Nucleophilic describes the affinity of a nucleophile to bond with positively chargedatomic nuclei. Nucleophilicity, sometimes referred to as nucleophile strength, refers to a substance's nucleophilic character and is often used to compare the affinity ofatoms. Neutral nucleophilic reactions withsolvents such asalcohols and water are namedsolvolysis. Nucleophiles may take part innucleophilic substitution, whereby a nucleophile becomes attracted to a full or partial positive charge, andnucleophilic addition. Nucleophilicity is closely related tobasicity. The difference between the two is, thatbasicity is athermodynamic property (i.e. relates to an equilibrium state), but nucleophilicity is akinetic property, which relates to rates of certain chemical reactions.[1]
In general, in a group across the periodic table, the more basic the ion (the higher the pKa of the conjugate acid) the more reactive it is as a nucleophile. Within a series of nucleophiles with the same attacking element (e.g. oxygen), the order of nucleophilicity will follow basicity. Sulfur is in general a better nucleophile than oxygen.[citation needed]
Many schemes attempting to quantify relative nucleophilic strength have been devised. The followingempirical data have been obtained by measuringreaction rates for many reactions involving many nucleophiles and electrophiles. Nucleophiles displaying the so-calledalpha effect are usually omitted in this type of treatment.[citation needed]
The first such attempt is found in the Swain–Scott equation[4][5] derived in 1953:
Thisfree-energy relationship relates thepseudo first orderreaction rate constant (in water at 25 °C),k, of a reaction, normalized to the reaction rate,k0, of a standard reaction with water as the nucleophile, to a nucleophilic constantn for a given nucleophile and a substrate constants that depends on the sensitivity of a substrate to nucleophilic attack (defined as 1 formethyl bromide).
The Ritchie equation, derived in 1972, is another free-energy relationship:[6][7][8]
whereN+ is the nucleophile dependent parameter andk0 thereaction rate constant for water. In this equation, a substrate-dependent parameter likes in the Swain–Scott equation is absent. The equation states that two nucleophiles react with the same relative reactivity regardless of the nature of the electrophile, which is in violation of thereactivity–selectivity principle. For this reason, this equation is also called theconstant selectivity relationship.
In the original publication the data were obtained by reactions of selected nucleophiles with selected electrophiliccarbocations such astropylium ordiazonium cations:
or (not displayed) ions based onmalachite green. Many other reaction types have since been described.
Thesecond orderreaction rate constantk at 20 °C for a reaction is related to a nucleophilicity parameterN, an electrophilicity parameterE, and a nucleophile-dependent slope parameters. The constants is defined as 1 with2-methyl-1-pentene as the nucleophile.
Typical N values with s in parentheses are −4.47 (1.32) forelectrophilic aromatic substitution totoluene (1), −0.41 (1.12) forelectrophilic addition to 1-phenyl-2-propene (2), and 0.96 (1) for addition to 2-methyl-1-pentene (3), −0.13 (1.21) for reaction with triphenylallylsilane (4), 3.61 (1.11) for reaction with2-methylfuran (5), +7.48 (0.89) for reaction with isobutenyltributylstannane (6) and +13.36 (0.81) for reaction with theenamine 7.[11]
With E = −9.15 for theS-methyldibenzothiophenium ion, typical nucleophile values N (s) are 15.63 (0.64) forpiperidine, 10.49 (0.68) formethoxide, and 5.20 (0.89) for water. In short, nucleophilicities towards sp2 or sp3 centers follow the same pattern.
Examples of nucleophiles are anions such as Cl−, or a compound with alone pair of electrons such as NH3 (ammonia) and PR3.[citation needed]
In the example below, theoxygen of the hydroxide ion donates an electron pair to form a new chemical bond with thecarbon at the end of thebromopropane molecule. The bond between the carbon and thebromine then undergoesheterolytic fission, with the bromine atom taking the donated electron and becoming thebromide ion (Br−), because a SN2 reaction occurs by backside attack. This means that the hydroxide ion attacks the carbon atom from the other side, exactly opposite the bromine ion. Because of this backside attack, SN2 reactions result in a inversion of theconfiguration of the electrophile. If the electrophile ischiral, it typically maintains its chirality, though the SN2 product'sabsolute configuration is flipped as compared to that of the original electrophile.[citation needed]
Anambident nucleophile is one that can attack from two or more places, resulting in two or more products. For example, thethiocyanate ion (SCN−) may attack from either the sulfur or the nitrogen. For this reason, theSN2 reaction of an alkyl halide with SCN− often leads to a mixture of an alkyl thiocyanate (R-SCN) and an alkylisothiocyanate (R-NCS). Similar considerations apply in theKolbe nitrile synthesis.[citation needed]
While thehalogens are not nucleophilic in their diatomic form (e.g. I2 is not a nucleophile), their anions are good nucleophiles. In polar, protic solvents, F− is the weakest nucleophile, and I− the strongest; this order is reversed in polar, aprotic solvents.[13]
Of sulfur nucleophiles,hydrogen sulfide and its salts,thiols (RSH), thiolate anions (RS−), anions of thiolcarboxylic acids (RC(O)-S−), and anions of dithiocarbonates (RO-C(S)-S−) and dithiocarbamates (R2N-C(S)-S−) are used most often.
In general,sulfur is very nucleophilic because of its large size, which makes it readily polarizable, and its lone pairs of electrons are readily accessible.
Although metal centers (e.g., Li+, Zn2+, Sc3+, etc.) are most commonly cationic and electrophilic (Lewis acidic) in nature, certain metal centers (particularly ones in a low oxidation state and/or carrying a negative charge) are among the strongest recorded nucleophiles and are sometimes referred to as "supernucleophiles." For instance, using methyl iodide as the reference electrophile, Ph3Sn– is about 10000 times more nucleophilic than I–, while the Co(I) form ofvitamin B12 (vitamin B12s) is about 107 times more nucleophilic.[14] Other supernucleophilic metal centers include low oxidation state carbonyl metalate anions (e.g., CpFe(CO)2–).[15]
^Ingold, C. K. (1933). "266. Significance of tautomerism and of the reactions of aromatic compounds in the electronic theory of organic reactions".Journal of the Chemical Society (Resumed): 1120.doi:10.1039/jr9330001120.
^Lapworth, A. (1925). "Replaceability of Halogen Atoms by Hydrogen Atoms".Nature.115: 625.
^Mayr, Herbert; Patz, Matthias (1994). "Scales of Nucleophilicity and Electrophilicity: A System for Ordering Polar Organic and Organometallic Reactions".Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English.33 (9): 938.doi:10.1002/anie.199409381.
^Mayr, Herbert; Bug, Thorsten; Gotta, Matthias F; Hering, Nicole; Irrgang, Bernhard; Janker, Brigitte; Kempf, Bernhard; Loos, Robert; Ofial, Armin R; Remennikov, Grigoriy; Schimmel, Holger (2001). "Reference Scales for the Characterization of Cationic Electrophiles and Neutral Nucleophiles".Journal of the American Chemical Society.123 (39):9500–12.doi:10.1021/ja010890y.PMID11572670.S2CID8392147.
^Chem 2401 Supplementary Notes. Thompson, Alison and Pincock, James, Dalhousie University Chemistry Department
^Schrauzer, G. N.; Deutsch, E.; Windgassen, R. J. (April 1968). "The nucleophilicity of vitamin B(sub 12s)".Journal of the American Chemical Society.90 (9):2441–2442.doi:10.1021/ja01011a054.ISSN0002-7863.PMID5642073.
^Dessy, Raymond E.; Pohl, Rudolph L.; King, R. Bruce (November 1966). "Organometallic Electrochemistry. VII. 1 The Nucleophilicities of Metallic and Metalloidal Anions Derived from Metals of Groups IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII".Journal of the American Chemical Society.88 (22):5121–5124.doi:10.1021/ja00974a015.ISSN0002-7863.