Celiac Disease

 

R. JOHN PRESUTTI, DO, JOHN R. CANGEMI, MD, HARVEY D. CASSIDY, MD, and DAVID A. HILL, DO

Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida

Am Fam Physician. 2007 Dec 15;76(12):1795-1802.

 Patient information: See related handout onceliac disease, written by the authors of this article.

ACF  This article exemplifies the AAFP 2007 Annual Clinical Focus on management of chronic illness.

As many as one in every 100 to 200 persons in the United States has celiac disease, a condition resulting from an inappropriate immune response to the dietary protein gluten. The manifestations of celiac disease range from no symptoms to overt malabsorption with involvement of multiple organ systems and an increased risk of some malignancies. When celiac disease is suspected, initial testing for serum immunoglobulin A (IgA) tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibodies is useful because it offers adequate sensitivity and specificity at a reasonable cost. A positive IgA tTG result should prompt small bowel biopsy with at least four tissue samples to confirm the diagnosis. However, 3 percent of patients with celiac disease have IgA deficiency. Therefore, if the serum IgA tTG result is negative but clinical suspicion for the disease is high, a serum total IgA level may be considered. Screening of asymptomatic patients is not recommended. The basis of treatment for celiac disease is adherence to a gluten-free diet, which may eliminate symptoms within a few months. Patients should also be evaluated for osteoporosis, thyroid dysfunction, and deficiencies in folic acid, vitamin B12, fat-soluble vitamins, and iron, and treated appropriately. Serum IgA tTG levels typically decrease as patients maintain a glutenfree diet.

Celiac disease (or celiac sprue) is an autoimmune disorder with a prevalence of approximately 0.5 to 1 percent in the United States.1,2 It is associated with inflammation of the mucosa of the small intestine, which may result in villous atrophy. Celiac disease produces a variety of gastrointestinal symptoms that can begin at almost any age. Treatment consists of removal of gluten proteins from the diet, which improves and often eliminates the small intestine pathology.

Pathophysiology and Epidemiology

Gluten proteins occur throughout our food supply and are relatively resistant to digestive enzymes. Incomplete digestion in the upper gastrointestinal tract results in peptide derivatives that are highly immunogenic to patients with celiac disease. In affected patients, after absorption in the small intestine these proteins interact with the antigen-presenting cells in the lamina propria causing an inflammatory reaction that targets the mucosa of the small intestine. Rye, wheat, and barley, alone or as ingredients in many processed foods, contain gluten and may elicit this immune response.

View/Print Table

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Key clinical recommendationEvidence ratingReferences

IgA tissue transglutaminase antibodies and IgA endomysial antibodies are appropriate first-line serologic tests to rule in celiac disease.

C

5,6,16,17,20

Because IgA deficiency can cause false-negative results, total IgA levels should be measured in patients at high risk for celiac disease who have negative results on serologic testing.

C

2,5,17

Small bowel biopsy should be performed to confirm the diagnosis of celiac disease in patients with abnormal results on serologic testing.

C

2,5,6,16

A gluten-free diet is recommended as the primary treatment for celiac disease.

A

2,23,26


IgA = immunoglobulin A.

A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, see page 1760 orhttps://www.aafp.org/afpsort.xml.

SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Key clinical recommendationEvidence ratingReferences

IgA tissue transglutaminase antibodies and IgA endomysial antibodies are appropriate first-line serologic tests to rule in celiac disease.

C

5,6,16,17,20

Because IgA deficiency can cause false-negative results, total IgA levels should be measured in patients at high risk for celiac disease who have negative results on serologic testing.

C

2,5,17

Small bowel biopsy should be performed to confirm the diagnosis of celiac disease in patients with abnormal results on serologic testing.

C

2,5,6,16

A gluten-free diet is recommended as the primary treatment for celiac disease.

A

2,23,26


IgA = immunoglobulin A.

A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, see page 1760 orhttps://www.aafp.org/afpsort.xml.

Two factors are involved in the development of celiac disease—consumption of gluten proteins and genetic predisposition. It is not completely understood how gluten sensitivity begins or whether early exposure to gluten proteins increases the risk of sensitivity. However, almost all patients with celiac disease express human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8, which facilitate the immune response against gluten proteins.2 Concordance rates of 70 to 75 percent among monozygotic twins and 5 to 22 percent among first-degree relatives have been reported.1,2,3  Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, Down syndrome, Turner's syndrome, or an associated autoimmune disorder are at increased risk of celiac disease(Table 115).

View/Print Table

Table 1

Risk Factors for Celiac Disease

Risk factorPrevalence of celiac disease among those with risk factor (%)

Dermatitis herpetiformis

100

First-degree relative with celiac disease

5 to 22

Autoimmune thyroid disease

1.5 to 14

Down syndrome

5 to 12

Turner's syndrome

2 to 10

Type 1 diabetes mellitus

Children

3 to 8

Adults

2 to 5


Information from references1 through5.

Table 1

Risk Factors for Celiac Disease

Risk factorPrevalence of celiac disease among those with risk factor (%)

Dermatitis herpetiformis

100

First-degree relative with celiac disease

5 to 22

Autoimmune thyroid disease

1.5 to 14

Down syndrome

5 to 12

Turner's syndrome

2 to 10

Type 1 diabetes mellitus

Children

3 to 8

Adults

2 to 5


Information from references1 through5.

Clinical Diagnosis

Many patients with celiac disease have diarrhea, borborygmus, abdominal pain, and weight loss(Table 2611). However, the disease can affect several organ systems, including the skin, liver, nervous system, bones, reproductive system, and endocrine system.12,13 Dermatitis herpetiformis(Figure 1), a pathognomonic skin eruption, occurs in 10 to 20 percent of patients with celiac disease.14

View/Print Table

Table 2

Signs and Symptoms of Celiac Disease

Sign or symptomPrevalence in patients with celiac disease (%)

Common

Diarrhea

45 to 85

Fatigue

78 to 80

Borborygmus

35 to 72

Abdominal pain

34 to 64

Weight loss

45

Abdominal distention

33

Flatulence

28

Uncommon or rare

Osteopenia or osteoporosis

1 to 34

Abnormal liver function

2 to 19

Vomiting

5 to 16

Iron-deficiency anemia

10 to 15

Neurologic dysfunction

8 to 14

Constipation

3 to 12

Nausea

4


Information from references6 through11.

Table 2

Signs and Symptoms of Celiac Disease

Sign or symptomPrevalence in patients with celiac disease (%)

Common

Diarrhea

45 to 85

Fatigue

78 to 80

Borborygmus

35 to 72

Abdominal pain

34 to 64

Weight loss

45

Abdominal distention

33

Flatulence

28

Uncommon or rare

Osteopenia or osteoporosis

1 to 34

Abnormal liver function

2 to 19

Vomiting

5 to 16

Iron-deficiency anemia

10 to 15

Neurologic dysfunction

8 to 14

Constipation

3 to 12

Nausea

4


Information from references6 through11.

View/Print Figure

Figure 1.

Dermatitis herpetiformis.


Figure 1.

Dermatitis herpetiformis.

Because the small intestine can compensate if the degree of involvement is limited, many patients (up to 38 percent) are asymptomatic.2,15 The disease is often diagnosed only through careful attention to clinical signs such as iron deficiency anemia or osteoporosis, through screening of patients at increased risk, or through other testing. One report found that up to 36 percent of patients with celiac disease had previously received a diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome.9  Common conditions that should be considered in the differential diagnosis are listed inTable 3.10 A suggested diagnostic approach to patients with possible celiac disease is summarized inFigure 2.

View/Print Table

Table 3

Differential Diagnosis of Celiac Disease

Anorexia nervosa

Autoimmune enteropathy

Bacterial overgrowth

Collagenous sprue

Crohn's disease

Giardiasis

Human immunodeficiency virus enteropathy

Hypogammaglobulinemia

Infective gastroenteritis

Intestinal lymphoma

Irritable bowel syndrome

Ischemic enteritis

Lactose intolerance

Other immunodeficiency states

Soy protein intolerance

Tropical sprue

Tuberculosis

Whipple's disease

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome


Information from reference10.

Table 3

Differential Diagnosis of Celiac Disease

Anorexia nervosa

Autoimmune enteropathy

Bacterial overgrowth

Collagenous sprue

Crohn's disease

Giardiasis

Human immunodeficiency virus enteropathy

Hypogammaglobulinemia

Infective gastroenteritis

Intestinal lymphoma

Irritable bowel syndrome

Ischemic enteritis

Lactose intolerance

Other immunodeficiency states

Soy protein intolerance

Tropical sprue

Tuberculosis

Whipple's disease

Zollinger-Ellison syndrome


Information from reference10.

View/Print Figure

Evaluation for Celiac Disease

Figure 2.

Algorithm for an approach to patients with possible celiac disease. (IgA = immunoglobulin A; tTG = tissue transglutaminase.)

Evaluation for Celiac Disease


Figure 2.

Algorithm for an approach to patients with possible celiac disease. (IgA = immunoglobulin A; tTG = tissue transglutaminase.)

Diagnostic Tests

No single test has been universally accepted as the standard for diagnosing celiac disease. However, serologic testing and small bowel biopsy are highly sensitive and specific in making the diagnosis, particularly in patients with symptoms suggestive of celiac disease and in those at increased risk (e.g., those with a family history of the disease, those with an associated autoimmune disorder).16 Diagnostic testing must be performed while the patient is on a diet that includes gluten-containing foods.

Patients with persistent gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhea, malabsorption, weight loss, abdominal pain, gas, and bloating should be evaluated for celiac disease. Diagnostic testing should also be considered in patients with premature osteopenia or osteoporosis, unexplained iron deficiency anemia, or unexplained liver abnormalities, and in high-risk patients with any of these findings or unexplained gastrointestinal symptoms(Table 46). Screening in asymptomatic patients is not recommended.

View/Print Table

Table 4

American Gastroenterological Association Institute Recommendations for Celiac Disease Screening

Consider testing in symptomatic patients at high risk for celiac disease with any of the following conditions:

Autoimmune hepatitis

Down syndrome

Premature onset of osteoporosis

Primary biliary cirrhosis

Unexplained elevations in liver transaminase levels

Unexplained iron deficiency anemia

Test selectively as part of the medical evaluation when symptoms could be secondary to celiac disease:

Autoimmune thyroid disease

Cerebellar ataxia

First- or second-degree relative with celiac disease

Irritable bowel syndrome

Peripheral neuropathy

Recurrent migraine

Selective immunoglobulin A deficiency

Short stature (in children)

Sjögren's syndrome

Turner's syndrome

Type 1 diabetes mellitus

Unexplained delayed puberty

Unexplained recurrent fetal loss


Information from reference6.

Table 4

American Gastroenterological Association Institute Recommendations for Celiac Disease Screening

Consider testing in symptomatic patients at high risk for celiac disease with any of the following conditions:

Autoimmune hepatitis

Down syndrome

Premature onset of osteoporosis

Primary biliary cirrhosis

Unexplained elevations in liver transaminase levels

Unexplained iron deficiency anemia

Test selectively as part of the medical evaluation when symptoms could be secondary to celiac disease:

Autoimmune thyroid disease

Cerebellar ataxia

First- or second-degree relative with celiac disease

Irritable bowel syndrome

Peripheral neuropathy

Recurrent migraine

Selective immunoglobulin A deficiency

Short stature (in children)

Sjögren's syndrome

Turner's syndrome

Type 1 diabetes mellitus

Unexplained delayed puberty

Unexplained recurrent fetal loss


Information from reference6.

SEROLOGY

The most common serologic markers used for celiac disease screening are serum immunoglobulin A (IgA) endomysial antibodies and IgA tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibodies.1719 Testing for gliadin antibodies is no longer recommended because of the low sensitivity and specificity for celiac disease. Most studies have found the sensitivity and specificity of testing for IgA endomysial and tTG antibodies to be greater than 95 percent.16,20 However, the sensitivity depends on the degree of mucosal involvement. In addition, because tTG is the autoantigen recognized by the endomysial antibody, there is rarely a need to perform both tests.16 The tTG antibody test is less costly because it uses an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; it is the recommended single serologic test for celiac disease screening in the primary care setting.6,16,20

Most studies on celiac disease testing have involved research populations with a high prevalence of the disease (up to 35 to 45 percent). When the prevalence is low, as in the general U.S. population (approximately 0.5 to 1 percent1,2 ), the risk of a false-positive result is high even with an accurate test(Table 515). Therefore, confirmatory testing, including small bowel biopsy, is advised.

View/Print Table

Table 5

Implications of Screening for Celiac Disease in Different Populations

Population (approximate prevalence of celiac disease)Positive predictive value (%)Negative predictive value (%)True positiveTrue negativeFalse positiveFalse negative

General population (1%)

49.7

99.9

9,800

980,100

9,900

200

First-degree relatives (5%)

83.7

99.9

49,000

940,500

9,500

1,000

First-degree relatives, high clinical suspicion (30%)

97.7

99.1

294,000

693,000

7,000

6,000


note:Assumes 98 percent sensitivity and 99 percent specificity of tumor markers in 1 million patients.

Information from references1 through5.

Table 5

Implications of Screening for Celiac Disease in Different Populations

Population (approximate prevalence of celiac disease)Positive predictive value (%)Negative predictive value (%)True positiveTrue negativeFalse positiveFalse negative

General population (1%)

49.7

99.9

9,800

980,100

9,900

200

First-degree relatives (5%)

83.7

99.9

49,000

940,500

9,500

1,000

First-degree relatives, high clinical suspicion (30%)

97.7

99.1

294,000

693,000

7,000

6,000


note:Assumes 98 percent sensitivity and 99 percent specificity of tumor markers in 1 million patients.

Information from references1 through5.

In some situations, testing for HLA phenotypes DQ2 or DQ8 may be useful.14 HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8, or both, are found in approximately 40 percent of the general population, but in more than 99 percent of patients with celiac disease. If these genetic markers are absent, celiac disease is unlikely.2

Approximately 3 percent of patients with celiac disease have IgA deficiency,5 which may cause a false-negative serologic test result. The American Gastroenterological Association recommends measuring total IgA levels only if IgA deficiency is suspected, or if serum tTG is negative but celiac disease is still suspected.2

Because serologic markers may have false-positive or false-negative results, they cannot be relied on for the diagnosis of celiac disease. However, positive serologic markers can indicate the need for further evaluation with small bowel biopsy, particularly in patients at increased risk. Conversely, negative serologic markers in low-risk patients without IgA deficiency have a high negative predictive value, and small bowel biopsy generally is not needed. Negative markers should never prevent small bowel biopsy if the index of suspicion for celiac disease is high.

SMALL BOWEL BIOPSY

Despite the advent of clinically accurate serologies, a small bowel biopsy is required to confirm the diagnosis of celiac disease for most patients.16 Biopsy should also be considered in patients with negative serologic test results who are at high risk or in whom the physician strongly suspects celiac disease.

However, the mucosal changes may vary from partial to total villous atrophy, or may be characterized by subtle crypt lengthening or increased epithelial lymphocytes. Furthermore, these changes may be patchy, and mucosal abnormalities on intestinal biopsy(Figure 3) may be missed. Variations in the severity of pathologic changes on biopsy may obscure the typical changes found in celiac disease, and patients with latent celiac disease may have normal results on small bowel biopsy.16 Therefore, to avoid false-negative results on endoscopic biopsy, most authorities recommend obtaining at least four tissue samples, which increases the sensitivity of the test.5

View/Print Figure

Figure 3.

Endoscopic and biopsy findings in patients with and without celiac disease.(A) High-definition endoscopic photo of normal small intestine. The villi are clearly visible with no evidence of atrophy or scalloping of the folds.(B) Biopsy specimen of normal small intestine (hematoxylineosin; original magnification, × 100).(C) Pill-Cam image of small intestine in a patient with celiac disease, showing scalloping of the mucosal folds(arrows) characteristic of a malabsorption pattern. There is also evidence of villous atrophy compared with normal.(D) Biopsy specimen of small intestine in a patient with celiac disease (hematoxylineosin; original magnification, × 100). Note the loss of villous architecture.


Figure 3.

Endoscopic and biopsy findings in patients with and without celiac disease.(A) High-definition endoscopic photo of normal small intestine. The villi are clearly visible with no evidence of atrophy or scalloping of the folds.(B) Biopsy specimen of normal small intestine (hematoxylineosin; original magnification, × 100).(C) Pill-Cam image of small intestine in a patient with celiac disease, showing scalloping of the mucosal folds(arrows) characteristic of a malabsorption pattern. There is also evidence of villous atrophy compared with normal.(D) Biopsy specimen of small intestine in a patient with celiac disease (hematoxylineosin; original magnification, × 100). Note the loss of villous architecture.

CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY

The biopsy is neither 100 percent sensitive nor specific for celiac disease; other clinical entities, such as infection (e.g., giardiasis, human immunodeficiency virus infection), enteritis, bacterial overgrowth, autoimmune enteropathy, or lymphoma, may have a similar appearance. Capsule endoscopy in this setting may be helpful to distinguish lesions in the jejunum or ileum beyond the reach of the standard endoscope if the diagnosis is in question.21

Treatment

Treatment of celiac disease is based on avoidance of food products that contain gluten proteins. It is essential that the diagnosis of celiac disease be confirmed before submitting patients to this therapy. Key elements to successful treatment include the motivation of the patient, the attentiveness of the physician to comorbidities that need to be addressed, and the assistance of a dietitian with expertise in gluten-free diets.

THE GLUTEN-FREE DIET

Wheat, rye, and barley are the basic grain elements that must be avoided. The role of oats is controversial. Although they provide an excellent source of nutrients and fiber, most commercial products are contaminated with other grains, and only a purified source can be used. The widespread use of glutens in food processing requires patients to pay close attention to labels.Table 6 lists common foods that contain gluten and those that are gluten free.22

View/Print Table

Table 6

Gluten Content of Some Common Foods

CategoryContains glutenUsually gluten free

Breads, cereals, rice, and pasta

Bread or pasta made from barley, bran, gluten flour, graham flour, oat bran,* rye, wheat-based semolina, spelt, wheat, or wheat germ

Cereals made with wheat, rye, barley, or oats, or with malt extract or malt flavorings

Bread, cereals, or pasta made from arrowroot corn, buckwheat, corn, cornmeal, hominy, millet, potato starch, rice, rice bran, sago, soy, or tapioca

Puffed corn

Rice (brown or white); rice noodles

Vegetables and beans

Creamed or breaded vegetables; some French fries

Canned baked beans

Plain, fresh, frozen, or canned vegetables

Soybeans

Fruits

Some commercial fruit pie fillings and dried fruit

All fruits

Dairy

Malted milk; some milk drinks and flavored or frozen yogurt

Milk and milk products that do not contain gluten additives

Meat, poultry, fish, shellfish, eggs, and nuts

Any prepared with barley, oats, rye, wheat, or gluten stabilizers or fillers, including some cold cuts, frankfurters, sandwich spreads, sausages, and canned meats

Plain meat, poultry, fish, and shellfish

Cold cuts, frankfurters, sandwich spreads, and sausages that do not contain gluten fillers

Eggs; nuts and peanut butter

Snacks and condiments

Many commercial salad dressings, prepared soups, condiments, and sauces

Butter and margarine

Honey; jam and jelly; molasses; sugar

Coconut; hard candy; marshmallows; meringue; plain chocolate

Beverages

Flavored instant coffees; herbal teas

Hot cocoa mixes; nondairy cream substitutes

Pure instant or ground coffee; tea

Carbonated drinks; fruit juices


*—Pure oats are usually well tolerated but patients should be cautioned that oat products are frequently contaminated with gluten during processing.

note:This is not a complete list. Patients should read food labels to confirm that food is gluten free. Patients should also check with their pharmacists because some medications contain gluten.

Information from reference22.

Table 6

Gluten Content of Some Common Foods

CategoryContains glutenUsually gluten free

Breads, cereals, rice, and pasta

Bread or pasta made from barley, bran, gluten flour, graham flour, oat bran,* rye, wheat-based semolina, spelt, wheat, or wheat germ

Cereals made with wheat, rye, barley, or oats, or with malt extract or malt flavorings

Bread, cereals, or pasta made from arrowroot corn, buckwheat, corn, cornmeal, hominy, millet, potato starch, rice, rice bran, sago, soy, or tapioca

Puffed corn

Rice (brown or white); rice noodles

Vegetables and beans

Creamed or breaded vegetables; some French fries

Canned baked beans

Plain, fresh, frozen, or canned vegetables

Soybeans

Fruits

Some commercial fruit pie fillings and dried fruit

All fruits

Dairy

Malted milk; some milk drinks and flavored or frozen yogurt

Milk and milk products that do not contain gluten additives

Meat, poultry, fish, shellfish, eggs, and nuts

Any prepared with barley, oats, rye, wheat, or gluten stabilizers or fillers, including some cold cuts, frankfurters, sandwich spreads, sausages, and canned meats

Plain meat, poultry, fish, and shellfish

Cold cuts, frankfurters, sandwich spreads, and sausages that do not contain gluten fillers

Eggs; nuts and peanut butter

Snacks and condiments

Many commercial salad dressings, prepared soups, condiments, and sauces

Butter and margarine

Honey; jam and jelly; molasses; sugar

Coconut; hard candy; marshmallows; meringue; plain chocolate

Beverages

Flavored instant coffees; herbal teas

Hot cocoa mixes; nondairy cream substitutes

Pure instant or ground coffee; tea

Carbonated drinks; fruit juices


*—Pure oats are usually well tolerated but patients should be cautioned that oat products are frequently contaminated with gluten during processing.

note:This is not a complete list. Patients should read food labels to confirm that food is gluten free. Patients should also check with their pharmacists because some medications contain gluten.

Information from reference22.

Adhering to a gluten-free diet can be extremely difficult and can have a significant negative impact on perceived quality of life. It may produce considerable psychological, emotional, and economic stresses.23 However, appropriate diet is essential in the recovery of patients with celiac disease, and formal consultation with a trained dietitian is necessary. The dietitian plays a vital role in helping the patient successfully adapt to the necessary behavioral changes and may provide much of the required follow-up. National celiac disease support organizations(seethe accompanying patient handout) can provide patients invaluable resources for information and support.

COMORBIDITIES

The physician should ensure that nutritional deficiencies associated with malabsorption are treated. Deficiencies of iron, folic acid, vitamin B12, and fat-soluble vitamins should be corrected, and levels should be monitored to ensure that replacement is adequate. Thyroid function studies should be obtained at the time of diagnosis because of the increased incidence of thyroid dysfunction in patients with celiac disease.4

Osteoporosis is a common finding in patients with celiac disease. The mechanism for bone loss is multifactorial and is thought to be related to secondary hyperparathyroidism from vitamin D deficiency and calcium malabsorption.1 With treatment of celiac disease, bone density values often return to normal in children, but may not do so in adults.17 Consideration should be given to testing bone mineral density in adults at the time of diagnosis, particularly in those who have been symptomatic.4

COMPLICATIONS

Celiac disease is linked with increased mortality. This is primarily because of the risk of malignancy; in particular, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, which is three to six times more likely in patients with celiac disease.2,2426 Patients with celiac disease are also at increased risk of oropharyngeal, esophageal, and small intestinal adenocarcinoma.24,27 The specific cause of increased malignancy risk is not known; however, several studies support the role of a gluten-free diet in reducing the risk of cancer.22,24,28,29

Follow-up

Long-term follow-up of patients with celiac disease is recommended. Serologic markers may be used to monitor compliance with a gluten-free diet. Antibody levels typically return to normal within three to 12 months of starting a gluten-free diet.4 Lack of response may suggest continued exposure to dietary gluten, which is often inadvertent, and patients should have further dietary instruction to ensure proper compliance with a gluten-free diet.

Most patients who make appropriate dietary changes will improve. If the patient does not respond as expected despite adherence to a gluten-free diet, the physician should consider diseases that may mimic celiac disease, such as microscopic colitis, pancreatic insufficiency, inflammatory bowel disease, ulcerative jejunoileitis, collagenous sprue, and T-cell lymphoma.

A repeat small bowel biopsy three to four months after initiation of a gluten-free diet is not necessary if the patient responds appropriately to therapy. Gluten rechallenge with subsequent small bowel biopsy is no longer recommended. If the diagnosis remains uncertain, or if the response to therapy is not adequate, further diagnostic testing for other diseases should be performed(Table 310). The natural history of untreated asymptomatic disease has not been delineated.

Screening

In a population with a low prevalence of celiac disease, such as that in the United States, the positive predictive value of serologic markers may produce a significant number of false-positive results that would necessitate further evaluation with small bowel biopsy(Table 515). Screening an asymptomatic patient for celiac disease must be weighed against the psychological, emotional, and economic impact of a false positive result.8,16,17 In addition, the need to follow a strict diet indefinitely can adversely affect the patient's perceived quality of life. Therefore, routine screening of the general population is not recommended.2 However, in persons at high risk for celiac disease who exhibit any level of symptoms, appropriate testing is indicated.

Read the full article.

  • Get immediate access, anytime, anywhere.
  • Choose a single article, issue, or full-access subscription.
  • Earn up to 6 CME credits per issue.
Already a member/subscriber?

Log in >>
Purchase Access:
See My Optionsclose

Already a member or subscriber?Log in

 

Best Value!

Get Full Access

From $140

  • Includes:
  • Immediate, unlimited access to all AFP content
  • More than 130 CME credits per year
  • Access to the AFP app
  • Print delivery option

 

Access This Issue

$39.95

 
  • Includes:
  • Immediate access to this issue
  •   CME credits in this issue

 

Access This Article

$20.95

 
  • Includes:
  • Immediate access to this article

 
 
To see the full article, log in or purchase access.

The Authors

show all author info

R. JOHN PRESUTTI, DO, is a consultant in the Department of Family Medicine at Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Fla. He is also an assistant professor of family medicine at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine in Rochester, Minn. Dr. Presutti completed his residency training at Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, and his internship training at Sun Coast Hospital in Largo, Fla. He received his degree in osteopathic medicine from Nova Southeastern University in Fort Lauderdale, Fla....

JOHN R. CANGEMI, MD, is a consultant in the Division of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine at Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, and an assistant professor of medicine at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine. He completed a fellowship in gastroenterology at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md., and a residency in internal medicine at Mayo School of Graduate Medical Education, Rochester. Dr. Cangemi received his medical degree from Brown University in Providence, R.I.

HARVEY D. CASSIDY, MD, is chair of the Department of Family Medicine, associate dean of medical and lab specialties, and an associate director of the Department of Family Medicine Residency Program at Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville. He is also an assistant professor of family medicine at Mayo Clinic College of Medicine. He completed his residency at the Geisinger Medical Center in Danville, Pa., and received his medical degree from Jefferson Medical College in Philadelphia, Pa.

DAVID A. HILL, DO, is a resident in the Department of Family Medicine at Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville.

Address correspondence to R. John Presutti, DO, Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd., Jacksonville, FL 32224. Reprints are not available from the authors.

Author disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

REFERENCES

show all references

1.Fasano A, Berti I, Gerarduzzi T, et al. Prevalence of celiac disease in at-risk and not-at-risk groups in the United States: a large multicenter study.Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(3):286–292....

2.Rostom A, Murray JA, Kagnoff MF. American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute technical review on the diagnosis and management of celiac disease.Gastroenterology. 2006;131(6):1981–2002.

3.Greco L, Romino R, Coto I, et al. The first large population based twin study of coeliac disease.Gut. 2002;50(5):624–628.

4.Collin P, Kaukinen K, Välimäki M, Salmi J. Endocrinological disorders and celiac disease.Endocr Rev. 2002;23(4):464–483.

5.Cataldo F, Marino V, Ventura A, Bottaro G, Corazza GR. Prevalence and clinical features of selective immunoglobulin A deficiency in coeliac disease: an Italian multicentre study. Italian Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology (SIGEP) and “Club del Tenue” Working Groups on Coeliac Disease.Gut. 1998;42(3):362–365.

6.AGA Institute. AGA Institute Medical Position Statement on the Diagnosis and Management of Celiac Disease.Gastroenterology. 2006;131(6):1977–1980.

7.Sanders DS, Hurlstone DP, Stokes RO, et al. Changing face of adult coeliac disease: experience of a single university hospital in South York-shire.Postgrad Med J. 2002;78(915):31–33.

8.Collin P. Should adults be screened for celiac disease? What are the benefits and harms of screening?Gastroenterology. 2005;128(4 suppl 1):S104–S108.

9.Green PH. The many faces of celiac disease: clinical presentation of celiac disease in the adult population.Gastroenterology. 2005;128(4 suppl 1):S74–S78.

10.Dewar DH, Ciclitira PJ. Clinical features and diagnosis of celiac disease.Gastroenterolology. 2005;128(4 suppl 1):S19–S24.

11.Bodé S, Gudmand-Hoyer E. Symptoms and haematologic features in consecutive adult coeliac patients.Scand J Gastroenterol. 1996;31(1):54–60.

12.Rewers M, Liu E, Simmons J, Redondo MJ, Hoffenberg EJ. Celiac disease associated with type 1 diabetes mellitus.Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2004;33(1):197–214,xi.

13.Rewers M. Epidemiology of celiac disease: what are the prevalence, incidence, and progression of celiac disease?Gastroenterology. 2005;128(4 suppl 1):S47–S51.

14.Alaedini A, Green PH. Narrative review: celiac disease: understanding a complex autoimmune disorder.Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(4):289–298.

15. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on Celiac Disease, June 28–30, 2004.Gastroenterology. 2005;128(4 suppl 1):S1–S9.

16.Hill ID. What are the sensitivity and specificity of serologic tests for celiac disease? Do sensitivity and specificity vary in different populations?Gastroenterology. 2005;128(4 suppl 1):S25–S32.

17.Treem WR. Emerging concepts in celiac disease.Curr Opin Pediatr. 2004;16(5):552–559.

18.Accomando S, Cataldo F. The global village of celiac disease.Dig Liver Dis. 2004;36(7):492–498.

19.Tommasini A, Not T, Kiren V, et al. Mass screening for coeliac disease using antihuman transglutaminase antibody assay.Arch Dis Child. 2004;89(6):512–515.

20.Lewis NR, Scott BB. Systematic review: the use of serology to exclude or diagnose coeliac disease (a comparison of the endomysial and tissue transglutaminase antibody tests).Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24(1):47–54.

21.Culliford A, Daly J, Diamond B, Rubin M, Green PH. The value of wireless capsule endoscopy in patients with complicated celiac disease.Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62(1):55–61.

22.Shield J, Mullin MC. Patient Education Materials. Supplement to the Manual of Clinical Diatetics. 3rd ed. Chicago, Ill.: American Dietetic Association; 2001.

23.Kupper C. Dietary guidelines and implementation for celiac disease.Gastroenterology. 2005;128(4 suppl 1):S121–S127.

24.Freeman HJ. Lymphoproliferative and intestinal malignancies in 214 patients with biopsy-defined celiac disease.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004;38(5):429–434.

25.Logan RF, Rifkind EA, Turner ID, Ferguson A. Mortality in celiac disease.Gastroenterology. 1989;97(2):265–271.

26.Catassi C, Bearzi I, Holmes GK. Association of celiac disease and intestinal lymphomas and other dancers.Gastroenterology. 2005;128(4 suppl 1):S79–S86.

27.Green PH, Fleischauer AT, Bhagat G, Goyal R, Jabri B, Neugut AI. Risk of malignancy in patients with celiac disease.Am J Med. 2003;115(3):191–195.

28.Collin P, Pukkala E, Reunala T. Malignancy and survival in dermatitis herpetiformis: a comparison with coeliac disease.Gut. 1996;38(4):528–530.

29.Holmes GK, Prior P, Lane MR, Pope D, Allan RN. Malignancy in coeliac disease—effect of a gluten free diet.Gut. 1989;30(3):333–338.

 

 

Copyright © 2007 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP. Contactafpserv@aafp.org for copyright questions and/or permission requests.

Want to use this article elsewhere?Get Permissions

Advertisement

More inAFP


Related Content


More in Pubmed

MOST RECENT ISSUE


Apr 15, 2021

Access the latest issue ofAmerican Family Physician

Read the Issue


Email Alerts

Don't miss a single issue. Sign up for the freeAFP email table of contents.

Sign Up Now

Navigate this Article