Let be a finite field and be a set of polynomials such that the number of variables satisfies
where is thetotal degree of. The theorems are statements about the solutions of the following system of polynomial equations
TheChevalley–Warning theorem states that the number of common solutions is divisible by thecharacteristic of. Or in other words, the cardinality of the vanishing set of is modulo.
TheChevalley theorem states that if the system has the trivial solution, that is, if the polynomials have no constant terms, then the system also has a non-trivial solution.
Chevalley's theorem is an immediate consequence of the Chevalley–Warning theorem since is at least 2.
Both theorems are best possible in the sense that, given any, the list has total degree and only the trivial solution. Alternatively, using just one polynomial, we can takef1 to be the degreen polynomial given by thenorm ofx1a1 + ... +xnan where the elementsa form a basis of the finite field of orderpn.
Warning proved another theorem, known as Warning's second theorem, which states that if the system of polynomial equations has the trivial solution, then it has at least solutions where is the size of the finite field and. Chevalley's theorem also follows directly from this.
so the sum over of any polynomial in of degree less than also vanishes.
The total number of common solutions modulo of is equal to
because each term is 1 for a solution and 0 otherwise.If the sum of the degrees of the polynomials is less thann then this vanishes by the remark above.
It is a consequence of Chevalley's theorem that finite fields arequasi-algebraically closed. This had been conjectured byEmil Artin in 1935. The motivation behind Artin's conjecture was his observation that quasi-algebraically closed fields have trivialBrauer group, together with the fact that finite fields have trivial Brauer group byWedderburn's theorem.
TheAx–Katz theorem, named afterJames Ax andNicholas Katz, determines more accurately a power of the cardinality of dividing the number of solutions; here, if is the largest of the, then the exponent can be taken as theceiling function of
The Ax–Katz result has an interpretation inétale cohomology as a divisibility result for the (reciprocals of) the zeroes and poles of thelocal zeta-function. Namely, the same power of divides each of thesealgebraic integers.
Warning, Ewald (1935), "Bemerkung zur vorstehenden Arbeit von Herrn Chevalley",Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg (in German),11:76–83,doi:10.1007/BF02940715,JFM61.1043.02,Zbl0011.14601