| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Turnout | 87% 1pp[1] | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
In the1911 Chicago mayoral election, DemocratCarter Harrison IV was elected to his fifth non-consecutive term as mayor, tying the then-record set by his fatherCarter Harrison Sr. for the most Chicago mayoral election victories. Harrison defeated Republican nomineeCharles E. Merriam and Socialist nomineeWilliam E. Rodriguez.
The election was held on April 4.[2]
On February 28, 1911, for the first time, directprimary elections were held. Both major parties held primaries to determine their nominees, and both the Democratic and Republican primaries saw heated races. In the Democratic primary, former mayor Harrison won a very narrow 0.97% margin of victory over former mayorEdward F. Dunne, also beating a competitive candidacy by banker Andrew J. Graham. With incumbent Republican mayorFred A. Busse declining to seek a second term, the Republican Party also had an open race for its nomination. Charles E. Merriam won a strong victory over restaurateur John R. Thompson and formerIllinois treasurerJohn F. Smulski, as well as two minor candidates.
Ahead of the election, Illinois adopted a law to hold directprimary elections for public offices in the state.[3][4] Illinois law changes scheduled for such primary elections to be held on the last Tuesday of February in the case of Chicago's municipal elections.[5] Being the first Chicago mayoral election held since the law change, the Democratic and Republican primaries were the first direct primary elections for Chicago mayor.[6] The primaries were incredibly tenuous, and even elicited incidents of election-day violence.[6] All parties held their primaries on February 28, 1911.[7]
Carter Harrison IV, who had previously served four terms as mayor, defeated former mayorEdward F. Dunne as well as Andrew J. Graham (a wealthy banker)[8][9] in the Democratic primary on February 28.[2][7] Harrison's margin of victory in the primary was very narrow.[10]
Harrison had, in late 1910, formed a political alliance withWilliam Randolph Hearst.[11] Their mutual interest was that they both sought to oustpolitical bossRoger Charles Sullivan and his network.[11]
Dunne announced his candidacy on November 19, 1910. His candidacy came as somewhat of a surprise, as his chances of winning appeared unrealistic.[11] However, he had a few factors that were still to his advantage. One was that he had strong support among the city's Irish middle class.[11] Another was that he was a reform-minded politician in an election year in which reform seemed important to voters.[11] Shortly after he announced his candidacy, he received backing from reformist figures such as aldermanJohn J. Bradley (who would serve as manager of his campaign),William Emmett Dever,Margaret Haley,Clarence Darrow, andRaymond Robins.[11] Dunne's platform called for improving service and lowering the prices of gas and electricity, nighttimewaste collection, universaltransfers, the construction of city-owned subways, aconsolidation of Chicago andCook County, and the creation of parks administrations.[11] He also pledged to root out graft, bomb throwing.[11] He pledged to instill a government which emphasized, "decency towards and fair treatment of the citizen from public officials".[11] He would adopt "wet" stance, opposingprohibition of alcohol.[11] While Dunne's campaign had an invigorated launch, receiving the support many reformist endorsers, most of the press and political professionals still disregarded his prospects.[11]
Andrew J. Graham announce his candidacy on December 9, 1910.[12] was backed byRoger Charles Sullivan.[12] He, in essence, ran as Sullivan's hand-picked candidate.[11] Graham was a prominent banker from the city'sWest Side, who was a longtime friend and associate of Sullivan's.[12] Graham was known for acts of philanthropy which had earned him popularity in his locality of the city.[12] With no political record, it was difficult for opponents to make political attacks on him.[12] Graham's platform placed a focus on eliminating graft, pointing specifically to kinds of graft which incumbent mayor Busse's administration had been disgraced by.[12] He also advocated a consolidation of Chicago and Cook County (something that would have served the political interests of Sullivan).[12] He wanted subways and universal transfers.[12] He supported "personal liberty", which was a euphemistic way of saying that he supported protecting access toalcoholic drinks.[12] Less than a week after he declared his candidacy, Graham received the formal endorsement of theDemocratic Party of Cook County Committee. He received 63 votes from the 84 members who were present at the vote (formerCook County sheriffJohn E. Traeger had received two votes and Harrison received no votes, and fourteen abstentions were made).[11] Graham's official campaign manager was Thomas F. Flynn.[11]
Other individuals that had been speculated as potential candidates for the Democratic nomination includedFred W. Blocki,John T. Connery, Henry Gibbons,Charles F. Gunther, Lockwood Honoré,Ernst Hummel,James Hamilton Lewis,Charles J. Vopicka, andCharles H. Wacker.[13]
The platforms of candidates did not heavily differ on substance.[11] The primary was heavily centered upon personal attacks between opponents.[11] In its (biased) coverage, Hearst'sExaminer emphasized Graham's connection with Sullivan, who the paper caricatured and portrayed as a villain.[11] The Examiner reported on and exaggerated Sullivan's involvement with the local utility trust People's Gas Light & Coke Company, and claimed that Graham was running to simply keep gas prices high.[11] Harrison used this narrative too, calling Sullivan the "gas dictator".[11] Harrison declared himself to be the "Anti-Roger C. Sullivan and Anti-Gas candidate".[11] He proclaimed that "Roger Sullivan is not a Democrat" and that neither was Graham.[11] Roger's supporters went to great lengths to describe Sullivan as an immense villain.[11] In an attempt to directly counter these attacks, for the first time in two decades, Sullivan delivered stump speeches, breaking his longtime policy of not delivering public speeches.[11]
Graham ran an extensivebillboard advertising campaign, utilizing as many as 3,000 billboards.[11] At first, most of his billboards used simple slogans such as "No Graft at the City Hall" and "A Seat for Every Pupil in the Public Schools".[11] Eventually, the campaign began using former Hearst quotes and cartoons from 1904 (when Harrison had opposed Hearst's presidential campaign) that vilified Harrison.[11]
Graham received a celebrity endorsement from world heavyweight boxing championJack Johnson.[11]
Dunne, while for much of the race having not been widely covered by the press and largely ignored by his opponents, attacked both Harrison and Graham.[11] He accused Harrison of sabotaging his reelection campaign in 1907, and called Graham a puppet of Sullivan, who he claimed had also for sabotaged his reelection campaign in 1907 .[11] After weeks of the press and both of his opponents largely disregarding him, Dunne's candidacy had begun to gain momentum, and the race began to move in his favor.[11] Dunne secured the endorsement of theChicago Federation of Labor.[11] The betting odds atJames Patrick O'Leary's betting house, which had originally been 4-5 for Graham, 8-5 for Harrison, and 5-2 for Dunne, had changed to 3-5 for Graham, 9-5 for Harrison and 7-7 for Dunne.[11]
By the closing weeks of the race, Graham's odds of winning had subsided.[11] There were even some reports that members of Sullivan's own coalition were quietly changing their support over to Dunne's campaign. In the closing weeks of the race, Dunne had ceased attacks on Graham and Roger Sullivan in his stump speeches. He focused his campaign instead on appealing to reformist sentiments that had been strengthened by the scandals of Busse's administration and the scandals ofWilliam Lorimer. Harrison, meanwhile, focused his campaign on convincing Democrats that he had strong electability for the general election, as well as using promises ofpatronage to his advantage. Harrison seized on reports that part of Sullivan's coalition was shifting their support to Dunne, painting Dunne as being tied to Sullivan.[11] By Election Day, Harrison and Dunne were seen as the only two with chances of winning the primary.[14]
The initial result was so narrow, with a 1,420 vote margin of victory of Harrison, that Dunne requested a recount. A recount was held, with Harrison remaining the victor.[11]
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | Carter Harrison IV | 55,116 | 36.94 | |
| Democratic | Edward Fitzsimmons Dunne | 53,696 | 35.98 | |
| Democratic | Andrew J. Graham | 38,578 | 25.85 | |
| Write-ins | Other | 1,829 | 1.23 | |
| Total votes | 149,219 | 100 | ||
Incumbent mayorFred A. Busse did not seek a second term. Despite the high hopes some supporters had for him, Busse's term had been rather uneventful in regards to achievements.[15] Additionally, Busse's administration was plagued by allegations of graft.[11] Busse reportedly believed that he would be able to defeat Merriam in the primary, but did not believe that he could beat a Democratic opponent in the general election.[16]
Harold L. Ickes convinced Merriam to run for mayor[17] and managed his campaign.[18][19] Merriam's campaign was financially supported byJulius Rosenwald,\ andVictor Lawson.[17]
Educator and politicianCharles E. Merriam (a strong proponent ofprogressivism) defeated a number of candidates, including restaurateur[20] John R. Thompson and formerIllinois TreasurerJohn F. Smulski.
