Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.History is littered with hundreds of conflicts over the future of a community, group, location or business that were "resolved" when one of the parties stepped ahead and destroyed what was there. With the original point of contention destroyed, the debates would fall to the wayside. Archive Team believes that by duplicated condemned data, the conversation and debate can continue, as well as the richness and insight gained by keeping the materials. Our projects have ranged in size from a single volunteer downloading the data to a small-but-critical site, to over 100 volunteers stepping forward to acquire terabytes of user-created data to save for future generations.
The main site for Archive Team is atarchiveteam.org and contains up to the date information on various projects, manifestos, plans and walkthroughs.
This collection contains the output of many Archive Team projects, both ongoing and completed. Thanks to the generous providing of disk space by the Internet Archive, multi-terabyte datasets can be made available, as well as in use by theWayback Machine, providing a path back to lost websites and work.
Our collection has grown to the point of having sub-collections for the type of data we acquire. If you are seeking to browse the contents of these collections, the Wayback Machine is the best first stop. Otherwise, you are free to dig into the stacks to see what you may find.
The Archive Team Panic Downloads are full pulldowns of currently extant websites, meant to serve as emergency backups for needed sites that are in danger of closing, or which will be missed dearly if suddenly lost due to hard drive crashes or server failures.
To use ArchiveBot, drop by #archivebot on EFNet. To interact with ArchiveBot, you issue commands by typing it into the channel. Note you will need channel operator permissions in order to issue archiving jobs. The dashboard shows the sites being downloaded currently.
There is a dashboard running for the archivebot process athttp://www.archivebot.com.
ArchiveBot's source code can be found athttps://github.com/ArchiveTeam/ArchiveBot.

English [en] Deutsch [de] français [fr] italiano [it] മലയാളം [ml] Nederlands [nl] polski [pl] русский [ru] українська [uk]
byRichard Stallman
The two political camps in the free software community are the freesoftware movement and open source. The free software movement is acampaignforcomputer users' freedom; we say that a nonfree program is aninjustice to its users. The open source camp declines to see theissue as a matter of justice to the users, and bases its arguments on practicalbenefits only.
To emphasize that “free software” refers to freedom andnot to price, we sometimes write or say “free (libre)software,” adding the French or Spanish word that means free inthe sense of freedom. In some contexts, it works to use just“libre software.”
A researcher studying practices and methods used by developers inthe free software community decided that these questions wereindependent of the developers' political views, so he used the term“FLOSS,” meaning “Free/Libre and Open SourceSoftware,” to explicitly avoid a preference between the twopolitical camps. If you wish to be neutral, this is a good way to doit, since this makes the names of the two camps equally prominent.
Others use the term “FOSS,” which stands for“Free and Open Source Software.” This is meant to mean thesame thing as “FLOSS,” but it is less clear, since itfails to explain that “free” refers tofreedom.It also makes “free software” less visible than“open source,” since it presents “open source”prominently but splits “free software” apart.
“Free and Open Source Software” is misleading inanother way: it suggests that “free and open source” namesa single point of view, rather than mentioning two different ones.This conceptualization of the field is an obstacle to understandingthe fact that free software and open source are different politicalpositions that disagree fundamentally.
Thus, if you want to be neutral between free software and opensource, and clear about them, the way to achieve that is to say“FLOSS,” not “FOSS.”
We in the free software movement don't use either of these terms,because we don't want to be neutral on the political question. Westand for freedom, and we show it every time—by saying“free” and “libre”— or “free(libre)”.
“The Free Software Foundation (FSF) is a nonprofit with a worldwidemission to promote computer user freedom. We defend the rights of allsoftware users.”
TheFree Software Foundation isthe principal organizational sponsor of the GNU Operating System.Support GNU and the FSF bybuying manuals and gear,joining the FSF as an associate member, ormaking a donation.
Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to<gnu@gnu.org>.There are alsoother ways to contactthe FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sentto<webmasters@gnu.org>.
Please see theTranslationsREADME for information on coordinating and submitting translationsof this article.
Copyright © 2013, 2015, 2016 Richard Stallman
This page is licensed under aCreativeCommons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Updated:$Date: 2016/11/18 06:31:40 $