Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Wayback Machine
33 captures
25 Sep 2010 - 08 Nov 2022
AugOCTDec
Previous capture11Next capture
201020112012
success
fail
COLLECTED BY
Organization:Internet Archive
The Internet Archive discovers and captures web pages through many different web crawls.At any given time several distinct crawls are running, some for months, and some every day or longer.View the web archive through theWayback Machine.
Web wide crawl with initial seedlist and crawler configuration from March 2011 using HQ software.
TIMESTAMPS
loading
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20111011182110/http://cgdev.org/content/publications/detail/1424248/
CGD
Independent research & practical ideas for global prosperity
About Us   |  On the Hill   |  Press Center   |  Subscribe   |  Invest
Print Print    Share/Bookmark Share
Home PublicationsInside the World Bank's Black Box Allocation System: How Well Does IDA Allocate Resources to the Neediest and Most Vulnerable Countries? - Working Paper 216

Inside the World Bank's Black Box Allocation System: How Well Does IDA Allocate Resources to the Neediest and Most Vulnerable Countries? - Working Paper 216

Ben Leo

06/24/2010

Working Paper 216

During the last few International Development Association (IDA) replenishment negotiations, several large donors have pressed for reforms to further increase the share of IDA resources provided to the neediest and most vulnerable countries. While the proposed reforms take different forms, the philosophical thrust is the same—push IDA’s focus further down the development chain.

Against this backdrop, this paper explores just how well IDA’s existing performance-based allocation (PBA) system actually addresses these issues. To achieve this, I examine how IDA allocations are distributed at each successive stage of the PBA methodology based upon a number of need and vulnerability measures. Next, I apply two simple measures to gauge IDA’s performance: (1) whether per-capita allocations to the neediest and most vulnerable countries are equal to or greater than those for the best off countries and (2) whether allocations to the neediest and most vulnerable countries increase between the baseline and final allocation scenarios.

Based on these criteria, IDA has a mixed track record. IDA’s performance is very modest with respect to the relative share allocated to the neediest or most vulnerable countries. Of the eight measures examined, only two illustrate parity between final allocations to the bottom and top quartile of countries. However, the litany of PBA exceptions clearly helps to redistribute resources in absolute terms. Per-capita allocations to the neediest and most vulnerable countries more than doubles between the baseline and final PBA scenarios for every need and vulnerability indicator examined. Clearly, the existing system has several built-in biases to redistribute resources to these countries. However, these exceptions fall short from ensuring full parity that some IDA donors may wish to achieve. As such, the philosophical debate among key IDA donors likely will continue for the foreseeable future.

Preview

  Tweet

Research Topics

CGD Experts

Articles

Events

Multimedia


Contact Us |Press Center |Jobs |RSS |Invest © 2011, CGD. All rights reserved.   |  Credits
CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT
1800 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Third Floor
Washington DC 20036
Tel 202.416.4000   |   Fax 202.416.4050
TwitterFacebookYouTube
RSSMeetupPodcast
Global Prosperity Wonkcast  What We're Reading  CGD Society

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp