Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Mesangiospermae

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromCore angiosperms)
One of two clades of flowering plants

Mesangiospermae
Diversity of Mesangiosperms
Scientific classificationEdit this classification
Kingdom:Plantae
Clade:Tracheophytes
Clade:Angiosperms
Clade:Mesangiosperms
Groups
Synonyms
  • Core angiosperms
Flower ofLiriodendron tulipifera, a Mesangiosperm

Mesangiospermae is aclade that contains the majority offlowering plants (angiosperms). Mesangiosperms are therefore known as thecore angiosperms, in contrast to the three orders of earlier-diverging species known as thebasal angiosperms:Nymphaeales (includingwater lilies),Austrobaileyales (includingstar anise), andAmborellales. Mesangiospermae includes about 350,000 species,[1] while there are about 175 extant species of basal angiosperms.[2]

It is a name created under the rules of thePhyloCode system ofphylogenetic nomenclature.[3] While such a clade with a similar circumscription exists in theAPG III system, it was not given a name.[4]

Phylogeny

[edit]

Besides the mesangiosperms, the other groups of flowering plants areAmborellales,Nymphaeales, andAustrobaileyales. These constitute aparaphyleticgrade calledbasal angiosperms. Theordernames, ending in -ales are used here without reference to taxonomic rank because these groups contain only one order.[clarification needed]

Mesangiospermae includes the following clades:

Cladogram: Thephylogenetic position of the Mesangiospermae within the angiosperms, as of APG IV (2016)[5]
basal angiosperms
core angiosperms

Name

[edit]

The mesangiosperms are usually recognized inclassificationsystems that do not assign groups totaxonomic rank. The name Mesangiospermae is abranch-modifiednode-based name inphylogenetic nomenclature. It isdefined as the most inclusivecrown clade containingPlatanus occidentalis, but notAmborella trichopoda,Nymphaea odorata, orAustrobaileya scandens.[6] It is sometimes written as /Mesangiospermae even though this is not required by thePhyloCode. The "clademark" slash indicates that the term is intended as phylogenetically defined.[3]

Description

[edit]

Inmolecular phylogeneticstudies, the mesangiosperms are always stronglysupported as amonophyletic group.[7] There is nodistinguishing characteristic which is found in all mature mesangiosperms but which is not found in any of the basal angiosperms. Nevertheless, the mesangiosperms are recognizable in the earliest stage of embryonic development.[2][8] Theovule contains amegagametophyte, also known as anembryo sac, that isbipolar in structure and contains 8cell nuclei. Theantipodal cells arepersistent, and theendosperm istriploid.

History

[edit]

The oldest knownfossils of flowering plants are fossil mesangiosperms from theHauterivianstage of theCretaceousperiod.[9]

Molecular clock comparisons of DNA sequences indicate that the mesangiosperms originated between 140 and 150Mya (million years ago) near the beginning of the Cretaceous period.[10] This was about 25Ma (million years) after the origin of the angiosperms in the mid-Jurassic.[11]

By 135Mya, the mesangiosperms hadradiated into 5 groups:Chloranthales,Magnoliids,Monocots,Ceratophyllales, andEudicots.[11] The radiation into 5 groups probably occurred in about 4 million years.

Because the interval of this radiation (about 4 million years) is short in proportion to its age (about 145 million years), it had long appeared that the 5 groups of mesangiosperms had arisen simultaneously. The mesangiosperms were shown as an unresolvedpentatomy inphylogenetic trees. In 2007, two studies attempted toresolve thephylogeneticrelationships among these 5 groups by comparing large portions of theirchloroplastgenomes.[11][12] These studies agreed on the most likely phylogeny for the mesangiosperms. In this phylogeny, the monocots aresister to the clade [Ceratophyllales + eudicots]. However, this result is not strongly supported. The approximately unbiased topologytest showed that some of the other possible positions of the monocots had more than 5% probability of being correct. The major weakness of these 2 studies was the small number of species whose DNA was being used in the phylogenetic analysis, 45 in one study and 64 in the other.[11] This was unavoidable, becausecomplete chloroplast genomesequences are known for only a few plants.

References

[edit]
  1. ^Alan J. Paton, Neil Brummitt,Rafaël Govaerts, Kehan Harman, Sally Hinchcliffe, Bob Allkin, & Eimear Nic Lughadha (2008). "Towards Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation: a working list of all known plant species - progress and prospects".Taxon57(2):602-611.
  2. ^abPeter F. Stevens (2001 onwards). Angiosperm Phylogeny Website In: Missouri Botanical Garden Website. (seeExternal links below).
  3. ^abPhilip D. Cantino, James A. Doyle, Sean W. Graham,Walter S. Judd, Richard G. Olmstead,Douglas E. Soltis,Pamela S. Soltis, and Michael J. Donoghue (2007). "Towards a phylogenetic nomenclature ofTracheophyta".Taxon.56 (3):822–846.doi:10.2307/25065865.JSTOR 25065865.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. ^Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2009), "An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III",Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society,161 (2):105–121,doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x,hdl:10654/18083
  5. ^APG IV 2016.
  6. ^Philip D. Cantino, James A. Doyle, Sean W. Graham,Walter S. Judd, Richard G. Olmstead,Douglas E. Soltis,Pamela S. Soltis, and Michael J. Donoghue. 2007. Electronic Supplement: pages E1-E44. To: Cantino et alii. 2007. "Towards a phylogenetic nomenclature ofTracheophyta".Taxon56(3):822-846. (seeExternal links below).
  7. ^Douglas E. Soltis,Pamela S. Soltis, Peter K. Endress, andMark W. Chase (2005).Phylogeny and Evolution of the Angiosperms. Sinauer: Sunderland, MA
  8. ^William E. Friedman and Kirsten C. Ryerson (2009). "Reconstructing the ancestral female gametophyte of angiosperms: Insights from Amborella and other ancient lineages of flowering plants".American Journal of Botany 96(1):129-143.doi:10.3732/ajb.0800311
  9. ^Else Marie Friis, K. Raunsgaard Pedersen, and Peter R. Crane (2006). "Cretaceous angiosperm flowers: Innovation and evolution in plant reproduction".Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology232(2-4):251–293.doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.07.006
  10. ^T. Jonathan Davies, Timothy G. Barraclough,Mark W. Chase,Pamela S. Soltis,Douglas E. Soltis, andVincent Savolainen (2004). "Darwin's abominable mystery: Insights from a supertree of the angiosperms".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101(7):1904-1909.
  11. ^abcdMichael J. Moore, Charles D. Bell,Pamela S. Soltis, andDouglas E. Soltis (2007). "Using plastid genome-scale data to resolve enigmatic relationships among basal angiosperms".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(49):19363-19368.doi:10.1073/pnas.0708072104
  12. ^Robert K. Jansen, Zhengqiu Cai, Linda A. Raubeson, Henry Daniell, Claude W. dePamphilis, James Leebens-Mack, Kai F. Müller, Mary Guisinger-Bellian, Rosemarie C. Haberle, Anne K. Hansen, Timothy W. Chumley, Seung-Bum Lee, Rhiannon Peery, Joel R. McNeal, Jennifer V. Kuehl, and Jeffrey L. Boore (2007). "Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(49):19369-19374doi:10.1073/pnas.0709121104

Bibliography

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Magnoliids
Monocots
Commelinids
Rosids
Fabids
Malvids
Asterids
Campanulids
Lamiids
Mesangiosperms
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mesangiospermae&oldid=1286465444"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp