in:Real-world articles,Articles needing citation,Incomplete OOU lists,Home video

The Star Wars Trilogy Special Edition

The subject of this article exists in or is relevant to the real world.

Help me,Obi-Wan Kenobi. You're my only hope.

This article is in need of referencing per Wookieepedia'ssourcing guidelines.

This article needs appropriate citations. Help usimprove this article by referencing valid resource material. Remove this notice when finished.

Special Edition theatrical poster — *Special Edition* theatrical poster

"And one of the great things about doing the Special Editions was we were able to go back and do the original Star Wars: A New Hope exactly the way George wanted it. The way he had written it. Whether people liked it, it didn't matter, it was his movie and he couldn't make it when he first made it because there were so many compromises he had to go through."

―Rick McCallum at the Episode I DVD press conference in 2001^[1]

The Star Wars Trilogy Special Edition,^[2] also known as theStar Wars Trilogy: Special Edition,^[3] was a theatrical anniversary edition of theoriginal trilogy, in order to celebrate the 20th anniversary of the release ofStar Wars: Episode IVA New Hope.

The three movies were shown in the U.S. from January through March at a monthly interval.Star Wars was debuted onJanuary 31,1997, followed byThe Empire Strikes Back onFebruary 21, 1997.^[4]^[5]Return of the Jedi was scheduled to premiere and debut onMarch 7, 1997, but due to the box-office success of the first two (mostlyA New Hope, which grossed the most of the three re-releases), it was pushed a week, toMarch 14.^[6] Previously, the release was set to begin during the President's Day weekend, but it was pushed forward to January 31 by October 1996. Coverage on CNN in 1997 notes thatGeorge Lucas spent $10 million to rework his original 1977 film, which was roughly what it cost to film it originally. $3 million of that was spent on the audio track for the Special Edition. Lucas also spent $2.5 million each on Episodes V and VI.

The trilogy aimed to renew the movies in the minds of both the older and the younger audience, and to prepare the way for the upcoming release ofStar Wars: Episode IThe Phantom Menace.

"You know, I was fine with doing it, I didn't feel at all that we were hurting anything. My feeling always was that the original version was always gonna be there, and I don't know if that's necessarily happened. George hasn't put the effort into doing an HD, super good HD version of the original versions and I don't know if that will ever happen. But at the time my feeling was that we could finally make these shots better, you know. He went through and picked a bunch of shots, and I picked a bunch of shots and we redid them so they just looked a lot better. I was fine with it, and I think it's gone overboard, I think it's been done too many times and too many shots, but I just feel as long as the original version is always there that it's fine to be able to work on it later on, and sort of like 'so what', you know?"

―Dennis Muren^[7]

The renewal was done by digitally remastering the image and sound with extensive clean-up and restoration work, Lucas also made a number ofchanges to the films in order to "finish the film the way it was meant to be" (as Lucas said in a September 2004 interview with the Associated Press) so that someone who started watching the saga from theprequel trilogy wouldn't notice the aesthetic difference between the 20 years.

The most significant alterations were cosmetic, generally adding special effects which weren't originally possible, like the addition of some originally filmed but cut scenes (likeHan Solo's confrontation withJabba the Hutt), the addition of new digitally made sequences (like the arrival atMos Eisley) which sometimes included the replacement of older scenes altogether (like the flight to theDeath Star).

Other changes, however, are considered to have affected plot or character development. These changes, such as the change often referred to with the phrase "Han shot first" or the replacement ofLapti Nek, have been controversial, inciting considerable criticism of George Lucas by fans.