U.S. CURRENCY, ET AL.Case Number: 24CV-0205746This matter is on calendar for status. A Claim Opposing Forfeiture was filed by real party ininterest Xay Va Vang on August 14, 2024. A Petition for Forfeiture in Rem was filed by thePeople on September 30, 2024. An appearance is necessary on today’s calendar to discuss thestatus of the underlying criminal matter.

FCS055884Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Approval of Class Action SettlementTENTATIVE RULINGThe Parties and any interested persons are to appear.Department 7 is inviting you to a scheduled ZoomGov meeting.Join ZoomGov Meetinghttps://solano-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/1611554664?pwd=T3U4QlBGWWNWaGlieXJTcGxIVHRXZz09Meeting ID: 161 155 4664Passcode: 818575One tap mobile+16692545252,,1611554664#,,,,*818575# US (San Jose)+14154494000,,1611554664#,,,,*818575# US (US Spanish Line)Dial by your location+1 669 254 5252 US (San Jose)+1 415 449 4000 US (US Spanish Line)+1 669 216 1590 US (San Jose)+1 551 285 1373 US (New Jersey)+1 646 828 7666 US (New York)+1 646 964 1167 US (US Spanish Line)+1 833 568 8864 US Toll-free

BALAZS, ET AL. VS. PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, ET AL.Case Number: CVCV21-0198434This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of stay following coordination with JCCP5165 in San Francisco County. No status statements have been filed. Plaintiffs attempted to filea Request for Dismissal of the entire action on May 23, 2025. That filing was rejected by the clerkdue to form (missing page 2). Plaintiff is directed to refile the complete Request for Dismissal, iftheir intent is to dismiss the matter. This matter is continued to Monday, July 28, 2025, at 9:00a.m. in Department 64 for confirmation of dismissal. If the dismissal is entered prior to thecontinued hearing date, it will be dropped from calendar. No appearance is necessary on today’scalendar.

FCS055884Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Approval of Class Action SettlementTENTATIVE RULINGThe Parties and any interested persons are to appear.Department 7 is inviting you to a scheduled ZoomGov meeting.Join ZoomGov Meetinghttps://solano-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/1611554664?pwd=T3U4QlBGWWNWaGlieXJTcGxIVHRXZz09Meeting ID: 161 155 4664Passcode: 818575One tap mobile+16692545252,,1611554664#,,,,*818575# US (San Jose)+14154494000,,1611554664#,,,,*818575# US (US Spanish Line)Dial by your location+1 669 254 5252 US (San Jose)+1 415 449 4000 US (US Spanish Line)+1 669 216 1590 US (San Jose)+1 551 285 1373 US (New Jersey)+1 646 828 7666 US (New York)+1 646 964 1167 US (US Spanish Line)+1 833 568 8864 US Toll-free

U.S. CURRENCY, ET AL.Case Number: 24CV-0205746This matter is on calendar for status. A Claim Opposing Forfeiture was filed by real party ininterest Xay Va Vang on August 14, 2024. A Petition for Forfeiture in Rem was filed by thePeople on September 30, 2024. An appearance is necessary on today’s calendar to discuss thestatus of the underlying criminal matter.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. $634,100.00 U.S. CURRENCYCase Number: 24CV-0205760This matter is on calendar for status. A Claim Opposing Forfeiture was filed by real party ininterest Justin Brown on August 15, 2024. A Petition for Forfeiture in Rem was filed by the Peopleon September 4, 2024. An appearance is necessary on today’s calendar to discuss the status of theunderlying criminal matter.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 24CV022499: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA vs $57,980.37 IN US CURRENCY, et al. 07/09/2025 Hearing on Motion for Order Compelling Request for Production of Documents, Set One in Department 54Tentative RulingNOTICE:PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that any oral arguments regarding this tentative ruling willbe heard in Department 28, located at 720 9th Street, Sacramento, CA, the Hon.Richard C. Miadich presiding.Any party who wishes to contest the tentative ruling below must: (1) request a hearing by calling the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874-2615, by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the noticed hearing date, and leave a voicemail message (a) identifying themselves as the party requesting oral argument; (b) indicating the specific matter/motion for which they are requesting oral argument; and (c) confirming that they have notified the opposing party of their intention to appear; and (2) advise the opposing party of the location and time of hearing pursuant to Local Rule 1.06.If a hearing is not requested by 4:00 p.m. on the Court day before the noticed hearingdate, the tentative ruling will become the final order of the Court.If a hearing is requested, the Court prefers in-person attendance by the parties.However, parties may appear by Zoom unless the Court specifically orders in personattendance. Parties choosing to appear by Zoom are reminded, however, that a Zoomappearance is still a formal appearance before the Court. Parties appearing via Zoomshould do so from a quiet location, free from undue distractions, and wear attire suitablefor an in-person court appearance.The parties may join the Zoom session for hearing on the tentative ruling by audioand/or video through the following link:https://saccourt-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/my/sscdept28SIP Address:16039062174@sip.zoomgov.com Page 1 of 3 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 24CV022499: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA vs $57,980.37 IN US CURRENCY, et al. 07/09/2025 Hearing on Motion for Order Compelling Request for Production of Documents, Set One in Department 54(833) 568-8864ID: 16039062174Parties requesting services of a court reporter will need to arrange for private courtreporter services at their own expense, pursuant to Government code §68086 andCalifornia Rules of Court, Rule 2.956. Requirements for requesting a court reporter arelisted in the Policy for Official Reporter Pro Tempore available on the SacramentoSuperior Court website at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp-6a.pdf.Parties may contact Court-Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore by utilizing the listof Court Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore available athttps://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp-13.PdfA Stipulation and Appointment of Official Reporter Pro Tempore (CV/E-206) is requiredto be signed by each party, the private court reporter, and the Judge prior to thehearing, if not using a reporter from the Court’s Approved Official Reporter Pro Temporelist.Once the form is signed it must be filed with the clerk. If a litigant has been granted afee waiver and requests a court reporter, the party must submit a Request for CourtReporter by a Party with a Fee Waiver (CV/E-211) and it must be filed with the clerk atleast 10 days prior to the hearing or at the time the proceeding is scheduled if less than10 days away. Once approved, the clerk will be forward the form to the Court Reporter’sOffice and an official reporter will be provided.TENTATIVE RULING:Petitioner the People of the State of California’s (“Petitioner”) motion to compel realparty in interest Ahmed Elsaadany (“Mr. Elsaadany”) to serve verified responses,without objections, to Petitioner’s Request for Production of Document, Set One, isUNOPPOSED and GRANTED.Mr. Elsaadany shall serve verified responses, without objections, to Petitioner’s Requestfor Production of Document, Set One, no later than July 23, 2025. Page 2 of 3 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 24CV022499: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA vs $57,980.37 IN US CURRENCY, et al. 07/09/2025 Hearing on Motion for Order Compelling Request for Production of Documents, Set One in Department 54To the extent Petitioner also purports to seek an order compelling Mr. Elsaddany’sproduction of documents responsive to the subject requests, the motion must be deniedbecause (1) Petitioner did not file a motion to compel compliance pursuant to Code ofCivil Procedure section 2031.320(a) and (2) such an order would not be appropriatehere. A motion to compel compliance pursuant to section 2031.320(a) is appropriateonly where a responding party has agreed to produce documents, but then fails topermit inspection consistent with that response. Here, Mr. Elsaadany has not provided astatement of compliance in response to the demand. Thus, any motion for production ofdocuments is premature.No monetary sanctions were requested.The minute order is effective immediately. No formal order pursuant to California Rulesof Court, Rule 3.1312 or further notice is required. Page 3 of 3

FCS055884Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Approval of Class Action SettlementTENTATIVE RULINGThe Parties and any interested persons are to appear.Department 7 is inviting you to a scheduled ZoomGov meeting.Join ZoomGov Meetinghttps://solano-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/1611554664?pwd=T3U4QlBGWWNWaGlieXJTcGxIVHRXZz09Meeting ID: 161 155 4664Passcode: 818575One tap mobile+16692545252,,1611554664#,,,,*818575# US (San Jose)+14154494000,,1611554664#,,,,*818575# US (US Spanish Line)Dial by your location+1 669 254 5252 US (San Jose)+1 415 449 4000 US (US Spanish Line)+1 669 216 1590 US (San Jose)+1 551 285 1373 US (New Jersey)+1 646 828 7666 US (New York)+1 646 964 1167 US (US Spanish Line)+1 833 568 8864 US Toll-free

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. $634,100.00 U.S. CURRENCYCase Number: 24CV-0205760This matter is on calendar for status. A Claim Opposing Forfeiture was filed by real party ininterest Justin Brown on August 15, 2024. A Petition for Forfeiture in Rem was filed by the Peopleon September 4, 2024. An appearance is necessary on today’s calendar to discuss the status of theunderlying criminal matter.