New old visual novels
Posted in
#1 byEzezin 2023-08-06 at 21:49 | <report >I see you are adding some old visual novels. However, no links, sources or references are provided (likeR.P.G -Realistic Painful Game-). If you got that information from a website, forum, archive site, social media, etc. even if it is not official, it would be nice if you link to them, so other people can fill more information if possible. Specially if there are no links in the release entry. This is not a rule, so I'm not forcing you to do it, but it's still important.Last modified on 2023-08-06 at 21:50 |
#2 byparkjinhon 2023-08-06 at 22:11 | <report >I didn't add it because there was no separate game introduction page However, if go to the developer's website, there are some information about this game (link ) When I add a game in the future, if I can find the homepage, I will add it. However, many doujin games do not have homepages or cannot be found. Some games not even exist in erogamescape some can find reviews on game review blogs or twitter, but I don't know if adding these review blogs or twitter is allowed, so I haven't added them. If possible, I will add a sales page for Surugaya or Mandarake, but I don't know adding such sites are allowed or notLast modified on 2023-08-06 at 22:39 |
#3 byEzezin 2023-08-06 at 22:40 | <report >It's ok, I'm not talking about the release entry (link should be the official website in this case), I'm talking about reviews on game review blogs or twitter Copy and paste the link in the edit summary when you create or edit an entry, that should be more than enough. This could be anything, from official websites/stores to a blog or social media.Some examples (Check how users link their sources in the edit summary):link,link,linkLast modified on 2023-08-06 at 22:41 |
#4 byEzezin 2023-11-11 at 12:39 | <report >I'm going to ask you again to put your sources in theedit summary for those old games you are adding and the when release entry does not have an external link or official website. Otherwise we won't know where did you get the information. For examplePure Innocence 2 has no links whatsoever. Also:v47854.1 If you won't show proof that this is not a CG Collection, I'm going to delete this and similar entries.Last modified on 2023-11-11 at 12:49 |
#5 byparkjinhon 2023-11-11 at 13:05 | <report >link This is 高級接待クラブ・プレイメイトDOA 's discontinued digiket sales page. If you look here, you can see that it says novel game made by using Live Maker are included There was no 高級接待クラブ・プレイメイトDOA's homepage or continued sales page, and Since all of 凶暴情緒帯's works are basically CG collections with short visual novels, and there are screenshots to prove this on the pages of 凶暴情緒帯's other games, I didn't think the need to add that link I'll put a link next time. In the case of Pure Innocence, the cover said it is a visual novel for ages over 18, so I added it thinking it is a novel game.Last modified on 2023-11-11 at 14:11 |
#6 byEzezin 2023-11-11 at 14:30 | <report > I didn't think the need to add that page Never assume that a page is not important. Maybe not important to YOU, but look what I found inlink:r115000Stores, blogs, whatever, it doesn't matter if the product is not available anymore or if it is impossible to download or acquire, it is still important to link to your sources. It's not about availability, it's about information. the cover said I think you are not understanding something. Let me rephrase what I'm trying to tell you and I'm sorry in advance if this sounds harsh or disrespectful: I want you to put the website in the edit summary or release entry if it's official. Forget about availability, we don't care about that. In this case, you had to use the cover from somewhere else, this is what I'm asking you to share.Last modified on 2023-11-11 at 14:33 |
#7 byparkjinhon 2023-11-11 at 14:44 | <report >yes i'm sorry I didn't realize that the link I thought was trivial or unnecessary so didn't need to be added could actually be important for leaving evidence or informing others. From next time, when I edit, I will include the source where I found the information, whether it's a tweet or a Yahoo Auction page etcLast modified on 2023-11-11 at 14:45 |
#8 byparkjinhon 2023-11-26 at 23:37 | <report >It's about the 星の聖杯 On the erogamescape page, it says “DQ同人”. Although it is not an official source, it was written by someone who appears to have played the game. Is this considered valid information? link Add:I just found this game mentioned in the Dragon Quest doujin game list on 2ch's Dragon Quest thread link This seems like solid information. Is it okay to restore the page?Last modified on 2023-11-26 at 23:54 |
#9 byEzezin 2023-11-26 at 23:55 | <report >UseDragon Quest |
Reply
You must be logged in to reply to this thread.