Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Religion in ancient Tamilakam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromAncient Tamil religion)
Religious beliefs in ancient Tamilakam

Krishna with his consortsRukmini andSatyabhama and his mountGaruda,Tamil Nadu,India, late 12th–13th century
Part ofa series on
Hinduism
Worldview
Ontology
God
Mokṣa-related topics:
Mind
Ethics
Practices
Worship, sacrifice, and charity
Meditation
Modern
Divisions
Principal Upanishads
Rigveda:
Yajurveda:
Samaveda:
Atharvaveda:

Hinduism, in particularVaishnavism andShaivism, was the predominantreligion in ancient Tamilakam. TheSangam period inTamilakam (c. 600 BCE–300 CE) was characterized by the coexistence of many denominations and religions:Vaishnavism,Shaivism,Jainism,Ajivika and later joined byBuddhism alongside thefolk religion of theTamil people. The monarchs of the time practiced religious tolerance and openly encouraged religious discussions and invited teachers of every sect to the public halls to preach their doctrines.[1]Hinduism,Jainism, andBuddhism were the three major religions that prevailed in the Tamil region predating theCommon Era, as early as theSangam period.

Part ofa series on
History of Tamil Nadu
Part ofa series on
Tamils
iconTamil portal

Early religious practices in the Tamil country

[edit]

A Neolithic cattle-herding culture existed inSouth India several millennia prior to the Common Era.[2] By the fifth century, a relatively well-developed culture had emerged. It is described in vivid details in early Tamil texts such as theTholkappiyam (2nd century BCE) and by the Sankam poets—an "academy" of poets whose poems are primarily dated to the early common era with few poems dated to the 1st century BCE.[3]

Ancient Tamil grammatical works such as theTholkappiyam and poetic works like theTen Idylls (Pathuppāṭṭu), and theEight Anthologies (Eṭṭuttokai) sheds light on early religion of ancient Tamil people.Thirumal was glorified in almost all Sangam literature and was the only god who has the statusparamporul. Thirumal was the Supreme God for the Tamilians in Sangam age. According toKamil Zvelebil,Vishnu was considered ageless (the god who stays for ever) and the supreme god ofTamils where asSkanda was considered young and a personal god of the Tamils.[4][5]Murugan was glorified as,the red god seated on the blue peacock, who is ever young and resplendent.[6] Early iconography ofMurugan[7] andThirumal[8][9][10] and their association with native flora and fauna goes back to Indus Valley Civilization.[11][12] There are 2 temples inTamil Nadu which date pre pallava era which are dedicated toLord Vishnu and lord Muruga . The temples areVeetrirundha Perumal Temple andMurugan Temple, Saluvankuppam.[13] This shows These 2 gods were the most worshiped gods by the sangam era people. TheSangam landscape was classified into five categoriesthinais based on the mood, the season and the land. Tolkappiyam mentions that each of thesethinai had an associated deity suchMaayon inMullai—the forests who was consideredsupreme,Seyyon inKurinji—the hills,Kotravai inPālai—the deserts,Ventan/Senon inMarutham—the plains andVarunan/Kadalon inNeithal—the coasts and the seas.

The cult of the mother goddess is treated as an indication of a society which venerated femininity. This mother goddess was conceived as a virgin, one who has given birth to all and one.[14] The temples of the Sangam days, mainly of Madurai, seem to have had priestesses to the deity, which also appear predominantly a goddess.[15] In the Sangam literature, there is an elaborate description of the rites performed by the Kurava priestess in the shrine Palamutircholai.[16]

Supreme God

[edit]
Main article:Vaishnavism in Ancient Tamilakam

Paripadal mentions Perumal as the supreme deity of the world.Mayon is indicated to be the deity associated with themullai tiṇai (pastoral landscape) in theTolkappiyam.[17][18] He is regarded to be the only deity who enjoyed the status ofParamporul (achieving oneness withParamatma) during theSangam age. He is also known as Māyavan, Māmiyon, Netiyōn, and Māl inSangam literature.[19]

Example:-

Paripāṭal i :Line 50 to 56

ஐந்தலை உயிரிய அணங்குடை அருந்திறல் மைந்துடை ஒருவனும்– you are the one with five heads who causes great fear and is one of great ability and strength – Sivan, மடங்கலும்நீ – one where all lives end, நலம் முழுது அளைஇய – with all benefits, புகர்அறு காட்சிப் புலமும்– faultless learning – Vēdās, பூவனும் – you are Brahman who appeared on a flower, நாற்றமும்நீ – you are creation created by Brahman, வலன் உயர் எழிலியும் – clouds that rise up with strength, மாக விசும்பும் – wide sky, நிலனும்– land, நீடிய இமயமும்– and the tall Himalayas, நீ– you, அதனால் – so, இன்னோர் அனையை– like so and so, இனையையால்– like somebody, என– thus, அன்னோர் – those, யாம் இவண் காணாமையின் – I have not seen here, பொன் அணி நேமி – wheels decorated with gold, வலம் கொண்டு ஏந்திய – lifting on your right side or lifting with strength, மன்னுயிர் முதல்வனை – you are supreme to lives on earth.

Veriyattam

[edit]

"Veriyattam" refers tospirit possession of women, who took part in priestly functions. Under the influence of the god, women sang and danced, but also read the dim past, predicted the future, diagnosed diseases.[20] Twenty two poets of the Sangam age in as many as 40 poems portray Veriyatal. Velan is a reporter and prophet endowed with supernatural powers. Veriyatal had been performed by men as well as women.[21]

Nadukkal

[edit]

Among the early Tamils the practice of erectinghero stones (nadukkal) had appeared, and it continued for quite a long time after the Sangam age, down to about 11th century.[22] It was customary for people who sought victory in war to worship these hero stones to bless them with victory.[23]

Theyyam

[edit]

Theyyam is a ritual shaman dance popular inKerala and parts ofKarnataka. Theyyam migrates into the artist who has assumed the spirit and it is a belief that the god or goddess comes in the midst of fathering through the medium of possessed dancer. The dancer throws rice on the audience and distributes turmeric powder as symbols of blessing. Theyyam incorporates dance, mime and music and enshrines the rudiments of ancient tribal cultures which attached great importance to the worship of heroes and the spirits of ancestors, is a socio-religious ceremony. There are over 400 Theyyams performed. The most spectacular ones are those ofRaktha Chamundi, Kari Chamundi, Muchilottu Bhagavathi, Wayanadu Kulaven, Gulikan andPottan. These are performed in front of shrines, sans stage or curtains.[24]

The layout of villages can be assumed to be standard across most villages. An Amman (mother goddess) is at the centre of the villages while a maleguardian deity (Tamilகாவல் கடவுள்,kāval kaṭavuḷ) has a shrine at the village borders.

Pre-Sangam and Sangam age

[edit]

Throughout Tamil Nadu, a king was considered to be divine by nature and possessed religious significance.[25] The King was 'the representative of God on earth' and lived in akoyil, which means the "residence of the king". The Modern Tamil word for temple iskoil (Tamil:கோயில்). Titular worship was also given to Kings.[26][27]

Words meaning 'King', like (Tamil:கோ "King"),iṟai (இறை "The One Above All") andāṇḍavan (ஆண்டவன் "Conqueror") now primarily refer to Gods. Mōcikīraṉār in thePurananuru says:

Not rice, not water,
only the King is the life-breath
of a kingdom.

The Kingdom suffered by famine or disorder when the King erred.[28] These elements were incorporated later intoHinduism like the legendary marriage ofSivan (Sokkanathar, in this avatar) to Queen Meenatchi who ruledMadurai orVendhan, also known asIndra.[29]Tolkappiyar refers to theThree Crowned Kings as the "Three Glorified by Heaven", (Tamilவான்புகழ் மூவர்,Vāṉpukaḻ Mūvar).[30] In the Dravidian-speaking South, the concept of divine kingship led to the assumption of major roles by state and temple.[31]

Middle ages

[edit]

At the birth ofRaja Raja Chola I, the Thiruvalangadu inscription states, "Having noticed by the marks (on his body) that Arulmozhi was the veryThirumal, the protector of the three worlds, descended on earth..." During theBhakti movement, poets often compared gods to kings.[32]

Hinduism

[edit]
Main article:Substratum in Vedic Sanskrit
Main article:Hinduism in Tamil Nadu
Srivaikuntanathan Perumal temple atSrivaikuntham one of the 108Divya Desams close toAdichanallur and Mentioned inBrahmanda Purana dating 400 BCE.[33]

Hinduism in Tamil Nadu finds its earliest literary mention in theSangam literature as early as the 5th century BCE. TheTolkappiyam, possibly the most ancient of the extant Sangam works, dated between the 3rd century BCE and 5th century CE, glorifiedPerumal as, the favoured god of the Tamils.[19]

TheVeetrirundha Perumal Temple was built on top of an older brick temple some of whose remains have survived. The remains constitute one of the two surviving Hindu temples of the pre-Pallava period, the other being theMurugan temple at Saluvankuppam, and one of the oldest ones in Tamil Nadu.[34]

The brick temple excavated in 2005[35] dates to theSangam period and is speculated to be the oldest temple to be found in Tamil Nadu. The temple faces north, unlike most Hindu temples which face either east or west, Even though theVeetrirundha Perumal Temple faces East . This shows thatVishnu andMurugan were the most worshiped gods in Ancient Tamil Nadu.

TheMurugan temple at Salavanakuppam nearMahabalipuram

During the Sangam period,Perumal,Indra,Varuna,Murugan, andKotravai were some of the populardeities. The poetic division of the landscape intofive regions also associated each region with its own patron deity.[36]The people of the pastoral lands or theMullai regions worshippedThirumal. TheMarutham people worshippedVendhan, while theNeithal people considered Kadalon to be their patron deity and thePalai people worshippedKorravai.

The temples of the Sangam age were built out of perishable materials such as plaster, timber and brick, which is why little trace of them is found today.[37] The only public structures of any historical importance belonging to this age that have survived to this day are the rock-beds hewn out of natural rock formation, that were made for the ascetics. TheSilappatikaram and the Sangam poems such asKaliththokai,Mullaippāṭṭu andPurananuru mention several kinds of temples such as thePuranilaikkottam or the temple at the outskirts of a city, theNetunilaikkottam or the tall temple, thePalkunrakkottam the temple on top of a hill, theIlavantikaippalli or the temple with a garden and bathing ghat, theElunilaimatam or a seven storeyed temple, theKatavutkatinakar or the temple city.[38]

Ajivika

[edit]

Ajivika is an ascetic philosophy and way of life for Tamils. No books available on this philosophy of grace. However, there are countless references to the Ajivika philosophy fromBuddhist andJain theologians and other archeological texts. Ajivika flourished around the 5th century BCE. It was considered a rival to Vedic Brahmanism, Jainism, and Buddhism.

There is evidence to suggest that Ajivikas existed in Tamil Nadu. They are known to have had a presence along the Palar river, in regions like Vellore, Kanchipuram, and Tiruvallur districts, until around the 14th century CE. However, due to persecution and the rise of Bhakti movements, Ajivikas eventually assimilated into Vaishnavism.

Philosophy

[edit]

Absolute determinism and no free will

[edit]

The problems of time and change was one of the main interests of the Ajivikas. Their views on this subject may have been influenced by Vedic sources, such as the hymn toKala (Time) inAtharvaveda.[39] Both Jaina and Buddhist texts state that Ājīvikas believed in absolute determinism, absence of free will, and called thisniyati.[40][41] Everything in human life and universe, according to Ajivikas, was pre-determined, operating out of cosmic principles, and true choice did not exist.[41][42] The Buddhist and Jaina sources describe them as strict fatalists, who did not believe inkarma.[40][43] The Ajivikas philosophy held that all things are preordained, and therefore religious or ethical practice has no effect on one's future, and people do things because cosmic principles make them do so, and all that will happen or will exist in future is already predetermined to be that way. No human effort could change thisniyati and thekarma ethical theory was a fallacy.[43] James Lochtefeld summarizes this aspect of Ajivika belief as, "life and the universe is like a ball of pre-wrapped up string, which unrolls until it was done and then goes no further".[40]

Riepe states that the Ajivikas belief in predeterminism does not mean that they were pessimistic. Rather, just likeCalvinists belief in predeterminism in Europe, the Ajivikas were optimists.[44] The Ajivikas simply did not believe in the moral force of action, or in merits or demerits, or in after-life to be affected because of what one does or does not do. Actions had immediate effects in one's current life but without any moral traces, and both the action and the effect was predetermined, according to the Ajivikas.[44]

Makkhali Gosala seems to have combined the ideas of older schools of thought into an eclectic doctrine. He appears to have believed in destiny, nature, and change, and possiblyparinama, which may have prompted other philosophical schools to label him variously asahetuvadin,vainayikavadin,ajnanavadin, andissarakaranavadin.[45] According to him all beings undergo development (parinama). This culminates in the course of time (samsarasuddhi) in final salvation to which all beings are destined under the impact of the factors of destiny, nature, and change.[45] As such destiny does not appear as the only player, but rather chance or indeterminism plays equal part in his doctrine. He thus subscribed to fatalism only in the sense that he thought thatsome future events like salvation for all were strictly determined.[45]

Atomism

[edit]

Ajivikas developed a theory of elements and atoms similar to theVaisheshika school of Vedic's. Everything was composed of minuscule atoms, according to Ajivikas, and qualities of things are derived from aggregates of atoms, but the aggregation and nature of these atoms was predetermined by cosmic forces.[46]

The description of Ajivikas' atomism is inconsistent between those described in Buddhist and Vedic texts. According to three Tamil texts,[44] the Ajivikas held there exists sevenkayas (Sanskrit: काय, assemblage, collection, elemental categories):pruthvi-kaya (earth),apo-kaya (water),tejo-kaya (fire),vayo-kaya (air),sukha (joy),dukkha (sorrow) andjiva (life).[46] The first four relate to matter, the last three non-matter. These elements areakata (that which is neither created nor destroyed),vanjha (barren, that which never multiplies or reproduces) and have an existence independent of the other.[46] The elements, asserts Ajivika theory in the Tamil text Manimekalai, are made ofparamanu (atoms), where atoms were defined as that which cannot be further subdivided, that which cannot penetrate another atom, that which is neither created nor destroyed, that which retains its identity by never growing nor expanding nor splitting nor changing, yet that which moves, assembles and combines to form the perceived.[46][44]

The Tamil text of Ajivikas asserts that this "coming together of atoms can take diversity of forms, such as the dense form of a diamond, or a loose form of a hollow bamboo". Everything one perceives, states the atomism theory of Ajivikas, was mere juxtapositions of atoms of various types, and the combinations occur always in fixed ratios governed by certain cosmic rules, formingskandha (molecules, building blocks).[46][44] Atoms, asserted the Ajivikas, cannot be seen by themselves in their pure state, but only when they aggregate and formbhutas (objects).[46] They further argued that properties and tendencies are characteristics of the objects. The Ajivikas then proceeded to justify their belief in determinism and "no free will" by stating that everything experienced –sukha (joy),dukkha (sorrow) andjiva (life) – is mere function of atoms operating under cosmic rules.[46][44]

Riepe states that the details of the Ajivikas theory of atomism provided the foundations of later modified atomism theories found in Jain, Buddhist and Vedic traditions.[44]

Antinomian ethics

[edit]

Another doctrine of Ajivikas philosophy, according to Buddhist texts, was their antinomian ethics, that is there exist "no objective moral laws".[47][48] Buddhaghosa summarizes this view as, "There is neither cause nor basis for the sins of living beings and they become sinful without cause or basis. There is neither cause nor basis for the purity of living beings and they become pure without cause or basis. All beings, all that have breath, all that are born, all that have life, are without power, or strength, or virtue, but are the result of destiny, chance and nature, and they experience joy and sorrow in six classes".[47]

Despite this ascribed premise of antinomian ethics, both Jain and Buddhist records note that Ājīvikas lived a simple ascetic life, without clothes and any material possessions.[40][41]

Tamil literature on Ajivikas suggests that they practicedAhimsa (non-violence) and a vegetarian lifestyle.[49] Arthur Basham notes that Buddhist and Jaina texts variously accuse Ajivikas of immorality, unchastity and worldliness, but they also acknowledge the confusion among Buddhists and Jainas when they observed the simple, ascetic lifestyle of Ajivikas.[50]

Jainism

[edit]
Main article:Tamil Jain

The exact origins of Jainism in Tamil Nadu is unclear. However, Jains flourished in Tamil Nadu at least as early as theSangam period. Tamil Jain tradition places their origins are much earlier. Some scholars believe that the author of the oldest extant work of literature in Tamil (3rd century BCE),Tolkāppiyam, was a Jain.[51]S. Vaiyapuri Pillai suggests that Tolkappiyar was a Jain scholar well-versed in the Aintiram grammatical system and posits a later date, placing him in southern Kerala around the 5th century CE. Notably, Tolkappiyam incorporates several Sanskrit and Prakrit loanwords, reflecting its historical and linguistic context.[52]

A number of Tamil-Brahmi inscriptions have been found in Tamil Nadu that date from the 2nd century BCE. They are regarded to be associated with Jain monks and lay devotees.[53][54]

Some scholars consider theTirukkural byValluvar to be the work by a Jain.[55][56][57] It emphatically supportsmoral vegetarianism (Chapter 26) and states that giving up animal sacrifice is worth more than a thousand offerings in fire (verse 259).[58][59]

Silappatikaram, a major work in Tamil literature, was written by a Samaṇa (jain),Ilango Adigal. It describes the historical events of its time and also of the then-prevailing religions, Jainism, Buddhism andShaivism. The main characters of this work,Kannagi andKovalan, who have a divine status among Tamils, were Jains.

According toGeorge L. Hart, the legend of theTamil Sangams or "literary assemblies" was based on the Jainsangham atMadurai:

There was a permanent Jaina assembly called a Sangha established about 604 CE in Maturai. It seems likely that this assembly was the model upon which tradition fabricated the cangkam legend."[60]

Jainism began to decline around the 8th century, with many Tamil kings embracing Hindu religions, especiallyShaivism. Still, theChalukya,Pallava andPandya dynasties embraced Jainism.

Buddhism

[edit]
Main article:Tamil Buddhism
Footprint of Buddha engraved on stone, c. 1st century CE

The heritage of the town ofNākappaṭṭinam is found in the Burmese historical text of the 3rd century BCE and gives evidence of a Budha Vihar built by theKing Ashoka. An inscription fromAnuradhapura, Sri Lanka dated to 2nd century BCE records the association of Tamil merchants with Buddhist institution.[61]

TheBuddhists worshiped the impressions ofBuddha’s feet engraved on stone and platforms made of stone that represented his seat. The pious Buddhist walked round them, with his right side towards them and bowed his head as a token of reverence.[62] TheSilapatikaram mentions that themonks worshipped Buddha by praising him as the wise, holy and virtuous teacher who adhered to his vows strictly, as the one who subdued anger and all evil passions and as the refuge of all mankind.Manimekalai is a sequel to the Silapathikaram, which tells the story ofBuddhism of the daughter ofKovalan andMadhavi.

In the BuddhistViharas or monasteries, learned monks preached their sermons, seated in a place which was entirely concealed from the view of the audience. The Buddhists did not observe the distinctions of caste and invited all ranks to assemble on a footing of equality. Self-control, wisdom and charity were among the virtues preached and practiced by the monks, who were numerous in the ancient Tamil country.[1]

Christianity

[edit]
Main articles:Saint Thomas Christians,Christianity in Tamil Nadu, andChristianity in Kerala
Thiruvithamcode Arappally, believed to be built byThomas the Apostle, was patronised by theChera king, Udayancheral.

Christianity was believed to have been introduced in India bySt. Thomas the Apostle who landed atMuziris onMalabar Coast in the year 52 CE.[citation needed] These ancient Christians are today known asSaint Thomas Christians or Syriac Christians or Nasrani.[63][64][65] They are now divided into different denominations namely,Syro-Malabar Catholic,Syro-Malankara Catholic,Malankara Orthodox,Jacobite andMalankara Marthoma. Syriac Christians followed the same rules of caste and population as that of Hindus and sometimes they were even considered as population neutralizers.[66][67] They tend to be endogamous, and tend not tointermarry even with other Christian groupings. Saint Thomas Christians derive status within the caste system from the tradition that they were elites, who wereevangelized by St. Thomas.[68][69][70] Also, internal mobility is allowed among these Saint Thomas Christian sects and the caste status is kept even if the sect allegiance is switched (for example, fromSyriac Orthodox toSyro-Malabar Catholic).[71] Despite the sectarian differences, Syriac Christians share a common social status within theCaste system of Kerala and is considered asForward Caste.[70]

Judaism

[edit]

The traditional account is that traders fromJudea arrived in the city ofCochin, Kerala in 562 BCE, and that more Jews came as exiles from Israel in the year 70 CE after the destruction of theSecond Temple.[72] The distinct Jewish community was calledAnjuvannam. The still-functioningsynagogue in Mattancherry belongs to theParadesi Jews, the descendants ofSephardim that were expelled from Spain in1492.[72]

Philosophies of religion

[edit]

Secularism

[edit]

The secular identity[73] of theSangam literature is often celebrated to represent the tolerance amongTamil people. In his bookHistory ofTamil language and literature: beginning to 1000 A. D.,Vaiyapuri Pillai concludes,[74] "Thus the Tamil land became a fertile nursery and the several religions... throve in friendly rivalry." Most scholars agree that the lack of 'god' should not be inferred to be atheistic.[citation needed] TheTamil books of Law, particularly theTirukkural, is considered as thePerennial philosophy ofTamil culture because of its universalisability.[citation needed]

Ūzh and Vinai

[edit]

Ūzh meaning 'fate' or 'destiny' and vinai meaning 'works' concerns the ancientTamil belief of differentiating what man can do and what is destined.[75]

Iṟaivaṉ and Iyavuḷ

[edit]

SangamTamil people understood two distinct characteristics of Godhood.God who is beyond all (Tamilஇறைவன்,Iṟaivaṉ) and theGod who sets things in motion (Tamilஇயவுள்,Iyavuḷ).[76]

See also

[edit]
Part ofa series on
Sri Lankan Tamils

References

[edit]
  1. ^abKanakasabhai 1904, p. 233.
  2. ^Reddy, V. Rami (1985)."South Indian Neolithic Culture Seen in Retrospect".East and West.35 (1/3):43–65.ISSN 0012-8376.JSTOR 29756713.
  3. ^Zvelebil, Kamil (1973).The Smile of Murugan: On Tamil Literature of South India. BRILL.ISBN 978-90-04-03591-1.
  4. ^Zvelebil, Kamil (1974).Tamil Literature. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag.ISBN 9783447015820.
  5. ^A HISTORY OF INDIAN LITERATURE volume 10 TAMIL LITERATURE page number 49 written by Kamil Zvelebil
  6. ^Kanchan Sinha, Kartikeya in Indian art and literature, Delhi: Sundeep Prakashan (1979).
  7. ^Mahadevan, Iravatham (2006).A Note on the Muruku Sign of the Indus Script in light of the Mayiladuthurai Stone Axe Discovery. harappa.com. Archived fromthe original on 4 September 2006.
  8. ^Ranbir Vohra (2000).The Making of India: A Historical Survey. M.E. Sharpe. p. 15.ISBN 9780765607119.
  9. ^Grigorii Maksimovich Bongard-Levin (1985).Ancient Indian Civilization. Arnold-Heinemann. p. 45.
  10. ^Steven Rosen, Graham M. Schweig (2006).Essential Hinduism. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 45.
  11. ^Basham 1967
  12. ^Frederick J. Simoons (1998).Plants of life, plants of death. p. 363.
  13. ^N. Ramya (1 August 2010)."New finds of old temples enthuse archaeologists".The Times of India.Archived from the original on 15 September 2012.
  14. ^Thiruchandran, Selvy (1997).Ideology, caste, class, and gender. Vikas Pub. House.
  15. ^Manickam, Valliappa Subramaniam (1968).A glimpse of Tamilology. Academy of Tamil Scholars of Tamil Nadu. p. 75.
  16. ^Lal, Mohan (2006).The Encyclopaedia Of Indian Literature (Volume Five (Sasay To Zorgot), Volume 5. Sahitya Akademi. p. 4396.ISBN 8126012218.
  17. ^Hardy, Friedhelm (1 January 2015).Viraha Bhakti: The Early History of Krsna Devotion. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 156.ISBN 978-81-208-3816-1.
  18. ^Clothey, Fred W. (20 May 2019).The Many Faces of Murukan: The History and Meaning of a South Indian God. With the Poem Prayers to Lord Murukan. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. p. 34.ISBN 978-3-11-080410-2.
  19. ^abPadmaja, T. (2002).Temples of Kr̥ṣṇa in South India: History, Art, and Traditions in Tamilnāḍu. Abhinav Publications. p. 27.ISBN 978-81-7017-398-4.
  20. ^Iyengar, Srinivasa (1929).History of the Tamils: from the earliest times to 600 A.D. Asian Educational Services. p. 77.
  21. ^Venkatasubramanian, T.K. (2010).Music as History in TamilNadu. Primus Books. p. 16.ISBN 978-9380607061.
  22. ^Shashi, S. S. (1996).Encyclopaedia Indica: India, Pakistan, Bangladesh: Volume 100. Anmol Publications.
  23. ^Subramanium, N. (1980).Śaṅgam polity: the administration and social life of the Śaṅgam Tamils. Ennes Publications.
  24. ^Pereira, Filipe (24 May 2018)."Theyyam, The Dancing Gods".Journal of Anthropological Films.2 (1): 1369.doi:10.15845/jaf.v2i1.1369.ISSN 2535-437X.
  25. ^Harman, William P. (1992).The sacred marriage of a Hindu goddess. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 6.
  26. ^Anand, Mulk Raj (1980).Splendours of Tamil Nadu. Marg Publications.
  27. ^Chopra, Pran Nath (1979).History of South India. S. Chand.
  28. ^A.K., Ramanujan (2011).Poems of Love and War: From the Eight Anthologies and the Ten Long Poems of Classical Tamil. Columbia University Press. p. 287.
  29. ^Bate, Bernard (2009).Tamil oratory and the Dravidian aesthetic: democratic practice in south India. Columbia University Press.
  30. ^A. Kiruṭṭin̲an̲ (2000).Tamil culture: religion, culture, and literature. Bharatiya Kala Prakashan. p. 17.
  31. ^Embree, Ainslie Thomas (1988).Encyclopedia of Asian history: Volume 1. Scribner.ISBN 9780684188980.
  32. ^Hopkins, Steven (2002).Singing the body of God: the hymns of Vedāntadeśika in their South Indian tradition. Oxford University Press. pp. 113.ISBN 978-0-19-512735-5.
  33. ^Rocher, Ludo (1986).The Purāṇas. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. p. 157, with footnotes.ISBN 3-447-02522-0.
  34. ^S. Sivakumar (13 August 2010)."Much more than stone".The Hindu. Archived fromthe original on 10 November 2012.
  35. ^"Archive News".The Hindu. Retrieved25 June 2020.
  36. ^Subrahmanian 1972, p. 381.
  37. ^Subrahmanian 1972, p. 382.
  38. ^Gopalakrishnan 2005, p. 19.
  39. ^Jayatilleke 1963, p. 142.
  40. ^abcdJames Lochtefeld, "Ajivika",The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Vol. 1: A–M, Rosen Publishing.ISBN 978-0823931798, page 22
  41. ^abcBasham 1951, Chapter 1.
  42. ^DM Riepe (1996), Naturalistic Tradition in Indian Thought, Motilal Banarsidass,ISBN 978-8120812932, pages 42-45
  43. ^abAjivikas World Religions Project,University of Cumbria, United Kingdom
  44. ^abcdefgDale Riepe (1996), Naturalistic Tradition in Indian Thought, Motilal Banarsidass,ISBN 978-8120812932, pages 41-44 with footnotes
  45. ^abcJayatilleke 1963, p. 140-161.
  46. ^abcdefgBasham 1951, pp. 262–270.
  47. ^abDM Riepe (1996),Naturalistic Tradition in Indian Thought, Motilal Banarsidass,ISBN 978-8120812932, pages 39-40
  48. ^Basham 1951, p. 4.
  49. ^Basham 1951, p. 123.
  50. ^Basham 1951, pp. 123–127.
  51. ^Singh, Narendra (2001).Encyclopaedia of Jainism. Anmol Publications. p. 3144.ISBN 978-81-261-0691-2.
  52. ^Prof. S. Vaiyapuri Pillai (1956).History of Tamil Language and Literature (Beginning to 1000 A.D.). p. 62-68.
  53. ^Early Tamil epigraphy from the earliest times to the sixth century A.D. Iravatham Mahadevan, Harvard University Press, 2003
  54. ^http://jainsamaj.org/rpg_site/literature2.php?id=595&cat=42 Recent Discoveries of Jaina Cave Inscriptions in Tamilnadu by Iravatham Mahadevan
  55. ^Tirukkural, Vol. 1, S.M. Diaz, Ramanatha Adigalar Foundation, 2000,
  56. ^Tiruvalluvar and his Tirukkural, Bharatiya Jnanapith, 1987
  57. ^The Kural, P. S. Sundaram, Penguin Classics, 1987
  58. ^Das, G. N. (1997).Readings from Thirukkural. Abhinav Publications. pp. 11–12.ISBN 8-1701-7342-6.
  59. ^A. A. Manavalan (2009).Essays and Tributes on Tirukkural (1886–1986 AD) (1 ed.). Chennai: International Institute of Tamil Studies. p. 128.
  60. ^The Milieu of the Ancient Tamil Poems, Prof. George Hart
  61. ^Duraiswamy, Dayalan."Role of Archaeology on Maritime Buddhism".{{cite journal}}:Cite journal requires|journal= (help)
  62. ^Kanakasabhai 1904, p. 232.
  63. ^Journal of the Institute of Asian Studies, Volume 18. Institute of Asian Studies (Madras, India). 2000.
  64. ^Weil S. 1982; Jessay P.M. 1986; Menachery 1973; Menachery 1998.
  65. ^A. E. Medlycott,India and The Apostle Thomas, pp.1–71, 213–97; M. R. James,Apocryphal New Testament, pp.364–436; Eusebius,History, chapter 4:30;J. N. Farquhar,The Apostle Thomas in North India, chapter 4:30; V. A. Smith,Early History of India, p.235; L. W. Brown,The Indian Christians of St. Thomas, p.49-59.
  66. ^Vadakkekara, Benedict (2007).Origin of Christianity in India: a Historiographical Critique, pp. 325–330. Media House Delhi.
  67. ^Fuller, Christopher J. (March 1976). "Kerala Christians and the Caste System".Man. New Series.11 (1). Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland:55–56.doi:10.2307/2800388.JSTOR 2800388.(subscription required)
  68. ^Fuller, Christopher J. (March 1976). "Kerala Christians and the Caste System".Man. New Series.11 (1). Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland: 55, 68.doi:10.2307/2800388.JSTOR 2800388.(subscription required)
  69. ^Fuller, C.J. "Indian Christians: Pollution and Origins."Man. New Series, Vol. 12, No. 3/4. (Dec., 1977), pp. 528–529.
  70. ^abForrester, Duncan (1980).Caste and Christianity. Curzon Press. pp. 98, 102.ISBN 9780700701292.
  71. ^Fuller, Christopher J. (March 1976). "Kerala Christians and the Caste System".Man. New Series.11 (1). Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland: 61.doi:10.2307/2800388.JSTOR 2800388.(subscription required)
  72. ^abP. 125The Shengold Jewish Encyclopedia By Mordecai Schreiber
  73. ^Encyclopaedia of Tamil Literature: Introductory articles. Institute of Asian Studies. 1990.
  74. ^Piḷḷai, Es Vaiyāpurip (1956).History of Tamil language and literature: beginning to 1000 A. D. New Century Book House.
  75. ^Journal of Tamil studies, Issues 31–32. International Association of Tamil Research. 1987.
  76. ^Singam, S. Durai Raja (1974).Ananda Coomaraswamy: remembering and remembering again and again. Raja Singam. p. 50.

Bibliography

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Religion_in_ancient_Tamilakam&oldid=1284067407"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp