DATE: 07/11/25 TIME: 9:00 A.M. DEPT: D CASE NO: FL0001735PRESIDING: HON. BETH S. JORDANREPORTER: CLERK: STACY BONDPETITIONER: VANESSA KIRKPATRICKandRESPONDENT: FABIEN ROLANDDUREUILNATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: REQUEST FOR ORDER - VISITATIONRULINGThis matter is set for hearing on Respondent/Fathers 6/27/25 Requests for TemporaryEmergency Orders re: visitation with the parties children, Aveline (DOB 4/19/16), Lucia (DOB9/16/17), and Ronan (DOB 2/21/22), family therapy, and for the Court to follow theRecommendations of Minors Counsel. Father further requests that the Court reinstate the pre-TRO custody/visitation orders. Father requests these orders be made before the DomesticViolence Restraining Order hearing, currently set to begin 10 days after this hearing date. Motherfiled a Responsive Declaration opposing the Fathers Requests on the grounds that the caseinvolves very serious allegations of abuse regarding the children, and making custodydeterminations at this time is essentially tantamount to having the Court pre-judge the casebefore the trial.The Court largely agrees with Mother. Given the circumstances, the Court will not makecustody/visitation orders regarding Aveline or Lucia until completion of trial.The Court has reviewed each of the Professional Supervisors Reports; and given that the visitswith Ronan appear to be going very well and there have been no issues, the Court will entertainincreasing the number of visits or length of Fathers visits with Ronan, so long as they continueto be supervised.SO ORDERED.The Court will prepare the order.FL0001735Parties must comply with Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 7.12(B), (C), whichprovide that If a party wants to present oral argument, the party must contact the Court at(415) 444-7046 and all opposing parties by 4:00 p.m. the court day preceding the scheduledhearing. Notice may be by telephone or in person to all other parties that argument is beingrequested (i.e., it is not necessary to speak with counsel or parties directly.) Unless the Courtand all parties have been notified of a request to present oral argument, no oral argument willbe permitted except by order of the Court. In the event no party requests oral argument inaccordance with Rule 7.12(C), the tentative ruling shall become the order of the court.IT IS ORDERED that video appearances though Zoom are permitted unless a party is orderedto appear in court. In-person appearances are also permitted. Evidentiary hearings shall bein-person in Department D. The parties may access Department D for video conference via alink on the court website.FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are responsible for ensuring that they have a goodconnection and that they are available for the hearing. If the connection is inadequate, theCourt may proceed with the hearing in the partys absence.Any party contesting the ruling and requesting oral argument shall appear in person orremotely through Zoom either by video or telephone. Please follow the guidelines set forth onthe court website at www.marin.courts.ca.govThe Zoom appearance information is as follows:July 2025 at 09:00 AMJoin Zoom Meetinghttps://marin-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/1601114119?pwd=p6bV9Ef8WHjm1j7jzyTrwiExIVOby4.1Meeting ID: 160 111 4119Passcode: 636308If you are only able to appear by phone you may dial the phone number below, follow theprompts and enter the meeting ID and passcode.+1-669-254-5252 US (San Jose)Meeting ID: 160 111 4119Passcode: 636308If a party and/or counsel elects to appear over Zoom they must follow proper Zoom etiquette.This includes joining the call five minutes early, speaking only one at a time, avoidingdisruptions, and wearing proper attire appropriate for a court environment. Parties must actand speak in a professional and respectful manner as though they are in an actual courtroom.If a party or counsel is unable to follow proper Zoom etiquette, the court may halt the hearingand order the parties to return in person.Page 2 of 2

DATE: 07/10/25 TIME: 9:00 A.M. DEPT: L CASE NO: FL0001864PRESIDING: HON. MARK A. TALAMANTESREPORTER: CLERK: JENN CHARIFA.PETITIONER: ANGELINA EVAGHILOTTIandRESPONDENT: TYLER RUGGLESNATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: 1) REQUEST FOR ORDER - CHILDCUSTODY/VISITATION2) REQUEST FOR ORDER - CHILD CUSTODY/VISITATIONRULINGPetitioner Angela Eva Ghilotti (Mother) filed a petition for Emergency Temporary Orders onMay 1, 2025, seeking emergency custody orders to require Respondent Tyler Ruggles (Father)to resume prior court ordered visitation. Both parents attended the hearing on May 1. Fatheradvised the court that he did not want his children exposed to Mothers boyfriend, Paul Deem,who is a felon.Both parents met with Marin Family Court Services (FCS) on or about June 14, 2025, on theissue raised by Father. The parents were interviewed together. (Marin is a recommendingcounty. (Family Code 3183; Marin County Rules, Family 7.17.A.) FCS issued a Report withvisitation recommendations on June 27, 2025.Together, these parents have one child. Jaxon is 2, born February 1, 2023. Mother is nowpregnant with Mr. Deens child, which is relevant to child visitation orders moving forward.Both parents are currently in recovery. Father represents that he is in recovery for meth andopiates use. Mother is in AA. Father knows Mr. Deem from the street and is adamant that hedoes not want him around this child. Mothers parents are also concerned about the exposure ofJaxon to Mr. Deem. This is a difficult demand given Mother is now pregnant with Mr. Deemsbaby.Paul Wesley Deems criminal history is extensive. Marin County court records included 37entries involving: 12 felonies, 10 misdemeanors, and 8 traffic. His arrests included allegationsof drug possession, paraphernalia, burglary, violence and threats of violence, and crimes.involving firearms.Mother, knowing of this record of criminality, has invited this man into her life. She mustappreciate that Father matters. His opinion matters and he does not believe her boyfriend is aFL0001864good influence on his son. Until Father is more comfortable with his son being in the presenceof Mr. Deem, Mothers inclusion of him in family visits will be curtailed.Custody and VisitationThe court has reviewed the application filed by Father in his request for emergency custodyorders. The court has also reviewed the FCS Report issued on June 27, 2025, and finds goodcause and that it is in the best interest of Jaxon to adopt the FCS recommendations as follows:Parental Responsibilities1.The parents shall share joint legal custody of Jaxon. The parents shall share in theresponsibility and confer in good faith on matters concerning the childs health, educationand welfare. Both parents shall have access to the childs school, medical, mental health,and dental records and the right to consult with professionals who are providing servicesto the child.2. The parents shall have physical custody of Jaxon.Timeshare Schedule3.Jaxon shall continue to live with both parents on a schedule where he is with Angelinaevery week from Sunday at 12:00 to Wednesday at 3:00 p.m. and with Tyler every weekfrom Wednesday at 3:00 p.m. to Sunday at 12:00 p.m.Any changes to the schedule shall occur as mutually agreed upon by the parents.As Jaxon gets older, Mother shall not put the child in a position where he is expected tobe dishonest to his Father. If there is a report that Mr. Deem is in the presence of thechild, visits will cease.Holidays/Vacations6.7.Jaxon shall be with both parents equally for Holidays and vacations on an agreed uponschedule until the baby is born.Holiday Schedule:e Mothers Day and Fathers Day (10 a.m. to 7 p.m.) shall be spent with therespective parent each year.e April religious holidays (10 a.m. to 7 p.m.): The children shall be with Father inodd-numbered years and Mother in even-numbered years.e Memorial Day (10 a.m. to 7 p.m.): The child shall be with Mother in odd-numbered years and Father in even-numbered years.Page 2 of 4FL0001864Fourth of July (10 a.m. to 7 p.m.): The child shall be with Father in odd-numbered years and Mother in even-numbered years.Labor Day (10 a.m. to 7 p.m.): The child shall be with Mother in odd-numberedyears and Father in even-numbered yearsHalloween (4 p.m. to 9 p.m.): The child shall be with Father in odd-numberedyears and Mother in even-numbered years.Thanksgiving shall be from Thanksgiving Day at 10 a.m. and shall be spent withMother in odd-numbered years and Father in even-numbered years.Christmas (and any other religious holiday in December): Father shall care forthe child from noon to 10 p.m. on Christmas Eve and Mother shall care for thechild on Christmas Day.New Years: New Years Eve from 5 p.m. to the New Years Day up to 7 p.m.shall be spent with Father in even-numbered years and with Mother in odd-numbered years.Collateral Issues8. Jaxon shall continue not to have any contact with Paul Wesley Deem until further orderof the court.9. Both parents shall continue their sobriety and continue to participate in programs tosupport it.10. Neither parent shall expose Jaxon to any drugs or drug paraphernalia.11. Both parents shall continue to be law-abiding.12. Jaxon shall be exposed to peaceful contact only between his parents and any other adults.13, Jaxon shall not be exposed to any domestic violence or any verbal or physical abuse.14. Neither parent shall make any disparaging comments about the other parent in thepresence of the children or allow others to do so.15. The matter will be called for an update on visitation on January 15, 2026, at 9 a.m. in thisdepartment. The parents are to contact FCS at 415-444-7090 by December 1, 2025, tomake an interview appointment.Litigants who require the assistance of an interpreter may appear in court to access the servicesof a staff interpreter, or they may appear remote. Persons who require interpreter services viaPage 3 of 4FL0001864remote appearance shall notify the clerk of the court in advance to schedule remote interpretationservices.As authorized by CRC 5.125, the court will prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing.Parties must comply with Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 7.12(B), (C), whichprovide that if a party wants to present oral argument, the party must contact the Court at(415) 444-7046 and all opposing parties by 4:00 p.m. the court day preceding the scheduledhearing. Notice may be by telephone or in person to all other parties that argument is beingrequested (i.e., it is not necessary to speak with counsel or parties directly.) Unless the Courtand all parties have been notified of a request to present oral argument, no oral argument willbe permitted except by order of the Court. In the event no party requests oral argument inaccordance with Rule 7.12(Q), the tentative ruling shall become the order of the court.IT IS ORDERED that evidentiary hearings shall be in-person in Department L. For routineappearances, the parties may access Department L for video conference via a link on the courtwebsite. Litigants in the virtual courtroom are required to leave the video screen on and waitSor your case to be called.FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are responsible for ensuring that they have a goodconnection and that they are available for the hearing. If the connection is inadequate, theCourt may proceed with the hearing in the partys absence.Page 4 of 4

IN RE: MASSEY, IIICase Number: 25CV-0207125Tentative Ruling on Petition for Change of Name: Petitioner William James Massey, III seeks to change hisname to William James Sebree. All procedural requirements of CCP §§ 1275 et. seq. have been satisfied, withthe exception that proof of publication has not been filed. The Court intends to grant the Petition upon presentationof sufficient proof of publication. An appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

IN RE: MASSEY, IIICase Number: 25CV-0207125Tentative Ruling on Petition for Change of Name: Petitioner William James Massey, III seeks to change hisname to William James Sebree. All procedural requirements of CCP §§ 1275 et. seq. have been satisfied, withthe exception that proof of publication has not been filed. The Court intends to grant the Petition upon presentationof sufficient proof of publication. An appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

DATE: 06/27/25 TIME: 9:00 A.M. DEPT: D CASE NO: FL0001852PRESIDING: HON. BETH S. JORDANREPORTER: CLERK: STACY BONDPETITIONER: RANDALL CRAILandRESPONDENT: ARIADNE MUNIZ-CRAILNATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: REQUEST FOR ORDER - CHILD CUSTODY/VISITATIONRULINGThis matter is set for further hearing on Petitioner/Fathers 5/8/25 Request for Order ("RFO") rechild custody/visitation regarding the parties child, Bella (DOB 3/1/21) and receipt of theFamily Court Services (FCS) Report & Recommendations. The referral to FCS was madefollowing the Courts granting Temporary Emergency Orders on 5/12/25 in response toRespondent/Mothers April relocation with Bella, without notice to or agreement by Father, fromCorte Madera to Pleasanton.Father requests sole legal custody for educational decisions, that the court set a time-shareschedule that affords him overnights, that the court order Mother return to Marin County within3 to 6 months; and that the court order neither parent from moving more than 15 miles fromBellas current school without mutual written consent or court order.Father states that Bellas routine and schooling has been disrupted. He lives in Larkspur, andBella has attended school nearby. She has developed friendships, a familiar routine, supportiveteachers and staff, and has extended family close by in Marin. Father claims Mothers behaviorregarding shared parenting has been coercive and manipulative, and her move to Pleasantonseverely interferes with his relationship with Bella and the ability for them to spend timetogether. Father also states concerns regarding Mothers lapses of judgment. He requests a 2/2/5time-share schedule.Father failed to mention in his papers that a Criminal Protective Order (CPO") was issued on4/19/25 in which he is the named restrained party and Mother is the protected party in Case No.CR0002349. At that time, however, the CPO only provided orders for no abuse and for notdissuading a victim or witness from attending a hearing, testifying or making a report to any lawenforcement agency or person.FL0001852On 5/21/25, the CPO was expanded to include no-contact and stay-away orders from Mother,with an exception for peaceful contact for exchanges of Bella. As a condition of his 3 yearsupervised probation, Father must complete a certified 52-week batterers intervention programand shall not use, consume, possess or transport alcohol, marijuana or any non-prescribed orillegal drug or intoxicant of any kind. The terms set forth in the CPO are not consistent withFathers statements that the CPO was reduced to a peaceful contact order and there is someconfusion about alcohol prohibition. The CPO was again modified on 6/23/25, but not as to anyof the substantive restrictions. As noted by Family Court Services, the CPO triggers the FamilyCode $ 3044 presumption that it is detrimental to a child for a perpetrator of domestic violence toshare joint legal or physical custody.Both parties were interviewed separately on 6/11/25, and FCS filed its Report &Recommendations with the Court on 6/17/25. Mother seeks sole legal and physical custody ofBella. She believes Bella is too young for overnights and is concerned that Father is still usingalcohol, as she saw a bottle in his car when they were exchanging Bella, which raises concernsfor Bellas safety. Mother did confirm that Bella likes to be with Father.After reviewing and considering the parties written submissions, as well as the FCS Report &Recommendations, the Court finds that it is in the best interests of Bella to adopt the FCSRecommendations, as modified below, as the Courts order on these matters:Parental Responsibilities1. Temporarily, Mother shall have sole legal custody of Bella. Except as set forth below,Mother shall make decisions on all matters concerning the health and welfare of Bella.However, both parents shall have access to Bellas school, medical, mental health, anddental records and the right to consult with professionals who are providing services toher.2. Temporarily, Mother shall have sole physical custody of Bella.Timeshare Schedule3. Bella shall be with Father on the following schedule (and with Mother the remainder ofthe time. Week #1 and Week #2 shall be rotating):a. Week #1: Father shall pick Bella up after pre-school at Cottage pre-school onThursday and shall have her in his care until Friday at 7:00 pm and shall also haveher on Sunday from 10:30 until 7:00 pmb. Week #2: Father shall pick Bella up after pre-school at Cottage pre-school onThursday and shall have her in his care until Saturday at 7:00 pm4. Mother shall drop Bella off at Cottage pre-school on Thursday mornings and shall alsodrop Bella off curbside outside Fathers home for the Sunday morning exchanges. The7:00 p.m. exchanges shall continue to take place outside the Oakland Zoo, unless anotherlocation is agreed upon by the parents.Page 2 of 4FL00018525. Any changes to the schedule, or any additional time for Bella to be with either parent,shall occur as mutually agreed upon by the parents.6. Neither party shall change Bellas schools or school schedules without mutual writtenagreement or court order.Collateral Issues7. Father shall follow al/ of the terms of his probation, including no alcohol unless he canprovide the Court with an amended CPO which deletes that term.8. If Father can provide such an amended CPO, he still shall not consume any alcohol whileBella is in his care, and for at least 12 hours prior to his time with Bella.9. Neither parent shall remove Bella from the 9 Bay Area counties without writtenpermission from the other parent, or a court order.10. Both parents shall ensure that Bella is properly supervised at all times.11. Father shall take a parenting class appropriate for raising a 4-year-old child.12. Both parents shall (separately) take a co-parenting class and bring proof of successfulcompletion to any future mediations or court hearings.13. Bella shall be exposed to peaceful contact only between her parents.14. Neither parent shall make any disparaging comments about the other parent in thepresence of Bella or allow others to do so.15. Bella shall not be exposed to any verbal or physical abuse.16. Bellas custody situation shall be reviewed in September of 2025. The parties areordered to contact FCS in early August at (415) 444-7090 to schedule an appointment.17. The matter is continued for review hearing to September 19, 2025 at 9:00 am inDepartment D.SO ORDERED.Counsel for Father to prepare the order.Parties must comply with Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 7.12(B), (C), whichprovide that If a party wants to present oral argument, the party must contact the Court at(415) 444-7046 and all opposing parties by 4:00 p.m. the court day preceding the scheduledhearing. Notice may be by telephone or in person to all other parties that argument is beingPage 3 of 4FL0001852requested (i.e., it is not necessary to speak with counsel or parties directly.) Unless the Courtand all parties have been notified of a request to present oral argument, no oral argument willbe permitted except by order of the Court. In the event no party requests oral argument inaccordance with Rule 7.12(C), the tentative ruling shall become the order of the court.IT IS ORDERED that video appearances though Zoom are permitted unless a party is orderedto appear in court. In-person appearances are also permitted. Evidentiary hearings shall bein-person in Department D. The parties may access Department D for video conference via alink on the court website.FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are responsible for ensuring that they have a goodconnection and that they are available for the hearing. If the connection is inadequate, theCourt may proceed with the hearing in the partys absence.Any party contesting the ruling and requesting oral argument shall appear in person orremotely through Zoom either by video or telephone. Please follow the guidelines set forth onthe court website at wwwThe Zoom appearance information is as follows:June 2025 at 09:00 AMJoin Zoom Meetinghttps://marin-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/16Meeting ID: 160 111 4119Passcode: 63630819? pwd=p6bV9EPSWHim lj 7jzvPrwiExIVObv4. 1If you are only able to appear by phone you may dial the phone number below, follow theprompts and enter the meeting ID and passcode.+1-669-254-5252 US (San Jose)Meeting ID: 160 111 4119Passcode: 636308If a party and/or counsel elects to appear over Zoom they must follow proper Zoom etiquette.This includes joining the call five minutes early, speaking only one at a time, avoidingdisruptions, and wearing proper attire appropriate for a court environment. Parties must actand speak in a professional and respectful manner as though they are in an actual courtroom.If a party or counsel is unable to follow proper Zoom etiquette, the court may halt the hearingand order the parties to return in person.Page 4 of 4

DATE: 07/09/25 TIME: 9:00 A.M. DEPT: B CASE NO: FL0000193PRESIDING: HON. JANET L. FRANKELREPORTER: CLERK: ALEX URTONPETITIONER: THOMAS A. JACOBSandRESPONDENT: KAREN JACOBSNATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: 1) CASE PROGRESS CONFERENCE2) TRIAL READINESS CONFERENCE3) REQUEST FOR ORDER - OTHER: LEAVE TO AMEND PETITION & OTHER ORDERS4) REQUEST FOR ORDER - ATTORNEYS FEESRULINGThis matter comes before the court on Petitioner/Husbands Request for Order (HusbandsRFO), filed on May 28, 2025, seeking Leave to Amend Petition and Other Orders.This matter also comes before the court on Respondent/Wifes Request for Order (Wifes RFO),filed on June 11, 2025, seeking attorneys fees and costs.Husbands declaration asserts that the parties did, at first, cohabit as spouses. Husband assertsthat Wife joined Husband on business trips for a few years into their marriage, and that shecooked meals for him until recent years. Husband complains that now, Wife resides separatelyfrom him, and he is reduced to a check book. (Husbands RFO, Supporting Declaration, 5:10-13.)Husband asserts that he was aware of these facts when he filed his initial petition for dissolutionof marriage in August 2023, and that he did not discover any new facts afterwards. Husbandstates he learned he could seek a nullity of marriage based on fraud from his current attorney,who substituted in as attorney of record for Husband on November 18, 2024.Husbands assertions, on their face, do not support an allegation of fraudulent inducement tomarry. Husbands request for leave to amend his petition of dissolution to nullity is DENIED,without prejudice. !As to Husbands request for limitations on discovery, to the extent that the parties have anyremaining disputes regarding discovery, they are referred to MCR Fam 7.16 and should availthemselves of the Discovery Facilitator Program if appropriate.FL0000193As to Wifes request for additional attorneys fees, the court is mindful of its recent grant ofWifes request for $75,000 ($50,000 in attorneys fees and $25,000 in expert fees on June 13,2025). Wife now asserts that she has incurred a total of $101,812 in fees and costs as of June 30,2025. Wife requests an additional award of attorneys fees in the amount of $50,000, which shestates increased due to Husbands request to seek to nullify the marriage.There is a disparity in income and assets between these parties, as previously noted in the courtsJune 13, 2025 Findings and Order After Hearing. Based on Family Code sections 2030 and 2032,the court GRANTS Wifes request for additional attorneys fees in the amount of $35,000,payable forthwith.The Case Progress Conference and the Trial Readiness Conference are continued to August 8,2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department B.,,,}Counsel for Wife is ordered to prepare the formal order after hearing. )Litigants who require the assistance of an interpreter may appear in court to access the services )of a staff interpreter, or they may appear remotely. Persons who require interpreter services via ,remote appearance shall notify the clerk of the court in advance to schedule remote interpreter !services. ,Parties must comply with Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 7.12(B), (C), whichprovide that if a party wants to present oral argument, the party must contact the Court at (415)444-7046 and all opposing parties by 4:00 p.m. the court day preceding the scheduled hearing.Notice may be by telephone or in person to all other parties that argument is being requested(ie., it is not necessary to speak with counsel or parties directly.) Unless the Court and all partieshave been notified of a request to present oral argument, no oral argument will be permittedexcept by order of the Court. In the event no party requests oral argument in accordance withRule 7.12(C), the tentative ruling shall become the order of the court.IT IS ORDERED that video appearances though Zoom are permitted unless a party is ordered toappear in court. In-person appearances are also permitted.FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are responsible for ensuring that they have a goodconnection and that they are available for the hearing. If the connection is inadequate, the Courtmay proceed with the hearing in the partys absence.Any party contesting the ruling and requesting oral argument shall appear in person or remotelythrough Zoom either by video or telephone. Please follow the guidelines set forth on the court,website at www.marin.courts.ca.gov. ,,Ifa party and/or counsel elects to appear over Zoom they must follow proper Zoom etiquette.This includes joining the call five minutes early, speaking only one at a time, avoidingdisruptions, and wearing proper attire appropriate for a court environment. Parties must act andspeak in a professional and respectful manner as though they are in an actual courtroom. If aparty or counsel is unable to follow proper Zoom etiquette, the court may halt the hearing andorder the parties to return in person.Page 2 of 2

DATE: 07/11/25 TIME: 9:00 A.M. DEPT: D CASE NO: FL0001827PRESIDING: HON. BETH S. JORDANREPORTER: CLERK: STACY BONDPETITIONER: MANUEL GARCIAGODINEZandRESPONDENT: CAMILLE RENEEHOWARDNATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: REVIEW OF REPORTS HEARINGRULINGThis matter is set for custody/visitation regarding the parties son, Ashton (DOB 10/3/23) andreceipt of a Report & Recommendations from Family Court Services (FCS) following theCourts issuing a one-year Domestic Violence Restraining Order (SDVRO) on 5/13/25 withRespondent/Mother as the restrained person and Petitioner/ Father and Ashton are protectedpersons. Father was granted sole legal and physical custody of Ashton with Mother havingsupervised visits at Rally twice a week. Mother is also required to complete a 17-week battererstreatment course. The parties were both interviewed by FCS, and FCS filed its Report &Recommendations with the Court on 6/26/25.Mother reported she had completed the third week of an 18-week DV course, but denies shecommitted any domestic violence against Father and seeks sole legal custody of Ashton. Thepatties attorneys are working to set up visits between Ashton and Tobias, Mothers son fromanother relationship, who is very close with Ashton.After review and consideration of the parties written submissions and the FCS Report &Recommendations, the Court finds that it is in the best interests of Ashton to adopt the FCSrecommendations, as modified below.1. All prior orders not in conflict with the below shall remain in full force and effect withthe following modifications.2. Sole legal and physical custody to Father.3. Mother shall continue to have supervised visits at Rally twice per week.FL00018274. Mother shall be assessed by a therapist to identify any mental health concerns. Mothershall participate in therapy with the frequency and duration to be directed by thetherapist. A copy of this report shall be released to Mothers therapist.5. Mothers son Tobias may visit with Ashton and Father as arranged per mutual agreementbetween the parents with the assistance of their attorneys.6. Mother shall comply with any orders issued by the criminal court including participationin a longer-term in-person batterers treatment course.7. Once Mother completes her batterers treatment course and once she has completed atleast three months of weekly individual therapy, her visits with Ashton shall transition tounsupervised day visits twice a week (up to four hours per visit).8. There shall be no corporal punishment of Ashton by either parent.9. Father shall not put Ashton in a cold shower as punishment for toileting accidents or as ateaching tool for potty training once potty training begins for Ashton. Father shall take aparenting class focused on parenting toddlers to learn about appropriate toilet trainingtechniques.10. Ashton shall not be exposed to domestic violence when in the custody of either parent.11. Father shall not drive Ashton if he does not possess a valid drivers license.SO ORDERED.The Court will prepare the order per Rule 5.125, CA Rules of CourtParties must comply with Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 7.12(B), (C), whichprovide that If a party wants to present oral argument, the party must contact the Court at(415) 444-7046 and all opposing parties by 4:00 p.m. the court day preceding the scheduledhearing. Notice may be by telephone or in person to all other parties that argument is beingrequested (i.e., it is not necessary to speak with counsel or parties directly.) Unless the Courtand all parties have been notified of a request to present oral argument, no oral argument willbe permitted except by order of the Court. In the event no party requests oral argument inaccordance with Rule 7.12(C), the tentative ruling shall become the order of the court.IT IS ORDERED that video appearances though Zoom are permitted unless a party is orderedto appear in court. In-person appearances are also permitted. Evidentiary hearings shall bein-person in Department D, The parties may access Department D for video conference via alink on the court website.Page 2 of 3FL0001827FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are responsible for ensuring that they have a goodconnection and that they are available for the hearing. If the connection is inadequate, theCourt may proceed with the hearing in the partys absence. :Any party contesting the ruling and requesting oral argument shall appear in person orremotely through Zoom either by video or telephone. Please follow the guidelines set forth onthe court website at www.marin.courts.ca.govThe Zoom appearance information is as follows:July 2025 at 09:00 AMJoin Zoom Meetinghttps://marin-courts-ca-gov.:Meeting ID: 160 111 4119Passcode: 636308If you are only able to appear by phone you may dial the phone number below, follow theprompts and enter the meeting ID and passcode.+1-669-254-5252 US (San Jose)Meeting ID: 160 111 4119Passcode: 636308If a party and/or counsel elects to appear over Zoom they must follow proper Zoom etiquette.This includes joining the call five minutes early, speaking only one at a time, avoidingdisruptions, and wearing proper attire appropriate for a court environment. Parties must actand speak in a professional and respectful manner as though they are in an actual courtroom.Ifa party or counsel is unable to follow proper Zoom etiquette, the court may halt the hearingand order the parties to return in person.Page 3 of 3

IN RE: CROMBIECase Number: 24CV-0206296Tentative Ruling on Petition for Change of Name: Petitioner Dakota Crombie seeks to change his name toDakota Mantis. No proof of publication has been submitted. The Court requires an original Certificate ofPublication from the publishing newspaper before the Petition may be granted. If the Certificate of Publicationis provided, the Court intends to grant the Petition, vacate all future dates, and close the file.