Created on2012-03-30.00:00:00 last changed145 months ago
Additional note, February, 2014:
This issue is resolved by the resolution ofissue 1402, which removed the problematicsentence.
According to 11.4.5.3 [class.copy.ctor] paragraph 11, the last bullet,a defaulted move constructor for a class is defined as deleted if
a non-static data member or direct or virtual base class with a typethat does not have a move constructor and is not trivially copyable.
This means that an example like
struct S { S(); int &&r; } s{S()};is ill-formed. This is probably not intended.
(Note that the February, 2012 proposed resolution forissue 1402 also makes this exampleill-formed, because the move constructor is not declared and thecopy constructor is defined as deleted because of the rvalue-referencemember.)
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: +msg4972 |
| 2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drafting -> cd3 |
| 2012-11-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> drafting |
| 2012-03-30 00:00:00 | admin | create | |