Proposition 64 was a proposition in the state ofCalifornia on the November 4, 1986, ballot. It was aninitiative statute that would have restoredAcquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) to the list ofcommunicable diseases. The measure was defeated by a margin of 71% to 29%.
Activists associated withLyndon LaRouche formed the "Prevent AIDS Now Initiative Committee" (PANIC) to place what became "Proposition 64" on the California state ballot. The initiative was written by Khushro Ghandhi,[1] who was also the president of PANIC. Brian Lantz was vice-president[2] and Ted Andromidas was treasurer.[3]
Proponents argued that the measures would merely return AIDS to the list of communicable diseases under thepublic health laws. The ballot argument in favor of the proposition werepathologist John Grauerholz,psychiatrist Nancy T. Mullan, and formerCenters for Disease Control advisor Gus S. Sermos.[4] CongressmanWilliam E. Dannemeyer was also a proponent.
Opponents characterized it as an effort to force HIV-positive individuals out of their jobs and intoquarantine. Said Helen Miramontes, R.N., president of theCalifornia Nurses Association:
Health professionals believe that Proposition 64 would seriously hurt their ability to treat and find a cure for AIDS. Current medical efforts based on years of research will be undermined by the fear generated by this irrational proposition.
The ballot argument against the measure was signed by Gladden V. Elliott, president of theCalifornia Medical Association, CongressmanEd Zschau, and SenatorAlan Cranston.The submitted supporting argument included claims that AIDS could be transmitted by insects, respiratory means and casual contact.[4] These claims were challenged in a suit by California Secretary of StateMarch Fong Eu, based on the argument that they had no scientific support.[4]
The initiative was opposed by the Catholic Bishops of California.[5]
In 1986, the text of Proposition 64 was re-introduced in California by the "Prevent AIDS Now In California" (also PANIC) committee and appeared on the November 1986 ballot as "Proposition 69." It was also defeated.
The gathering of signatures to qualify the initiative was handled in part by a paid contractor. The fee was paid with a contribution by the Caucus Distributors Inc, a key part of theLaRouche movement.[6] The political consultant who was hired by the LaRouche organization to collect signatures for the PANIC initiative was convicted of fraud in October 1988. The consultant, Stanley I. Dale, used out-of-state signature-collectors and claimed they were California residents.[7]March Fong Eu,Secretary of State of California, notified the committee that her office had received numerous complaints of harassment by signature gatherers, including "outrageous verbal abuse for mere failure to sign petitions". She warned them that further complaints would result in legal action.[8]
LaRouche activists accused official agencies such as theCenters for Disease Control of "criminal malfeasance" for refusing to back measures such as mandatory testing.[9]
| History |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Active organizations | ||
| Defunct organizations | ||
| Members |
| |
| Members who separated from the movement | ||
| Critics | ||
| Related persons | ||
