- Letter
- Published:
Increasing wildfires threaten historic carbon sink of boreal forest soils
- Xanthe J. Walker1,
- Jennifer L. Baltzer2,
- Steven G. Cumming3,
- Nicola J. Day2,
- Christopher Ebert1,
- Scott Goetz1,4,5,
- Jill F. Johnstone6,7,
- Stefano Potter5,
- Brendan M. Rogers5,
- Edward A. G. Schuur1,8,
- Merritt R. Turetsky9,10 &
- …
- Michelle C. Mack1,8
Naturevolume 572, pages520–523 (2019)Cite this article
14kAccesses
184Citations
430Altmetric
Abstract
Boreal forest fires emit large amounts of carbon into the atmosphere primarily through the combustion of soil organic matter1,2,3. During each fire, a portion of this soil beneath the burned layer can escape combustion, leading to a net accumulation of carbon in forests over multiple fire events4. Climate warming and drying has led to more severe and frequent forest fires5,6,7, which threaten to shift the carbon balance of the boreal ecosystem from net accumulation to net loss1, resulting in a positive climate feedback8. This feedback will occur if organic-soil carbon that escaped burning in previous fires, termed ‘legacy carbon’, combusts. Here we use soil radiocarbon dating to quantitatively assess legacy carbon loss in the 2014 wildfires in the Northwest Territories of Canada2. We found no evidence for the combustion of legacy carbon in forests that were older than the historic fire-return interval of northwestern boreal forests9. In forests that were in dry landscapes and less than 60 years old at the time of the fire, legacy carbon that had escaped burning in the previous fire cycle was combusted. We estimate that 0.34 million hectares of young forests (<60 years) that burned in the 2014 fires could have experienced legacy carbon combustion. This implies a shift to a domain of carbon cycling in which these forests become a net source—instead of a sink—of carbon to the atmosphere over consecutive fires. As boreal wildfires continue to increase in size, frequency and intensity7, the area of young forests that experience legacy carbon combustion will probably increase and have a key role in shifting the boreal carbon balance.
This is a preview of subscription content,access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
Australian wildfires cause the largest stratospheric warming since Pinatubo and extends the lifetime of the Antarctic ozone hole
- Lilly Damany-Pearce
- ,Ben Johnson
- … Jim Haywood
Scientific ReportsOpen Access25 August 2022
Arctic Oscillation and Pacific-North American pattern dominated-modulation of fire danger and wildfire occurrence
- Flavio Justino
- ,David H. Bromwich
- … Sheng-Hung Wang
npj Climate and Atmospheric ScienceOpen Access24 June 2022
California wildfire spread derived using VIIRS satellite observations and an object-based tracking system
- Yang Chen
- ,Stijn Hantson
- … James T. Randerson
Scientific DataOpen Access30 May 2022
Access options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
204,58 €
only 4,01 € per issue
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.



Code availability
The R code for emissions is archived with the original publication2. The R code used for all analyses in this study is available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Bond-Lamberty, B., Peckham, S. D., Ahl, D. E. & Gower, S. T. Fire as the dominant driver of central Canadian boreal forest carbon balance.Nature450, 89–92 (2007).
Walker, X. J. et al. Cross-scale controls on carbon emissions from boreal forest megafires.Glob. Change Biol.24, 4251–4265 (2018).
Amiro, B. D. et al. Direct carbon emissions from Canadian forest fires, 1959–1999.Can. J. For. Res.31, 512–525 (2001).
Chapin, F. S. et al. Reconciling carbon-cycle concepts, terminology, and methods.Ecosystems9, 1041–1050 (2006).
Kasischke, E. S. & Turetsky, M. R. Recent changes in the fire regime across the North American boreal region—spatial and temporal patterns of burning across Canada and Alaska.Geophys. Res. Lett.33, 09703 (2006).
Balshi, M. S. et al. Assessing the response of area burned to changing climate in western boreal North America using a Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) approach.Glob. Change Biol.15, 578–600 (2009).
de Groot, W. J., Flannigan, M. D. & Cantin, A. S. Climate change impacts on future boreal fire regimes.For. Ecol. Manage.294, 35–44 (2013).
Li, F., Lawrence, D. M. & Bond-Lamberty, B. Impact of fire on global land surface air temperature and energy budget for the 20th century due to changes within ecosystems.Environ. Res. Lett.12, 044014 (2017); corrigendum12, 069501 (2017).
Johnstone, J. F. et al. Fire, climate change, and forest resilience in interior Alaska.Can. J. For. Res.40, 1302–1312 (2010).
Kelly, R. et al. Recent burning of boreal forests exceeds fire regime limits of the past 10,000 years.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA110, 13055–13060 (2013).
Johnson, E. A.Fire and Vegetation Dynamics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992).
Little, D., Farrell, E. & Collins, J. Land-use legacies and soil development in semi-natural ecosystems in the marginal uplands of Ireland.Catena30, 83–98 (1997).
Rogers, B. M., Soja, A. J., Goulden, M. L. & Randerson, J. T. Influence of tree species on continental differences in boreal fires and climate feedbacks.Nat. Geosci.8, 228–234 (2015).
Turetsky, M. R. et al. Recent acceleration of biomass burning and carbon losses in Alaskan forests and peatlands.Nat. Geosci.4, 27–31 (2011).
Boby, L. A., Schuur, E. A., Mack, M. C., Verbyla, D. & Johnstone, J. F. Quantifying fire severity, carbon, and nitrogen emissions in Alaska’s boreal forest.Ecol. Appl.20, 1633–1647 (2010).
Lorenz, K. & Lal, R. inCarbon Sequestration in Forest Ecosystems (eds Lorenz, K. & Lal, R.) 159–205 (Springer, 2010).
Harden, J. W. et al. The role of fire in the boreal carbon budget.Glob. Change Biol.6, 174–184 (2000).
Hoy, E. E., Turetsky, M. R. & Kasischke, E. S. More frequent burning increases vulnerability of Alaskan boreal black spruce forests.Environ. Res. Lett.11, 095001 (2016).
Walker, X. J. et al. Soil organic layer combustion in boreal black spruce and jack pine stands of the Northwest Territories, Canada.Int. J. Wildland Fire27, 125–134 (2018).
Johnstone, J. F., Hollingsworth, T. N. & Chapin, F. S.A Key for Predicting Postfire Successional Trajectories in Black Spruce Stands of Interior Alaska. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-767 (US Department of Agriculture, 2008).
Mack, M. C. et al. Carbon loss from an unprecedented Arctic tundra wildfire.Nature475, 489–492 (2011).
Levin, I. & Hesshaimer, V. Radiocarbon – a unique tracer of global carbon cycle dynamics.Radiocarbon42, 69–80 (2000).
Hayes, D. J. et al. Is the northern high-latitude land-based CO2 sink weakening?Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles25, GB3018 (2011).
van der Werf, G. R. et al. Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016.Earth Syst. Sci. Data9, 697–720 (2017).
Pellegrini, A. F. A. et al. Fire frequency drives decadal changes in soil carbon and nitrogen and ecosystem productivity.Nature553, 194–198 (2018).
Schuur, E. A. G. et al. Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback.Nature520, 171–179 (2015).
Minayeva, T. Yu. et al. Carbon accumulation in soils of forest and bog ecosystems of southern Valdai in the Holocene.Biol. Bull.35, 524–532 (2008).
Young, A. M., Higuera, P. E., Duffy, P. A. & Hu, F. S. Climatic thresholds shape northern high-latitude fire regimes and imply vulnerability to future climate change.Ecography40, 606–617 (2017).
Yue, X. et al. Impact of 2050 climate change on North American wildfire: consequences for ozone air quality.Atmos. Chem. Phys.15, 10033–10055 (2015).
Cook, E. R. & Kairiukstis, L.Methods of Dendrochronology: Applications in the Environmental Sciences (Springer Science and Business Media, 1990).
Trumbore, S. E. & Harden, J. W. Accumulation and turnover of carbon in organic and mineral soils of the BOREAS northern study area.J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.102, 28817–28830 (1997).
Melvin, A. M. et al. Differences in ecosystem carbon distribution and nutrient cycling linked to forest tree species composition in a mid-successional boreal forest.Ecosystems18, 1472–1488 (2015).
Trumbore, S. E. et al. inRadiocarbon and Climate Change: Mechanisms, Applications and Laboratory Techniques (eds Schuur, E. A. G. et al.) 279–315 (Springer, 2016).
Vogel, J. S., Southon, J. R. & Nelson, D. E. Catalyst and binder effects in the use of filamentous graphite for AMS.Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B29, 50–56 (1987).
Schuur, E. A. G., Druffel, E. R. & Trumbore, S. E.Radiocarbon and Climate Change: Mechanisms, Applications and Laboratory Techniques (Springer, 2016).
de Groot, W. J. et al. Estimating direct carbon emissions from Canadian wildland fires.Int. J. Wildland Fire16, 593–606 (2007).
Fraser, R. H., Li, Z. & Cihlar, J. Hotspot and NDVI differencing synergy (HANDS): a new technique for burned area mapping over boreal forest.Remote Sens. Environ.74, 362–376 (2000).
Burton, P. J., Parisien, M.-A., Hicke, J. A., Hall, R. J. & Freeburn, J. T. Large fires as agents of ecological diversity in the North American boreal forest.Int. J. Wildland Fire17, 754–767 (2008).
Parisien, M.-A. et al. Spatial patterns of forest fires in Canada, 1980–1999.Int. J. Wildland Fire15, 361–374 (2006).
Stocks, B. J. et al. Large forest fires in Canada, 1959–1997.J. Geophys. Res.107, 8149 (2002).
Walker, X. J. et al. ABoVE: wildfire carbon emissions and burned plot characteristics, NWT, CA, 2014–2016.ORNL DAAChttps://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1561 (2018).
R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing (2018).
Heinze, G., Ploner, M., Dunkler, D. & Southworth, H. logistf: Firth’s bias-reduced logistic regression (2016).
Heinze, G. & Schemper, M. A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression.Stat. Med.21, 2409–2419 (2002).
Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R.Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (Springer Science and Business Media, 2003).
Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R. & Huyvaert, K. P. AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.65, 23–35 (2011).
Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S. & Sturdivant, R. X.Applied Logistic Regression (John Wiley & Sons, 2013).
Walker, X. J. et al. ABoVE: characterization of carbon dynamics in burned forest plots, NWT, Canada, 2014.ORNL DAAChttps://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1664 (2019).
Acknowledgements
This project was supported by funding awarded to M.C.M. from NSF DEB RAPID grant number 1542150, and from the NASA Arctic Boreal and Vulnerability Experiment (ABoVE) Legacy Carbon grant NNX15AT71A; by NSERC Discovery Grants to J.F.J. and M.R.T.; by Government of the Northwest Territories Cumulative Impacts Monitoring Program Funding project number 170 to J.L.B.; by an NSERC-PDF to N.J.D.; and by Polar Knowledge Canada’s Northern Science Training Program funding awarded to Canadian field assistants. Logistical and financial support was provided through the Government of the Northwest Territories–Wilfrid Laurier University Partnership Agreement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Center for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
Xanthe J. Walker, Christopher Ebert, Scott Goetz, Edward A. G. Schuur & Michelle C. Mack
Biology Department, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Jennifer L. Baltzer & Nicola J. Day
Department of Wood and Forest Sciences, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
Steven G. Cumming
School of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems (SICCS), Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
Scott Goetz
Woods Hole Research Center, Falmouth, MA, USA
Scott Goetz, Stefano Potter & Brendan M. Rogers
Department of Biology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Jill F. Johnstone
Institute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA
Jill F. Johnstone
Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
Edward A. G. Schuur & Michelle C. Mack
Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Merritt R. Turetsky
Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
Merritt R. Turetsky
- Xanthe J. Walker
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Jennifer L. Baltzer
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Steven G. Cumming
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Nicola J. Day
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Christopher Ebert
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Scott Goetz
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Jill F. Johnstone
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Stefano Potter
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Brendan M. Rogers
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Edward A. G. Schuur
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Merritt R. Turetsky
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
- Michelle C. Mack
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Contributions
M.C.M. conceived the study with help from S.G., J.F.J., E.A.G.S. and X.J.W. M.C.M., X.J.W., J.F.J., M.R.T., J.L.B., S.G.C. and N.J.D. designed the field sampling. X.J.W. and N.J.D. collected the field data. X.J.W. and C.E. completed the laboratory work with technical support from M.C.M. and E.A.G.S. X.J.W. analysed the data with help from M.C.M. and E.A.G.S. B.M.R. and S.P. provided the data and wrote the Methods section ‘Estimation of young burned area’. X.J.W. wrote the manuscript and all co-authors edited the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Correspondence toXanthe J. Walker.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Peer review informationNature thanks Mary Edwards and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Fig. 1 Area burned in the 2014 wildfires in the Northwest Territories of Canada that was considered as young burned (younger than 60 years at the time of fire).
a,b, Percentage (a) and cumulative percentage (b) of area burned in the 2014 wildfires, expressed in years since the fire and year of burn. Ina, the dashed line represents the best fit between the observed values in the fire databases and the solid line represents the linear extrapolation to 1954. Grey shading indicates the standard error of the observed values and red shading indicates the predicted standard error (y = 0.01430x + 0.01097;R2 = 0.09;P < 0.05).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walker, X.J., Baltzer, J.L., Cumming, S.G.et al. Increasing wildfires threaten historic carbon sink of boreal forest soils.Nature572, 520–523 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1474-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
Share this article
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
This article is cited by
California wildfire spread derived using VIIRS satellite observations and an object-based tracking system
- Yang Chen
- Stijn Hantson
- James T. Randerson
Scientific Data (2022)
The black carbon cycle and its role in the Earth system
- Alysha I. Coppola
- Sasha Wagner
- Matthew W. Jones
Nature Reviews Earth & Environment (2022)
Fire effects on the persistence of soil organic matter and long-term carbon storage
- Adam F. A. Pellegrini
- Jennifer Harden
- Robert B. Jackson
Nature Geoscience (2022)
Arctic Oscillation and Pacific-North American pattern dominated-modulation of fire danger and wildfire occurrence
- Flavio Justino
- David H. Bromwich
- Sheng-Hung Wang
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science (2022)
Rewetting global wetlands effectively reduces major greenhouse gas emissions
- Junyu Zou
- Alan D. Ziegler
- Zhenzhong Zeng
Nature Geoscience (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by ourTerms andCommunity Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.