Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

53 equal temperament

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Musical tuning system of 53 pitches
Figure 1: 53 TET on the syntonic temperament's tuning continuum at 701.89 cents, fromMilne, Sethares & Plamondon (2007)[1]

In music,53 equal temperament, called53 TET,53 EDO, or53 ET, is thetempered scale derived by dividing the octave into 53 equal steps (equal frequency ratios) (Play). Each step represents a frequency ratio of21 ∕ 53 , or 22.6415 cents (Play), an interval sometimes called theHoldrian comma.

53 TET is a tuning ofequal temperament in which the tempered perfect fifth is 701.89 cents wide, as shown in Figure 1, and sequential pitches are separated by 22.642 cents.

The 53-TET tuning equates to the unison, ortempers out, the intervals 32 805 / 32 768, known as theschisma, and 15 625 / 15 552, known as thekleisma. These are both 5 limit intervals, involving only the primes 2, 3, and 5 in their factorization, and the fact that 53 TET tempers out both characterizes it completely as a 5 limit temperament: It is the onlyregular temperament tempering out both of these intervals, orcommas, a fact which seems to have first been recognized by Japanese music theoristShohé Tanaka. Because it tempers these out, 53 TET can be used for bothschismatic temperament, tempering out the schisma, andHanson temperament (also called kleismic), tempering out the kleisma.

The interval of 7 / 4 is closest to the 43rd note (counting from 0) and243 ∕ 53 = 1.7548   is only 4.8 cents sharp from theharmonic 7th  = 7 / 4 in 53 TET, and using it for7-limit harmony means that theseptimal kleisma, the interval 225 / 224, is also tempered out.

History and use

[edit]

Theoretical interest in this division goes back to antiquity.Jing Fang (78–37 BCE), a Chinese music theorist, observed that a series of 53 just fifths( [ 3 / 2]53) is very nearly equal to 31 octaves (231). He calculated this difference with six-digit accuracy to be 177 147 / 176 776.[2][3] Later the same observation was made by the mathematician and music theoristNicholas Mercator (c. 1620–1687), who calculated this value precisely as 353/ 284 = 19 383 245 667 680 019 896 796 723 / 19 342 813 113 834 066 795 298 816,[verification needed] which is known asMercator's comma.[4] Mercator's comma is of such small value to begin with( ≈ 3.615 cents), but 53 equal temperament flattens each fifth by only1/ 53  of that comma (0.0682 cent1/ 315 syntonic comma1/ 344 pythagorean comma). Thus, 53 tone equal temperament is for all practical purposes equivalent to an extendedPythagorean tuning.

After Mercator,William Holder published a treatise in 1694 which pointed out that 53 equal temperament also very closely approximates thejust major third (to within 1.4 cents), and consequently 53 equal temperament accommodates the intervals of5 limitjust intonation very well.[5][6] This property of 53 TET may have been known earlier;Isaac Newton's unpublished manuscripts suggest that he had been aware of it as early as 1664–1665.[7]

Music

[edit]

In the 19th century, people began devising instruments in 53 TET, with an eye to their use in playing near-just5-limit music. Such instruments were devised byR.H.M. Bosanquet[8](p 328–329) and the American tunerJ.P. White.[8](p 329) Subsequently, the temperament has seen occasional use by composers in the west, and by the early 20th century, 53 TET had become the most common form of tuning inOttoman classical music, replacing its older, unequal tuning.Arabic music, which for the most part bases its theory onquartertones, has also made some use of it; the Syrian violinist and music theoristTwfiq Al-Sabagh proposed that instead of an equal division of the octave into 24 parts a 24 note scale in 53 TET should be used as the master scale for Arabic music.[citation needed]

Croatian composerJosip Štolcer-Slavenski wrote one piece, which has never been published, which usesBosanquet's Enharmonium during its first movement, entitledMusic for Natur-ton-system.[9][10][11][a]


Furthermore, General Thompson worked in league with the London-based guitar makerLouis Panormo to produce the Enharmonic Guitar.[12]

Notation

[edit]
Notation used in Ottoman classical music, where the whole notes are divided into 9 commas.

Attempting to use standard notation, seven-letter notes plus sharps or flats, can quickly become confusing. This is unlike the case with19 TET and31 TET where there is little ambiguity. By not being meantone, it adds some problems that require more attention. Specifically, the Pythagorean major third (ditone) and just major third are distinguished, as are the Pythagorean minor third (semiditone) and just minor third. The fact that thesyntonic comma is not tempered out means that notes and intervals need to be defined more precisely.Ottoman classical music uses a notation of flats and sharps for the 9 comma tone.

Furthermore, since 53 is not a multiple of 12, notes such as G and A are not enharmonically equivalent, nor are the correspondingkey signatures. As a result, many key signatures will require the use of double sharps (such as G major / E minor), double flats (such as F major / D minor), or microtonal alterations.

Extended pythagorean notation, using only sharps and flats, gives the following chromatic scale:

  • C, B, Adouble sharp, Etriple flat, D, C, Bdouble sharp, Ftriple flat, Edouble flat,
  • D, Cdouble sharp, Bdouble sharp, Fdouble flat, E, D, Cdouble sharp, Gtriple flat, F,
  • E, Ddouble sharp, Cdouble sharpdouble sharp/Adouble flatdouble flat, Gdouble flat,
  • F, E, Ddouble sharp, Atriple flat, G, F, Edouble sharp, Ddouble sharpdouble sharp/Bdouble flatdouble flat, Adouble flat,
  • G, Fdouble sharp, Edouble sharp, Btriple flat, A, G, Fdouble sharp, Ctriple flat, Bdouble flat,
  • A, Gdouble sharp, Fdouble sharpdouble sharp/Ddouble flatdouble flat, Cdouble flat, B, A, Gdouble sharp, Dtriple flat, C,
  • B, Adouble sharp, Gdouble sharpdouble sharp/Edouble flatdouble flat, Ddouble flat, C

Unfortunately, the notes run out of letter-order, and up to quadruple sharps and flats are required. As a result, a just major 3rd must be spelled as a diminished 4th.

Ups and downs notation[13] keeps the notes in order and also preserves the traditional meaning of sharp and flat. It uses up and down arrows, written as a caret or a lower-case "v", usually in a sans-serif font. One arrow equals one step of 53-TET. In note names, the arrows come first, to facilitate chord naming. The many enharmonic equivalences allow great freedom of spelling.

  • C, ^C, ^^C, vvC/vD, vC/D, C/^D, ^C/^^D, vvD, vD,
  • D, ^D, ^^D, vvD/vE, vD/E, D/^E, ^D/^^E, vvE, vE,
  • E, ^E, ^^E/vvF, vF,
  • F, ^F, ^^F, vvF/vG, vF/G, F/^G, ^F/^^G, vvG, vG,
  • G, ^G, ^^G, vvG/vA, vG/A, G/^A, ^G/^^A, vvA, vA,
  • A, ^A, ^^A, vvA/vB, vA/B, A/^B, ^A/^^B, vvB, vB,
  • B, ^B, ^^B/vvC, vC, C

Chords of 53 equal temperament

[edit]

Since 53-TET is a Pythagorean system, with nearly pure fifths, justly-intonated major and minor triads cannot be spelled in the same manner as in ameantone tuning. Instead, the major triads are chords like C-F-G (using the Pythagorean-based notation), where the major third is a diminished fourth; this is the defining characteristic ofschismatic temperament. Likewise, the minor triads are chords like C-D-G. In 53-TET, thedominant seventh chord would be spelled C-F-G-B, but theotonal tetrad is C-F-G-Cdouble flat, and C-F-G-A is still another seventh chord. Theutonal tetrad, the inversion of the otonal tetrad, is spelled C-D-G-Gdouble sharp.

Further septimal chords are the diminished triad, having the two forms C-D-G and C-Fdouble flat-G, the subminor triad, C-Fdouble flat-G, the supermajor triad C-Ddouble sharp-G, and corresponding tetrads C-Fdouble flat-G-Bdouble flat and C-Ddouble sharp-G-A. Since 53-TET tempers out theseptimal kleisma, the septimal kleisma augmented triad C-F-Btriple flat in its various inversions is also a chord of the system. So is the Orwell tetrad, C-F-Ddouble sharpdouble sharp-Gdouble sharp in its various inversions.

Ups and downs notation permits more conventional spellings. Since it also names the intervals of 53 TET,[14] it provides precise chord names too. The pythagorean minor chord with a 32 / 27 third is still named Cm and still spelled C–E–G. But the 5-limitupminor chord uses the upminor 3rd 6/5 and is spelled C–^E–G. This chord is named C^m. Compare with ^Cm (^C–^E–^G).

  • Major triad: C-vE-G (downmajor)
  • Minor triad: C-^E-G (upminor)
  • Dominant 7th: C-vE-G-B (down add-7)
  • Otonal tetrad: C-vE-G-vB (down7)
  • Utonal tetrad: C-^E-G-^A (upminor6)
  • Diminished triad: C-^E-G (updim)
  • Diminished triad: C-vE-G (downdim)
  • Subminor triad: C-vE-G (downminor)
  • Supermajor triad: C-^E-G (upmajor)
  • Subminor tetrad: C-vE-G-vA (downminor6)
  • Supermajor tetrad: C-^E-G-^B (up7)
  • Augmented triad: C-vE-vvG (downaug dud-5)
  • Orwell triad: C-vE-vvG-^A (downmajor dud-5 up6)

Interval size

[edit]
7-Limit just intonation intervals approximated in 53 TET

Because a distance of 31 steps in this scale is almost precisely equal to ajustperfect fifth, in theory this scale can be considered a slightly tempered form ofPythagorean tuning that has been extended to 53 tones. As such the intervals available can have the same properties as any Pythagorean tuning, such as fifths that are (practically) pure, major thirds that are wide from just (about 81 / 64 opposed to the purer 5 / 4, and minor thirds that are conversely narrow ( 32 / 27 compared to 6 / 5).

However, 53 TET contains additional intervals that are very close to just intonation. For instance, the interval of 17 steps is also a major third, but only 1.4 cents narrower than the very pure just interval 5 / 4. 53 TET is very good as an approximation to any interval in 5 limit just intonation. Similarly, the pure just interval 6 / 5 is only 1.3 cents wider than 14 steps in 53 TET.

The matches to the just intervals involving the 7th harmonic are slightly less close (43 steps are 4.8 cents sharp for 7 / 4), but all such intervals are still quite closely matched with the highest deviation being the 7 / 5 tritone. The 11th harmonic and intervals involving it are less closely matched, as illustrated by the undecimal neutral seconds and thirds in the table below. 7-limit ratios are colored light gray, and 11- and 13-limit ratios are colored dark gray.

Size
(steps)
Size
(cents)
Interval nameNearest
Just ratio
Just
(cents)
Error
(cents)
Limit
531200perfect octave 2 / 1120002
521177.36graveoctave 160 / 811178.49−1.145
511154.72justaugmented seventh 125 / 641158.94−4.225
501132.08diminishedoctave 48 / 251129.33+2.755
481086.79justmajor seventh 15 / 81088.27−1.485
451018.87justminor seventh 9 / 51017.60+1.275
44996.23Pythagoreanminor seventh 16 / 9996.09+0.143
43973.59accute augmented sixth 225 / 128976.54−2.955
43973.59harmonic seventh 7 / 4968.83+4.767
43973.59accute diminished seventh 17 496 / 10 000968.43+5.155
42950.94justaugmented sixth 125 / 72955.03−4.095
42950.94justdiminished seventh 216 / 125946.92+4.025
39883.02major sixth 5 / 3884.36−1.345
37837.73tridecimal neutral sixth 13 / 8840.53−2.813
36815.09minor sixth 8 / 5813.69+1.405
31701.89perfect fifth 3 / 2701.96−0.073
30679.25grave fifth 40 / 27680.45−1.215
28633.96justdiminished fifth
(greatertritone)
 36 / 25631.28+2.685
27611.32Pythagorean augmented fourth 729 / 512611.73−0.413
27611.32greater ‘classic’tritone 64 / 45609.78+1.545
26588.68lesser ‘classic’tritone 45 / 32590.22−1.545
26588.68septimal tritone 7 / 5582.51+6.177
25566.04justaugmented fourth
(lessertritone)
 25 / 18568.72−2.685
24543.40undecimalmajor fourth 11 / 8551.32−7.9211
24543.40double diminished fifth 512 / 375539.10+4.305
24543.40undecimal augmented fourth 15 / 11536.95+6.4511
23520.76acute fourth 27 / 20519.55+1.215
22498.11perfect fourth 4 / 3498.04+0.073
21475.47grave fourth 320 / 243476.54−1.075
21475.47septimal narrow fourth 21 / 16470.78+4.697
20452.83just augmented third 125 / 96456.99−4.165
20452.83tridecimal augmented third 13 / 10454.21−1.3813
19430.19septimal major third 9 / 7435.08−4.907
19430.19just diminished fourth 32 / 25427.37+2.825
18407.54Pythagorean ditone 81 / 64407.82−0.283
17384.91justmajor third 5 / 4386.31−1.405
16362.26grave major third 100 / 81364.80−2.545
16362.26neutral third, tridecimal 16 / 13359.47+2.7913
15339.62neutral third, undecimal 11 / 9347.41−7.7911
15339.62acute minor third 243 / 200337.15+2.475
14316.98justminor third 6 / 5315.64+1.345
13294.34Pythagorean semiditone 32 / 27294.13+0.213
12271.70just augmented second 75 / 64274.58−2.885
12271.70septimal minor third 7 / 6266.87+4.837
11249.06just diminished third 144 / 125244.97+4.095
10226.41septimal whole tone 8 / 7231.17−4.767
10226.41diminished third 256 / 225223.46+2.955
9203.77whole tone,major tone,
greater tone,just second
 9 / 8203.91−0.143
8181.13gravewhole tone,minor tone,
lesser tone,gravesecond
 10 / 9182.40−1.275
7158.49neutral second, greater undecimal 11 / 10165.00−6.5111
7158.49doubly grave whole tone 800 / 729160.90−2.415
7158.49neutral second, lesser undecimal 12 / 11150.64+7.8511
6135.85accutediatonic semitone 27 / 25133.24+2.615
5113.21greater Pythagorean semitone 2 187 / 2 048113.69−0.483
5113.21justdiatonic semitone,
just minor second
 16 / 15111.73+1.485
490.57major limma 135 / 12892.18−1.615
490.57lesser Pythagorean semitone 256 / 24390.22+0.343
367.92justchromatic semitone 25 / 2470.67−2.755
367.92greater diesis 648 / 62562.57+5.355
245.28justdiesis 128 / 12541.06+4.225
122.64syntonic comma 81 / 8021.51+1.145
00perfect unison 1 / 1001

Scale diagram

[edit]

The following are 21 of the 53 notes in the chromatic scale. The rest can easily be added.

Interval (steps)324323212414324323212
Interval (cents)684591684568452345912391684591684568452345
Note name (Pythagorean notation)CEtriple flatCDFdouble flatDFDdouble sharpCdouble sharpdouble sharp/Adouble flatdouble flatFGFGBtriple flatGBdouble flatCdouble flatACAdouble sharpGdouble sharpdouble sharp/Edouble flatdouble flatC
Note name (ups and downs notation)CvvC/vDC/^DDvvD/vED/^EvE^E^^E/vvFFvF/GF/^GGvvG/vAG/^AvAvvA/vBA/^BvB^B^^B/vvCC
Note (cents)  0   68 11320427231738543045349858961170277081588397410181087113211551200
Note (steps)0359121417192022262731343639434548505153

Holdrian comma

[edit]

Inmusic theory andmusical tuning theHoldrian comma, also calledHolder's comma, and rarely theArabian comma,[15] is a smallmusical interval of approximately 22.6415 cents,[15] equal to one step of 53 equal temperament, or 253 {\displaystyle \ {\sqrt[{53}]{2\;}}\ } (play). The name"comma", however, is technically misleading, since this interval is an irrational number and it does not describe a compromise between intervals of any tuning system. The interval gets the name "comma" because it is a close approximation of severalcommas, most notably thesyntonic comma (21.51 cents) (play), which was widely used as a unit of tonal measurement duringHolder's time.

The origin of Holder's comma resides in the fact that theAncient Greeks (or at least to the RomanBoethius[b])believed that in thePythagorean tuning the tone could be divided in nine commas, four of which forming the diatonic semitone and five the chromatic semitone. If all these commas are exactly of the same size, there results an octave of5 tones + 2 diatonic semitones,  5 × 9 + 2 × 4 = 53 equal commas. Holder[18] attributes the division of the octave in 53 equal parts toNicholas Mercator,[c]who himself had proposed that1/ 53  part of the octave be named the "artificial comma".

Mercator's comma and the Holdrian comma

[edit]

Mercator's comma is a name often used for a closely related interval because of its association withNicholas Mercator.[d]One of these intervals was first described byJing Fang in45BCE.[15] Mercator applied logarithms to determine that 255 {\displaystyle \ {\sqrt[{55}]{2\;}}\ } (≈ 21.8182 cents) was nearly equivalent to a syntonic comma of ≈ 21.5063 cents (a feature of the prevalentmeantone temperament of the time). He also considered that an "artificial comma" of 253 {\displaystyle \ {\sqrt[{53}]{2\;}}\ } might be useful, because 31 octaves could be practically approximated by a cycle of 53 just fifths.Holder, for whom theHoldrian comma is named, favored this latter unit because the intervals of 53 equal temperament are closer tojust intonation than to55 TET. Thus Mercator's comma and the Holdrian comma are two distinct but nearly equal intervals.

Use in Turkish makam theory

[edit]

The Holdrian comma has been employed mainly in Ottoman/Turkish music theory byKemal Ilerici, and by the Turkish composerErol Sayan. The name of this comma isHolder koması in Turkish.

Name of intervalCommasCentsSymbol
Koma122.64F
Bakiye490.57B
Küçük Mücennep5113.21S
Büyük Mücennep8181.13K
Tanini9203.77T
Artık Aralık (12)12271.70A (12)
Artık Aralık (13)13294.34A (13)

For instance, theRast makam (similar to the Westernmajor scale, or more precisely to thejustly-tuned major scale) may be considered in terms of Holdrian commas:

wherehalf flat denotes a Holdrian comma flat,[e]while in contrast, the Nihavend makam (similar to the Westernminor scale):

where denotes a five-comma flat,hasmedium seconds betweend–e,e–f,g–a,ab, andbc′, a medium second being somewhere in between 8 and 9 commas.[15]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^"Croatian composer Josip Štolcer-Slavenski wrote one piece,[9][10] which has never been published, which uses Bosanquet's Enharmonium during its first movement, entitled Music for Natur-ton-system".[11]
  2. ^According toBoethius,Pythagoras' disciplePhilolaus of Croton would have said that the tone consisted in twodiatonic semitones and acomma; the diatonic semitone consisted in twodiaschismata, each formed of two commas.[16][17]
  3. ^"The lateNicholas Mercator, a Modest Person, and a Learned and Judicious Mathematician, in a Manuscript of his, of which I have had a Sight."[18]
  4. ^Holder (1731) writes thatMarin Mersenne had calculated 58 1 / 4 commas in the octave;Mercator "working by thelogarithms, finds out but 55, and a little more."[18]
  5. ^In common Arabic and Turkish practice, the third noteehalf flat and the seventh notebhalf flat in Rast are even lower than in this theory, almost exactly halfway between western major and minor thirds abovec andg, i.e. closer to 6.5 commas (three-quarter tone) aboved ora and 6.5 belowf orc, the thirdsc–ehalf flat andg–bhalf flat often referred to as a "neutral thirds" by musicologists.

References

[edit]
  1. ^Milne, Andrew; Sethares, William; Plamondon, James (2007)."Isomorphic controllers and dynamic tuning: Invariant fingering over a tuning continuum".Computer Music Journal.31 (4):15–32.doi:10.1162/comj.2007.31.4.15.S2CID 27906745 – via mitpressjournals.org.
  2. ^McClain, Ernest; Hung, Ming Shui (1979). "Chinese cyclic tunings in late antiquity".Ethnomusicology.23 (2):205–224.
  3. ^"後漢書/卷91 - 维基文库,自由的图书馆" [Book of the Later Han Dynasty / Volume 91 - Wikisource, the free library].zh.wikisource.org (in Chinese). Retrieved2022-06-23.
  4. ^Monzo, Joe (2005)."Mercator's comma".Tonalsoft.
  5. ^Holder (1967)
  6. ^Stanley, Jerome (2002).William Holder and His Position in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy and Music Theory. The Edwin Mellen Press. — see alsoHolder (1967)
  7. ^Barbieri, Patrizio (2008).Enharmonic Instruments and Music, 1470–1900. Latina, Il Levante Libreria Editrice. p. 350. Archived fromthe original on 2009-02-15.
  8. ^abvon Helmholtz, H.L.F. (1954). Ellis, Alexander (ed.).On the Sensations of Tone (2nd English ed.). Dover Publications. pp. 328–329.
  9. ^abSlavencki, Josip (21 June 2007a)."Preface". 53 EDO piece (manuscript). Belgrade, Serbia: The Faculty of Music – via Wikimedia Commons.
  10. ^abSlavencki, Josip (21 June 2007b)."Title". 53 EDO movement (manuscript). Belgrade, Serbia: The Faculty of Music – via Wikimedia Commons.
  11. ^abSlavenski, Josip (February 2018). Khramov, Mykhaylo (ed.)."Music Natural 53e6v". 53 EDO movement.soundcloud.com – via soundcloud.com.
    Khramov, Mykhaylo, ed. (February 2018)."Link to ZIP with materials". 53 EDO movement – via Google Drive.
  12. ^Westbrook, James (2012)."General Thompson's enharmonic guitar".Soundboard. Vol. 38, no. 4. pp. 45–52.
  13. ^"Ups and downs notation".Xenharmonic Wiki (en.xen.wiki). Retrieved19 August 2024.
  14. ^"53edo intervals".Xenharmonic Wiki (en.xen.wiki). Retrieved19 August 2024.
  15. ^abcdTouma, H.H. (1996).The Music of the Arabs. Translated by Schwartz, Laurie. Portland, OR: Amadeus Press. p. 23.ISBN 0-931340-88-8.
  16. ^Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus.De institutione musica. Book 3, Chapter 8.
  17. ^Barbour, J.M. (1951).Tuning and Temperament: A historical survey. p. 123.
  18. ^abcHolder, W. (1731).A Treatise of the Natural Grounds, and Principles of Harmony (3rd ed.). London, UK. p. 79.
  • Holder, William (1967) [1694].A Treatise on the Natural Grounds, and Principles of Harmony (facsimile ed.). New York, NY: Broude Brothers. pp. 103–106.

External links

[edit]
Composers
Three quarter flat.
Three-quarter sharp.
Inventors
Tunings and
scales
Non-octave-
repeating scales
Equal temperament
Just intonation
Concepts and
techniques
Groups and
publications
Compositions
Other topics
Measurement
Just intonation
Temperaments
Equal
Linear
Irregular
Traditional
non-Western
Non-octave
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=53_equal_temperament&oldid=1274869488"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp