No appearances necessary. Notice of Conditional Settlement of Entire Case was filed on February 21, 2025. Plaintiff indicates that a request for dismissal will be filed by no later than April 29, 2027. The court sets the matter for Court's Motion to Dismiss pursuant to CRC 3.1385 on April 27, 2027 at 10:00 a.m. in Department 3.

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THEPLEADINGS ON COMPLAINT FORCOLLECTIONS CRC 3.740 (OVERACCELERATED$10,000 DOES NOT EXCEED $35,000)CVMV2408871 INVENTORYOF ACCELERATED INVENTORYMANAGEMENT LLC vsMANAGEMENT LLC BYMORRISONACCELERATED INVENTORYMANAGEMENT LLCTentative Ruling: Granted.Judgment shall enter in the amount of $13,381.31.

Case Number: 23STCV11113 Hearing Date: July 3, 2025 Dept: 53 Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles Central District Department 53 flock freight inc.; Plaintiff, vs. indio products, inc. , et al.; Defendants. Case No.: 23STCV11113 Hearing Date: July 3, 2025 Time: 10:00 a.m. [tentative] Order RE: plaintiffs motion for order setting aside dismissal and entering judgment pursuant to stipulation for entry of judgment MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Flock Freight Inc. RESPONDING PARTY: Unopposed Motion for Order Setting Aside Dismissal and Entering Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation for Entry of Judgment The court considered the moving papers filed in connection with this motion. No opposition papers were filed. DISCUSSION Plaintiff Flock Freight Inc. (Plaintiff) filed this action for open book account against defendant Indio Products, Inc. (Defendant) on May 17, 2023. The parties entered into a Stipulation RE: Entry of Judgment (the Settlement) to settle this action. (Gaba Decl., Ex. 1, Settlement.) Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement, the parties agreed that (1) judgment shall be entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant for the total amount of $305,598.96 (consisting of $262,611.28 in principal, $42,450.50 in interest, and $537.178 in costs), and (2) Plaintiff shall keep the Settlement in trust and not file it with the court provided that Defendant paid the sum of $200,000 to Plaintiff on the dates set forth therein. (Id. at ¶¶ 2-3.) The parties further agreed that the court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6. (Id. at ¶ 10.) Thus, the parties thereafter filed, on December 13, 2023, the Stipulation of All Parties to Dismiss Action Without Prejudice with the Court Retaining Jurisdiction to Enforce the Settlement, in which Plaintiff and Defendant (1) stated that the parties had entered into a written Stipulation RE: Entry of Judgment (i.e., the Settlement), in which the parties agreed that Defendant would make monthly settlement payments to Plaintiff over a period of six months, and (2) stipulated that the court would retain jurisdiction over this action and the parties pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 to enforce the terms of the Settlement. (Dec. 13, 2023 Stip., pp. 2:1-15, 3 [signature page showing signature of authorized representative of Plaintiff], 4 [signature page showing signature of authorized representative of Defendant].) On December 15, 2023, the court entered an order dismissing this action without prejudice and retaining jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement. (Dec. 13, 2023 Order, pp. 1:25-2:3.) Plaintiff now moves the court for an order (1) setting aside the dismissal of this action, and (2) entering judgment pursuant to the parties Settlement. If parties to pending litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement.¿ (Code Civ. Proc., § 664.6, subd. (a).)¿ This statute provides a summary procedure to enforce a settlement agreement by entering judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement.¿ (Hines v. Lukes (2008) 167 Cal.App.4th 1174, 1182.)¿ If the court determines that the parties entered into an enforceable settlement, it should grant the motion and enter a formal judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement.¿ (Ibid.)¿¿ First, as set forth above, the parties have stipulated, in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court, for the settlement of this case. (Code Civ. Proc., § 664.6, subd. (a); Gaba Decl., Ex. 1, Settlement.) Second, Plaintiff has shown that Defendant has defaulted under the terms of the Settlement by failing to make the scheduled payments and paying only $160,000 out of the required $200,000.[1] (Gaba Decl., ¶¶ 5, 7.) Third, Defendant has not filed opposition papers or other evidence with the court establishing that it has since made all required payments or otherwise arguing that the court should not enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the Settlement. Thus, the court finds that Plaintiff is entitled to an order entering judgment in its favor and against Defendant pursuant to the terms of the parties Settlement. (Code Civ. Proc., § 664.6, subd. (a).) The court further finds that Plaintiff has shown that it is entitled to judgment in the total amount of $145,598.96, consisting of $145,061.78 in principal and interest (($262,611.28 in principal + $42,450.50 in interest) - $160,000 in payments made) and $537.18 in costs. (Gaba Decl., ¶ 9 and Ex. 1, Settlement, ¶¶ 2, 7.) The court therefore grants Plaintiffs motion. ORDER The court grants plaintiff Flock Freight Inc.s motion for order setting aside dismissal and entering judgment pursuant to the parties stipulation for entry of judgment. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6, the court orders that its December 15, 2023 order dismissing this action is set aside. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6, the court orders that judgment shall be entered in favor of plaintiff Flock Freight Inc. and against defendant Indio Products, Inc., in the total amount of $145,598.96. The court orders plaintiff Flock Freight Inc. to prepare, serve, and file a proposed judgment on Judicial Council form JUD-100 within 10 days of the date of this order. The court sets an Order to Show Cause re entry of judgment for hearing on October 7, 2025, at 8:30 a.m., in Department 53. The court orders plaintiff Flock Freight Inc. to give notice of this ruling. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 3, 2025 _____________________________ Robert B. Broadbelt III Judge of the Superior Court [1] The court notes that paragraph 5 of the declaration of counsel appears to be incomplete, since it states that Defendant has defaulted under the terms of the Stipulation by failing to make the scheduled payment thereon in the sum of $payment amount per month. (Gaba Decl., ¶ 5 [emphasis in original].) While the amount of the payments made per month was omitted from that paragraph, the court has considered the statements that Defendant (1) has defaulted under the terms of the Settlement by failing to make the scheduled payments, and (2) has paid a total of $160,000 as of the date that counsel signed the declaration (April 29, 2025) to show that Defendant did not make all payments required by the Settlement, which required Defendant to pay a total of $200,000 by May 26, 2024. (Gaba Decl., ¶¶ 5, 7, and Ex. 1, Settlement, ¶ 3 [Defendant shall pay to Plaintiff $200,000 in six payments ending on May 26, 2024].)

MOTION TO ENTER JUDGMENT ONCAPITAL ONE, N.A. vsCVMV2405539 DEFAULTED STIPULATION BYSAMORACAPITAL ONE, N.A.Tentative Ruling: Granted.The dismissal is set aside, and judgment shall enter in the amount of $5,829.82.

MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC VS. HOLTCase Number: 23CVG-01124This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of judgment or dismissal. A notice ofconditional settlement was filed on December 31, 2024, which indicates this matter would bedismissed no later than March 13, 2026. This matter is removed from the Court’s control due to aconditional settlement. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

No appearances necessary. This is a collections case, as defined in Rule 3.740 of the California Rules of Court, filed on December 13, 2024. A proof of service is filed. Plaintiff must obtain default judgment within 360 days of filing the complaint. (Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.740(f).) This matter is continued for further CMC to December 31, 2025 at 1:30 p.m. in Dept 3. If Plaintiff has not obtained a default judgment by said date, this matter will be set for an order to show cause and monetary sanctions may be imposed. (CRC 3.740(f)).

DATE: 07/01/25 TIME: 1:30 P.M. DEPT: A CASE NO: CV0005128PRESIDING: HON. STEPHEN P. FRECCEROREPORTER: CLERK:PLAINTIFF: WELLS FARGO BANK, NAvs.DEFENDANT: ALIYAH A. ROSARIONATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: MOTION -ENTRY OF JUDGMENTRULINGThe unopposed motion of Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, NA for judgment on the pleadings isGRANTED. (Code Civ. Proc., $ 438.) The complaint states sufficient facts to constitute acause of action against the defendant and the answer does not state facts sufficient to constitute adefense to the complaint.All parties must comply with Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 2.10(B)to contest the tentative decision. Parties who request oral argument are required to appear inperson or remotely by ZOOM. Regardless of whether a party requests oral argument inaccordance with Rule 2.10(B), the prevailing party shall prepare an order consistent with theannounced ruling as required by Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 2.11.The Zoom appearance information for July, 2025 is as follows:Attps://marin-courts-ca-gov.zoomigoy.cony/] 6052672722 pwd=IO8Ch P6 TV 2mhCAyailnzo6lyz2d Kaw LtMeeting ID: 160 526 7272Passcode: 026935If you are unable to join by video, you may join by telephone by calling (669) 254-5252and using the above-provided passcode. Zoom appearance information may also be found onthe Courts website: https:/Avww.marin.courts.ca.gov

Matter on the Law & Motion/Discovery Calendar for Wednesday July 2, 2025, line 2, DEFENDANT CHRISTINA JOHNSON Motion To Vacate Renewal Of Judgment The unopposed motion to vacate renewal of the default judgment entered in this matter is granted. Moving party provides evidence that she was never served with process in this case. The judgment creditor does not oppose. The court exercises its equitable power and vacates renewal of the default judgment. For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested. The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. = (302/CVA)