Horseman's axe, circa 1475. The blade's punched decoration suggests German make. This is an example of a battle axe that was tailored for the use of a mounted knight. The wooden haft is modern.
Abattle axe (alsobattle-axe,battle ax, orbattle-ax) is anaxe specifically designed for combat. Battle axes were designed differently to utility axes, with blades more akin to cleavers than to wood axes. Many were suitable for use in one hand, while others were larger and were deployed two-handed.
Axes designed forwarfare ranged in weight from just over 0.5 to 3 kg (1 to 7 lb), and in length from just over 30 cm (1 ft) to upwards of 150 cm (5 ft), as in the case of theDanish axe or thesparth axe. Cleaving weapons longer than 150 cm (5 ft) would arguably fall into the category ofpolearms.
Through the course of human history, commonplace objects have been pressed into service asweapons. Axes, by virtue of their ubiquity, are no exception. Besides axes designed for combat, there were many battle axes that doubled as tools. Axes could be modified into deadly projectiles as well (see thefrancisca for an example).[1] Axes were often cheaper thanswords and considerably more available.[citation needed]
Battle axes generally weigh far less than modern splitting axes, especiallymauls, because they were designed to cut legs and arms rather than wood; consequently, slightly narrow slicing blades are the norm. This facilitates deep, devastating wounds. Moreover, a lighter weapon is much quicker to bring to bear in combat and manipulate for repeated strikes against an adversary.[original research?]
The crescent-shaped heads of European battle axes of theRoman and post-Roman periods were usually made ofwrought iron with acarbon steel edge or, as time elapsed across the many centuries of the medieval era, steel. The hardwood handles of military axes came to be reinforced with metal bands called langets, so that an enemy warrior could not cut the shaft. Some later specimens had all-metal handles.[citation needed]
Battle axes are particularly associated in Western popular imagination with theVikings. Certainly, Scandinavian foot soldiers and maritime marauders employed them as a stock weapon during their heyday, which extended from the beginning of the 8th century to the end of the 11th century. They produced several varieties, including specialized throwing axes (seefrancisca) and "bearded" axes or "skeggox" (so named for their trailing lower blade edge which increased cleaving power and could be used to catch the edge of an opponent's shield and pull it down, leaving the shield-bearer vulnerable to a follow-up blow).[citation needed] Viking axes may have been wielded with one hand or two, depending on the length of the plain wooden haft. SeeViking Age arms and armor.
Stone axe heads in polished greenstone from the collections of the Hôtel-Dieu inTournus (Saône-et-Loire, France). Found inSaône River
Stonehand axes were in use in thePaleolithic period for hundreds of thousands of years. The first hafted stone axes appear to have been produced about 6000 BCE during theMesolithic period. Technological development continued in theNeolithic period with the much wider usage of hard stones in addition toflint andchert and the widespread use of polishing to improve axe properties. The axes proved critical in wood working and became cult objects (for example, the entry for theBattle-axe people of Scandinavia, treated their axes as high-status cultural objects). Such stone axes were made from a wide variety of tough rocks such aspicrite and otherigneous ormetamorphic rocks, and were widespread in the Neolithic period. Many axe heads found were probably used primarily asmauls to split wood beams, and assledgehammers for construction purposes (such hammering stakes into the ground, for example).
Narrow axe heads made of cast metals were subsequently manufactured by artisans in theMiddle East and thenEurope during theCopper Age and theBronze Age. The earliest specimens were socket-less.
More specifically, bronze battle-axe heads are attested in the archaeological record fromancient China and theNew Kingdom ofancient Egypt. Some of them were suited for practical use as infantry weapons while others were clearly intended to be brandished as symbols of status and authority, judging by the quality of their decoration.
Theepsilon axe was widely used during the Bronze Age by irregular infantry unable to afford better weapons. Its use was limited to Europe and the Middle East.
In the eastern Mediterranean Basin during theIron Age, the double-bladedlabrys axe was prevalent, and a hafted, single-bitted axe made of bronze or later iron was sometimes used as a weapon of war by the heavy infantry ofancient Greece, especially when confronted with thickly-armored opponents[citation needed]. Thesagaris—described as either single bitted or double bitted—became associated by the Greeks with the mythologicalAmazons, though these were generally ceremonial axes rather than practical implements.[citation needed]
TheBarbarian tribes that the Romans encountered north of theAlps did include iron war axes in their armories, alongside swords and spears. TheCantabri from the Iberian peninsula also used battle axes.
Battle axes were very common in Europe in theMigration Period and the subsequentViking Age, and they famously figure on the 11th-centuryBayeux Tapestry, which depictsNorman mounted knights pitted againstAnglo-Saxon infantrymen. They continued to be employed throughout the rest of the Middle Ages, with significant combatants being noted axe wielders in the 12th, 13th, and 14th centuries.
Richard the Lionheart was often recorded in Victorian times wielding a large war axe, though references are sometimes wildly exaggerated as befitted a national hero: "Long and long after he was quiet in his grave, his terrible battle-axe, with twenty English pounds of English steel in its mighty head..." –A Child's History of England byCharles Dickens.[6] Richard is, however, recorded as using a Danish Axe at the relief ofJaffa.[7]Geoffrey of Lusignan is another famous crusader associated with the axe.[8]
Robert the Bruce, King of Scotland, used an axe to defeatHenry de Bohun in single combat at the start of theBattle of Bannockburn in 1314. Given that Bruce was wielding the axe on horseback, it is likely that it was a one handed horseman's axe. They enjoyed a sustained revival among heavily armored equestrian combatants in the 15th century.[citation needed]
In the 14th century, the use of axes is increasingly noted byFroissart in his Chronicle,[9] which records the engagements between the kingdoms of France and England and the rise of professional and mercenary armies in the 14th century. KingJohn II is recorded as using one at theBattle of Poitiers in 1356 and SirJames Douglas at theBattle of Otterburn in 1388. Bretons were apparently noted axe users, with noted mercenariesBertrand du Guesclin andOlivier de Clisson both wielding axes in battle.[10] In these instances the type of battle axe - whether aDanish axe, or the proto-pollaxe - is not recorded.
Most medieval European battle axes had a socketed head (meaning that the thicker, butt-end of the blade contained an opening into which a wooden haft was inserted), and some included langets—long strips of metal affixed to the faces of the haft to prevent it from being damaged during combat. Occasionally the cheeks of the axehead bore engraved, etched, punched, or inlaid decorative patterns. Late-period battle axes tended to be of all-metal construction.[citation needed]
Such medievalpolearms as thehalberd and thepollaxe were variants of the basic battle-axe form.
Steel plate-armor covering almost all of a knight's body, and incorporating features specifically designed to defeat axe and sword blades, become more common in the late 14th and early 15th century. Its development led to a generation of hafted weapons with points that concentrated impact, either to penetrate steel plate or to damage the joints of articulated plate. Increasingly daggers calledmisericords were carried which enabled a sharp point to be thrust though gaps in armour if an opponent was disabled or being grappled with. Swords styles became more diverse – from the two-handedzweihänders to more narrow thrusting instruments with sharply pointed tips, capable of penetrating any "chinks in the armour" of a fully encased opponent: for example, theestoc.[citation needed]
A sharp, sometimes curved pick was often fitted to the rear of the battle axe's blade to provide the user with a secondary weapon of penetration. A stabbing spike could be added, too, as a finial. Similarly, thewar hammer evolved in late-medieval times with fluted or spiked heads, which would help a strike to "bite" into the armour and deliver its energy through to the wearer, rather than glance off the armor's surface. Strikes from these armour penetrating picks were not always fatal. There are many accounts of plate armored knights being struck with said weapons and while the armour was damaged, the individual underneath survived and in some cases was completely unharmed.[11]
A useful visual guide to high-medieval battle axes, contemporary with their employment, are the scenes of warfare depicted in theMaciejowski Bible (Morgan Bible) of c. 1250.[12]
Battle axes also came to figure as heraldic devices on thecoats of arms of several English and mainland European families.
Chinese general with his attendant, from Spanish illustrations, 16th century
Battle axes were eventually phased out at the end of the 16th century as military tactics began to revolve increasingly around the use ofgunpowder. However, as late as the 1640s,Prince Rupert—aRoyalist general and cavalry commander during theEnglish Civil War—is pictured carrying a battle axe, and this was not merely a decorative symbol of authority: the "short pole-axe" was adopted by Royalist cavalry officers to penetrate Roundhead troopers' helmets and cuirasses in close-quarters fighting,[13] and it was also used by their opponents: SirBevil Grenville was slain by a Parliamentarian pole-axe at theBattle of Lansdowne,[14] and SirRichard Bulstrode was wounded by one at theBattle of Edgehill.
In Scandinavia, however, the battle axe continued in use alongside the halberd, crossbow and pole-axe until the start of the 18th century. The nature of Norwegian terrain in particular made pike and shot tactics impracticable in many cases. A law instituted in 1604 required all farmers to own weaponry to serve in the militia. The Norwegian peasant militia battle axe, much more wieldy than thepike or halberd and yet effective against mounted enemies, was a popular choice. Many such weapons were ornately decorated, and yet their functionality shows in the way that the axe head was mounted tilting upwards slightly, with a significant forward curve in the shaft, with the intent of making them more effective against armoured opponents by concentrating force onto a narrower spot.[15]
DuringNapoleonic times, and later on in the 19th century,farriers in army service carried long and heavy axes as part of their kit. Although these could be used in an emergency for fighting, their primary use was logistical: the branded hooves of deceased military horses needed to be removed in order to prove that they had indeed died (and had not been stolen). Napoleon'sPioneer Corps also carried axes that were used for clearing vegetation—a practice employed by similar units in other armies.
