What's Wrong and Right About Searle's Chinese Room Argument?Harnad, Stevan (2001)What's Wrong and Right About Searle's Chinese Room Argument? [Book Chapter] This is the latest version of this eprint. Full text available as:
AbstractSearle's Chinese Room Argument showed a fatal flaw in computationalism (the idea that mental states are just computational states) and helped usher in the era of situated robotics and symbol grounding (although Searle himself thought neuroscience was the only correct way to understand the mind).
Available Versions of this Item
References in ArticleSelect the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work. Metadata
Repository Staff Only:item control page |