History is littered with hundreds of conflicts over the future of a community, group, location or business that were "resolved" when one of the parties stepped ahead and destroyed what was there. With the original point of contention destroyed, the debates would fall to the wayside. Archive Team believes that by duplicated condemned data, the conversation and debate can continue, as well as the richness and insight gained by keeping the materials. Our projects have ranged in size from a single volunteer downloading the data to a small-but-critical site, to over 100 volunteers stepping forward to acquire terabytes of user-created data to save for future generations.
The main site for Archive Team is atarchiveteam.org and contains up to the date information on various projects, manifestos, plans and walkthroughs.
This collection contains the output of many Archive Team projects, both ongoing and completed. Thanks to the generous providing of disk space by the Internet Archive, multi-terabyte datasets can be made available, as well as in use by theWayback Machine, providing a path back to lost websites and work.
Our collection has grown to the point of having sub-collections for the type of data we acquire. If you are seeking to browse the contents of these collections, the Wayback Machine is the best first stop. Otherwise, you are free to dig into the stacks to see what you may find.
The Archive Team Panic Downloads are full pulldowns of currently extant websites, meant to serve as emergency backups for needed sites that are in danger of closing, or which will be missed dearly if suddenly lost due to hard drive crashes or server failures.
This extensible open source toolkit can help you examine, report, and mitigate discrimination and bias in machine learning models throughout the AI application lifecycle. We invite you to use and improve it.
Learn more about fairness and bias mitigation concepts, terminology, and tools before you begin.
Step through the process of checking and remediating bias in an interactive web demo that shows a sample of capabilities available in this toolkit.
Watch videos to learn more about AI Fairness 360.
Read a paper describing how we designed AI Fairness 360.
Step through a set of in- depth examples that introduces developers to code that checks and mitigates bias in different industry and application domains.
Join our AIF360 Slack Channel to ask questions, make comments and tell stories about how you use the toolkit.
Open a directory of Jupyter Notebooks in GitHub that provide working examples of bias detection and mitigation in sample datasets. Then share your own notebooks!
You can add new metrics and algorithms in GitHub. Share Jupyter notebooks show-casing how you have examined and mitigated bias in your machine learning application.
Use to mitigate bias in training data. Modifies training data features and labels.
Use to mitgate bias in training data. Modifies the weights of different training examples.
Use to mitigate bias in classifiers. Uses adversarial techniques to maximize accuracy and reduce evidence of protected attributes in predictions.
Use to mitigate bias in predictions. Changes predictions from a classifier to make them fairer.
Use to mitigate bias in training data. Edits feature values to improve group fairness.
Use to mitigate bias in training data. Learns fair representations by obfuscating information about protected attributes.
Use to mitigate bias in classifiers. Adds a discrimination-aware regularization term to the learning objective.
Use to mitigate bias in predictions. Optimizes over calibrated classifier score outputs that lead to fair output labels.
Use to mitigate bias in predictions. Modifies the predicted labels using an optimization scheme to make predictions fairer.
Use to mitigate bias in classifier. Meta algorithm that takes the fairness metric as part of the input and returns a classifier optimized for that metric.
The difference of the rate of favorable outcomes received by the unprivileged group to the privileged group.
The difference of true positive rates between the unprivileged and the privileged groups.
The average difference of false positive rate (false positives/negatives) and true positive rate (true positives/positives) between unprivileged and privileged groups.
The ratio of rate of favorable outcome for the unprivileged group to that of the privileged group.
Measures the inequality in benefit allocation for individuals.
The average Euclidean distance between the samples from the two datasets.
The average Mahalanobis distance between the samples from the two datasets.
The average Manhattan distance between the samples from the two datasets.
About this site
AI Fairness 360 was created byIBM Research anddonated by IBM to theLinux Foundation AI & Data.
Additional research sites that advance other aspects ofTrusted AI include:
AI Explainability 360
AI Privacy 360
Adversarial Robustness 360
Uncertainty Quantification 360
AI FactSheets 360