Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Wayback Machine
37 captures
30 Apr 2006 - 21 Dec 2025
NovDECJan
03
202320242025
success
fail
COLLECTED BY
TIMESTAMPS
loading
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20241203073123/https://near.jhuapl.edu/eros/history/eros_useful.html
This website provides access to the wealth of NEAR mission news and data. Though accurate at the time of publication, it is no longer being updated. For the latest on Johns Hopkins APL space missions, visitcivspace.jhuapl.edu.
Near Earth   Asteroid Rendezvous

Eros comes on stage, finally a useful asteroid

Discovery
On Saturday night, August 13, 1898, Eros was discoveredphotographically by Gustav Witt, director of the UraniaObservatory in Berlin, Germany.Six hundred and seventy five miles to the southwest it was independently photographedon the same date by August H. P. Charlois from Nice, France.August 14th was a Sunday and the next day (15th) was a holiday, so theFrench planet hunter did not examine his plate until August 16th, thuslosing the honor of being the discoverer or at least the codiscoverer.Within months about 20 prediscovery photographs taken at Harvard Observatorywere found, covering from October 1893 to June 1896.

Orbits of planets and asteroids may change over long time periods, so the abovevalues may also change but should be quite good for hundreds of years.

Close approaches
Earth reaches the point in its orbit closest to Eros' perihelion aboutJanuary 22 each year. If Eros is then at its perihelion pointthe distance from Earth will be minimum, about 14 million miles.But if Earth passes Eros (that is, Eros is in opposition) any time duringJanuary or February it is nearly as good. Favorable oppositions aresomewhat rare and unfortunately a very favorable oppositionoccured on January 9, 1894, at 0.15 AU, a few years before Eros was discovered.Unfavorable opositions occur in June, July, or August. A late Julyopposition can be as far as 0.77 AU. Eros was discovered at anunfavorable opposition, which occurred August 14, 1898 at a distance of0.74 AU, one day after discovery. The next opposition after discovery wason November 11, 1900 at a moderate distance of 0.32 AU, but Eros stayedfarther away until the favorable opposition of February 27, 1931 at 0.17 AU.The next favorable opposition was December 4, 1937 at 0.22 AU. Good oppositions occur in pairs, 7 years apart, at intervals of 37 or 44 years.The missed opposition of 1894 was closely repeated on January 13, 1975 at0.15 AU, the closest one observed so far.

Brightness and brightness variations
Eros at its brightest (a perihelion opposition) is about magnitude 7.2, visible to the unaided eye under dark skies to those with good eyesight, and brighter than any other asteroid except perhaps the first 4 or 5 discovered. The orbit of Eros is so eccentric that at the most unfavorable opposition, 0.77 AU, the magnitude of Eros would only be 10.8, and it would take good sized binoculars or a small telescope to see it. At its most unfavorable of all, at aphelion on the far side of the sun, just the opposite of opposition, it would be magnitude 13.5 at its brightest and 15 at its faintest. It would take a pretty big telescope (a mirror or lens larger than 12 inches) just to see it under very dark skies, but it would be close to the sun so never out of twilight.

The brightness of Eros varies with a period of about 5.3 hours. The amount of variation is not constant but ranges from almost nothing to about 1.5 magnitudes, depending where Eros and Earth are in their orbits. The brightness changes were early recognized as due to its rotation once every 5 hours 16 minutes, its elongated shape, and highly inclined equator (that is, its pole is tipped over quite far). When Eros' pole faces toward the earth the light variations are at a minimum since the cross-sectional area doesn't change. When the earth is in the plane of Eros' equator the light variations are at a maximum. This variation in the amplitude of the light curve was used in the past to determine which way the rotation pole of Eros is pointing. Later NEAR could watch the actual rotation as it flew by and after allowing for the motion of the spacecraft could determine the pole direction. The table below gives the increasingly accurate values.

Rotation pole estimates:
DateRight AscensionDeclination
Pre-1975 0h +31°
1975 data 0h 40m +16°
1998 NEAR 0h 45m ± 16m +20.5° ± 4°
1999 NEAR 1h 02m ± 15m +16.4° ± 1.8°
2000 NEAR 0h 45m 29s ± 12s +17.219° ± 0.05°

Many light curves have been measured for Eros in the past, one of the latestwasmade by the NEAR spacecraft itself. This light curve gives an ideaof Eros' brightness variations but does not correspond to ground basedlight curves since Eros was viewed at a larger phase angle (a crescentphase for a more spherical body) than ever possible from earth.

Early size and shape estimates
The light variations not only give information on the rotation poleorientation, but also give a fairly good idea of the overall shape.A 1937 estimate by Watson (not likely the same Watson that left moneyin his will to compute orbits for his asteroids) found that the brightnessvariations could be accounted for by assuming Eros had the shape of a cylinder22 miles long and 7 miles in diameter and rotating about an axis at rightangles to the long axis. A 1938 estimate by Roach and Stoddard found anellipsoid 22 miles long, 10 miles wide, and 5 miles thick, rotating aboutthe shortest axis. The 1945 astronomy book listing these estimates went onto state "The numerical values are rough, and Eros may be much more irregularin shape."The images from the NEAR spacecraft proved that Eros was indeed much moreirregular in shape, but also proved the early size estimates to be quitegood. NEAR gives a size for Eros of 22 x 8 x 8 miles, in very goodagreement with the past estimates.Flyby imagesandflyby images with the shape model show the irregular shape of Erosas imaged by NEAR.

The Eros close approach of 1930/1931 had a minimum distance of 0.174 AU which occured about Jan 30, 1931. Sometime during February two observersreported that, using a 26.5 inch telescope, they could detect an elongated image for Eros and see it rotate with the expected time period as indicatedby the light curve. This is a very interesting claim, could they possiblyhave detected the elongated shape of Eros by direct observation throughthat size telescope? A computer simulation of telescopic views of Erosallows that story to be investigated in more detail inAppendix A. There is even a simulated view of what the HubbleSpace telescope would see, also a discussion of telescope resolution.

Right after Eros was discovered in 1898 astronmers recognized its usefulnessin measuring the solar parallax. A 1928 book states the following:"In 1900 it came within about 47,000,000 kilometers (29 million miles) andthe favorable opportunity was utilized to organize an internationalcampaign for the determination of the distance between the earth and sun,with the result that we now know this value more exactly than ever before."

Eros would come even closer in 1931, 26 million km (16.2 million miles),but even before that "From the strong perturbations of Eros caused by theearth, Noteboom in 1921 derived the mass of the earth, which provided aparallax of 8.799 arc seconds." Note, this is a different method offinding the solar parallax, the dynamical Eros method.

"For the even more auspicious opposition of Eros in 1930-31 a greatcampaign of meridian and micrometer observation and photographic plateswas started, in which nearly forty northern and southern observatories tookpart with their best equipment. The reduction took 10 years, and in 1942,during the war, Spencer Jones, then at Greenwich, published the results.It was 8.790"±0.001". Considering the extent of the collaboration,the large amount of observational data, the perfection of the methodsused, the watchful elimination of sources of error, the careful discussion,we may say that another determination of the same or higher quality isnot to be expected in the near future."The measurements from this opposition were pushed to enough precisionthat the size of Eros was suspected of being a limiting factor, as tinyas it is it is still not a star-like pin point of light and that cancause some error in its position estimate.

It's not stated what is meant by "near future" but that was from a 1961book and in 1958 radar observations of the solar system started.Radar has given the best estimates of the solar parallax ever, butindependent checks on such important quantities are always desired and Eroswas still an important part of the picture in a study by Jay H. Lieske ofYale University Observatory. He used 8,639 Eros observations, fromprediscovery photographs of 1893 to observations from 1966.Dr. Lieske compared the observations of Eros to an ephemeris he computedtaking into account perturbations from all nine principal planets. Hefound the mass of the earth-moon system relative to the sun was1/328,915 with an uncertainty of ±4 in the denominator.Using this dynamical Eros method a solar parallax of8.79402"±0.00012" was derived. The corresponding length of theastronomical unit is 149,600,400±800 km(92,957,200±500 miles).A bit of inspection shows this to be a rather incredible amount ofprecision. Remember that the solar parallax is the angle that theearth's radius would subtend at one astronomical unit. An error of 0.00012" corresponds to an error in earth'sradius of 87 meters or 285 feet.That's less than the average height of the Coast Redwood trees inCalifornia (they average 300-350 feet (91-107 meters) in height.).Looking at it another way, if the earth's diameter is represented by a sixfoot tall man, then the error would be 1/8 the width of a human hair(assuming a 0.1 mm hair width).The Eros solar parallax compares very well with thevalue adopted by the International Astronomical Union in 1964 of149,600,000 km. It also compares well with the present value ofthe radar astronomical unit which is 149,598,000 km ± 200 km,corresponding to a solar parallax of 8.79414 ± 0.00004.Note the error here corresponds to less than 100 feet at the sun's distance.

In January 1975 Eros made its closest approach to Earth since itsdiscovery. Among the many observations made of it at that timewere ones made by radar. So Eros has provided three ways to findthe solar parallax: trigonometric (the angular shift against the backgroundstars as seen from different positions on earth), dynamical (using it tofind the earth-moon mass and from that the solar parallax), and directradar distance measurement.

With the solar parallax known quite well and radar being the techniqueof choice for its measurement, after the flyby of 1975 Eros somewhatfaded from interest. That is, until the NEAR mission came along.Eros' historical importance was not a factor in its choice as the target,it was a fairly easy asteroid to reach and had enough gravity to holda spacecraft in orbit.

Back:The Quest for the Solar ParallaxTable of Contents Main Eros page


References

1 Edward A. Fath,The Elements of Astronomy (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1928), p. 169.

2The NEAR Earth Asteroid Rendezvous A Giude to the Mission, the Spacecraft, and the People. (NEAR Press Kit) (Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 1998), p. 10.

3 Jean Meeus, "Eros' Closest Approach to the Earth",Sky and Telescope vol. 48, no. 4 (Oct 1974): p. 221.

4Ibid., p. 221.

5 Henry Norris Russell, Raymond Smith Dugan, and John Quincy Stewart,Astronomy (Boston: Ginn and Company, 1945), p. 356.

6Ibid., p. 356.

7Ibid., p. 356, 357.

8 Fred Whipple,Earth, Moon and Planets (Philadelphia: The Blakiston Company, 1941), p. 45.

9 Edward A. Fath,The Elements of Astronomy (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1928), p. 169.

10 A. Pannekoek,A History of Astronomy (New York: Interscience Publishers, 1961), p. 347.

11Ibid., p. 347.

12 "Solar Parallax"Britannica Online.
http://www.eb.com:180/bol/topic?eu=59856&sctn;=3#s_top
[Accessed 27 May 1999]

Copyright©1998-1999 JHUAPL All rights reserved.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp