Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Wayback Machine
12 captures
22 Apr 2019 - 20 Jun 2025
MarAPROct
Previous capture22Next capture
201820192020
success
fail
COLLECTED BY
Organization:Internet Archive
These crawls are part of an effort to archive pages as they are created and archive the pages that they refer to. That way, as the pages that are referenced are changed or taken from the web, a link to the version that was live when the page was written will be preserved.

Then the Internet Archive hopes that references to these archived pages will be put in place of a link that would be otherwise be broken, or a companion link to allow people to see what was originally intended by a page's authors.

The goal is tofix all broken links on the web. Crawls of supported "No More 404" sites.
This is a collection of web page captures from links added to, or changed on, Wikipedia pages. The idea is to bring a reliability to Wikipedia outlinks so that if the pages referenced by Wikipedia articles are changed, or go away, a reader can permanently find what was originally referred to.

This is part of the Internet Archive's attempt torid the web of broken links.
TIMESTAMPS
loading
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20190422135319/https://reason.com/2012/05/06/oh-hey-starchild
Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets

Libertarian Party

Starchild Is Here

|

Las Vegas—San Francisco Libertarian Party activst Starchild, a Lee Wrights supporter, was not bothered by the nasty fight for national chairman, but he was worried about running out of time.

"If we ran out of time that could have shut down the convention and then the top-down group that controls the LNC would have had to vote," he said.

The way Starchild sees this fight is that it was originally the two factions bickering like usual, until accustions of voter improprities were thrown around. The integrity of the whole process was at stake, he said. 

"The problem was it wasn't clear whether a.) People could change their vote; b.) whether people that didn't vote could vote, or whether people that voted only in previous rounds could vote; c.) Whether it was okay to lobby people to change their vote. People didn't know what the rules were. So it became a huge clusterfuck," he said. 

With the defeat of what he calls the "top-down faction" (Alicia Mattson, Aaron Starr, Wayne Allyn Root, Bill Redpath, Mark Rutherford, and others) though, he found hope for the future of the party. 

"It might be too early to say that the party has turned a corner but I think it's headed in the right direction," he said.

Starchild was elected to an at-large spot on the Libertarian National Committee. He joins Bill Redpath, Wayne Allyn Root, Michael Cloud and Arvin Vohra on the committee.

Watch his nomination video after the jump. 

Garrett Quinn is a Boston-based journalist. He covered the 2012 presidential election for Reason.com.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.Report abuses.

52 responses to “Starchild Is Here

  1. I think you mean “oh heeeey, starchild”.

  2. I suppose that every political party has its freak show. The Dems have Michael Moore, the Repubs have Santorum, and and the Libs have Starchild. Not bad by comparison.

    1. It makes me honestly happy to know that I am a member of a party so open and accepting of differences. The Democratic Party is nothing compared to the Libertarian Party.

  3. So it became a huge clusterfuck…

    The party has its slogan.

    1. I thought that wasyour slogan. Oh wait, your slogan is “I may be a swaggering, overbearing, tin-plated dictator with delusions of godhood, but I’m not soft.”

      1. And I didn’t say you should be hauling garbage, I said you should be hauled awayas garbage.

        1. (takes a swing at FoE)

  4. Yeah, yeah, but who is the Monolith endorsing?

    1. I’m guessingSMOD.

    1. The falling bear must have been raised in captivity and didn’t how forage. Wild animals should be let in the wild or killed.

      1. Alas, I also “don’t how forage”.

        1. Ho ho ho ho !!! Your’re going to pretend you didn’t know what I meant!! How clever!!!

          1. Copernicus’ focus on your typo not withstanding the majority of the animal species known as humans doesn’t know how to forage: discuss.

            1. IMO, there has already been sufficient discussion of this topic here in recent months.

      2. It was wild and under stress to find a food source:

        Ms Churchill said a dry winter had stressed the bears’ normal food supply of chokecherry and serviceberry bushes, forcing them to look for food in urban areas.
        She added that young male bears search for new territory when they wake from winter hibernation.
        “If a bear finds a food source it will return even if it’s in town,” she said. “This could be a tough year for bears.”

        1. Chokecherry and serviceberry? Retarded names.

    2. Phew, I thought it was going to bethis bear

  5. Well, as long as you are going to support Libertarian principles, as in – leave me the fuck alone if I’m not fucking with you -, welcome aboard.

  6. Francisco d Anconia
    May.6.2012 at 8:36 pm

    While I completely support his right to dress as he(?) chooses…

    Why does no one take the LP seriously? I give you … STARCHILD!

    This shenanigans is why I’m little l and not big L.

    1. …and WAR and Michael “Buy me, I’m for sale” Cloud are people you take seriously?

    2. FDA…. ok (:

      Dude, you do realize that the Rs and Ds are chock full of full on retards, yes? Witness… Rick Santorum, and well, don’t make me name the trillions of D retards, ok, but you get my point, yes?

      1. Francisco d Anconia
        May.6.2012 at 9:13 pm

        Yep, point taken, that’s why I’m not an R or D either.

        But ya gotta ask yourself, “Self, where is the msm going to point their cameras?”

        Between Starchild and NOTA…

        They’re scaring the straights, okay.

        1. Fuck the MSM. Really, FDA, most straights that I know, which are nearly 100% of people that I know, will not be put off from voting LP because of Starchild. We aren’t going to get the SoCon or progressive votes, those people are beyond hope.

        2. Apatheist ?_??
          May.6.2012 at 9:26 pm

          As far as I’m aware they aren’t pointing their cameras anywhere related to the LP convention at all.

          1. Francisco d Anconia
            May.6.2012 at 9:44 pm

            Good point Ap.

    3. Apatheist ?_??
      May.6.2012 at 9:08 pm

      I’m a little l but Starchild is awesome.

      1. Yeah, I’m ex-LP, little-L libertarian, but I gotta say Starchild is remarkably intelligent when you get to know him.

    4. I hate it when someone says something like, “Why does no one take the LP seriously?”

      “No one” is a pretty big brush stroke.

      I take the LP seriously, as do plenty of others. And I take it seriously precisely because itis accepting of people like Starchild (in addition to other reasons).

      I feelcomfortable with the LP because the LP is willing to let people be whomever they are, as long as they do not initiate force or fraud. I absolutely wouldnot feel comfortable in a party that is not as open and accepting of differences as the LP. For this reason, among others, I do not take the Democratic Party seriously.

      Respectfully yours,
      Alex Peak

  7. Eduard van Haalen
    May.6.2012 at 8:41 pm

    Also OT, Kermit the Frog raps “Piggy Got Back.”

    http://bit.ly/unC22i

    1. Nah, Kermit the Frog singing WILD THING on his ukulele is better.
      http://tinyurl.com/8xn9m44

    2. I love full figured chicks, married one, but don’t remember getting wood for Miss Piggy, hmmmmm, maybe Kermy was getting a view that we couldn’t get…

      1. Pig girls try harder.

    3. Kermit hasfeelings

  8. I’m here to give you a choice. I know you’ve thought about destroying government. You can do this, but you will die. You can also control government, but you will lose everything you have. The final option is to merge government with free markets forever – the pinnacle of capitalism. Also, no matter which one you choose, Japanese sexbots will all be destroyed.

    1. Whoa, Starchild. Stop already with that destroying sexbot shit. Libertarians are 1000% in favor of sexbots. Ok, maybe the Japanese sexbots don’t have enought T&A, but we can’t destroy them until the more voluptuos sexbots are on the market…

      1. Why the world might need robotic prostitutes

        A new scientific paper suggests that by 2050, many bordellos and brothels will have replaced human prostitutes with lifelike robots.

        1. And Ds and Rs will vote lockstep to outlaw them, for the childins of course…

          1. Eduard van Haalen
            May.6.2012 at 9:32 pm

            They won’t have all moving metallic parts, will they? That might make the customers nervous.

            1. Course not dude, don’t get all nervous, silicon ….. good….

              1. Apatheist ?_??
                May.6.2012 at 9:37 pm

                Silicon will probably be alright but lab engineered human flesh may have trouble.

                1. Why? I’m not a bio engineer. Why do you think that could be a problem?

                  1. It’d have to be banned for the children Hyp.

                    1. Bio artificial pussy will never be banned. There is no effort known to corruptocratianism that could pull it off. Yes, drugs are popular and the drug war is a horrendous failure, but the war on AP will never even get off the ground. The first entrepreneur who figures out how to really make this work will make Bill Gates look poor in about 3 fucking seconds.

                    2. Groovus Maximus
                      May.6.2012 at 11:02 pm

                      Bio artificial pussy will never be banned.

                      Nope. You have heard of sheep and apple pie, no?

                    3. The first entrepreneur who figures out how to really make this work will make Bill Gates look poor in about 3 fucking seconds.

                      I see what you did there.

    2. Starchild|5.6.12 @ 8:59PM|#
      “I’m here to give you a choice…”

      Maybe Starchild, if someone didn’t sock the name. Maybe not.
      Regardless, when you deal with Starchild, you do
      have a choice:
      You can focus on Starchild’s costume (which is always amusing) and ignore his comments at your loss.
      Or you can listen to the comments which is almost always worth the effort. *Then* you can be amused at the costume.
      There’s no doubt what the MSM will do, but who cares? If they didn’t have that, they’d make fun of someone’s tie. And *still* miss the message.

  9. The real problem with the Libertarian party is that no one seems all that interested in it – look at the dearth of comments on the posts about it here, which is full of libertarians…

    1. Well, it was the weekend.

  10. Starchild is a smart guy with great costumes and a pleasing musculature. I wish I could vote for him for something.

  11. Interesting article.

Pleaselog in to post comments

Comments are closed.

Recommended

Most Read

Broward

Cops

Watch Broward County Sheriff’s Deputies Slam a 14-Year-Old Boy’s Head Into the Pavement

The cops were there to break up a fight, not start one.

|

Andrew-Yang

Basic Income/Negative Income Tax

Andrew Yang: The Capitalist Candidate Championing a Universal Basic Income

The 2020 Democratic presidential hopeful is running on a "Freedom Dividend" plan which promises a $1,000 per month UBI.

|

Amish

History

What Inmates, the Amish, and Imperial Chinese Law Teach Us About Relying on the State

David Friedman’sLegal Systems Very Different from Ours explores the costs and benefits of various legal systems across time.

|

ddpphotos249422

California

California’s Unfixable Housing Mess Is Years in the Making

At least now we're arguing over the right thing: the need to hike housing supply.

|

obstruction4-19

Mueller Investigation

In Defense of Trump Obstructing Justice (When There’s No Underlying Crime)

Forget about Donald Trump and the Mueller report and think about all the little (and not-so-little) people who get crushed by the feds.

|


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp