Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article reviews
Shortcut:
WP:CAR
WP:CAR
Comprehensive article reviews |
This page is forreviews of existingComprehensive articles. A Comprehensive article review is conducted when a current status article no longer meets one of the standards listed in theCAN rules or has significantly changed from the state it was in at the time of gaining status. On this page, users can nominate articles that they believe need updates or require their status removed.
How to nominate:
- Select a Comprehensive article that requires a review and refer tothis guide on the article review process.
- Add {{CAreview}} at the top of the article you are creating a review for, and save the page.Please note that if the article you are nominating has been nominated for Comprehensive article review previously, the same page will be used.
- Members ofWookieepedia'sDiscord server can open a review with the following command, andJocastaBot will automatically add the review to this page:@JocastaBot create review for ArticleName
- Open the redlink in a new tab to create the nomination page, modifying the preloaded instructions as necessary. A reason for opening the review must be provided.
- Copy the code provided to thebottom of this page.
- Purge the article to update the template.
- Other users can add additional issues and suggested improvements (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources, etc).
- On the review, all editors are able to add and address objections noted on the article's review. Afterward, one of several outcomes occurs:
- …all objections are satisfied.
- …all objections have remained unsatisfied for a period of thirty days, without a request for extension.
- …the article has exceeded Comprehensive article word count.
- …the article has changed significantly from its original state.
Closing stages:
- If all objections are addressed,EduCorps review board members can start a vote to close the review after it has been open for a minimum of 48 hours. Three EduCorps votes are required for an article to maintain its Comprehensive status.
- If objections have remained unsatisfied, the article has exceeded the word count, or the article has changed significantly from its original state, the EduCorps review board can send the article to a probationary status. A consensus of at least three EduCorps members is required for an article to retain its Comprehensive status or have it removed at the end of the probation.
- …articles that exceed the word count can have Comprehensive status removed.
- …articles marked for probation that have unsolved objections for over thirty days, with no request for extension or attempts made to fix, can have Comprehensive status removed.
- …articles that have changed significantly from their original state are reviewed by EduCorps members. When determined that the article's current state is satisfactory, the review can be closed, and the article maintains its status.
Comprehensive article reviews
View recent changes for this page and its subpages
Kessel encounter
Objections
- Is there any evidence it was actually part of the war? There's no indication of who the opposing force is, with this I'd also like to see the removal of "anti-Republic force."
- Kessel isn't referred to as a planet in the book, so therefore needs sourcing.
- I think the conversation in which it's brought up in the book should be prosified.Lewisr (talk) 02:36, 7 July 2025 (UTC)