Created on2011-06-28.00:00:00 last changed145 months ago
[Voted into the WP at the February, 2012 meeting;moved to DR at the October, 2012 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (August, 2011):
This issue is resolved by the resolution ofissue 1301.
According to the current rules of 9.5 [dcl.init], givena class like
struct A { int i; A() = default; A(int i): i(i) { } };value-initialization leavesA::i uninitialized. This seemslike an oversight.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drwp -> cd3 |
| 2012-11-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: +msg4171 |
| 2012-11-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> drwp |
| 2012-02-27 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: +msg3817 |
| 2012-02-27 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: ready -> dr |
| 2011-06-28 00:00:00 | admin | create | |