Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


skip to main contentskip to footer
Get Started Book Demo
Log In
  1. Home
  2. State Courts
  3. California
  4. Solano County Superior Courts
  5. Fcs043086 - Lucero, Ambra Vs. Kirker-Chan, Linda P., Et. Al.

Boolean Operators

AND"motion for summary judgment" AND "breach of contract"
ORvehicle OR automobile
AND NOTdisability AND NOT discrimination
"""motion to dismiss"
()"motion to compel" AND (interrogatories OR deposition)
*negligen*
""~#"motion arbitration"~5 [finds data where words "motion" and "arbitration" are within 5 words of each other]

Judge Filters

judge:last-namejudge:nieto

Party / Law Firm / Attorney Filters

party:"law firm name"party:"Law Offices of John Smith"
party:"attorney name"party:"John Smith"
party:"company name"party:"Apple"
party:"individual party name"party:"elon musk"
"individual party name"~2"elon musk"~2

Location Filters

state:state-abbreviationstate:ca
county:county-name [no spaces]county:losangeles
courthouse:"courthouse name"courthouse:"stanley mosk"
caret down

Party

caret down
Requires practice area
caret down
caret down
Requires state
caret down
Requires practice area
 Case Filed Between
caret down
 Document Filed Between
PAGA / Complex / Class Action
Only cases with documents
Clear Filters
Track This Topic

We are checking for the latest updates in this case. We will email you when the process is complete.

Fcs043086 - Lucero, Ambra Vs. Kirker-Chan, Linda P., Et. Al.

Download DocketDownload Docket
Print DocketPrint Docket
Track Case ChangesTrack Case Changes

Lucero, Ambra, filed a(n) Automobile - Torts case represented byBennett, Scott Robert, againstChan, Chris,Kirker-Chan, Linda P., represented byBrown, Kari J, in the jurisdiction of Solano County. This case was filed in Solano County Superior Courts with POWER, DAVID EDWIN presiding.

Case Details for Lucero, Ambra v. Chan, Chris , et al.

Judge

POWER, DAVID EDWIN

Filing Date

February 26, 2014

Category

Mv - Compl.For Motor Vehicle

Last Refreshed

January 12, 2022

Practice Area

Torts

Filing Location

Solano County, CA

Matter Type

Automobile

Parties for Lucero, Ambra v. Chan, Chris , et al. Track Parties

Plaintiffs

Lucero, Ambra

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Bennett, Scott Robert

Defendants

Chan, Chris
Kirker-Chan, Linda P.

Attorneys for Defendants

Brown, Kari J

Case Events for Lucero, Ambra v. Chan, Chris , et al.

DateTypeDescription
November 05, 2014Docket Event VACATED
November 05, 2014Docket Event DISMISSAL ENTIRE ACTION W/PRE
LUCERO, AMBRA
October 08, 2014Docket Event DISMISSAL (PARTY ONLY)
LUCERO, AMBRA
September 18, 2014Docket Event MINUTE ORDER
September 15, 2014Docket Event HEARD
September 02, 2014Docket Event CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ONE
LUCERO, AMBRA
August 22, 2014Docket Event PAYMENT
CHAN, CHRIS
August 22, 2014Docket Event UNLIMITED RESPONSE
CHAN, CHRIS
August 22, 2014Docket Event UNLIMITED RESPONSE
KIRKER-CHAN, LINDA P.
August 22, 2014Docket Event PAYMENT
KIRKER-CHAN, LINDA P.
See all events

Related Content in Solano County

Case

Nancy Wells vs. Marjorie Litsinger et al
Jul 01, 2025 | Auto Tort (22) | Civil | CU25-06080

Case

Rocco Feramisco vs. Emerald Maloney
Jul 01, 2025 | Civil Pet: Harassment (43) | Civil | CU25-06026

Case

Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Insurance Company vs. Maria Criselda David Baz et al
Jul 01, 2025 | PI/PD/WD Tort: Other (23) | Civil | CU25-06054

Case

Sure Built Construction, a California Corporation vs. Ford Motor Company. a Delaware corporation
Jun 30, 2025 | PI/PD/WD Tort: Prod Liability (24) | Civil | CU25-05972