Thetabarzin (Persian:تبرزین, lit. "saddle axe" or "saddle hatchet")[16] is the traditional battle axe ofPersia. It bears one or two crescent-shaped blades. The long form of the tabar was about seven feet long, while a shorter version was about three feet long. What made the Persian axe unique is the very thin handle, which is very light and alwaysmetallic.[17] The tabar became one of the main weapons throughout the Middle East, and was always carried at a soldier's waist not only in Persia but Egypt, and the Arab world from the time of the Crusades.Mamluk bodyguards were known astabardiyya after the weapon. The tabarzin is sometimes carried as a symbolic weapon by wanderingdervishes (Muslim ascetic worshippers).
Different types of battleaxes may be found in ancient China. In Chinese mythology,Xingtian (刑天), a deity, uses a battle axe against other gods. Theqi (鏚) andyue (鉞) are heavy axes. They were common in Zhou dynasty but fell out of favor with users due to the lack of mobility. The eventually became used only for ceremonial purposes and such battleaxes made of bronze and jade have been found. Thedagger axe (ge) is another form used in ancient times.
Chinese battleaxes can be divided in three subgroups: Fu (斧),Yue (钺) andGe (戈).[18] The distinction between a Yue and a Fu is that a Yue is, as a general rule, broader than a Fu. In the Shang dynasty the Yue was also a symbol of power, the bigger the Yue, the greater the power. There are a few rare examples of Yue with a round blade and a hole in the middle.
In the Yuan and Ming dynasties, axes retained their use in the army. In theQing dynasty new types of axes emerge among theEight Banners Army with straight edges. TheGreen Standard Army among the Eight Banners used double axes weighing 0.54 kg (1.2 lb) each, with a length of 50 cm (20 in).[19]
In modern Chinesewushu and Chinese opera there are many depictions of the axe. Many of these axes look thick and heavy, however, the axe heads are hollow.
A Japanese rendition of the axe-wielding outlaw, Li Kui
The battle axe of ancient India was known as aparashu (orfarasa in some dialects). Made from iron, bamboo, wood, or wootz steel, it usually measures 90–150 cm (3.0–4.9 ft) though some are as long as 210 cm (7 ft). A typical parashu could have a single edge or double edge, with a hole for fixing a shaft. The haft is often tied with a leather sheet to provide a good grip. The cutting edge is invariably broad and the length of the haft could be about three to four feet. The parashu is often depicted in religious art as one of the weapons of Hindu deities such asShiva andDurga. The sixth avatar ofLord Vishnu,Parashurama, is named after the weapon. Parashu are still used as domestic tools in Indian households, particularly in the villages, as well as being carried by certain sects of eremiticsadhu.
Sindhi tabar battle axe, late 18th century or earlier, crescent shape 12 cm (5 in) long head with a square hammer opposite of the blade, 55 cm (22 in) long steel haft, the end of the haft unscrews to reveal a 12 cm (5 in) slim blade. Heavily patinated head and handle with traces of engraving.
Indian tabar-zaghnal, a combination tabar axe and zaghnal war hammer / pick, all steel construction, 18th to 19th century.
Indian (Deccan) tabar-shishpar, an extremely rare combination tabar axe and shishpar six flanged mace, steel with hollow shaft, 55 cm (22 in). 17th to 18th century.
Thepanabas (also known as nawi among some ethnic groups) is a traditional battle axe favored by theMoro andLumad tribes ofMindanao,Philippines. It was also used as an agricultural or chopping tool. It ranges in size from 60 to 120 cm (2 to 4 ft) and usually 85 cm (33 in) long and can be held with one or two hands. Hilts were often wrapped in rattan bindings or had metal collars.[20] Due to its clean cutting capabilities it was also sometimes used as an execution weapon. It is said that the Moro warriors wielding panabas would follow the main group of warriors up front and would immediately charge in on any American survivors of the first wave of attack during thePhilippine–American War.
Among the variousCordilleran peoples of the northern Philippines, another type of traditional battle axe, thehead axe, was favored forheadhunting raids. It was specialized for beheading enemy combatants but was also used as an agricultural tool. They were banned, along with headhunting practices, during theAmerican colonial period of the Philippines in the early 20th century.[21][22]
Theketeriya was a type of battle axe that was used in ancient Sri Lanka. A keteriya consisted of a single edge and a short handle made of wood. This would allow the user to wield it with a single hand.
^Roger de Hoveden, Translated Henry T. Riley (1853).The Annals of Roger de Hoveden: Comprising The History of England and of Other Countries of Europe from A.D. 732 to A.D. 1201, Vol 1. H. G. Bohn. pp. 243, 244.
^Dickens is referencing Chaucer here, from the Tournament of Theseus of Athens in the Knights Tale, where a combatant "hath a sparth of twenty pound of weight"[1]
^Old French Continuation of William of Tyre, in The Conquest of Jerusalem and the Third Crusade: Sources in Translation, ed. Peter W. Edbury, p. 117.
^Nicholson, Helen (2004).Medieval Warfare. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. p. 101.ISBN0-333-76331-9.