Parties, and counsel if represented, are ordered to appear personally or remotely for settlement conference. You must notify the court and all other parties that you intend to appear remotely using form RA-010. Department 3’s Zoom link is available at https://www.amadorcourt.org/os-zoomRequestForm.aspx under the “Click to Connect” Tab.

IN RE: MASSEY, IIICase Number: 25CV-0207125Tentative Ruling on Petition for Change of Name: Petitioner William James Massey, III seeks to change hisname to William James Sebree. All procedural requirements of CCP §§ 1275 et. seq. have been satisfied, withthe exception that proof of publication has not been filed. The Court intends to grant the Petition upon presentationof sufficient proof of publication. An appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

DATE: 07/11/25 TIME: 9:00 A.M. DEPT: D CASE NO: FL0001827PRESIDING: HON. BETH S. JORDANREPORTER: CLERK: STACY BONDPETITIONER: MANUEL GARCIAGODINEZandRESPONDENT: CAMILLE RENEEHOWARDNATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: REVIEW OF REPORTS HEARINGRULINGThis matter is set for custody/visitation regarding the parties son, Ashton (DOB 10/3/23) andreceipt of a Report & Recommendations from Family Court Services (FCS) following theCourts issuing a one-year Domestic Violence Restraining Order (SDVRO) on 5/13/25 withRespondent/Mother as the restrained person and Petitioner/ Father and Ashton are protectedpersons. Father was granted sole legal and physical custody of Ashton with Mother havingsupervised visits at Rally twice a week. Mother is also required to complete a 17-week battererstreatment course. The parties were both interviewed by FCS, and FCS filed its Report &Recommendations with the Court on 6/26/25.Mother reported she had completed the third week of an 18-week DV course, but denies shecommitted any domestic violence against Father and seeks sole legal custody of Ashton. Thepatties attorneys are working to set up visits between Ashton and Tobias, Mothers son fromanother relationship, who is very close with Ashton.After review and consideration of the parties written submissions and the FCS Report &Recommendations, the Court finds that it is in the best interests of Ashton to adopt the FCSrecommendations, as modified below.1. All prior orders not in conflict with the below shall remain in full force and effect withthe following modifications.2. Sole legal and physical custody to Father.3. Mother shall continue to have supervised visits at Rally twice per week.FL00018274. Mother shall be assessed by a therapist to identify any mental health concerns. Mothershall participate in therapy with the frequency and duration to be directed by thetherapist. A copy of this report shall be released to Mothers therapist.5. Mothers son Tobias may visit with Ashton and Father as arranged per mutual agreementbetween the parents with the assistance of their attorneys.6. Mother shall comply with any orders issued by the criminal court including participationin a longer-term in-person batterers treatment course.7. Once Mother completes her batterers treatment course and once she has completed atleast three months of weekly individual therapy, her visits with Ashton shall transition tounsupervised day visits twice a week (up to four hours per visit).8. There shall be no corporal punishment of Ashton by either parent.9. Father shall not put Ashton in a cold shower as punishment for toileting accidents or as ateaching tool for potty training once potty training begins for Ashton. Father shall take aparenting class focused on parenting toddlers to learn about appropriate toilet trainingtechniques.10. Ashton shall not be exposed to domestic violence when in the custody of either parent.11. Father shall not drive Ashton if he does not possess a valid drivers license.SO ORDERED.The Court will prepare the order per Rule 5.125, CA Rules of CourtParties must comply with Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 7.12(B), (C), whichprovide that If a party wants to present oral argument, the party must contact the Court at(415) 444-7046 and all opposing parties by 4:00 p.m. the court day preceding the scheduledhearing. Notice may be by telephone or in person to all other parties that argument is beingrequested (i.e., it is not necessary to speak with counsel or parties directly.) Unless the Courtand all parties have been notified of a request to present oral argument, no oral argument willbe permitted except by order of the Court. In the event no party requests oral argument inaccordance with Rule 7.12(C), the tentative ruling shall become the order of the court.IT IS ORDERED that video appearances though Zoom are permitted unless a party is orderedto appear in court. In-person appearances are also permitted. Evidentiary hearings shall bein-person in Department D, The parties may access Department D for video conference via alink on the court website.Page 2 of 3FL0001827FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are responsible for ensuring that they have a goodconnection and that they are available for the hearing. If the connection is inadequate, theCourt may proceed with the hearing in the partys absence. :Any party contesting the ruling and requesting oral argument shall appear in person orremotely through Zoom either by video or telephone. Please follow the guidelines set forth onthe court website at www.marin.courts.ca.govThe Zoom appearance information is as follows:July 2025 at 09:00 AMJoin Zoom Meetinghttps://marin-courts-ca-gov.:Meeting ID: 160 111 4119Passcode: 636308If you are only able to appear by phone you may dial the phone number below, follow theprompts and enter the meeting ID and passcode.+1-669-254-5252 US (San Jose)Meeting ID: 160 111 4119Passcode: 636308If a party and/or counsel elects to appear over Zoom they must follow proper Zoom etiquette.This includes joining the call five minutes early, speaking only one at a time, avoidingdisruptions, and wearing proper attire appropriate for a court environment. Parties must actand speak in a professional and respectful manner as though they are in an actual courtroom.Ifa party or counsel is unable to follow proper Zoom etiquette, the court may halt the hearingand order the parties to return in person.Page 3 of 3