Smulski was considered to be a leader in the city's Polish community.[11] He received the backing of GovernorCharles Deneen and noted businessman John R. Thompson.[11] He was seen as a natural heir to receive the support of Busse's political base.[11] He ran on a campaign calling for clean and efficient government rooted in "Progressive Republicanism" based on "the value of conservation as applied to municipal affairs as in the relation to state and national interests".[11] He aimed to launch "a straight challenge to the graft system, spoils system, and the special privilege system".[11] Some of Dunne's reformist colleagues backed this Republican candidate over their Dunne, includingRaymond Robins who campaigned extensively won Smulski's behalf.[11] TheChicago Federation of Labor endorsed him for the Republican nomination.[11]
Merriam benefited from a reformist sentiment that had been fed by revelations of municipal corruption that he had played a large role in originally uncovering.[11]
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | Charles E. Merriam | 53,089 | 47.95 | |
| Republican | John R. Thompson | 26,406 | 23.85 | |
| Republican | John F. Smulski | 23,138 | 20.90 | |
| Republican | Tom Murray | 2,799 | 2.53 | |
| Republican | John Edward Scully | 1,052 | 0.95 | |
| Write-in | Others | 4,237 | 3.83 | |
| Total votes | 110,721 | 100 | ||
TheProhibition Party nominated William A. Brubaker,[21] its 1907 mayoral nominee and the chairman of the Prohibition Central Committee of Cook County.[22]
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | William A. Brubaker | 433 | 100 | |
| Total votes | 433 | 100 | ||
William E. Rodriguez received the Socialist nomination.
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | William E. Rodriguez | 2,143 | 100 | |
| Total votes | 2,143 | 100 | ||
Both the Democratic and Republican Party had been divided by their contentious primaries.[12]
The general election was contentious.[23]
For his 1911 campaign, Harrison adopted many progressive policies.[23][24] The reform proposals which Harrison put forth were easily understood. "We plan to wage this fight on the theory that public utility corporations should be our servants instead of our masters. I believe that the gas company can sell its products not more than 70 cents for 1000 cubic feet."[23] He also championed theBurnham Plan of Chicago.[23] He portrayed himself as a pragmatic and experienced change-maker and Merriam as an overly-idealistic and bookish professor.[23]
To ward off potential immigrant support for Merriam, Harrison accused him of being a prohibitionist (a stance that was unpopular in the city's immigrant communities).[23] While Merriam was well connected to the "dry" side of the debate over alcohol, as a mayoral candidate he tried to frame his position on the matter as being more about home rule and democracy than an outright support of implementing such laws.[11] He claimed to be opposed toblue laws, and said that he would respect the will of the people of Chicago as mayor, which he recognized as being overwhelmingly opposed to prohibition.[11]
Allegations surfaced that Merriam had been a member of the Hyde Park Protective Association, which was anti saloons and had also earned a strongly anti-African American reputation.[11] Merriam denied these allegations.[11]
Due to Merriam's strong reformist views, many Republicanmachine operatives ofpolitical boss Lorimer had worked to strengthen Harrison's bid, sabotaging their own party's nominee.[25]
Socialist candidate William E. Rodgriguez pledged that as mayor, he would focus on, “the problems of theworking class,” which he stated included, “comfortable and sanitary dwellings at low cost” and “adequate street car service in the working-class districts.”[26] He also pledged to pursue and an efficient health department, fair pay, and for the public schools to be open for public meetings.[26]
Harrison was able to win a relatively-narrow victory.[23] Merriam returned to the board of aldermen in 1913.[27]
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | Carter Harrison IV] | 177,997 | 48.53 | |
| Republican | Charles E. Merriam | 160,673 | 43.81 | |
| Socialist | William E. Rodriguez | 24,825 | 6.77 | |
| Prohibition | William Brubaker | 2,239 | 0.61 | |
| Socialist Labor | Anthony Prince | 1,053 | 0.29 | |
| Turnout | 366,787 | 87 | ||
According to polls, Harrison received 68.91% of thePolish-American vote, while Merriam received 24.40% and Rodriguez received 5.60%.[29]
|  | |
| Elections |
| |
1 tenure as acting officeholder. 2 Election declared null and void. | ||
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