Case

Irmalinda M. Salazar vs. Anita Fletcher
Jul 01, 2025 | Civil Pet: Harassment (43) | Civil | CU25-06015

Case

Thuy Thu Huynh vs. Shawn Berrigan
Jul 02, 2025 | Civil Pet: Harassment (43) | Civil | CU25-06071

Case

Ok Hui Moyland vs. Paul Moyland
Jul 01, 2025 | Elder Abuse | Family | FL25-01283

Case

Derek Goodspeed, Jr vs. Marhazhane L Day
Jul 03, 2025 | Civil Pet: Harassment (43) | Civil | CU25-06118

Ruling

FCS057573 - PEREZ, HEIDI JUDITH VS BOOKER, WESLEY (DMS)
Jul 04, 2025 | FCS057573
FCS057573Motions for ContemptTENTATIVE RULING:Petitioners motions for contempt are denied.No affidavit of the facts constituting any contempt has been presented to thecourt. The filing of a sufficient affidavit is a jurisdictional prerequisite to acontempt proceeding. (Code Civ. Proc. 1211(a); Koehler v. Superior Court(2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 1153, 1169; Oil Workers Intl Union v. Superior Court(1951) 103 Cal.App.2d 512, 541.)Page 1of1

Ruling

CSAA Insurance Exchange vs. Jay Jaurigue
Jul 01, 2025 | CU25-03574
CU25-03574Motion to Amend Responses to Requests for AdmissionTENTATIVE RULINGCSAA Insurance Exchanges unopposed motion for leave to withdraw admissions isgranted.Join ZoomGov Meetinghttps://www.zoomgov.com/j/1602210102?pwd=emlhR29SczExam56NFFqWHFvSitmZz09Meeting ID: 160 221 0102Passcode: 650928One tap mobile+16692545252,,1602210102#,,,,*650928# US (San Jose)+16692161590,,1602210102#,,,,*650928# US (San Jose)

Ruling

CSAA Insurance Exchange vs. Jay Jaurigue
Jul 06, 2025 | CU25-03574
CU25-03574Motion to Amend Responses to Requests for AdmissionTENTATIVE RULINGCSAA Insurance Exchanges unopposed motion for leave to withdraw admissions isgranted.Join ZoomGov Meetinghttps://www.zoomgov.com/j/1602210102?pwd=emlhR29SczExam56NFFqWHFvSitmZz09Meeting ID: 160 221 0102Passcode: 650928One tap mobile+16692545252,,1602210102#,,,,*650928# US (San Jose)+16692161590,,1602210102#,,,,*650928# US (San Jose)

Ruling

FCS057573 - PEREZ, HEIDI JUDITH VS BOOKER, WESLEY (DMS)
Jul 03, 2025 | FCS057573
FCS057573Motions for ContemptTENTATIVE RULING:Petitioners motions for contempt are denied.No affidavit of the facts constituting any contempt has been presented to thecourt. The filing of a sufficient affidavit is a jurisdictional prerequisite to acontempt proceeding. (Code Civ. Proc. 1211(a); Koehler v. Superior Court(2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 1153, 1169; Oil Workers Intl Union v. Superior Court(1951) 103 Cal.App.2d 512, 541.)Page 1of1

Ruling

FCS057573 - PEREZ, HEIDI JUDITH VS BOOKER, WESLEY (DMS)
Jun 30, 2025 | FCS057573
FCS057573Motions for ContemptTENTATIVE RULING:Petitioners motions for contempt are denied.No affidavit of the facts constituting any contempt has been presented to thecourt. The filing of a sufficient affidavit is a jurisdictional prerequisite to acontempt proceeding. (Code Civ. Proc. 1211(a); Koehler v. Superior Court(2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 1153, 1169; Oil Workers Intl Union v. Superior Court(1951) 103 Cal.App.2d 512, 541.)Page 1of1

Ruling

FCS057573 - PEREZ, HEIDI JUDITH VS BOOKER, WESLEY (DMS)
Jul 02, 2025 | FCS057573
FCS057573Motions for ContemptTENTATIVE RULING:Petitioners motions for contempt are denied.No affidavit of the facts constituting any contempt has been presented to thecourt. The filing of a sufficient affidavit is a jurisdictional prerequisite to acontempt proceeding. (Code Civ. Proc. 1211(a); Koehler v. Superior Court(2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 1153, 1169; Oil Workers Intl Union v. Superior Court(1951) 103 Cal.App.2d 512, 541.)Page 1of1

Ruling

CSAA Insurance Exchange vs. Jay Jaurigue
Jul 05, 2025 | CU25-03574
CU25-03574Motion to Amend Responses to Requests for AdmissionTENTATIVE RULINGCSAA Insurance Exchanges unopposed motion for leave to withdraw admissions isgranted.Join ZoomGov Meetinghttps://www.zoomgov.com/j/1602210102?pwd=emlhR29SczExam56NFFqWHFvSitmZz09Meeting ID: 160 221 0102Passcode: 650928One tap mobile+16692545252,,1602210102#,,,,*650928# US (San Jose)+16692161590,,1602210102#,,,,*650928# US (San Jose)

Ruling

CSAA Insurance Exchange vs. Jay Jaurigue
Jul 02, 2025 | CU25-03574
CU25-03574Motion to Amend Responses to Requests for AdmissionTENTATIVE RULINGCSAA Insurance Exchanges unopposed motion for leave to withdraw admissions isgranted.Join ZoomGov Meetinghttps://www.zoomgov.com/j/1602210102?pwd=emlhR29SczExam56NFFqWHFvSitmZz09Meeting ID: 160 221 0102Passcode: 650928One tap mobile+16692545252,,1602210102#,,,,*650928# US (San Jose)+16692161590,,1602210102#,,,,*650928# US (San Jose)

Ruling

FCS057573 - PEREZ, HEIDI JUDITH VS BOOKER, WESLEY (DMS)
Jul 01, 2025 | FCS057573
FCS057573Motions for ContemptTENTATIVE RULING:Petitioners motions for contempt are denied.No affidavit of the facts constituting any contempt has been presented to thecourt. The filing of a sufficient affidavit is a jurisdictional prerequisite to acontempt proceeding. (Code Civ. Proc. $ 1211(a); Koehler v. Superior Court(2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 1153, 1169; Oil Workers Intl Union v. Superior Court(1951) 103 Cal.App.2d 512, 541.)Page 1of1

Document

SHAM PIEPER vs. ZHIMING HE, et al
Sep 29, 2022 | Foiles, Robert D | (22) Unlimited Auto | 22-CIV-04001

Document

Issac Armenta VS Frontier Communications of America, Inc., City of San Bernardino
Jun 30, 2025 | Premises Liability | Personal Injury - Premises Liability | TCN-404609

Document

California Fair Plan Association vs. Gardner, Frederic John et al
Jan 17, 2023 | Civil-Roseville | Other Tort: Other Non PI/PD/WD (35) | S-CV-0049743

Document

Ondina Calix VS Victoria's Secret & Co.; Cabazon Outlets; Property Owners of 48400 Seminole Dr.
Jul 01, 2025 | Premises Liability | Personal Injury - Premises Liability | TCN-406141

Document

MACOVICHUK, MICHAEL VS LAKE
Dec 13, 2024 | Clark, Thomas S. | 13-CV Defamation - Civil Unlimited | BCV-24-104309

Document

Windie Shepherd-Clark vs. Amanda Moran
Aug 02, 2023 | Mangano, Robert | 25 Unlimited - Professional Negligence | 23CECG03124

Document

BOATMAN -v- JARAMILLO et al Print
Dec 10, 2024 | Thomas S Garza | Auto PI/PD/WD Unlimited | Auto PI/PD/WD Unlimited | CIVSB2436638

Document

TRAON CALL VS ARIC EBRAHIMIAN
Jun 27, 2025 | Harry Jay Ford III | Legal Malpractice (General Jurisdiction) | Legal Malpractice (General Jurisdiction) | 25SMCV03272

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp