Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Wayback Machine
17 captures
17 Mar 2020 - 04 Dec 2023
JunJULAug
09
202020212022
success
fail
COLLECTED BY
TIMESTAMPS
loading
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20210709205248/https://www.jstor.org/stable/43700653
Skip to Main Content
Have library access? Log in through your library
Weed Science
journal article
In-Field Movement of Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmen) and Its Impact on Cotton Lint Yield: Evidence Supporting a Zero-Threshold Strategy
Jason K. Norsworthy, Griff Griffith, Terry Griffin, Muthukumar Bagavathiannan and Edward E. Gbur
Weed Science
Vol. 62, No. 2 (April-June 2014), pp. 237-249 (13 pages)
Published By: Cambridge University Press
Weed Science
https://www.jstor.org/stable/43700653
Cite this Item

Why register for an account?

  • Access supplemental materials and multimedia.
  • Unlimited access to purchased articles.
  • Ability to save and export citations.
  • Custom alerts when new content is added.
Register/LoginProceed to Cart×Close Overlay
Preview
Preview
Abstract

This research was aimed at understanding how far and how fast glyphosate-resistant (GR) Palmer amaranth will spread in cotton and the consequences associated with allowing a single plant to escape control. Specifically, research was conducted to determine the collective impact of seed dispersal agents on the in-field expansion of GR Palmer amaranth, and any resulting yield reductions in an enhanced GR cotton system where glyphosate was solely used for weed control. Introduction of 20,000 GR Palmer amaranth seed into a 1-m² circle in February 2008 was used to represent survival through maturity of a single GR female Palmer amaranth escape from the 2007 growing season. The experiment was conducted in four different cotton fields (0.53 to 0.77 ha in size) with no history of Palmer amaranth infestation. In the subsequent year, Palmer amaranth was located as far as 114 m downslope, creating a separate patch. It is believed that rainwater dispersed the seeds from the original area of introduction. In less than 2 yr after introduction, GR Palmer amaranth expanded to the boundaries of all fields, infesting over 20% of the total field area. Spatial regression estimates indicated that no yield penalty was associated with Palmer amaranth density the first year after introduction, which is not surprising since only 0.56% of the field area was infested with GR Palmer amaranth in 2008. Lint yield reductions as high as 17 kg ha⁻¹ were observed 2 yr after the introduction (in 2009). Three years after the introduction (2010), Palmer amaranth infested 95 to 100% of the area in all fields, resulting in complete crop loss since it was impossible to harvest the crop. These results indicate that resistance management options such as a "zero-tolerance threshold" should be used in managing or mitigating the spread of GR Palmer amaranth. This research demonstrates the need for proactive resistance management.

Journal Information

Weed Science publishes original research and scholarship focused on understanding "why" phenomena occur. As such, it focuses on fundamental research directly related to all aspects of weed science.

Publisher Information

Cambridge University Press (www.cambridge.org) is the publishing division of the University of Cambridge, one of the world’s leading research institutions and winner of 81 Nobel Prizes. Cambridge University Press is committed by its charter to disseminate knowledge as widely as possible across the globe. It publishes over 2,500 books a year for distribution in more than 200 countries.Cambridge Journals publishes over 250 peer-reviewed academic journals across a wide range of subject areas, in print and online. Many of these journals are the leading academic publications in their fields and together they form one of the most valuable and comprehensive bodies of research available today. For more information, visit http://journals.cambridge.org.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to ourTerms and Conditions
Weed Science © 2014Cambridge University Press
Request Permissions


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp