Tax Foundation experts regularly testify before the US Congress, in US statehouses, and in government institutions and parliaments throughout Europe.
Featured Testimony

Testimony: Alternatives to Tariffs to Boost US Competitiveness
While tariffs are often presented as tools to enhance US competitiveness, a long history of evidence and recent experience shows they lead to increased costs for consumers and unprotected producers and harmful retaliation, which outweighs the benefits afforded to protected industries.

Testimony: Lessons for the 2025 Tax Policy Debate
The stakes for next year’s expiring tax provisions are quite high. If Congress does nothing, then 62 percent of households will see their taxes go up in January of 2026.

Testimony: Capital Gains Taxation in the EU
It is essential to understand that the taxation of capital gains places a double tax on corporate income.
All Testimony
Refine Results

Testimony: Assessment Limits and Property Taxes in Nebraska
Assessment limits are not sound tax policy. While well-intended, with hopes of preventing owners from being “taxed out of their homes,” the tax shifts, lock-in effects, and housing supply issues created by assessment limits make housing affordability worse.

Testimony: Taxation of Ultra-High-Net-Worth Individuals
Instead of implementing new wealth taxes, European policymakers should focus on making the current tax system more efficient and transparent.

Testimony: Digital Services Taxes in the European Union
Since digital services taxes deliver limited revenue, shift the burden to European consumers, and risk provoking trade disputes, it’s time for policymakers to rethink their approach.

Testimony: Kansas Sales Tax Modernization and Income and Property Tax Relief Considerations
Kansas policymakers’ proposal to expand the sales tax base is well-intentioned but could be designed more prudently.

Response to OECD Consultation on BEPS 1.0
The BEPS project’s 15 actions were decisive responses to real problems in cross-border taxation, offering real benefits but also real costs. A decade of implementation experience has revealed a critical side effect: sharply higher compliance costs for both tax administrations and the business community.

Testimony: The Inflation Reduction Act’s Green Energy Tax Credits
William McBride discussed how and why the budgetary cost of the IRA’s tax credits has grown, described who benefits from the tax credits, and recommended ways to reform the credits amid budget reconciliation.

Testimony: A High-Earner Income Tax Surcharge Would Hurt Rhode Island’s Economic Competitiveness
The economic literature overwhelmingly suggests that an income tax increase of this magnitude would negatively affect economic growth and opportunity in Rhode Island.

Testimony: Alternatives to Tariffs to Boost US Competitiveness
While tariffs are often presented as tools to enhance US competitiveness, a long history of evidence and recent experience shows they lead to increased costs for consumers and unprotected producers and harmful retaliation, which outweighs the benefits afforded to protected industries.

Testimony: Pro-Growth Tax Reforms to Boost Competitiveness in Louisiana
Louisiana’s tax code currently features a number of inefficient and uncompetitive policies that are leaving the state further and further behind.

Testimony: Lessons for the 2025 Tax Policy Debate
The stakes for next year’s expiring tax provisions are quite high. If Congress does nothing, then 62 percent of households will see their taxes go up in January of 2026.

Testimony: International Tax Avoidance
Lawmakers should aim for policies that support investment and hiring in the United States and refining anti-avoidance measures to improve administrability and lower compliance costs.

Tax Foundation Response to UN Request for Public Input on a Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation
The global economy needs policymakers who are invested in seeing growth recover and avoiding unnecessary barriers to cross-border trade and investment. The challenges countries face will become even more difficult to solve in a stagnant global economy.

Testimony: The OECD’s Pillar One Project and the Future of Digital Services Taxes
If a multilateral solution to remove digital services taxes (DSTs) is not agreed to, then DSTs will continue to spread and mutate with negative impacts on some of the most innovative companies in the world.

Testimony: Capital Gains Taxation in the EU
It is essential to understand that the taxation of capital gains places a double tax on corporate income.

Response to Treasury’s Request for Public Input on Pillar One
A multilateral agreement that eliminates digital services taxes would be valuable, but not if it introduces more complexity and leaves unanswered many questions about the impacts on the U.S. tax base.

Testimony: The Costs and Complexity of the Federal Tax Code Demand Reform
Lawmakers should simplify the tax code so that taxpayers can understand the laws and the IRS can administer them with minimum cost and frustration.

Testimony: Considerations for Improving Indiana’s Tax Structure and Competitiveness
Indiana’s tax code is structured in a relatively sound and economically efficient manner overall, but additional improvements should be considered to make the state even more economically competitive.

Testimony: A Property Tax Assessment Limit Would Do More Harm Than Good in Kansas
Instead of adopting a highly distortive property tax assessment limit, policymakers should consider how similar goals could be met through other means.

Testimony: Reviewing Recent Federal Tax Policies and Considering Pro-Growth Reforms
Lawmakers should focus on simplifying the federal tax code, creating stability, and broadly improving economic incentives. There are incremental steps that can be made on the path to fundamental tax reform.

Testimony: The Role of Corporate Taxation in the European Union’s Future Tax Policy Mix
As policymakers shift their focus away from tax rates and look to harmonize the EU’s corporate tax base, they should understand the benefits of full expensing.