.5
39 Mauritius65.173.350.775.362.564.131.667.1
40 Romania65.070.052.073.269.466.738.470.4
41 Bulgaria64.470.449.758.571.770.441.572.7
42 Hungary64.067.952.160.071.071.146.069.2
43 Argentina63.967.446.466.573.768.547.473.5
44 Brazil62.566.946.071.269.664.239.469.6
45 Trinidad and Tobago61.171.360.138.968.055.232.070.8
46 Serbia60.667.929.960.261.970.544.066.4
47 Peru60.061.952.475.471.061.530.467.7
48 Jamaica60.069.035.062.561.665.829.664.8
49 Mongolia59.872.845.737.968.755.625.972.4
50 El Salvador58.763.947.175.663.159.022.964.2
51 Ghana57.871.641.976.453.131.916.962.2
52 Philippines57.764.044.977.359.150.025.864.1
53 Colombia57.358.046.379.065.961.830.363.7
54 Namibia57.268.937.973.952.044.419.263.6
55 Albania56.958.536.064.065.868.442.263.3
56 Tunisia56.661.641.671.852.062.230.057.4
57 Georgia56.458.740.968.965.866.328.861.9
58 Botswana56.364.643.673.053.940.728.360.2
59 Dominican Republic55.961.337.870.956.558.329.159.9
60 Mexico55.755.650.071.165.167.125.862.3
61 Moldova55.657.947.961.563.362.631.463.0
62 Ecuador55.555.045.870.870.066.226.965.4
63 Bolivia55.461.644.862.666.048.224.365.7
64 Senegal55.366.137.367.754.743.918.961.8
65 India54.863.646.668.650.945.918.157.5
66 Nicaragua54.055.541.871.767.362.918.564.0
67 Timor-Leste53.756.839.393.750.346.423.054.8
68 Indonesia53.556.747.472.957.547.725.857.7
69 Paraguay53.053.844.665.962.960.627.060.2
70 Ukraine52.354.342.829.772.362.943.665.3
71 South Africa52.270.526.948.635.930.627.857.1
72 Malawi52.157.433.996.152.538.712.756.4
73 Benin51.763.344.062.247.326.520.154.9
74 North Macedonia51.353.427.166.753.867.331.454.6
75 Turkey50.642.651.271.562.964.042.853.7
76 Malaysia50.441.160.461.469.362.345.253.7
77 Papua New Guinea49.954.742.175.654.536.017.454.4
78 Tanzania49.553.741.568.761.340.315.160.8
79 Guatemala49.048.250.866.158.157.117.054.3
80 Sri Lanka49.042.746.883.863.162.120.555.3
81 Sierra Leone48.356.540.893.944.112.89.551.1
82 Bangladesh48.147.040.474.460.251.719.655.1
83 Madagascar48.150.440.587.457.238.94.555.7
84 Kuwait47.936.185.848.264.363.336.949.6
85 Honduras47.744.442.667.758.061.925.252.6
86 Bosnia and Herzegovina47.549.520.556.153.469.928.253.5
87 Liberia47.450.339.691.244.933.613.048.1
88   Nepal47.145.546.961.467.054.614.256.5
89 Lesotho46.962.524.376.326.313.116.445.5
90 Kenya46.449.435.971.953.434.720.653.5
91 Armenia46.041.532.060.061.163.835.051.3
92 Zambia45.550.132.373.457.331.010.453.5
93 Burkina Faso45.346.241.891.847.325.515.946.0
94 Niger43.249.440.072.133.332.57.239.6
95 Kyrgyzstan43.039.137.351.064.756.324.953.1
96 Russian Federation43.027.158.351.272.760.751.250.8
97 Lebanon42.932.845.148.657.974.339.645.6
98 Morocco42.535.143.069.548.759.029.640.6
99 Mozambique42.553.523.365.235.420.912.247.3
100 Venezuela42.231.433.360.668.262.939.452.9
101 Mali39.536.838.599.233.823.816.133.7
102 Guinea39.435.241.692.141.326.017.238.0
103 Togo39.440.238.465.153.428.67.248.4
104 Nigeria39.341.446.373.634.513.917.738.0
105 Haiti39.036.436.367.657.039.37.946.5
106 Bahrain38.618.271.550.764.466.941.939.6
107 China38.321.947.753.967.966.038.345.5
108 Côte d'Ivoire38.140.442.369.833.513.319.735.5
109 Egypt35.724.832.770.645.355.529.234.2
110 Pakistan34.932.441.561.534.638.810.731.7
111 Libya29.515.832.257.145.058.223.429.6
112 Yemen22.510.228.970.420.938.714.914.4

Vision

[edit]

"The Democracy Ranking is interested in contributing to the global enhancement of the Quality of Democracy in a world-wide understanding and approach."[4]

Theory, conceptual formula and methodology

[edit]

The Democracy Ranking initiative applies the following conceptual formula for defining democracy and measuring the quality of democracy:

Quality of Democracy = (freedom & other characteristics of the political system) & (performance of the non-political dimensions).[5]

This approach includes also the output of democracies. Democracy Ranking refers tocountries (country-based democracies) with apopulation of one million or more and that are classified byFreedom House as "free" or at least as "partly free" (see alsothe Freedom House report). The Democracy Ranking makes explicit the "theoretical basis", which governs the theoretical self-understanding of the Democracy Ranking.[6]

The Democracy Ranking understands and measures democracies in a multi-dimensional framework and approach. By this, the Democracy Ranking contributes to a further development of measurement of democracy. According to the ranking, democracy consists of six dimensions (one political, five non-political), with different weights for the overall quality of democracy. Their weights are distributed accordingly:

  1. politics (or thepolitical system) 50%;
  2. gender (gender equality in socioeconomic and educational terms) 10%;
  3. economy (or theeconomic system) 10%;
  4. knowledge (knowledge society, research and education) 10%;
  5. health (or thehealth system and health status) 10%;
  6. and environment (environmental sustainability) 10%.[7]

The theoretical basis of the Democracy Ranking encourages a broader approach for explaining and measuring democracy while covering and integrating non-political dimensions. This is enabled by an understanding that democracy represents not only a concept of the political system, but also a concept that extends to society and the context of society, and includes interfaces between politics, society, economy, and even the environment. Politics (policy) has or should have a responsibility for economic (socioeconomic) performance. Furthermore, there is also a need that democracy reflects the context of the (natural) environment.

Concepts of democracy turn out to be more demanding, the more they move from a mainlyelectoral democracy (emphasizingelections andpolitical rights) to aliberal democracy (also encompassingcivil liberties), and further extending to a liberal democracy of an advanced high quality. In that logic, the Democracy Ranking reflects and requires a "demanding type" of democracy.

Methodically, the Democracy Ranking does not create new indicators, but relies on already existing indicators that are being released regularly by renowned international and/or privatenon-profit organizations. The Democracy Ranking draws on available indicators according to a distinct conceptual formula and six-fold dimensional structure, thus providing a theoretically based conceptual design (a basic concept) of how to combine and aggregate these indicators. Depending on the source, the content of the indicators varies, extending from peer review assessment (Democracy indices) to indicators that capture performance (e.g., socioeconomic behavior). The Democracy Ranking initiative acknowledges the work of organizations such asFreedom House, theWorld Bank, and also theUnited Nations Development Program (more specifically theHuman Development Index).

Reflections on the Democracy Ranking

[edit]

The work of the Democracy Ranking is being reflected in academic discourse[8][9][10][11][12][13][14] and in coverage by international media.[15][16]

Democracy Ranking

[edit]

The Democracy Ranking analyzes several-year intervals, revealing relative ranking positions as well as changes of score levels over time. Typically, more than hundred countries are being compared in context of a specific Democracy Ranking. Based on ranking results and their shifts, a Democracy Improvement Ranking is being carried out, with a full result release. The Democracy Improvement Ranking places the emphasis on increases or decreases of the ranking scores of democracies. Individual annual rankings of the Democracy Ranking are also published in separate book volumes.[17]

See also

[edit]
   

References

[edit]
  1. ^"About Us".Democracy Ranking.Archived from the original on 13 January 2016. Retrieved22 September 2023.
  2. ^"Contact".Democracy Ranking.Archived from the original on 13 January 2016. Retrieved22 September 2023.
  3. ^"2016 Democracy Ranking".democracyranking.org.Archived from the original on 16 June 2022. Retrieved3 April 2022.
  4. ^"Mission Statement".Archived from the original on 13 January 2016. Retrieved22 September 2023.
  5. ^"Campbell, David F. J. (2008). The Basic Concept for the Democracy Ranking of the Quality of Democracy. Vienna: Democracy Ranking"(PDF).Archived(PDF) from the original on 15 December 2018. Retrieved22 September 2023.
  6. ^"Theoretical Basis". Retrieved22 September 2023.
  7. ^"Campbell, David F. J. / Miklós Sükösd (eds.) (2002). Feasibility Study for a Quality Ranking of Democracies. Vienna: Global Democracy Award"(PDF).Archived(PDF) from the original on 26 December 2010. Retrieved22 September 2023.
  8. ^"Romo, M. C. Felipe Reyes (2007). Transnacionalismo y participación política. Consideraciones teórico-metodológicas para el desarrollo de un sistema electoral con participación extraterritorial.Congresistas (No. 149-153)"(PDF).Archived(PDF) from the original on 24 April 2014. Retrieved22 September 2023.
  9. ^"Campbell, David F. J. / Thorsten D. Barth (2009). Wie können Demokratie und Demokratiequalität gemessen werden? Modelle, Demokratie-Indices und Länderbeispiele im globalen Vergleich. (How Can Democracy and the Quality of Democracy Be Measured? Models, Democracy Indices and Country-Based Case Studies in Global Comparison.)SWS-Rundschau 49 (2), 208-233"(PDF). Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 23 May 2011. Retrieved9 December 2009.
  10. ^Jochem, Sven (1 June 2010)."Wandel und Zukunftsaussichten des schwedisch-sozialdemokratischen Modells".Leviathan.38 (2):227–249.doi:10.1007/s11578-010-0083-9.S2CID 145508627 – via Springer Link.
  11. ^Barth, Thorsten D. (23 June 2010).Konzeption, Messung und Rating der Demokratiequalität: Brasilien, Südafrika, Australien und die Russische Föderation 1997-2006. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.‹See Tfd›ASIN 3639264320.
  12. ^Denters, Bas; Rosema, Martin; Aarts, Kees (12 January 2011).How Democracy Works: Political Representation and Policy Congruence in Modern Societies : Essays in Honour of Jacques Thomassen. Amsterdam University Press.ISBN 9789085550365 – via Google Books.
  13. ^Hankivsky, Olena; Salnykova, Anastasiya (2 April 2013).Gender, Politics and Society in Ukraine. University of Toronto Press.ISBN 9781442693395 – via Google Books.
  14. ^Vatter, Adrian (12 June 2014).Das politische System der Schweiz. Nomos.ISBN 9783825240110 – via Google Books.
  15. ^""Globale Demokratie-Hitliste: Wer steigt auf und wer ab" (2013, December 12) by Wieland Schneider, Die Presse (Austria)". 11 December 2013.Archived from the original on 24 April 2014. Retrieved23 April 2014.
  16. ^""Only democracy can clean up the planet. Save the ballot box and save the world" (2009, November 20), by Neil Reynolds, The Globe and Mail (Canada)".The Globe and Mail.Archived from the original on 23 November 2009. Retrieved26 August 2017.
  17. ^Campbell, David F. J.; Barth, Thorsten D.; Pölzlbauer, Paul; Pölzlbauer, Georg (10 September 2012).Democracy Ranking (Edition 2012): The Quality of Democracy in the World. Books On Demand.ISBN 978-3848217984.

External links

[edit]

Official links

[edit]

Freedom
Corruption
Competitiveness
History
Rights
Democracy
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Democracy_Ranking&oldid=1281892602"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp