TheAetolian (orAitolian)League (Ancient Greek:Κοινὸν τῶν Αἰτωλῶν)[1] was a confederation of tribal communities and cities[2] inancient Greece centered inAetolia inCentral Greece. It was probably established during the earlyHellenistic era, in opposition toMacedon and theAchaean League. Two annual meetings were held atThermon and Panaetolika. The league occupiedDelphi from 290 BC and steadily gained territory until, by the end of the 3rd century BC, it controlled the whole of central Greece with the exception ofAttica andBoeotia. At its peak, the league's territory includedLocris,Malis, Dolopes, parts ofThessaly,Phocis, andAcarnania. In the latter part of its power, certainGreek city-states joined the Aetolian League such as the Arcadian cities ofMantineia,Tegea,Phigalia andKydonia onCrete.[3]
During theclassical period the Aetolians were not highly regarded by other Greeks, who considered them to be semi-barbaric and reckless.[4] Their League had a complex political and administrative structure, and their armies were easily a match for the other Greek powers. However, during theHellenistic period, they emerged as a dominant state in central Greece and expanded by the voluntary annexation of several Greek city-states to the League. Still, the Aetolian League had to fight againstMacedonia and were driven to an alliance withRome, which resulted in the final conquest of Greece by the Romans.
Theater ofCalydon, AetoliaAncient regions of central Greece including Aetolia, prior to its expansion
The Aetolians were a recognised ethnic group with a religious centre atThermos from at least the seventh century BC. During thePeloponnesian War, theAetolians were initially neutral, but when theAthenianstried to invade Aetolia in 426 BC, the Aetolians forced them to retreat.[5] In the course of the fourth century, the league offered passive support to more powerful states and was rewarded for it, receivingAeolis from the Thebans in 367 BC andNaupactus fromPhilip II of Macedon in 338 BC. Sometime in this century, theKoinon tōn Aitōlōn (League of the Aetolians) was founded, but it is uncertain when. One suggestion is that the league was founded byEpaminondas in 367 BC.[6][7] Grainger believes that it was founded much later, around the time of the rise of Philip II of Macedon.[8] Archaeology indicates that settlements in Aetolia began to grow in size and complexity over the course of this century.
After the death of Philip II in 336 BC, the Aetolians joined the Thebans in opposingAlexander the Great and the stress of their defeat caused the league to implode. Over the next decade it seems to have been reconstituted and in the later years of Alexander's reign the Aetolians seizedOeniadae against his will.
The Aetolian League joined the Athenians in theLamian war againstAntipater which broke out after Alexander's death in 323 BC and continued to oppose Macedonian power throughout theWars of the Diadochi, participating in invasions of Macedon in 320, 316/5 and 313 BC. Around 301 BC, the Aetolians took control ofParnassus, including thepanhellenic sanctuary ofDelphi, which they would continue to control for over a century.Demetrius Poliorcetes launched theFifth Sacred War, 289-287 BC, in an attempt to remove them, but was defeated and driven from Macedonia altogether with the help ofPyrrhus of Epirus. ASixth Sacred War, 281 BC, led byAreus I was rebuffed by the Aetolians alone and in 280 BC, they took control ofHeraclea in Trachis, which gave them control over the crucial pass atThermopylae.[9]
Territory of the Aetolian League in 200 BC.
In 279 BC, they were victorious in battle against theGauls, who had invaded Greece and were threatening the sanctuary ofDelphi. After their victory they earned the appreciation of the rest of the Greeks and they were admitted as a new member into theAmphictyonic League.
In 232 BC, the Illyrians under Agron attacked the Aetolians, and managed to take many prisoners and booty.[10]
In 229 BC, the Aetolians participated in anaval battle off the island of Paxos in a coalition withKorkyra and theAchaean League, and were defeated by a coalition ofIllyrians andAcarnanians; as a result, the Korkyreans were forced to accept an Illyrian garrison in their city, which was put under the command of Demetrius of Pharos.[11]
In theSocial War, 220-217 BC, the Aetolian League fought against theKingdom of Macedonia.Philip V of Macedon invaded Aetolia and sacked the city of Thermos as a response to the Aetolians' invasion at the city ofDodona in Epirus.
The league was the first Greek ally of theRoman Republic, siding with the Romans during theFirst Macedonian War, 215-205 BC, and helping to defeatPhilip V of Macedon at theBattle of Cynoscephalae in 197 BC, during theSecond Macedonian War. However, it grew increasingly hostile to Roman involvement in Greek affairs and only a few years later sided withAntiochus III, the anti-Roman king of theSeleucid Empire, during theRoman-Syrian War. The defeat of Antiochus in 189 BC robbed the league of its principal foreign ally and made it impossible to stand alone in continued opposition to Rome. The league was forced to sign a peace treaty with Rome that made it a subject ally of the republic. Although it continued to exist in name, the power of the league was broken by the treaty and it never again constituted a significant political or military force.
Thermos, sanctuary and assembly place of the Aetolian League
The league had a federal structure, which could raise armies and conduct foreign policy on a common basis. It also implemented economic standardization, levying taxes, using a common currency and adopting a uniform system of weights and measures. There may not have been any central archive of state documents. However, the constituent communities of the league enjoyed substantial autonomy. At times the league was unable (or unwilling) to prevent its members from undertaking military actions against states that had treaties with it. The league members were grouped together in a number oftele (districts), which seem to have had administrative and juridical powers of some sort.[12]
The league's central administrative apparatus consisted of an assembly, a council, and a number of magistrates. TheEkklesia (Assembly) was open to all citizens of all member communities of the league. The assembly was the ultimate authority within the league, with responsibility for declarations of war and peace, but its power was limited by the infrequency with which it met. Two meetings took place a year, one at the Thermica festival which was held at Thermos on theautumnal equinox and another in spring at the Panaetolica festival which took place at a different site each year. Emergency meetings could also be called.[13]
The exact competencies of the Council, referred to as aboula orsynedrion in different documents, relative to the Assembly are not clear. It consisted of delegates elected by each of the constituent communities of the league in proportion to their size. By the late third century BC it had around 1500 members - too large for it to have been in continuous session. A small portion of the council's members, known as theapokletoi ("Select-men"), conducted day-to-day business, such as sending and receiving embassies.[13]
The league'sarchons (magistrates) were elected by the assembly each year at the Thermica. The chief executive was thestrategos (General), who commanded the league's armies, received all diplomatic contacts from other states in first instance, and presided over meetings of the assembly, the council, and the select-men. The office could be held multiple times, but only after an interval of, probably, four years. Thehipparchos (Cavalry Commander), originally a minor post, became the General's deputy from the late 260s BC, but his exact responsibilities are not clear. The third in command was theGrammateus (Secretary). These three officials wereEponymous archons (eponymous magistrates), which is to say that they were named in the dating formula for all decrees of the league. From around 260 BC, there were also seventamiai (Treasurers) and sevenepilektarchoi (Commanders of the Elite), who managed financial and military matters respectively. There were a number ofboularchoi (Council Commanders) who seem to have been a steering committee for the Council. When these first appear in the 260s, there were two of them, but by the end of the third century BC they had risen to six or more, presumably as a result of the continued expansion of the league's membership (and thus of the size of the Council).[13]
From 278 the league sent delegates to theAmphictyonic League (Delphic Amphictyony), gradually increasing over time until the league held a majority of the seats on the council, which increasingly became an instrument of Aetolian power projection. From the 260s, the secretary of the Amphictyonic council was always an Aetolian. These delegates seem to have been elected along with the other magistrates at the Thermica, but their relative rank is not clear.[14]
The Aetolian League acquired a reputation forpiracy andbrigandage. Though some historians recognize a pro-Achaean bias in the portrayal of the League byPolybius, many modern historians also accept his portrayal as largely justified. For example, Walbank is explicit in seeing the Aetolians as systematically using piracy to supplement their income due to the meager resources of their region[15] and Will simply assumes the truth of the charge.[16]
By contrast, Grainger concludes that Aetolian involvement in piracy appears unlikely given that they lacked the necessary ships.[17]
^N. Tod,A selection of Greek Historical Inscriptions, vol. 2, p. 137
^John D. Grainger, The League of the Aetolians, p. 49
^Scholten, Joseph B. (2000).The politics of plunder : Aitolians and their koinon in the early Hellenistic era, 279-217. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press. pp. 15–25.ISBN0520201876.
^Scholten, Joseph B. (2000).The politics of plunder : Aitolians and their koinon in the early Hellenistic era, 279-217. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press. pp. 64–5, 90.ISBN0520201876.
^abcScholten, Joseph B. (2000).The politics of plunder : Aitolians and their koinon in the early Hellenistic era, 279-217. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press. pp. 26–28, 62.ISBN0520201876.
^Scholten, Joseph B. (2000).The politics of plunder : Aitolians and their koinon in the early Hellenistic era, 279-217. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press. pp. 38,66–67.ISBN0520201876.