DATE: 07/11/25 TIME: 9:00 A.M. DEPT: D CASE NO: FL0001461PRESIDING: HON. BETH S. JORDANREPORTER: CLERK: STACY BONDPETITIONER: YASMIN PAJKINandRESPONDENT: CHAFIQ FDAOCHNATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: 1) REQUEST FOR ORDER SPOUSAL SUPPORT2) CASE PROGRESS CONFERENCERULINGThis matter is set for hearing on Petitioners 5/16/25 Request for Order (RFO") re: spousalsupport. The Court notes that the RFO was not served within the time required for the 7/11/25hearing; as a result, the matter is continued for hearing to 8/1/25 at 9:00 am in Department D.SO ORDERED.The Court will prepare the order per Rule 5.125, CA Rules of CourtParties must comply with Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 7.12(B), (C), whichprovide that If a party wants to present oral argument, the party must contact the Court at(415) 444-7046 and all opposing parties by 4:00 p.m. the court day preceding the scheduledhearing. Notice may be by telephone or in person to all other parties that argument is beingrequested (i.e., it is not necessary to speak with counsel or parties directly.) Unless the Courtand all parties have been notified of a request to present oral argument, no oral argument willbe permitted except by order of the Court. In the event no party requests oral argument inaccordance with Rule 7.12(C), the tentative ruling shall become the order of the court.IT IS ORDERED that video appearances though Zoom are permitted unless a party is orderedto appear in court. In-person appearances are also permitted. Evidentiary hearings shall bein-person in Department D. The parties may access Department D for video conference via alink on the court website.FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are responsible for ensuring that they have a goodconnection and that they are available for the hearing. If the connection is inadequate, theCourt may proceed with the hearing in the partys absence,FL0001461Any party contesting the ruling and requesting oral argument shall appear in person orremotely through Zoom either by video or telephone. Please follow the guidelines set forth onthe court website at www.marin.courts.ca.govThe Zoom appearance information is as follows:July 2025 at 09:00 AMJoin Zoom Meetinghttps://marin-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/1601114119? pwd=p6bV9Ef8WHjm1j7izyTrwjEx{VOby4.1Meeting ID: 160 111 4119Passcode: 636308If you are only able to appear by phone you may dial the phone number below, follow theprompts and enter the meeting ID and passcode.+1-669-254-5252 US (San Jose)Meeting ID: 160 111 4119Passcode: 636308If a party and/or counsel elects to appear over Zoom they must follow proper Zoom etiquette.This includes joining the call five minutes early, speaking only one at a time, avoidingdisruptions, and wearing proper attire appropriate for a court environment. Parties must actand speak in a professional and respectful manner as though they are in an actual courtroom.If a party or counsel is unable to follow proper Zoom etiquette, the court may halt the hearingand order the parties to return in person.Page 2 of 2

DATE: 07/10/25 TIME: 9:00 A.M. DEPT: L CASE NO: FL0001864PRESIDING: HON. MARK A. TALAMANTESREPORTER: CLERK: JENN CHARIFA.PETITIONER: ANGELINA EVAGHILOTTIandRESPONDENT: TYLER RUGGLESNATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: 1) REQUEST FOR ORDER - CHILDCUSTODY/VISITATION2) REQUEST FOR ORDER - CHILD CUSTODY/VISITATIONRULINGPetitioner Angela Eva Ghilotti (Mother) filed a petition for Emergency Temporary Orders onMay 1, 2025, seeking emergency custody orders to require Respondent Tyler Ruggles (Father)to resume prior court ordered visitation. Both parents attended the hearing on May 1. Fatheradvised the court that he did not want his children exposed to Mothers boyfriend, Paul Deem,who is a felon.Both parents met with Marin Family Court Services (FCS) on or about June 14, 2025, on theissue raised by Father. The parents were interviewed together. (Marin is a recommendingcounty. (Family Code 3183; Marin County Rules, Family 7.17.A.) FCS issued a Report withvisitation recommendations on June 27, 2025.Together, these parents have one child. Jaxon is 2, born February 1, 2023. Mother is nowpregnant with Mr. Deens child, which is relevant to child visitation orders moving forward.Both parents are currently in recovery. Father represents that he is in recovery for meth andopiates use. Mother is in AA. Father knows Mr. Deem from the street and is adamant that hedoes not want him around this child. Mothers parents are also concerned about the exposure ofJaxon to Mr. Deem. This is a difficult demand given Mother is now pregnant with Mr. Deemsbaby.Paul Wesley Deems criminal history is extensive. Marin County court records included 37entries involving: 12 felonies, 10 misdemeanors, and 8 traffic. His arrests included allegationsof drug possession, paraphernalia, burglary, violence and threats of violence, and crimes.involving firearms.Mother, knowing of this record of criminality, has invited this man into her life. She mustappreciate that Father matters. His opinion matters and he does not believe her boyfriend is aFL0001864good influence on his son. Until Father is more comfortable with his son being in the presenceof Mr. Deem, Mothers inclusion of him in family visits will be curtailed.Custody and VisitationThe court has reviewed the application filed by Father in his request for emergency custodyorders. The court has also reviewed the FCS Report issued on June 27, 2025, and finds goodcause and that it is in the best interest of Jaxon to adopt the FCS recommendations as follows:Parental Responsibilities1.The parents shall share joint legal custody of Jaxon. The parents shall share in theresponsibility and confer in good faith on matters concerning the childs health, educationand welfare. Both parents shall have access to the childs school, medical, mental health,and dental records and the right to consult with professionals who are providing servicesto the child.2. The parents shall have physical custody of Jaxon.Timeshare Schedule3.Jaxon shall continue to live with both parents on a schedule where he is with Angelinaevery week from Sunday at 12:00 to Wednesday at 3:00 p.m. and with Tyler every weekfrom Wednesday at 3:00 p.m. to Sunday at 12:00 p.m.Any changes to the schedule shall occur as mutually agreed upon by the parents.As Jaxon gets older, Mother shall not put the child in a position where he is expected tobe dishonest to his Father. If there is a report that Mr. Deem is in the presence of thechild, visits will cease.Holidays/Vacations6.7.Jaxon shall be with both parents equally for Holidays and vacations on an agreed uponschedule until the baby is born.Holiday Schedule:e Mothers Day and Fathers Day (10 a.m. to 7 p.m.) shall be spent with therespective parent each year.e April religious holidays (10 a.m. to 7 p.m.): The children shall be with Father inodd-numbered years and Mother in even-numbered years.e Memorial Day (10 a.m. to 7 p.m.): The child shall be with Mother in odd-numbered years and Father in even-numbered years.Page 2 of 4FL0001864Fourth of July (10 a.m. to 7 p.m.): The child shall be with Father in odd-numbered years and Mother in even-numbered years.Labor Day (10 a.m. to 7 p.m.): The child shall be with Mother in odd-numberedyears and Father in even-numbered yearsHalloween (4 p.m. to 9 p.m.): The child shall be with Father in odd-numberedyears and Mother in even-numbered years.Thanksgiving shall be from Thanksgiving Day at 10 a.m. and shall be spent withMother in odd-numbered years and Father in even-numbered years.Christmas (and any other religious holiday in December): Father shall care forthe child from noon to 10 p.m. on Christmas Eve and Mother shall care for thechild on Christmas Day.New Years: New Years Eve from 5 p.m. to the New Years Day up to 7 p.m.shall be spent with Father in even-numbered years and with Mother in odd-numbered years.Collateral Issues8. Jaxon shall continue not to have any contact with Paul Wesley Deem until further orderof the court.9. Both parents shall continue their sobriety and continue to participate in programs tosupport it.10. Neither parent shall expose Jaxon to any drugs or drug paraphernalia.11. Both parents shall continue to be law-abiding.12. Jaxon shall be exposed to peaceful contact only between his parents and any other adults.13, Jaxon shall not be exposed to any domestic violence or any verbal or physical abuse.14. Neither parent shall make any disparaging comments about the other parent in thepresence of the children or allow others to do so.15. The matter will be called for an update on visitation on January 15, 2026, at 9 a.m. in thisdepartment. The parents are to contact FCS at 415-444-7090 by December 1, 2025, tomake an interview appointment.Litigants who require the assistance of an interpreter may appear in court to access the servicesof a staff interpreter, or they may appear remote. Persons who require interpreter services viaPage 3 of 4FL0001864remote appearance shall notify the clerk of the court in advance to schedule remote interpretationservices.As authorized by CRC 5.125, the court will prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing.Parties must comply with Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 7.12(B), (C), whichprovide that if a party wants to present oral argument, the party must contact the Court at(415) 444-7046 and all opposing parties by 4:00 p.m. the court day preceding the scheduledhearing. Notice may be by telephone or in person to all other parties that argument is beingrequested (i.e., it is not necessary to speak with counsel or parties directly.) Unless the Courtand all parties have been notified of a request to present oral argument, no oral argument willbe permitted except by order of the Court. In the event no party requests oral argument inaccordance with Rule 7.12(Q), the tentative ruling shall become the order of the court.IT IS ORDERED that evidentiary hearings shall be in-person in Department L. For routineappearances, the parties may access Department L for video conference via a link on the courtwebsite. Litigants in the virtual courtroom are required to leave the video screen on and waitSor your case to be called.FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are responsible for ensuring that they have a goodconnection and that they are available for the hearing. If the connection is inadequate, theCourt may proceed with the hearing in the partys absence.Page 4 of 4

IN RE: MASSEY, IIICase Number: 25CV-0207125Tentative Ruling on Petition for Change of Name: Petitioner William James Massey, III seeks to change hisname to William James Sebree. All procedural requirements of CCP §§ 1275 et. seq. have been satisfied, withthe exception that proof of publication has not been filed. The Court intends to grant the Petition upon presentationof sufficient proof of publication. An appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

IN RE: TODDCase Number: 25CV-0206939Tentative Ruling on Petition for Change of Name: Petitioner seeks to change the name of her minor child.When a petition to change the name of a minor is brought by one parent only, the nonpetitioning parent must bepersonally served with the notice of hearing or Order to Show Cause at least 30 days before the hearing date. SeeCCP § 1277(a)(4). No proof of service has been filed. Proof of Publication has also not been submitted. The Courtrequires Proof of Service on the father and the Certificate of Publication before the Petition may be granted. Ifproper Proof of Service and Certificate of Publication are provided, the Court intends to grant the Petition. Anappearance is necessary on today’s calendar to discuss service on the father and status of publication.

DATE: 07/11/25 TIME: 9:00 A.M. DEPT: D CASE NO: FL0001461PRESIDING: HON. BETH S. JORDANREPORTER: CLERK: STACY BONDPETITIONER: YASMIN PAJKINandRESPONDENT: CHAFIQ FDAOCHNATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: 1) REQUEST FOR ORDER SPOUSAL SUPPORT2) CASE PROGRESS CONFERENCERULINGThis matter is set for hearing on Petitioners 5/16/25 Request for Order (RFO") re: spousalsupport. The Court notes that the RFO was not served within the time required for the 7/11/25hearing; as a result, the matter is continued for hearing to 8/1/25 at 9:00 am in Department D.SO ORDERED.The Court will prepare the order per Rule 5.125, CA Rules of CourtParties must comply with Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 7.12(B), (C), whichprovide that If a party wants to present oral argument, the party must contact the Court at(415) 444-7046 and all opposing parties by 4:00 p.m. the court day preceding the scheduledhearing. Notice may be by telephone or in person to all other parties that argument is beingrequested (i.e., it is not necessary to speak with counsel or parties directly.) Unless the Courtand all parties have been notified of a request to present oral argument, no oral argument willbe permitted except by order of the Court. In the event no party requests oral argument inaccordance with Rule 7.12(C), the tentative ruling shall become the order of the court.IT IS ORDERED that video appearances though Zoom are permitted unless a party is orderedto appear in court. In-person appearances are also permitted. Evidentiary hearings shall bein-person in Department D. The parties may access Department D for video conference via alink on the court website.FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are responsible for ensuring that they have a goodconnection and that they are available for the hearing. If the connection is inadequate, theCourt may proceed with the hearing in the partys absence,FL0001461Any party contesting the ruling and requesting oral argument shall appear in person orremotely through Zoom either by video or telephone. Please follow the guidelines set forth onthe court website at www.marin.courts.ca.govThe Zoom appearance information is as follows:July 2025 at 09:00 AMJoin Zoom Meetinghttps://marin-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/1601114119? pwd=p6bV9Ef8WHjm1j7izyTrwjEx{VOby4.1Meeting ID: 160 111 4119Passcode: 636308If you are only able to appear by phone you may dial the phone number below, follow theprompts and enter the meeting ID and passcode.+1-669-254-5252 US (San Jose)Meeting ID: 160 111 4119Passcode: 636308If a party and/or counsel elects to appear over Zoom they must follow proper Zoom etiquette.This includes joining the call five minutes early, speaking only one at a time, avoidingdisruptions, and wearing proper attire appropriate for a court environment. Parties must actand speak in a professional and respectful manner as though they are in an actual courtroom.If a party or counsel is unable to follow proper Zoom etiquette, the court may halt the hearingand order the parties to return in person.Page 2 of 2